Jump to content

QBR is worthless; Tua higher than Allen


Inigo Montoya

Recommended Posts

https://www.espn.com/nfl/boxscore/_/gameId/401326438

 

Tua

21/39 passing

53% completion

205 yards

5.3   yard average

0 passing TDs

1 INT

4 rushes  10 yards

1 rush TD

Tua QBR;  68

 

Josh

29/42 passing

69%  completion 

249 yards

5.9 yard average

2 passing TDs

0 INT

8 rushes   55 yards

1 rush TD

Josh QBR;  45

 

Can someone please explain to me how Josh beats Tua in every statistical category and finishes with a lower QBR?  QBR is worthless.

 

 

Edited by Inigo Montoya
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Shocked 2
  • Agree 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Beast said:

Didn’t ESPN create that stat? That could be the answer.

 

I don’t think there is anything to add beyond that. ESPN is fading like Sports Illustrated, remember them? They are  BOTH hot garbage. 

 

 

ESPN college basketball recruiting is inferior to what some middle school kids can produce. They should be embarrassed and just shut that down. The last decent thing they had was Mike & Mike, and they managed to ruin that. 

 

 

.

Edited by Augie
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Inigo Montoya changed the title to QBR is worthless; Tua higher than Allen

Actually, in this game it was Allen that was throwing the short s*** passes & Tua that was throwing down the field (at least somewhat).  Allen only had 1 20 yd completion whereas Tua had like 3 (including the 40 yder).

I'll concede by the eyeball test, no way could you say Tua had a better game than Allen.  But, possibly based on some sort of "yds completed down the field metric" (that ignores TD passes & INTS ;) ) I could see how you would rate Tua's performance superior.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Inigo Montoya said:

https://www.espn.com/nfl/boxscore/_/gameId/401326438

 

Tua

21/39 passing

53% completion

205 yards

5.3   yard average

0 passing TDs

1 INT

4 rushes  10 yards

1 rush TD

Tua QBR;  68

 

Josh

29/42 passing

69%  completion 

249 yards

5.9 yard average

2 passing TDs

0 INT

8 rushes   55 yards

1 rush TD

Josh QBR;  45

 

Can someone please explain to me how Josh beats Tua in every statistical category and finishes with a lower QBR?  QBR is worthless.

 

 

4 Letters E S P N it’s honestly a useless stat 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Rew said:

Tua had more ypc.  Way overrated stat in qbr


I have never heard anybody talk about yards per completion. It’s always yards per attempt.  But that would be an explanation for Tua to rank higher since that’s the only statistic in which he beat Josh. It’s a dumb explanation, but it’s an explanation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Inigo Montoya said:

https://www.espn.com/nfl/boxscore/_/gameId/401326438

 

Tua

21/39 passing

53% completion

205 yards

5.3   yard average

0 passing TDs

1 INT

4 rushes  10 yards

1 rush TD

Tua QBR;  68

 

Josh

29/42 passing

69%  completion 

249 yards

5.9 yard average

2 passing TDs

0 INT

8 rushes   55 yards

1 rush TD

Josh QBR;  45

 

Can someone please explain to me how Josh beats Tua in every statistical category and finishes with a lower QBR?  QBR is worthless.

 

 

And on top of all that, Josh Allen rose to win the game for us while Toa disappeared.

 

A lot of times I agree with the QBRs, on this occurrence I haven't the foggiest.

It wasn't Josh's best game game but it was a hell of a lot better than tooahs....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember when the "stat" was rolled out?

 

Highest single game QBR: Charlie Batch's 2-pick, 180+ yd game in 2010. Not kidding.

 

There's an article but I don't feel like looking it up bc it's so egregious.

 

The guy on TBL last wk, talking about new QB metric, seems much more accurate (vid was posted but can't find).

 

Esp welcome bc, as I recall, JA was top/top 3(?) this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Inigo Montoya said:

https://www.espn.com/nfl/boxscore/_/gameId/401326438

 

Tua

21/39 passing

53% completion

205 yards

5.3   yard average

0 passing TDs

1 INT

4 rushes  10 yards

1 rush TD

Tua QBR;  68

 

Josh

29/42 passing

69%  completion 

249 yards

5.9 yard average

2 passing TDs

0 INT

8 rushes   55 yards

1 rush TD

Josh QBR;  45

 

Can someone please explain to me how Josh beats Tua in every statistical category and finishes with a lower QBR?  QBR is worthless.

 

 

Those QBR numbers HAS to be in reverse. Remember a QBR of 50 is average.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Inigo Montoya said:

https://www.espn.com/nfl/boxscore/_/gameId/401326438

 

Tua

21/39 passing

53% completion

205 yards

5.3   yard average

0 passing TDs

1 INT

4 rushes  10 yards

1 rush TD

Tua QBR;  68

 

Josh

29/42 passing

69%  completion 

249 yards

5.9 yard average

2 passing TDs

0 INT

8 rushes   55 yards

1 rush TD

Josh QBR;  45

 

Can someone please explain to me how Josh beats Tua in every statistical category and finishes with a lower QBR?  QBR is worthless.

 

 


no way that’s correct. Got to be a glitch in the matrix 

Edited by Over 29 years of fanhood
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They showed the QB stats at the end of the game on the fantasy stats scoreboard, the one at the tunnel end of the field. It had those numbers totally opposite. Josh's rating was almost twice as high as Toungueaviolinoa.

 

ESPN = Every Stat Produced, Nonsense

Edited by Bubba Gump
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Part of the equation is based on how well you play when game is hanging in the balance, so Josh was worse in first half and Tua is not why Dolphins lost. I still can't explain this kind of stupidity except I know Tua made some real right window throws which boosts the number 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

Part of the equation is based on how well you play when game is hanging in the balance, so Josh was worse in first half and Tua is not why Dolphins lost. I still can't explain this kind of stupidity except I know Tua made some real right window throws which boosts the number 

 

When Tua throws them they are tight window.  When Josh throws them they are turnover worthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Scott7975 said:

 

When Tua throws them they are tight window.  When Josh throws them they are turnover worthy.

Tua had infinitely more turnovers than josh 😂 he throws ducks all game long…dude just doesn’t have it. If the refs somehow don’t lose their eyesight tua looks much worse on the stat sheet 

Edited by Generic_Bills_Fan
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Scott7975 said:

When Tua throws them they are tight window.  When Josh throws them they are turnover worthy.

Exactly. The dumbest "stat" in the history of sports. Turnover worthy plays.

 

Soon they'll introduce a stat for "intended TD passes" or "possible sacks if your offensive line blinked out of existence after 2.5 seconds on a play".

 

"Smart" people trying to show the world how smart they are by creating stupid numbers that don't mean anything. Want someone to believe your opinion? Give your opinion a number and call it a fact.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...