MJS

They'll be fine.

There seems to be some kind of misconception about Hamlin that he is a poor athlete and really slow. That's just not true. He is an average to above average athlete at safety. He has an RAS of a 7, which means he is above average. His composite speed grade is good. He is 100% an NFL caliber athlete. People need to stop saying he isn't, because it is false. Does that mean he should be the starter? Not at all. He is a good depth safety with starting experience, though. Not a bad guy to have on the roster. Bishop is an elite athlete though.

I have zero tattoos. But if I got one, it would not be of a male celebrity.

It is extremely weird to get a tattoo of another man on your body.

I stated he is better than Hamlin. That was with the assumption that he would be the 3rd safety behind Rapp and Bishop as starters. And if he does outplay Hamlin and slot ahead of him in the depth chart, that means he is good enough to at least fill in as a starter, just like Hamlin did. But I think we are all hoping that Bishop is the starter. It would be disappointing if he isn't. He should start even if he needs to pass through some growing pains.

Why would he leap Bishop?

People go to jail for that all the time.

I guess they better stay friends.

Founding of what?

If he brings a Lombardi or two, I agree.

That graphic looks like it was made in 1999.

The Saints and Carr haven't really been on my radar since they are in the NFC, even though I live in Louisiana.

Darrick Forrest, a UDFA (Wande Owens), and a draft pick in Hancock. Seems like they have brought in safeties to me. Yeah, he is better than Hamlin. More upside, too. So, even if Bishop isn't ready to start, Forrest is still a good option.

And everyone would be making fun of you as well.

It's never higher than about a 25% chance even for the greatest teams, so I'd give the Bills about a 20% chance. This is why it is foolish to ever expect a superbowl. The odds are far too low to ever expect it. It's something you hope for, not expect.