Chaos

I think it is very possible posters on this board do not have an accurate picture of the other teams view of McDermott. in truth he was a dead end with eight years of Josh Allen The “culture” so many are enthralled with from a management perspective may be viewed as this very insular promote from within very Sean Controlled style that may not appeal to others A shorter way of saying this, is that all the other openings would be like the Bills determining to “run it back “ without Josh Allen.

Or they had better coaching. That is what we are testing next

the correct answer is negative 3. or maybe negative 4.

this is all logical

On the one hand, it is proper for Beane to own the decision. On the other hand it is proper for Beane to factor in the coaches advise and requests into the decision. And even get the coaches blessing on the decision. Later on, it might not be proper for coach to blame Beane for that decision. It might be proper for the owner to criticize Beane for making the decision. But in this sequence of events, it is it more upstanding for the coach to support the decision.

then you missed the point on being better off. the other poster implied coaching elsewhere would be better than working with Beane and Pegula.

His remaining contract, which he does not need to do any work for, is more than the lifetime earnings of 90% of people.

And pretty much every Super Bowl winner was once of those three things.

who might that be? Reid was a success with McNabb. He was a super success with Mahomes. Maybe Tomlin. Tomlin won with Big Ben. He did not go far with bad QBs. And Tomlin is reasonably young. But Reid's success with the Eagles was more recent and consistent thant Tomlin's success with the Steelers.

The goal is to get the next "Sean McVay". McVay is the best coach in the NFL. This is a swing for the fences. You can't get the next McVay from retread coaches we have all heard of, or guys who have been coordinators for two decades "waiting their turn".

When you question it also matters. And roster adequacy would also seem to always be a comparative question. It does not appear anyone in 2025 has a roster so overwhelming that no one can complete. In the Bills case, we actually beat the Patriots. And except for the refs, actually beat the Broncos. So it would appear that the roster was certainly adequate to get to the super bowl.

Interesting thought. It has seemed this way to me for years. this seems to be the likely answer. But it seems to be a main source of contempt for Brady/Pegula at this juncture.

It is widely reported (and also discussed on this board in multiple threads) that there was some disagreement during a meeting "five weeks ago" regarding the ability of the roster to win the Super Bowl. My three questions are: Why the heck would a coach announce to the owner in the middle of a playoff and seeding battle "I can't win the Super Bowl" with this roster? Is this common practice? Did Liam Coen and Jim Harbaugh or DeMeco Ryans report similar concerns to their ownerships? Which team(s) did Sean McDermott report had rosters so insourmountable that the 2025 Bills simply could not compete for a championship? Curious to what people know about these typese of meetings. I have never heard before of such post-mortem type discussion while the team is still alive.

Einhorn is Finkle. Beane is Dunne.

If they did, 13 seconds would no longer be most Billsy thing ever.