Jump to content

Bills FA rumors thread


YoloinOhio

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Blainorama5 said:

Unfortunately for a lot of players these days, it's the only factor.  Don't know Chandler personally, so can't say if this is HIS mindset, but I think the vast majority of players know their time in the league is very limited, so grab every last dollar you can before the ride ends.

I wouldn’t call it unfortunate.  It’s our entertainment, but it is their profession.  If money is the determining factor, in an industry that leaves long lasting remnants of injury, it makes sense; especially if it’s a guy who won’t make up any discounts given with ad/pitch money off the field like a QB or transcendent talent would.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, folz said:

Per the writer (paraphrased): Engram has become a much better blocker, just can't hold up against bigger, powerful DEs due to size. But he is a willing blocker, good at the second level, and working hard on it. Offensive potential still sky high---deep ball effectiveness, but 2020 mistakes were brutal. Would be better as a specialty player than full-time TE. 

 

(To that last sentence...isn't that kind of what the Bills could/would do? Knox is your starter, primary TE/blocker. Engram would come in for special packages, or if in 12 personnel, he probably wouldn't have the difficult blocking assignment or would be going out on routes. You could kind of hide any blocking weaknesses if he is not the primary TE. And his "great" in the article is "Deep Usage"...isn't that what the Bills are looking for to exploit Josh's arm/deep throws...to open up defenses?)

 

 

So I have seen enough of the Giants (they still put them on tv all the freaking time) to know I disagree that he has got much better as a blocker. He might have 1 or two nice blocks people can gif but man he still sucks at it all in all. 

 

And to the parenthesis - no, I disagree. I think Dawson Knox is the weapon tight end who can block a bit, the specification for a 2nd tight end in this offense should be a blocking tight end who can be a safe, secure, underneath target IMO. If you are leaving Knox in to block so that Engram can run routes you are limiting the higher ceiling weapon IMO. Though I accept on this point it is arguable either way. Personally, I'd be building my offense to make Dawson Knox even more of a feature. Not limiting him to feature a guy like Engram. 

Edited by GunnerBill
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NewEra said:


I think you’re reading a bit too much into this.   Based on him saying he gets to pick his scheme, you suggest that we give some pause due to him having to be culture fit?  
 

Yeah I remember the Mario sitch.   After he was under contract and had been playing well, we had a coaching change and a scheme change that wasn’t conducive to his abilities.  This is not the same thing in the least.

Naw, I'm only reading into it a little bit. (I did start the post by saying I wasn't suggesting it was a red flag.) Definitely a different situation than with Mario. Mario (and the rest of that defense) had the rug pulled out from under him by Rex Ryan's incompetence. But, reading Jones' interview, it does sound a little like he might have some pretty well-defined expectations about his role, wherever he lands. I have no idea what he is like as a person, or what his character is. But, the quotes do make me think... Any player who comes into Buffalo is going to have to be reasonably flexible in their role, and scheme fit. There's definitely a "team first" culture in Buffalo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Rocky Landing said:

Naw, I'm only reading into it a little bit. (I did start the post by saying I wasn't suggesting it was a red flag.) Definitely a different situation than with Mario. Mario (and the rest of that defense) had the rug pulled out from under him by Rex Ryan's incompetence. But, reading Jones' interview, it does sound a little like he might have some pretty well-defined expectations about his role, wherever he lands. I have no idea what he is like as a person, or what his character is. But, the quotes do make me think... Any player who comes into Buffalo is going to have to be reasonably flexible in their role, and scheme fit. There's definitely a "team first" culture in Buffalo.

And if he chooses to sign in Buffalo,  I have no doubt that McD and Co will have had a meeting with him regarding his expectations or he wouldn’t have decided on Buffalo.  

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NewEra said:

And if he chooses to sign in Buffalo,  I have no doubt that McD and Co will have had a meeting with him regarding his expectations or he wouldn’t have decided on Buffalo.  

He’s basically saying he won’t play the run so it looks like we’re out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously Gronk would be better than Engram, I don't think anyone really disagrees with that. 

 

However, if you can't get Gronk or anyone else they really covet as a TE, Engram could serve as a quasi TE/Slot receiver in essence replacing some of Beasley's snaps.  He would be a much better blocker at that spot who could come down and do some effective crack back blocking.   I think they could get creative with him in the lineup and with his elite athleticism he would present matchup problems for the defense.

 

Does anyone really think that Engram with Josh Allen wouldn't produce a revived Engram?  I think we would see the best version of him yet.

 

I think the Bills have a compelling argument to make to obtain his services, reviving his career with a 1-2 year prove it sort of deal which could be had around the $5mish sort of range.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

So I have seen enough of the Giants (they still put them on tv all the freaking time) to know I disagree that he has got much better as a blocker. He might have 1 or two nice blocks people can gif but man he still sucks at it all in all. 

 

And to the parenthesis - no, I disagree. I think Dawson Knox is the weapon tight end who can block a bit, the specification for a 2nd tight end in this offense should be a blocking tight end who can be a safe, secure, underneath target IMO. If you are leaving Knox in to block so that Engram can run routes you are limiting the higher ceiling weapon IMO. Though I accept on this point it is arguable either way. Personally, I'd be building my offense to make Dawson Knox even more of a feature. Not limiting him to feature a guy like Engram. 

 

Can't say that I have seen enough of Giants football (even living in NYC) to have a strong opinion about his blocking. You may be right. But I don't think the Bills would be asking him to be a force in the blocking game (of course it would be better to have a Gronk-level blocker at TE, but you take what you can get). Engram would of course have to block, but with two TEs (rather than him being the only TE on the field), I think they could hide his deficiencies a bit.

 

What I was suggesting was that he wouldn't have as many snaps overall as Knox. Not that we run 12-personnel all the time with Knox as your Lee Smith blocking TE and Engram as your feature TE. Knox would still be your primary threat, but when they put both TEs on the field, it makes it difficult for the defense because they are both dynamic weapons. Two TEs...usually that's a run heavy formation, so are they going to run? Or send one TE out and keep one to block, or send both TEs out on a route. I don't think the Bills want a traditional TE pairing (as you said, "2nd tight end in this offense should be a blocking tight end who can be a safe, secure, underneath target."). If you put a Lee Smith-type in the game, you are kind of tipping your hat (as he is going to catch what 3-5 balls over a season). You don't have to worry about that player other than as a blocker. With Knox and Engram or Knox and Gronk, the multiple looks, play-options from one personnel grouping, and mismatches would be very intriguing and hard to stop.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, NewEra said:

And if he chooses to sign in Buffalo,  I have no doubt that McD and Co will have had a meeting with him regarding his expectations or he wouldn’t have decided on Buffalo.  

I agree entirely. I think Beane, and McD are very upfront about these things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Miyagi-Do Karate said:

This is a total rumor here, but my buddy who is a packers fan said his buddy, who is a Wisconsin reporter, heard that the Bills were releasing Micah Hyde. 
 

Sounded implausible to me— but any chance that Hyde’s cap hit would make him a surprise release candidate? 

 

Nothing is ever impossible, but this seems highly improbable to me.  I seriously doubt they break up our safety duo this year without a replacement on the team.  Especially with all the questions already at the CB position between Tre's injury and and Levi being a FA.  To create another hole in our secondary just seems so unlikely.  And I would guess they could trade Hyde if they were going to move on for some reason.

 

So seems like nothing to me.

 

Edited by Alphadawg7
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, folz said:

 

Can't say that I have seen enough of Giants football (even living in NYC) to have a strong opinion about his blocking. You may be right. But I don't think the Bills would be asking him to be a force in the blocking game (of course it would be better to have a Gronk-level blocker at TE, but you take what you can get). Engram would of course have to block, but with two TEs (rather than him being the only TE on the field), I think they could hide his deficiencies a bit.

 

What I was suggesting was that he wouldn't have as many snaps overall as Knox. Not that we run 12-personnel all the time with Knox as your Lee Smith blocking TE and Engram as your feature TE. Knox would still be your primary threat, but when they put both TEs on the field, it makes it difficult for the defense because they are both dynamic weapons. Two TEs...usually that's a run heavy formation, so are they going to run? Or send one TE out and keep one to block, or send both TEs out on a route. I don't think the Bills want a traditional TE pairing (as you said, "2nd tight end in this offense should be a blocking tight end who can be a safe, secure, underneath target."). If you put a Lee Smith-type in the game, you are kind of tipping your hat (as he is going to catch what 3-5 balls over a season). You don't have to worry about that player other than as a blocker. With Knox and Engram or Knox and Gronk, the multiple looks, play-options from one personnel grouping, and mismatches would be very intriguing and hard to stop.

 

Gronk is different cos Gronk is a genuine 2 way threat at tight end. I disagree pretty fundamentally on what I think the Bills will want out of a 2nd tight end though. I think they are happy Dawson is their big play guy. I think the fit for a #2 Tight End is a 2 way guy. That is what they thought they could turn Tommy Sweeney into. But he couldn't block a biscuit so they ended up taking him off the field and putting an extra OT out there. I think they want to be able to run that system and those plays but with a tight end that can block and be an underneath receiving option instead of Tommy Doyle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:

 

Nothing is ever impossible, but this seems highly improbable to me.  I seriously doubt they break up our safety duo this year without a replacement on the team.  Especially with all the questions already at the CB position between Tre's injury and and Levi being a FA.  To create another hole in our secondary just seems so unlikely.  And I would guess they could trade Hyde if they were going to move on for some reason.

 

I think releasing one of them is a possibility. Their both on their last year of their contract. Both are high up in age. Both have high cap hits and if you think that Damar Hamlin or Jaquan Johnson is ready for that role I dont see why its not a possibility. 

  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gronk is better than Engram, no doubt.  But Engram wouldn't be a bad add if we don't lure Gronk just on his ability to put pressure on the defense.  We can always draft a TE or sign another to be more of a blocking specialist if need be.  

 

Edited by Alphadawg7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said:

 

I think releasing one of them is a possibility. Their both on their last year of their contract. Both are high up in age. Both have high cap hits and if you think that Damar Hamlin or Jaquan Johnson is ready for that role I dont see why its not a possibility. 

This is not correct. Hyde has 2 more years left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Miyagi-Do Karate said:

This is a total rumor here, but my buddy who is a packers fan said his buddy, who is a Wisconsin reporter, heard that the Bills were releasing Micah Hyde. 
 

Sounded implausible to me— but any chance that Hyde’s cap hit would make him a surprise release candidate? 

No, and any buddy who lies to you is not a buddy. You don't release a 1st team all-pro on a reasonable contract. 

  • Thank you (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:

Gronk is better than Engram, no doubt.  But Engram wouldn't be a bad add if we don't lure Gronk just on his ability to put pressure on the defense.  We can always draft a TE or sign another to be more of a blocking specialist if need be.  

 

Lee Smith….anyone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Miyagi-Do Karate said:

This is a total rumor here, but my buddy who is a packers fan said his buddy, who is a Wisconsin reporter, heard that the Bills were releasing Micah Hyde. 
 

Sounded implausible to me— but any chance that Hyde’s cap hit would make him a surprise release candidate? 

 

The only way it would make sense is if Hyde wanted to be released and requested it (and the Bills did him a solid by not trading him instead). Or if there were some personal issues that nobody has heard about. I really doubt it.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, purple haze said:

I wouldn’t call it unfortunate.  It’s our entertainment, but it is their profession.  If money is the determining factor, in an industry that leaves long lasting remnants of injury, it makes sense; especially if it’s a guy who won’t make up any discounts given with ad/pitch money off the field like a QB or transcendent talent would.

Not going to disagree.  Maybe "unfortunate" was the wrong choice of words.  Money does makes people (not just athletes) make interesting life decisions - not always for their own betterment.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Miyagi-Do Karate said:

This is a total rumor here, but my buddy who is a packers fan said his buddy, who is a Wisconsin reporter, heard that the Bills were releasing Micah Hyde. 
 

Sounded implausible to me— but any chance that Hyde’s cap hit would make him a surprise release candidate? 

I would be surprised but the Bills will have to make a tough decision there very soon. Hyde will be 32 next year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Miyagi-Do Karate said:

This is a total rumor here, but my buddy who is a packers fan said his buddy, who is a Wisconsin reporter, heard that the Bills were releasing Micah Hyde. 
 

Sounded implausible to me— but any chance that Hyde’s cap hit would make him a surprise release candidate? 

No chance on this. That would signal a revolt. Easily one of the 4 best players on the top ranked D last year. It would be horrible 

35 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Lee Smith….anyone?

Retired 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MiltonWaddams said:

No chance on this. That would signal a revolt. Easily one of the 4 best players on the top ranked D last year. It would be horrible 


Nothing triggers me more than people referring to Buffalo as “the top ranked defense” but I agree… Moving off Hyde would be quite the head scratcher. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SCBills said:


Nothing triggers me more than people referring to Buffalo as “the top ranked defense” but I agree… Moving off Hyde would be quite the head scratcher. 

I think if you read that properly, it says top ranked not top defense. You can’t argue with the statistics. What you also can’t argue is the result of the last playoff game they played which showed they were not the top defense in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MiltonWaddams said:

I think if you read that properly, it says top ranked not top defense. You can’t argue with the statistics. What you also can’t argue is the result of the last playoff game they played which showed they were not the top defense in the league.


Oh, I get it.  It’s still a metric I never want to be reminded of in regards to last years Bills Defense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SCBills said:


Oh, I get it.  It’s still a metric I never want to be reminded of in regards to last years Bills Defense. 

It was a good, not great defense last year that now has glaring holes at CB and DT.  Even if Phillips stays, they need reinforcements at DT and CB is a barren wasteland at the moment that requires a FA and a high draft pick to ensure that they are covered if White isn’t ready at the beginning of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Miyagi-Do Karate said:

This is a total rumor here, but my buddy who is a packers fan said his buddy, who is a Wisconsin reporter, heard that the Bills were releasing Micah Hyde. 
 

Sounded implausible to me— but any chance that Hyde’s cap hit would make him a surprise release candidate? 

And replace an All Pro with whom??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, HOUSE said:

Bills Could Possibly Sign QB Colin Kaepernick as Josh Allen’s Backup

https://heavy.com/sports/buffalo-bills/colin-kaepernick-qb-backup-2022/

I’m going to go ahead and have a little bit of recency bias, but hasn’t this guy been out of the league for five seasons? I’m pretty sure this is a load of BS.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Miyagi-Do Karate said:

This is a total rumor here, but my buddy who is a packers fan said his buddy, who is a Wisconsin reporter, heard that the Bills were releasing Micah Hyde. 
 

Sounded implausible to me— but any chance that Hyde’s cap hit would make him a surprise release candidate? 

No, but Carlos Hyde got released by Jax. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Miyagi-Do Karate said:

This is a total rumor here, but my buddy who is a packers fan said his buddy, who is a Wisconsin reporter, heard that the Bills were releasing Micah Hyde. 
 

Sounded implausible to me— but any chance that Hyde’s cap hit would make him a surprise release candidate? 

Wow! That would be a complete surprise. He seems all in to me.  Draft a replacement and give him 2 years to develop. Hyde is still earning his contract. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...