Alphadawg7

Twice I believe…and wasn’t the primary WR when he did

I am still curious to what he could have done in this offense with Josh and Brady

Ok this was funny...nice work

I understand, but you misunderstood the context of my statement. When I said "You can only operate off what is known, you can't condemn a kid for life off an allegation that is yet to be substantiated", that had nothing to do with TSW or peoples reactions here. It was about how Hairston should have been viewed and treated on draft night. That at some point, life goes on, and if he was cleared then all you can do is treat it as such and Beane, or any other team, on draft night rightfully treated it as he had been cleared. And no disrespect, bringing up Diddy is no where near relatable, not even 1%. What Diddy was found not guilty on they had weak evidence of from the start...you just listed a lot of things that were NOT part of the actual charges he beat, like the video tape. I wanted Diddy to go down as much as anyone, but I said it right from the start, people do not understand what he is actually charged with and most the hard evidence showing how bad of a person he is not supporting evidence against him pertaining to the more serious charges he was on trial for. With Hairston, there was no evidence, nothing to corroborate the story this woman accused Hairston of after multiple investigations, including the authorities. And what all of them said was that there was no evidence to support the claims and that the incident didn't appear to happen. And that may be correct or that may not be correct...but 5 years later, its the only thing anyone has to go on which is why teams like the Bills didn't rely only on that, they also did a deep dive and due diligence on character witnesses to try and best understand who he is and the type of person he is and weigh that as well, which he got rave reviews on as well, further supporting his proclamation of innocence that the investigation provided.

You can only operate off what is known, you can't condemn a kid for life off an allegation that has yet to be substantiated. One of my best friends in High School was accused of all kinds of crap from a psycho we worked with and he briefly dated. She would call the police and fabricate things on nights he was out with me and crashed at my house or I crashed at his house so they couldn't possibly be true. I was even staying at his house one night after we went to a Kings game in Sacramento where she showed up in a hoody and broke his car windows but then called the police and claimed he came to her house, roughed her up, and broke HER windows and then claimed he broke his own windows to frame her lol. She even tried to create accusations to get him kicked out of the Navy before he even left for bootcamp on some psychotic hope they could be together if he didn't leave for Texas. So only him and the accuser know the truth - but just because he didn't have money back then doesn't mean she wasn't capable of fabricating or exaggerating information either. And to be fair, no charges being filed does NOT mean innocence either. But the bottom line is that nothing was ever found to corroborate the accusation, and his name was cleared through thorough investigations by many different parties, including the police. So life has to go on, and people can only operate based on what they could find or determine. So until something else changes, this kid had his name cleared and there was nothing wrong with drafting him. And if something damning comes out that was previously unknown, I have no doubt Beane would make a correct and swift decision to release him. But on draft night, I wouldn't fault anyone for drafting him after all the investigations by authorities, schools, and teams found nothing on the matter.

Man - If this isn’t a testament to how remarkable his comeback was. I can’t believe he was able to play football again on that leg. What a heroic story and effort of determination after one of the most gruesome injuries in the sports history. Hats off to him 👏 #Warrior

💯 - but also...

lol now you are just getting silly. All good, to each their own

Is it really an opinion though? I mean the facts are pretty clear. Bakers QB rankings in the NFL last year were: 3rd in yards 2nd in TDs 7th in avg yards per pass 4th in QBR 3rd in comp % I think its more than just an opinion that he should not be in consideration for the last of the franchise guys. He was arguably a top 5 QB in the NFL last year. Like I said, there are guys who you listed worthy of consideration and open for debate for the dubious "last of the franchise guys"...but Baker right now is not one of them.

I get that, my point remains, Baker has no place in this conversation. There is no reality where he is a contender for the "last of the franchise" QB's right now, he is clearly in a tier above all of those guys and firmly in that 2nd tier behind the top dogs. And as I said, while Purdy is less cut and dry, I don't think he does either.

To be fair - after agents, managers, taxes and hookers its probably more like $40m lol

Thats a fair assumption, but a lot of people think we made moves directly because of information given by Beane, and I just don't think that has any validity to it. McD already knew the Panthers needs before he was hired as HC, he definitely didn't need insight from Beane to know they might have interest in those positions. So the fact we traded up I think had nothing to do with Beane's eventual hire here and everything to do with McD already knowing the Panthers inside and out, Bills team scouting the whole year on who we wanted and what other teams besides just the Panthers might have interest as well, etc. I really don't think anything more than that occurred. We will never know for sure, but the likelihood anything from Beane influenced the Bills draft day decisions seems pretty low given McD would have known that info on his own having just come from the Panthers.

Your list - the list you wrote in your OP. You started with a list of 5 QB's who were "contenders" as you said in your opinion for the "last" - aka worst - of the franchise QB's. I like the question, but the inclusion of Baker as a contender is where I am saying he has no business being a part of this discussion. He is a tier 2 QB behind tier 1 of Allen, Mahomes, Burrow, and Lamar. He is easily a top 10 overall NFL QB right now, and can be argued anywhere from 5th to 8th overall QB in the NFL right now. I would have him at 6 or 7 overall at QB personally and no lower than 8th. He is in a higher tier that players like Tua, Lawerence, etc. I also don't think Purdy should have been mentioned either, as someone who has watched every game he has played I can say I think he is better than a lot of people want to give him credit for.

That really isn't evidence that he had inside information coming in from Beane though. I mean every draft every team has an idea of who other teams might be targeting position wise. Teams spend the whole calendar year scouting players and scouts, GM's etc see each other at the same places looking at the same guys. More importantly, McD just left the Panthers, so of course he was very aware of where they needed to upgrade and what their priorities were when he left as the team had been scouting all year long even prior to him leaving where the coaches weigh in as well. We didn't need inside info after he left to think we may need to get ahead of them for positions we already knew they (or anyone else) may be interested in. And quite frankly, that doesn't at all sound like something inside Beane's character to where he might leak insight to McD before he left the Panthers, especially before he knew he was getting the job. So this belief some people have that McD was getting tipped info from Beane, or anyone else, who the Panthers draft targets during the draft just seems more like a conspiracy theory than a plausible occurence.

Baker still has no business on this list, hes easily top 10 and I have him 7th overall right now.

Baker has no business being on this list IMO. Baker is definitely a top 10 QB right now, and I don't think its really disputable at this point based on how he played last year. Purdy is better than this too

If healthy - Diggs probably gets 20-30% more targets as he has less competition for targets and Maye will probably lean on him, as he should. But I think Shakir is going to be more efficient and be more important to his team this season. I think their season totals in terms of receptions and yards end up somewhat close, but based on target volume Diggs probably edges him out. But I expect Shakir to be more efficient, more clutch, and make more significant plays while likely leading in things like YAC, catch %, YPC, etc. I do think Diggs still has a good season left in him if he truly isn't hampered by the injury and doesn't let Pats likely not contending for much kill his enthusiasm. But I would without question take Shakir over Diggs on my team for this season.

Knox has been many times and Kincaid was there last 2 years. Kincaid's focus is getting stronger, be healthy, etc so I am sure that is playing a big part in that and I think its probably best he doesn't go right now while he is working on strength and being at his best physically this year. Kincaid has put a ton of work in this offseason too already according to Beane, so probably best he stays fresh as he can be for camp.

If people don't like McD's in game management, clock management, etc they will hate Tomlins. I get he got the SB, which is great for any HC. But if I had to win a game today, I would rather have McD than Tomlin. Tomlin is like a long marriage where you may not fight a lot, but you also don't sleep together much anymore and its content, but boring. I agree with you on the call no doubt, I wasn't arguing the call wasn't bad...I was saying the call doesn't mean they go on to win the SB without it. Im no McD apologist, so I get it and he needs to win the big one, and his seat should be warm now heading into this season. But I do think you are greatly minimizing his impact here though and giving too much credit to Allen. He took a team with no culture that no one wanted to play for outside Buffalo in the midst of being torn down that traded its best players and snapped a 17 year drought that much more talented teams and more experienced HC's could not do. And people always talk about how Bengals had to help us get in, but the reality was them giving Peterman a chance to see if he had anything to offer a team looking to rebuild against the lowly Chargers kept them from getting in on their own accord. His coaching job that year was much better than he gets credit for by some people around here. And then he and his staff took the rawest QB in the draft and developed him into someone with GOAT potential by end of his career. I also think you are overlooking a lot of Seans poor playoff track record as well. I get it to a degree, he deserves more credibility too as someone who has won the big game, but outside the one SB run, his playoffs record isn't stellar and he didn't have Reid and Mahomes standing in his way to blame for it, or anything close to what that tandem is as a threat that McD and the rest of the AFC face year after year. Its all good - this is all subjective, so just take my commentary as a discussion and nothing more. To be clear, I give Sean the nod now - but I am not so sure I will if McD wins the SB this year and has the better resume.

The 2009 season was absolutely fueled by the Katrina energy. It was the first season they reopened the Superdome and it was a big emotional season on the backs of hope and rebuilding. It was a major part of their story that year, especially in the playoffs where they were playing to win the first SB in team history at a time the region was rebuilding.

Campbell should either not be on the list or be on there but below McD. I love Campbell, but make not mistake about it - he has cost them playoff losses and key losses in regular season over his stubborn decisions. What he did vs the Cowboys with the #1 seed on the line is one of the single stupidest decisions I have ever seen in a HC. He also had bad end game decisions against the Bills and in the playoffs too that led to losses. I love his attitude, approach, brovado - but there is a time and place for it, and his in ability to control that and find that balance has cost the Lions seeding and playoff exits. That being said, if he can learn from that, he is on his way to being a great HC - like I said I am a fan of his though, just its not quite polished as it needs to have been yet.

I will play - McD - No other HC has more wins against Cheifs than McD. Paytons defenses have been worse than McD's and his playoff record and let downs are worse than McD's. So I will take McD over Sean to beat KC - and quite honestly, I think we will if we see them in the playoffs this year, but the team that concerns me more this season though is the Ravens. They are in tact and had a strong draft. They will be very tough again and our ability to get past them will come down to how defense improves between our FA and Rookie additions.

Where did I say he should have been fired? I said without a SB win that missing the playoffs 3 straight years also following being suspended a season is not something many coaches survive WITHOUT the SB win on the resume. McD's record is better by most measures except the SB win - yet there is no way McD survives getting suspended a season and then missing playoffs 3 straight years with McD. And to say he is miles better because of some list is silly. There is no way Tomlin and Stefanski are better HC's than McD and yet they are on this list for example. These lists are not in anyway proof of anything other than a list one person made and published. So you are giving Sean credit for a 2nd SB win, in which he didn't even reach, because he got a bad call in the playoffs? So why are you not giving McD a theoretical SB win then after the Refs stole the game this year first not giving Kincaid the first down on 2nd down when he was nearly a yard past the FD marker and then again not giving Josh the first on 4th down when he was clearly there? That was at least an 11 point, maybe a 15 point swing in the 4th quarter of a game we were up 1 with. Chiefs got the ball back and scored plus a 2 point conversion to go up 7 when we should have had the first (twice) and were already in FG range and yet would have had a first and still a chance to score a TD as well. So sorry - to say Sean would have had another is 100% hyperbole as they not only didn't win the game they were in, you don't know if they would even win the next game or not. And given they were in a game where 1 call could swing it shows they were not so dominant that you can just give them a "gimme" on any other games after that. I get you are a Sean fan, nothing wrong with that. But I don't agree there is this massive gap between Sean and McD, and again, if McD wins a SB, his resume will be better than Seans by most metrics, and will have done it with less to work with around Allen. You spend every offseason criticizing the weapons around Allen, meanwhile Brees had Colston, Graham, Kamara, Thomas, etc and they still won single digits 7 times, had plenty of bad playoff exits, and missed the playoffs 6 times.