Jump to content

Bills Restructure Kroft


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, ScottLaw said:

Doubling down on a bust FA signing last year.

 

Not a fan. Gotta hope Knox and Sweeney develop. 

 

This response is just not understanding the high IQ of a real GM.

 

We aren't going to come anywhere near spending to the cap because our biggest obligations come next year and the following.  Contracts that end in 2020 are irrelevant.  

 

This move, while subtle and maybe totally uneventful - shows how smart Beane is.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, gonzo1105 said:

Basically the Bills guaranteed his contract this year of 3.6 million out of the paycut. Got rid of the 3rd year so basically the Bills have him more guaranteed money probably locking him in from 2020 but have the flexibility to get out from under his contract

This.   A good move all around.  And if they get more competition and he sucks they cut him now and they dont have 2021 dead cap. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, billsfan89 said:

 

I think so but now they get a chance to see what he has to offer in camp and kick the tires before cutting him. In fact they get less dead cap if they cut him late in camp than they would if they just cut him outright. 

 

3 hours ago, njbuff said:

 

I don't disagree, but their thinking is that they are going to give him more than one year to prove he isn't a bust.

 

I would move on, but my vote means nothing. ?

 

This will be his 6th year in the league. He has one complete season, where he maxed out at 400 yards.  He's been on IR on 2 teams.

 

What else would you need to declare failure?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

 

This will be his 6th year in the league. He has one complete season, where he maxed out at 400 yards.  He's been on IR on 2 teams.

 

What else would you need to declare failure?

 

 

 

 

I am just telling you their thought process.

 

I would have cut him yesterday though.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Dablitzkrieg said:

Apparently the last year was restructured.  If they cut him after this year I think, we get a compensatory pick ?

I believe cutting a player does not account into comp picks.  May be that is why they restructured so that his contract expires at the end of the year and losing him makes us eligible for a pick

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have to think they're happy going into next year with Knox and Kroft as #1/#2, Smith as #3, and Sweeney to continue developing, with the expectation that Knox develops into a true starter. If Sweeney comes along well enough, they can ditch Kroft after this next year.

 

Edited by Rubes
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is tremendous cap management by Beane. Kroft underperformed his contract last year, presumably due to an Injury.  This gives him an opportunity to prove that was a fluke, while reducing the Bills’ downside risk, and frees the team to invest in other TE option should if they desire.  Very good job by the management team.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wppete said:

I have a feeling Beane has something big up his sleeve in FA or a big trade!!!! He is freeing up even more money. Can’t wait till Wednesday!

Him and Star can conceivably be used as trade bate now (not sure of the market value), but it also allows us to sign their longer term replacements and allow us to either keep them for great depth for a run or are  they are now very cut able. Great move again

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Fan in Chicago said:

For a FO that values availability, this is a head scratching move. He should have been cut outright with whatever financial implication that brought. 

Gives more flexibility with the contract though perhaps tradable now?

 

i am not concerned about the te position we drafted 2 good ones last year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

Gives more flexibility with the contract though perhaps tradable now?

 

i am not concerned about the te position we drafted 2 good ones last year

Which team would want to trade anything for Kroft ? Perhaps he is tradable from a contractual standpoint, but practically he will have little to no value in the trade market. 

 

As for stability at the TE position, I need to see more from Knox to declare victory at that position. I hope the drops were due to his over-exuberance as a rook and not due to a chronic issue. I am always one to tell you that we cannot have superstars at multiple spots on a team but I wouldnt mind acquiring a reliable TE who is at the sunset of his career and can help Allen with a reliable option on critical downs. ("who" you ask ? "I am too lazy to look" I say)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kroft snagged that TD pass in Pittsburgh to win the game. Hell of a route, great catch.  The guy has talent, let's see if he can stay healthy.  He's got one more shot.  He knows he's on the clock.  I don't have a problem with this move at all.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fan in Chicago said:

Which team would want to trade anything for Kroft ? Perhaps he is tradable from a contractual standpoint, but practically he will have little to no value in the trade market. 

 

As for stability at the TE position, I need to see more from Knox to declare victory at that position. I hope the drops were due to his over-exuberance as a rook and not due to a chronic issue. I am always one to tell you that we cannot have superstars at multiple spots on a team but I wouldnt mind acquiring a reliable TE who is at the sunset of his career and can help Allen with a reliable option on critical downs. ("who" you ask ? "I am too lazy to look" I say)

I am just not concerned about it because of Knox and sweeney

 

if we were counting on Kroft I would be more concerned

 

we need wide receivers

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, junior12thman92 said:

Can someone please explain this in simple terms/what this indicates? 

 

Is the main value of this that we don't have him on the books for 2021-22? Why not just cut him?

Prove it deal- if not c ya. Cutting him outright is a larger cap hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess is they are saying they want him to compete for the TE3 role and keep him as insurance if we can't sign another TE in FA. 

1 hour ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

 

This will be his 6th year in the league. He has one complete season, where he maxed out at 400 yards.  He's been on IR on 2 teams.

 

What else would you need to declare failure?

 

 

 

So even if they declare failure, they still save $ when they cut him. Why don't you like cap savings???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, wppete said:

I have a feeling Beane has something big up his sleeve in FA or a big trade!!!! He is freeing up even more money. Can’t wait till Wednesday!

I gotta agree. All these deals are team friendly and strategic.  Can't wait to see how things work out.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, ScottLaw said:

Ugh. Dude should be cut.

 

6 hours ago, Buffalo619 said:

No Thanks. Cut him. Our front office is too nice. This is football. 

And why is there urgency to do that? Let him go to camp and if he doesn't produce they can cut him then.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CaptnCoke11 said:

I don’t see a tight end being drafted or a free agent brought in this offseason.  I think they roll with Knox, Kroft, Smith, Sweeney and maybe bring Croom back.  


I think there is a good chance they pick one up on day 3. There are a few boom or bust and developmental type TEs who will be there in the 5th. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...