YoloinOhio Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 Would be great for Bills even though our kicker can also execute an onside kick 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thenorthremembers Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 Just now, YoloinOhio said: Didnt they bring up the same idea last year? I think its stupid. While picking up a 4th and 15 is rare, its more likely to happen than something like an onside kick. In my opinion, if a team needs a miracle to win a game despite losing for 59 minutes, you dont change rules to make them more likely to have a chance. 12 21 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coloradobillsfan Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 I don't like the idea. I think onside kicks should be difficult and converting them a rare occurrence. I want to see the better team win the game, not allow for more ways for lesser teams to upset them. My .02 anyway 8 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4_kidd_4 Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 No thanks. Leave as-is. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Stampede Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 I just don't like this rule. How about a 100 yard dash. Get your fastest guy up. Winner gets the ball on their own 20. 1 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 (edited) Seems like a totally arbitrary rule suggestion. The reason why an onside kick works is because it is not a change at all. A kick-off is a live ball, no matter where it lands on the playing field. Suddenly turning this into some odd 4th and 15 play seems nonsensical. Edited March 3, 2021 by SoCal Deek 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Stampede Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 1 minute ago, SoCal Deek said: Seems like a totally arbitrary rule suggestion. The reason why an onside kick works is because it is not a change at all. A kick-off is a live ball, no matter where it lands on the playing field. Suddenly turning this into some odd 4th and 15 play seems nonsensical. If anything go back to the old rules for onside kick. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEra Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 Awful rule. If they were to give the option of an offensive play, I feel it should be 4th and 25 at least, if not more. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 I'd say go back to the old onside kick rules. 2 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brand J Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 Before the rule changes, the onside kick was an exciting play and historically was recovered by the kicking team 13% of the time. There was actually a season where 21% of those kicks were recovered! With the rule changes that number has plummeted to just over 5%, one recovery per every 20 attempts. 4th and 15s are converted at an average of 16%, so changing the rule would bring excitement back into the game, but also somewhat punish the team with the lead since it’s far more likely they’d pick up a 4th and 15 than recover an onside kick. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logic Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 I’m fine with 4th and 20. NFL passing offenses are too good these days for 4th and 15 to be difficult enough. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaggersEOD Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 Why would you ever kick off? If your O was good enough to consistently convert, you could keep the ball all game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffaloboyinATL Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 31 minutes ago, thenorthremembers said: Didnt they bring up the same idea last year? I think its stupid. While picking up a 4th and 15 is rare, its more likely to happen than something like an onside kick. In my opinion, if a team needs a miracle to win a game despite losing for 59 minutes, you dont change rules to make them more likely to have a chance. And just think about how often teams will get the benefit of a bs pass interference call as well. 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJS Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 Continually taking the foot out of football. They should just go back to the old rules and call it good. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Motorin' Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 18 minutes ago, Doc said: I'd say go back to the old onside kick rules. If they want to avoid the running start, but make it easier to recover, make it a live ball after 5 yards, not 10. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rc2catch Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 I’m in favor of a change, but it’s not as simple as 4th and 15 boom. As mentioned pass interference is going to be HUGE in that situation. They would 100% have to add in a review for any and all calls in that one specific instance. In a time where fans question if the fix is in quite a bit and blame officiating it’s probably bad for the game to narrow so many games down to the refs. I think it’s best to go to the old onside kick rules and try and eliminate ref whistles deciding games as much as possible 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExWNYer Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 6 minutes ago, buffaloboyinATL said: And just think about how often teams will get the benefit of a bs pass interference call as well. This would be the bigger issue for me. Nobody will be running on 4th and 15. What happens when a ticky-tack PI call is made within a couple of yards of the line of scrimmage? The offense gets an automatic first down which eliminates the intent of a difficult conversion. Stupid rule proposed by a stupid organization. 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rochesterfan Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 I have no issue with the current rule. I think about a 0-5% rate is just about right. If you go the the offensive play - make it 4th and 25 and they have to get to their 40 - so the LOS is the 15. Huge penalty if they fail. And the reward is you still need to move the ball to score. I would also limit this option to 1 attempt per game. 9 minutes ago, Motorin' said: If they want to avoid the running start, but make it easier to recover, make it a live ball after 5 yards, not 10. I Hate this because you would greatly increase the number of collisions and potential helmet to helmet as people are diving and both teams are running for the ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 Tyler Bass is like: 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgewaycynic2013 Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 47 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said: I just don't like this rule. How about a 100 yard dash. Get your fastest guy up. Winner gets the ball on their own 20. Rock paper scissors? I will leave out lizard and Spock since the zebras would #*¥! that up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JGMcD2 Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 Josh Allen would absolutely eat if this came to fruition. The man loves 4th and 15+. Sometimes I think it’s easier for him to convert than 4th and 1. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhoTom Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 I don't like it. It eliminates the possibility of a surprise onside kick, in the same way that the new PAT rule eliminates the possibility of a surprise two-point conversion. Sure, both are rare, but it's fun when it happens. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangerDave Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 5 minutes ago, JGMcD2 said: Josh Allen would absolutely eat if this came to fruition. The man loves 4th and 15+. Sometimes I think it’s easier for him to convert than 4th and 1. May be true, but it seems like our defense can't defend third and longs lately, so there is always that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thenorthremembers Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 34 minutes ago, buffaloboyinATL said: And just think about how often teams will get the benefit of a bs pass interference call as well. Exactly. They need to stop fixing things that arent broken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Call_Of_Ktulu Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 Horrible rule change and it wouldn’t help them at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said: Would be great for Bills even though our kicker can also execute an onside kick 1 hour ago, thenorthremembers said: Didnt they bring up the same idea last year? I think its stupid. While picking up a 4th and 15 is rare, its more likely to happen than something like an onside kick. In my opinion, if a team needs a miracle to win a game despite losing for 59 minutes, you dont change rules to make them more likely to have a chance. This story is a year old. Why is this guy tweeting it now? https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/nfl-owners-to-vote-on-wild-rule-change-that-would-allow-a-fourth-and-15-onside-kick-alternative/ "A dramatic rule change pertaining to onside kicks could be coming to the NFL in 2020 if the league's owners vote to make it happen. The Eagles have proposed a rule that would give teams an alternative option to the onside kick. Instead of trying to recover an onside kick, teams would have the option of attempting to convert a fourth-and-15 play from their own 25-yard line" Edited March 3, 2021 by Mr. WEO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 2 hours ago, thenorthremembers said: Didnt they bring up the same idea last year? I think its stupid. While picking up a 4th and 15 is rare, its more likely to happen than something like an onside kick. In my opinion, if a team needs a miracle to win a game despite losing for 59 minutes, you dont change rules to make them more likely to have a chance. The problem is they changed the kickoff rules that made an onside kick even MORE difficult to complete than it already was. That is the real issue, not that the onside needs to be easier, its that they made substantially less likely than it had been throughout NFL history with the changes to the kickoff. Personally, I don't hate this idea, but I think 4th and 15 is too easy. If they are going to go with a 4th and distance scenario, I think it should be more like 4th and 20 or 4th and 25. Maybe limit the defense from being able to line all their guys up down filed around the 25 yard mark and make them play a normal D formation with only the safeties allowed to line up deep. So I agree it should NOT be made to be so easy that it happens at too high of a rate, but it should also not be so hard that its super rare to convert. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 2 hours ago, coloradobillsfan said: I don't like the idea. I think onside kicks should be difficult and converting them a rare occurrence. I want to see the better team win the game, not allow for more ways for lesser teams to upset them. My .02 anyway Anything that reduces the kicker's role in the game is something I can get behind! 1 minute ago, Alphadawg7 said: The problem is they changed the kickoff rules that made an onside kick even MORE difficult to complete than it already was. That is the real issue, not that the onside needs to be easier, its that they made substantially less likely than it had been throughout NFL history with the changes to the kickoff. Personally, I don't hate this idea, but I think 4th and 15 is too easy. If they are going to go with a 4th and distance scenario, I think it should be more like 4th and 20 or 4th and 25. Maybe limit the defense from being able to line all their guys up down filed around the 25 yard mark and make them play a normal D formation with only the safeties allowed to line up deep. So I agree it should NOT be made to be so easy that it happens at too high of a rate, but it should also not be so hard that its super rare to convert. They did it to reduce injury. The old school onside kick -- particularly the scrum tactic -- had the highest rate of injury of any play in the league. I'm not for injuries. I do think 4th and 15 is too easy. I'd make it 4th and 20. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beast Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 (edited) 3 hours ago, thenorthremembers said: Didnt they bring up the same idea last year? I think its stupid. While picking up a 4th and 15 is rare, its more likely to happen than something like an onside kick. In my opinion, if a team needs a miracle to win a game despite losing for 59 minutes, you dont change rules to make them more likely to have a chance. Well, a few years back they did change the rules of how an onside kick needs to be executed....so why can't they change them again? I like the 4th and 15 idea better than what they currently have but not as good as what they used to have. Also, make this 4th and 15 play from your own 15 yard line. I hope they don't do it from the 35 where they kickoff from. Edited March 3, 2021 by Beast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethan in Cleveland Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 How about if you recover an onside kick you automatically get 3 points and the ball. Then the losing team has a real fighting chance! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eball Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 3 hours ago, thenorthremembers said: Didnt they bring up the same idea last year? I think its stupid. While picking up a 4th and 15 is rare, its more likely to happen than something like an onside kick. In my opinion, if a team needs a miracle to win a game despite losing for 59 minutes, you dont change rules to make them more likely to have a chance. 3 hours ago, coloradobillsfan said: I don't like the idea. I think onside kicks should be difficult and converting them a rare occurrence. I want to see the better team win the game, not allow for more ways for lesser teams to upset them. My .02 anyway A contrarian thought: the onside kick is available throughout the game, not just at the end. Remember the Saints fooling Indy in the Super Bowl? Teams just don’t use it because it’s risky. What if the 4th and 15 rule is adopted and a good team (like the Bills) scores early and then uses this to really put pressure on an opponent? Sounds interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 Lol the Eagles have big brass ones. Why would the NFL let them do this when other teams have to kick? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyC81 Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 4 hours ago, Buffalo_Stampede said: I just don't like this rule. How about a 100 yard dash. Get your fastest guy up. Winner gets the ball on their own 20. I liked the way the XFL did “kickoffs” in their initial season. With the ball placed between them, One player from each team sprints to go get the ball. Yeah, it was gimmicky but fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Stampede Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 5 minutes ago, ColeB said: I liked the way the XFL did “kickoffs” in their initial season. With the ball placed between them, One player from each team sprints to go get the ball. Yeah, it was gimmicky but fun. Lol, it was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 4 hours ago, YoloinOhio said: Would be great for Bills even though our kicker can also execute an onside kick What are the numbers on third & 15ish yards? This seems to favor the team playing catch-up. Don’t like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsShredder83 Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 4 hours ago, Doc said: I'd say go back to the old onside kick rules. They initially changed the rule "to protect" players from the extra collisions i believe. Even if they wanted to, i dont think they can go back now. Seems like thatd open them up to all sorts of scrutiny/ lawsuits down the road for deciding safety isnt important again. I wish they could go back though, there was no reason to make it a lower % recovery than it already was Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Stampede Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 15 minutes ago, Beerball said: What are the numbers on third & 15ish yards? This seems to favor the team playing catch-up. Don’t like it. What about street basketball rules? Make it take it. How about if your score a TD and 2 point conversion you keep ball. At least that would be exciting. No game would be over. Lol. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beast Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 OK, if this rule gets implemented the 4th and 15 should take place at the defending teams 15 yard line. Less field for the defending team to cover and makes it more difficult on the offense. Also, at the snap, the clock runs. If successful, you get the ball on your own 35, where the kickoff takes place from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Formerly_of_Roch Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 5 hours ago, thenorthremembers said: Didnt they bring up the same idea last year? I think its stupid. While picking up a 4th and 15 is rare, its more likely to happen than something like an onside kick. In my opinion, if a team needs a miracle to win a game despite losing for 59 minutes, you dont change rules to make them more likely to have a chance. Does it? I have no idea! I'm sure there is enough analytics data out there that can tell you what the odds under the older system was and whatever the odds were just back up the distance until the odds are the same. Maybe it's 4th and 23 produces the same chance of success, then go with that. Admittedly I'm not sure I like this rule, but do think the current setup is practically impossible to succeed at, even though the Bills did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PetermansRedemption Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 I’m a big fan of this rule. While winning the game in the final minute shouldn’t be likely, it also should be impossible. Id also argue there’s far more luck than skill involved in the current onside kick format. Changing it to 4th and 15 shifts the needle closer to skill. 5 hours ago, NewEra said: Awful rule. If they were to give the option of an offensive play, I feel it should be 4th and 25 at least, if not more. But the reason of the rule would be to make it less impossible than an onside kick, not more. 4th and 25 and you might as well keep the current format. They didn’t arbitrarily pull the 15 yards out of thin air. It has very similar conversion percentages of the old onside kick I believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts