Ed_Formerly_of_Roch

Agree I was thinking the exact same, they are both colors almost was going to write that too, just as both players get paid in money so that is also similar.

I guess black and white are similar too.

I love it when the announcers say, "the injury was gruesome, but we're not going to show it" Then why even mention it? Just say he's hurt.

A little? OJ??

i posted this in another thread. As Diggs stated after the game, last weeks game did mean more to him. Maybe the same was true here for Allen. He wanted to show that the comment "Sure about that" WRT Allen wasn't because of Diggs, but was mostly due to him. It seems like in general it doesn't take much to Allen a little amped up and playing against Diggs could have done that.

Don't know if this has been talked about somewhere, didn't see it, but wondering if Allen's issues Sunday were due to him trying to prove he didn't need Diggs. Diggs commented afterwards, the game did mean alot, maybe Allen felt the same. Was reading Kubiaks column and he tends to rarely blame Allen even when they lose and looks like he did bad. He'll point out mistakes by the receivers or maybe the O-line. But not this week, he blamed the problems with Allen mostly not taking what the defense would give him and just repeatedly going for the deep pass rather than taking the easy completion.

And the announcer also criticized the Bills for going for it on 4th and 5 and they then had the 49 yard TD to Coleman. I heard the announcer say that to, and wondered what he was looking at as from the replay clearly could see Kincaid bobble it a bit and seemed like the ball even hit the ground. Highly doubtful the Bills would have won that challenge

Immediately when Allen was first on the ground, he was pointing to his chest. Yes he hit his head, but players hit their heads almost every play so saying he had a concussion is a leap here.

With all the players out on defense, plus Shakir who at this point is the only highly reliable WR we have also being out, overall not thta surprised at the outcome and overall how they played. The one area that does concern me the past two weeks is how weak the O-line seems to have looked as Allen seemed to be running for his life much of the game. Dawkins may have been dinged up, that may have added to things. Did Texans send the house quite a bit, maybe that was their plan send a lot of guys as with out Shakir, wasn't worried about needing more than 4 or 5 backs to cover everyone?

OK so who are the two in the rear left, guy with the beard and glasses and the guy on the end

Saw on the list of potential inductee's along with Tasker was Otis Taylor. Never watched that close, but it surprised me that I would have thought Taylor was already in the HOF. He was pretty damm good back in the day.

Well I'm more thinking from a mental standpoint, that Millers head wasn't maybe in the right frame of mind knowing this was coming. Add to that, with a large 2nd half lead , Ravens were mostly in a running play mode so his skills not needed as much.

Depends on how simple and the implications towards the following years cap. The Bills just took some big hits this season to free up cash going forward so don't want to undo that good for a small improvement this year. Like someone else posted if the team is 7-1 at that point, then maybe, but much worse stick with the plan and the plan whether they state it publicly or not, their actions spell mini rebuild year.

Does make me wonder if his limited play count on Sunday had anything to do with this? Either he and/or Bills knew this was coming?

Unless its someone on a real cheap deal but you said a top tier guy, so then no. Want to keep he cap $$ for next year. If they were going to do that, they could have kept Diggs or Morse, but they want to take the big hit on the cap this year and be done with it. So don't go right back to where we were.