Motorin'

That's the five year plan of creating a deep partnership with India, while drawing in investment around the globe to build in America. Shifting out of dependency on China to a mutually beneficial partnership with India, with the guiding vision being a sustainable and owned supply chain.

This is an option I have come to accept as well. For many years, especially under Bush's GWOT, I was in the decidedly liberal camp that criticized the attempt to label Islam a threat for fear of contributing to xenophobia and racism. And there are certainly racist and xenophobic people out there. But that doesn't change the fundamental truth that there are enough Muslims moving to the west who don't respect Western integration and who would decidedly vote to turn western democracies into Islamic theocracies. The term I've seen that does a good job describing how and why liberals turn a blind eye to the very real harm of Islamic ideology (and other toxic states of affairs) is "toxic empathy." That is, allowing for extremely toxic behavior out of fear of being called racist or sexist, or xenophobic or anti-trans... And this conglomeration of toxic states of affairs, from letting anyone and everyone cross the border illegally, to telling every five year old in school that changing their gender might solve all of their problems ECT... Is why millions and millions of people who haven't voted R in their lives saw Trump 2024 as the lesser of two evils.

Not going to lie, I thought this was going to be about a modern art installation on the ass of Stefon Digg's MET outfit.

Go ***** a couch? You also don't seem to understand that the US has historically backed Pakistan since it's inception. And the idea that the root causes of this conflict are "none of our business" is a massive signal to India that the US is no longer standing behind Pakistan.

Of course that's what you thought, because that's how the media spin it. The full comments tell a completely different story. "Well look, we’re concerned about any time nuclear powers collide and have a major conflict. What we’ve said, what Secretary Rubio has said, and certainly what the President has said is, we want this thing to deescalate as quickly as possible," Vance told Fox News’ Martha McCallum on "The Story" Thursday. "We can’t control these countries though, fundamentally, India has its gripes with Pakistan. Pakistan has responded to India. What we can do is encourage these folks to deescalate a little bit, but we're not going to get involved in the middle of a war that's fundamentally none of our business and has nothing to do with America's ability to control it."

This one gives goose bumps.

Looks like Trump sent a message and got what he wanted, the first American Pope! While we're talking "disrespectful," have you seen how Chicagoans immediately responded?

Daaaaaa Pope!

Spluttering ninny should be your tag line.

Omg. I'm talking to a brick wall.

So there's no comprehensive deal if hormone and chlorinated beef isn't accepted? And just for the record - you're pro-hormones and chlorine in your food and anti-US / UK trade deal. Noted! ***** dummy

Your post only carries water if the trade deal never goes into place. To carry your analogy forward, the idea that the UK government is now the mujahedeen standing in resistance to America's victory in Iraq is laughable. They want the trade deal and military partnership. They're not about to hold up in Fallujah and fight to the last man to keep the imperial forces of US beef out of England. Dummy.

There is a very narrow path for liberals with TDS to walk here. Here's their rules of engagement. 1. All posts about Trump must include failure, ridicule or contempt. 2. Trump can never win at anything. 3. ABC - Always Be Campaigning (for the next election cycle). Here's my suggested highlight: UK makes deal with convicted felon, rapist.

Is this a win? Let's see how the Democrat media spins this into a loss for Trump.