Jump to content

Watt to Cardinals (bills were Cardinals biggest competition per report)


Recommended Posts

Would you trade pick #30 for one of WFT’s Defensive lineman not named chase young?    They need a QB more than anything and are short draft assets to either trade for one or move up in the draft.  If rivera is following the Beane model, they will go all in to find their franchise QB.  And they aren’t gonna be able to pay Allen, Payne and Sweat in addition to Young.  

Edited by BuffaloRebound
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BuffaloRebound said:

Would you trade pick #30 for one of WFT’s Defensive lineman not named chase young?    They need a QB more than anything and are short draft assets to either trade for one or move up in the draft.  If rivera is following the Beane model, they will go all in to find their franchise QB.  And they aren’t gonna be able to pay Allen, Payne and Sweat in addition to Young.  

Jonathan Allen, yes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BuffaloRebound said:

Would you trade pick #30 for one of WFT’s Defensive lineman not named chase young?    They need a QB more than anything and are short draft assets to either trade for one or move up in the draft.  If rivera is following the Beane model, they will go all in to find their franchise QB.  And they aren’t gonna be able to pay Allen, Payne and Sweat in addition to Young.  

I would do it for Sweat for sure.  Still on a rookie deal w 5th year option

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buffalo could have offered less, but still been Watt's #2 choice.

 

He obviously was looking for a combination of pay and chance of winning.

 

Sounds like he thinks he got the best combo in AZ, but he considered Buffalo to be 2nd best.


That's how I read this.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Doc said:

Very odd.  I doubt you'd find many people who think this moves makes the Cardinals even a playoff team, much less a SB team.

 

I think the Cardinals have a very good chance to be a playoff team. Don't see them as a Superbowl contender.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:

 

No people are saying the Cardinals are not even a playoff team and the worst team in the division.  And since when is a team being a "contender" suddenly a statement of being a "lock".  You're just being absurd now and you know it.

 

I said they are an ascending team...it was pretty clear what I said.  

You said they'd be a contender.

6 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:

But, AZ isn’t a bad choice for him.  That’s a team on the rise that is expected to contend next year.  Defense was solid already and offense is getting better each year as Kyler grows.

Which I mean contend for a playoff spot sure, for the SB no not really and that's what was implied to be what Watt was looking for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I call BS. If money wasn’t the main factor, then why was this so absurdly public? And the “leaked” salary requirements? What was the point of dragging multiple fanbases on social media? I can’t hate the man as a person given all of his charity work, but I have to say i’ve lost some respect for him as a player with all these histrionics.

 

He didn’t even do anything particularly clever like ask the fanbases of said team to donate the most to charity to influence his decision. That would have been something.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

You said they'd be a contender.

Which I mean contend for a playoff spot sure, for the SB no not really and that's what was implied to be what Watt was looking for.

 

Why cant they contend for a Super Bowl?  They will have a good defense next year and an ascending offense.  If Murray takes another step in his 3rd year like Josh did, they could be a very good team.  Im not saying they are the favorite, but they are a team on the rise as long as one believes in Murray, and most do, including myself, that Murray should get better in his 3rd year.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, benderbender said:

I call BS. If money wasn’t the main factor, then why was this so absurdly public? And the “leaked” salary requirements? What was the point of dragging multiple fanbases on social media? I can’t hate the man as a person given all of his charity work, but I have to say i’ve lost some respect for him as a player with all these histrionics.

 

He didn’t even do anything particularly clever like ask the fanbases of said team to donate the most to charity to influence his decision. That would have been something.

He did call out donations as “bribes” 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

He couldn’t be paid to hitch his wagon to baker and wentz

 

i really need to know what Beane offered 

I suspect the $23M guaranteed on a 2-year deal was what drove his decision.  Lots of details to consider when it comes to contracts - guarantees, length, structure/backloading.  I heard the Browns offered $13.5M/yr earlier in the process.  No idea if they increased that or not.  Even at $13.5M AAV if it was for a a 3 year deal, then that’s $40.5M and they technically offered more in a way. Lots gets said about contract offers, but without details none of it really means much.

 

I think Watt was a phenomenal player and that he’s still good.  I’m glad we didn’t pay him what ‘Zona did though.  That’s just too much for a rotational 32 year old pass rusher.  Heck, I thought $13.5M would've too much unless it was a longer deal that was backloaded.  

Edited by BarleyNY
  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BuffaloBills1998 said:

Exactly I thought he wanted to be on a contender. Arizona is not even close to being one. But good riddance honestly, I’m glad Beane didn’t overpay for Watt

I thought his wife wanted to eat chicken  wings

 

I guess they can fly them in from duffs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, DJB said:

giphy.gif

 

 

I read in this very thread that, since no other media outlet had previously mentioned the Cardinals as a possible suitor for Watt, that any and all reports of contact with any other teams, let alone actual offers,  is "made up", i.e. never happened.

3 minutes ago, BarleyNY said:

I suspect the $23M guaranteed was what drove his decision.  

 

 

Yeah, I don't think he  cared who was his next QB...

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

 

I read in this very thread that, since no other media outlet had previously mentioned the Cardinals as a possible suitor for Watt, that any and all reports of contact with any other teams, let alone actual offers,  is "made up", i.e. never happened.

 

And I read elsewhere here that if someone quotes an anonymous person as the source of a story, than you should assume its true as no one would ever make that up to drive clicks or generate publicity for themselves...

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Aussie Joe said:

 

And I read elsewhere here that if someone quotes an anonymous person as the source of a story, than you should assume its true as no one would ever make that up to drive clicks or generate publicity for themselves...

 

 

Turns out the reports of other teams offering him money were obviously true, so I don't know what your angle is at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:

 

Why cant they contend for a Super Bowl?  They will have a good defense next year and an ascending offense.  If Murray takes another step in his 3rd year like Josh did, they could be a very good team.  Im not saying they are the favorite, but they are a team on the rise as long as one believes in Murray, and most do, including myself, that Murray should get better in his 3rd year.

I think Murray could be a good QB don't think he'll be a great one and I don't believe in there HC guy couldn't win at the College level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He will be banged up before the season starts.  The guy was the leader of a defense for a team that went 4-12 and gave up a whole bunch of yards and points.  

 

Everyone says the Texans have a lousy organization.  Well the players are part of that lousy organization that went 4-12 last season.  So maybe Watt and Watson are not as good as a lot want to say, because they were the leaders of a 4-12 team.  All I remember is Watson sitting on the bench crying with a towel over his head after he fumbled inside of the Indy 5 yard line at the end of the game.  That's a hell of a leader-not.  (Don't think Jimbo would have done that)  

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, FFadpecr said:

Focusing on and trying to build up the defense is a pointless endeavor, if your goal is to beat the Chiefs in 2021. The Bucs Defense was an outlier - no matter what the Bills do this offseason on Defense, they will NEVER recreate the Bucs 2020 Defense. That would literally take years and years to accomplish. So what is the point? Why even go that route? It's silly. Not to mention - NFL Defense in 2021 is a mirage - it comes and goes, not sustainable. Your defense is only as good as your last game. 

 

You can improve the DL, improve the LBs, improve the CB2....guess what? The Chiefs are still dropping 30+ against the Bills in 2021, both regular season and playoff game; all your defensive improvements are moot.

 

So then you are right back to Square 1, exactly where you were in 2020 - needing to outscore the Chiefs, needing to score ~35 points to win.

 

Focus on Offense over Defense. It's a much wiser investment, because Josh makes everyone on Offense better, so an offensive addition is guaranteed to make an impact. Sometimes your best defense is an unstoppable offense. The Bills just need 1 or 2 extra pieces to be unstoppable offensively - so add those few pieces and finish the deal. If you control the clock + score at will, your defense will just need to be "good enough".

 

You know the Bills averaged more ppg than the Chiefs in 2020 right

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FFadpecr said:

Focusing on and trying to build up the defense is a pointless endeavor, if your goal is to beat the Chiefs in 2021. The Bucs Defense was an outlier - no matter what the Bills do this offseason on Defense, they will NEVER recreate the Bucs 2020 Defense. That would literally take years and years to accomplish. So what is the point? Why even go that route? It's silly. Not to mention - NFL Defense in 2021 is a mirage - it comes and goes, not sustainable. Your defense is only as good as your last game. 

 

You can improve the DL, improve the LBs, improve the CB2....guess what? The Chiefs are still dropping 30+ against the Bills in 2021, both regular season and playoff game; all your defensive improvements are moot.

 

So then you are right back to Square 1, exactly where you were in 2020 - needing to outscore the Chiefs, needing to score ~35 points to win.

 

Focus on Offense over Defense. It's a much wiser investment, because Josh makes everyone on Offense better, so an offensive addition is guaranteed to make an impact. Sometimes your best defense is an unstoppable offense. The Bills just need 1 or 2 extra pieces to be unstoppable offensively - so add those few pieces and finish the deal. If you control the clock + score at will, your defense will just need to be "good enough".

 


I disagree with pretty much all of this.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Paup 1995MVP said:

He will be banged up before the season starts.  The guy was the leader of a defense for a team that went 4-12 and gave up a whole bunch of yards and points.  

 

Everyone says the Texans have a lousy organization.  Well the players are part of that lousy organization that went 4-12 last season.  So maybe Watt and Watson are not as good as a lot want to say, because they were the leaders of a 4-12 team.  All I remember is Watson sitting on the bench crying with a towel over his head after he fumbled inside of the Indy 5 yard line at the end of the game.  That's a hell of a leader-not.  (Don't think Jimbo would have done that)  

Yeah, but his stats don’t lie. :lol:

 

Screen-Shot-2020-12-06-at-4.35.12-PM.png

Edited by Rico
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, chongli said:

Buffalo (and Cleveland and Green Bay) could not compete against the Phoenix weather, marketability for Watt's "brand", and, most importantly, former teammate DeAndre Hopkins, who convinced him to go to Arizona.

He isn’t worth 31 million dollars that’s the ultimate factor no one was going to pay that...period 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said:

 

But yet the Bills were the biggest competition per this same source...

 

 

 

The thing is, there's the total $ value of the contract, and then there's the question how much of it is guaranteed and how is it structured?

 

It wouldn't surprise me at all if Watt was offered more money as part of a longer contract, or even the same length contract but with less up front or less guaranteed.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Warcodered said:

I think Murray could be a good QB don't think he'll be a great one and I don't believe in there HC guy couldn't win at the College level.

 

And Josh couldn't win at the college level either...its a mute point.  Just like how guys who won in college have gone on to be terrible in the pros.  

 

I will judge the HC by what he does in the NFL.  Right now, hes still a question mark, I am just not going to condemn him just on his college record alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...