Jump to content

Played scared on defense


Recommended Posts

What was our defensive identity this year? Waiting for the All-22, but if you could isolate one play on defense where we didn’t play scared aside from the one good hit Hyde put on a RB. Whether it was refusing to attempt to bump Kelce at the line, or letting all 5’ nothing 170lbs of Hill intimidate our entire staff, we clearly didn’t think our defense had a single strength to play to.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, benderbender said:

What was our defensive identity this year? Waiting for the All-22, but if you could isolate one play on defense where we didn’t play scared aside from the one good hit Hyde put on a RB. Whether it was refusing to attempt to bump Kelce at the line, or letting all 5’ nothing 170lbs of Hill intimidate our entire staff, we clearly didn’t think our defense had a single strength to play to.

So weak it was embarrassing, safeties 20 yards deep and backpedaling at the snap. They played defense all game like they were ahead by 3 touchdowns in the 4th qtr

  • Like (+1) 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Ramza86 said:

Soft was the word I came up with. Watching the Bucs defense and the Chiefs D line crush us lets us know how soft we are on the front 7.

Very, very soft.

 

I do trust McBeane though to address and correct this in the off-season.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was just a bad game. 
KC obviously had a game plan to play more physical than us. 
They punched us in the mouth in the second quarter and we never got up. 
That fight in the end should of happened in the 2nd quarter after the Jones punch, or the Diggs slam. They owned us. 
Defensive scheme or not nobody on the D line won a block the whole game. It was just ugly all the way around. Frazier and Daboll looked outmatched and the players followed suit. On to the offseason. I’m still happy with our season. 
The first 6-7 weeks we had NO DEFENSE so at least they improved despite failing in this game .

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, benderbender said:

What was our defensive identity this year? Waiting for the All-22, but if you could isolate one play on defense where we didn’t play scared aside from the one good hit Hyde put on a RB. Whether it was refusing to attempt to bump Kelce at the line, or letting all 5’ nothing 170lbs of Hill intimidate our entire staff, we clearly didn’t think our defense had a single strength to play to.

 

Our defense was bad all year, got a little better 2nd half, but still nothing like past two seasons and overall most of core players were same other than Star.  No pass rush all year it seemed, but stat wise, sacks looked good so hard to understand?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My issue is thrm not making some plays forcing more 3rd and longs.

 

Then there was YAC stats where ifyou play prevent you need to pursue and defend on YAC and force more 3rd and ling that then get drive stops and force more punts.

 

buffalo isbt designed around a front four big sack team.  
 

i believe if you can get pressure forcing quick plays then it’s to your advantage to play man coverage.

Edited by djp14150
Link to comment
Share on other sites

   The interior D had to do better. The most expensive in the league? Didn't look like it  I didn't hear Butler, Jefferson, or Oliver's name once.

 

    The defense, didn't seem to have a plan for Kelce at all. 

Edited by Seoulofstone
Clarifying for the bone-headed
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, benderbender said:

What was our defensive identity this year? Waiting for the All-22, but if you could isolate one play on defense where we didn’t play scared aside from the one good hit Hyde put on a RB. Whether it was refusing to attempt to bump Kelce at the line, or letting all 5’ nothing 170lbs of Hill intimidate our entire staff, we clearly didn’t think our defense had a single strength to play to.


we were good at all levels, dominant at none. Needed another impact player in the front 7.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Seoulofstone said:

   The interior D had to do better. The most expensive in the league? Didn't look like it  I didn't hear Butler, Jefferson, or Oliver's name once.

 

    They didn't seem to have a plan for Kelce at all. 


 

KC didn’t run much up the middle. DT don’t cover the TE.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every team that gets to the Super Bowl has 1 or 2 D linemen that can consistently get to the QB.

 

All due respect to Hughes, we don't have that.  

 

It's amazing we accomplished what we did this year.  In a lot of ways you can say we over achieved as a team a bit.  

 

Allen and Rodgers should be co-MVPs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Turk71 said:

So weak it was embarrassing, safeties 20 yards deep and backpedaling at the snap. They played defense all game like they were ahead by 3 touchdowns in the 4th qtr

 

And still give up a 50 yard run by Hardiman and a 70 yard catch by Hill on a 5 yard crossing pattern.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, BeastMaster said:

It wasn't just the D, either.

 

McD coached like a coward in his biggest game against his mentor that coaches to win.

 

 

Andy Reid coached that exact same way in big games throughout his whole career until he finally woke up last year. I don’t think it will take McD that long, he’s come a long way this year.

  • Vomit 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My biggest concern with this team and it's progression toward the final steps is McD. On offense we seem to be very flexible week to week in our approach. We aren't married to a system. On defense, we do seem married to a system. Against very high end QB's, it is not the optimal system to be in. With McD we will never have the players to play high end man coverage and that seems to be how you beat the best. Along with a great pass rush from your front four. 

Edited by KzooMike
  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KzooMike said:

My biggest concern with this team and it's progression toward the final steps is McD. On offense we seem to be very flexible week to week in our approach. We aren't married to a system. On defense, we do seem married to a system. Against very high end QB's, it is not the optimal system to be in. With McD we will never have the players to play high end man coverage and that seems to be how you beat the best, along with a great pass rush from your front four. 

This.

 

We can't run man because the roster isn't built to man press. And against KC you need to do what they did to us. Man press with one safety help.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Rc2catch said:

It was just a bad game. 
KC obviously had a game plan to play more physical than us. 
They punched us in the mouth in the second quarter and we never got up. 
That fight in the end should of happened in the 2nd quarter after the Jones punch, or the Diggs slam. They owned us. 
Defensive scheme or not nobody on the D line won a block the whole game. It was just ugly all the way around. Frazier and Daboll looked outmatched and the players followed suit. On to the offseason. I’m still happy with our season. 
The first 6-7 weeks we had NO DEFENSE so at least they improved despite failing in this game .

I would not say it was just a "bad game."


They are quite a bit better than us on both sides of the ball.

 

If we played them next Sunday, and each Sunday after that for a total of 5 games, they would probably win all 5 one way or the other.  They're better than us.

 

It will be interesting to see how Beane takes a scalpel to this roster and tweaks here and there.

 

We should be a better team next year.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

End of the day the only chance we had at beating KC was taking chances on defence and creating turnovers.  You double Hill and you chip Kelce hard at the line,  send 5 guys and force Mahomes into making quick decisions.  We played looking to avoid big plays and gave Mahomes time to find 2nd and 3rd options

 

Meanwhile KC was going hard after Allen on almost every play

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, BeastMaster said:

It wasn't just the D, either.

 

McD coached like a coward in his biggest game against his mentor that coaches to win.

 

 

He learned from Reid when He flat out sucked in the playoffs for many years. 

Reid evolved, I hope McD does as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, BeastMaster said:

It wasn't just the D, either.

 

McD coached like a coward in his biggest game against his mentor that coaches to win.

 

 

I thought McDermott had grown as a coach to the point that we wouldn’t see FGs in those situations.  I was wrong.  He regressed. Totally inexcusable but it didn’t cost us the game.  The Chiefs could have named the score.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, benderbender said:

What was our defensive identity this year? Waiting for the All-22, but if you could isolate one play on defense where we didn’t play scared aside from the one good hit Hyde put on a RB. Whether it was refusing to attempt to bump Kelce at the line, or letting all 5’ nothing 170lbs of Hill intimidate our entire staff, we clearly didn’t think our defense had a single strength to play to.

The first two drives weren’t terrible. We held them to 3 and out(Hill did have a bad drop). Second drive we were punishing their receivers then after that it was like we put in Niagara-Wheatfield middle schools defense and we figured there was a better chance of Kelce dropping a wide open pass than us trying to cover him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MJS said:

When they brought pressure they got burned. When they dropped into coverage they got burned. What would have them do?

 

They got beat by a really good team.

KC's defense played really really well. They were confusing us at the LOS and blanketing our WR's.

 

They shut down Diggs in the first half almost entirely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gameplan was a spitting image of week 6 only KC attacked it a different way....Terrible coaching. You don’t go up against the best team in the league and bring the same gameplan as you did earlier in the season. Doesn’t matter if the score was close, they were gonna be ready for it.  
 

We said we weren’t the same team as the first time we played, why the same game plan then? 

Edited by BananaB
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...