sven233 Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 (edited) UPDATE: CASE DISMISSED TMZ is just all over us lately! This one isn't for the right reasons, though. TMZ @TMZ Von Miller is being sued by a woman in L.A. who claims the NFL star, consumed by jealousy, sent sexually explicit photos to "two celebrities" and allegedly asked, "this the B word you want?" Full Story "Von Miller is being sued by a woman in Los Angeles who claims the NFL star, consumed by rage and jealousy, distributed a sexually explicit photo of her to "two well-known celebrities" in May 2020, TMZ Sports has learned." Doesn't sound like much will come of it. Seems like a really bad breakup. Not a great look, though. Edited May 29, 2022 by sven233 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiltonWaddams Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 Well, TMZ, you seem to have a thing for reporting about Bills stars. We made it guys! We made the big time! 1 1 1 10 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sierra Foothills Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 This is disturbing and disappointing. I wonder if the Bills knew about this prior to signing him? 5 6 1 5 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike in Horseheads Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 1 minute ago, Sierra Foothills said: This is disturbing and disappointing. I wonder if the Bills knew about this prior to signing him? Are you outraged? 3 22 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wiz Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 2 minutes ago, Sierra Foothills said: This is disturbing and disappointing. I wonder if the Bills knew about this prior to signing him? You would think that 160m contract has nothing to do with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 This just in don’t let people take nude photos of you 4 1 3 2 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chandler#81 Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 8 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: This just in don’t let people take nude photos of you Dammit! NOW you tell me!😡🤦♂️ 15 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 Not an ideal situation, but I'm not sure what law he's supposed to have broken. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wiz Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 14 minutes ago, Warcodered said: Not an ideal situation, but I'm not sure what law he's supposed to have broken. Can call it defamation even if they consented to it. Unless he has proof they did, I'd expect an out of court settlement. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 8 minutes ago, The Wiz said: Can call it defamation even if they consented to it. Unless he has proof they did, I'd expect an out of court settlement. But what's the false statement? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Stampede Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 30 minutes ago, Warcodered said: Not an ideal situation, but I'm not sure what law he's supposed to have broken. Googled it. It’s illegal. Misdemeanor in California. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sierra Foothills Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, Sierra Foothills said: This is disturbing and disappointing. I wonder if the Bills knew about this prior to signing him? 1 hour ago, Mike in Horseheads said: Are you outraged? Are you? Why do you ask me? Is disturbing and disappointing not clear enough for you? 1 hour ago, Sierra Foothills said: This is disturbing and disappointing. I wonder if the Bills knew about this prior to signing him? 58 minutes ago, The Wiz said: You would think that 160m contract has nothing to do with it. Not sure what you mean. Do you think the Bills knew about this? If they did, do you think they'd determine it's not a big deal? Edited April 21, 2022 by Sierra Foothills 1 3 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 17 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said: Googled it. It’s illegal. Misdemeanor in California. What specifically? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsShredder83 Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 58 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: This just in don’t let people take nude photos of you Or atleast ask yourself - am I ok with the whole world seeing this- and if you answered yes, I'll show you the secret handshake. All the cool kids are in here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 (edited) Here's the law in CA California has specifically outlawed "revenge porn." In California, it is a crime to post or otherwise electronically distribute a digital image of another person in order to harass, cause fear in, or lead to injury of that person. Revenge porn, sometimes called "cyber exploitation," is a form of nonconsensual pornography (NCP). Although disgruntled exes are frequently the perpetrators of revenge porn, strangers also commit NCP by hacking into others' accounts or devices and then posting images they find. Harassment By Means of Electronic Communication Anyone who uses an "electronic communication device" (such as a cell phone or computer, see below) can be charged with a misdemeanor in the following circumstances: Distribute or send. The law makes it illegal to distribute, post, email, or otherwise disclose any personal identifying information, including a digital image, of another person without consent; or to send a harassing message. Likely effect, on whom. The law applies when the distribution or sending would likely incite or produce harassment by a third party. Intent of the distributor or sender. The prosecution will have to prove that the defendant intended to place another person in reasonable fear for his or her own safety (or that of an immediate family member). (Cal. Penal Code § 653.2.) Any individual who engages in harassment by electronic communications may also be charged with misdemeanor stalking under California law. (Cal. Penal Code § 646.9.) For more information about stalking, see Harassment and Cyberbullying as Crimes. The California statute defines the terms used in the statute, as set forth below. Edited April 21, 2022 by Doc Brown 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikemac2001 Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 27 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said: Googled it. It’s illegal. Misdemeanor in California. does anywhere say this happened in CA he was living in Denver at the time Idk how each state and situation handles it. what if he was in Denver but photos we’re sent to someone in NY which area could they file the lawsuit/charges Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1ManRaid Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 29 minutes ago, Sierra Foothills said: Are you? Why do you ask me? Is disturbing and disappointing not clear enough for you? Not sure what you mean. Do you think the Bills knew about this? If they did, do you think they'd determine it's not a big deal? I take it you have all the details and facts? It could be 100% true, it could be a lie to extort a settlement out of someone who just got handed tens of millions of dollars. I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that based on your knee-jerk outrage over this, you've had something similar happen to you. 1 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Stampede Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 20 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: Here's the law in CA Harassment By Means of Electronic Communication Anyone who uses an "electronic communication device" (such as a cell phone or computer, see below) can be charged with a misdemeanor in the following circumstances: Distribute or send. The law makes it illegal to distribute, post, email, or otherwise disclose any personal identifying information, including a digital image, of another person without consent; or to send a harassing message. Likely effect, on whom. The law applies when the distribution or sending would likely incite or produce harassment by a third party. Intent of the distributor or sender. The prosecution will have to prove that the defendant intended to place another person in reasonable fear for his or her own safety (or that of an immediate family member). (Cal. Penal Code § 653.2.) Any individual who engages in harassment by electronic communications may also be charged with misdemeanor stalking under California law. (Cal. Penal Code § 646.9.) For more information about stalking, see Harassment and Cyberbullying as Crimes. The California statute defines the terms used in the statute, as set forth below. I figured the way it’s worded they’re saying it’s “revenge porn”. Either way if he did it as they say then he’ll have to settle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanForever19 Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 Geez. This isn't even the first eye opening thing I've seen regarding him and women in the past week. Hopefully he gets it together, stays off the suspension list, and focuses all his energy on Football going forward. https://www.marca.com/en/nfl/buffalo-bills/2022/04/14/625868a622601ddf438b45eb.html 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Junction Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 Yeah….. My dick ended up in a video on pornhub after an ex ended up trading her old phone for drugs years later…. This isn’t even a blip on my radar. If you consent to pics expect them to end up being seen by others. Fact of life in this digital age. 1 1 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Protocal69 Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 I saw something about this in passing on youtube last week but I really dont get caught up in the drama and rumors. Here is the video that covered it though I sort dont care for the guys videos: 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chandler#81 Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 NO!! Not Con Pillar!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punching Bag Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 1 hour ago, Buffalo_Stampede said: Googled it. It’s illegal. Misdemeanor in California. Isn't everything? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Vader Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 I call BS. There are no laws in California. 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo03 Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 So she decided to wait 2 years until he signs a $120 million dollar contract before doing this? Yeah, ok 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2o Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 She saw that $120M contract and said to herself, "Hmmm, how can I get my hands on some of that? Oh, I got it. Hello, Marks and Harrison?" 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsfaninChicago Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 (edited) 3 hours ago, John from Riverside said: This just in don’t let people take nude photos of you Oooof that will never be a problem for me. The camera lens would break at that sight. Edited April 21, 2022 by BillsfaninChicago Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy Claude Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 (edited) Revenge porn is illegal almost everywhere although I am not sure sending the pictures to two "celebrities" count. From ballotpedia: As of February 2021, 46 states and Washington D.C. had passed laws prohibiting the distribution or production of nonconsensual pornography. Nonconsensual pornography refers to the distribution of sexual or pornographic images of individuals without their consent. This may include images taken without consent or images taken with consent but later distributed without the consent of those in the images. These images are sometimes referred to as revenge porn. Yes, it is a pretty slimy thing to do if Von Miller actually did this No, I am not outraged but it is certainly disappointing. However, there is no need to defend the guy's actions just because he is a Bill. We are reaching the point in society that people are willing to defend anything someone does as long as the person is on their team. Edited April 21, 2022 by Billy Claude 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giuseppe Tognarelli Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 2 hours ago, Buffalo Junction said: Yeah….. My dick ended up in a video on pornhub after an ex ended up trading her old phone for drugs years later…. This isn’t even a blip on my radar. If you consent to pics expect them to end up being seen by others. Fact of life in this digital age. Link? 🤗 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PonyBoy Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 Von Miller putting the "D" in the Dline. Reminds me of the time I had a sex tape out there about my private parts....It's a short film, Google it 😃 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBean Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 I thought Von was married? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strive_for_five_guy Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 TSW legal experts and crime solvers, to the rescue! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOUSE Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 (edited) If I had more time, I would spend the weekend reading her tattoos Edited April 21, 2022 by HOUSE 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExWNYer Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 2 hours ago, Giuseppe Tognarelli said: Link? 🤗 Sausage, obviously. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDIGGZ Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 6 hours ago, John from Riverside said: This just in don’t let people take nude photos of you Winner. Laws should only exist if it's non-consensual like the person is sleeping or under the influence or spied on etc. If you knowingly take such photos, expect the world to see them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralonzo Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 (edited) Above the crazy line we have your danger zone. This is your redheads, your strippers, anyone named Tiffany, hairdressers... Edited April 21, 2022 by Ralonzo 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eball Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 3 hours ago, Billy Claude said: However, there is no need to defend the guy's actions just because he is a Bill. We are reaching the point in society that people are willing to defend anything someone does as long as the person is on their team. You just described every Cleveland Browns fan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plano Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 flick her $500k and this all goes away Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JakeFrommStateFarm Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 7 hours ago, Mike in Horseheads said: Are you outraged? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sierra Foothills Posted April 21, 2022 Share Posted April 21, 2022 5 hours ago, 1ManRaid said: I take it you have all the details and facts? It could be 100% true, it could be a lie to extort a settlement out of someone who just got handed tens of millions of dollars. I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that based on your knee-jerk outrage over this, you've had something similar happen to you. I ask some questions and you take it "I have all the facts?" Is it your lack of reading comprehension or your lack of deductive logic which draws this conclusion? Here, let me help you... disturbing and disappointing ≠ outrage... do try to keep up... if you need a math refresher let me know. And what outrage are you talking about? Who's outraged? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.