Jump to content

*[EDIT]* Multiple reports Browns actively shopping Mayfield pg. 29/30 - Ravens / Browns in QB contract pickle


Inigo Montoya

Recommended Posts

Stefanski is going into his 3rd season as HC. Every HC wants to bring in his own guy.

 

If he has any juice he wants out of Mayfield and to bring in his own guy (Cousins?) or make a move in the draft.

 

The Browns pick 13th. The Jets have picks 4 and 10 and are not in the market for a QB. The Browns are young team on paper and could handle a year of rookie growing pains without losing ground. 

 

The fan base is starting to turn on Mayfield and he's acting like someone trying to talk his way out of town. Seeing how well OBJ played in LA is having an effect as well. I think they should go their separate ways

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/16/2022 at 4:19 PM, LABILLBACKER said:

There is no way Mayfield,  Jackson or Murray are worth a penny over 35/ yr. Anyone dumb enough to pay these guys over this will be in cap hell for a long time. 

 

I 100% agree with you. Jackson makes the best case of the 3, but no way am I even going to pay Lamar Josh Allen money. There's a big talent gap between the two and it will only increase as he ages and can't run like he does now. All things equal, they will always behind against us if they pay him that much. 

 

  All 3 are starting to get beat up, but IMO Lamar is going to be the first to slow just due to the fact of how much he gets hit. People here are worried about Josh running and what it will do to him later down the road, but he only averages between 6-7 carries a game on a yearly basis. On top of that he's gotten alot better at sliding and going out of bounds, maybe not as much as us fans want him to, but those probably account for 2-3 of his carries a game. So he's only adding 4-5 additional hits a game and to be honest more often than not he's the one doing the hitting. Could be worse, Lamar has almost 200 more carries than Josh, in 3 less games, and he's 25 pounds lighter. 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/16/2022 at 7:06 PM, Don Otreply said:

If you realize that by future you mean what the are currently, it would take a special set of circumstances for Baltimore to be better than they were in the last two seasons, and that amounts to being “regular season “ maybe division winners, but true post season success would be unlikely, jmo. 

 

  I agree. For one reason, Lamar's cap hit over the last 4 years has been next to nothing. Even this past season his cap hit was only 3 million. That all changes next year and the quality of talent around him is going to suffer. Add to that there's got to be a point, in the near future, that he's going to have to reduce the number of times he carries the ball.       

 

 Josh runs quite a bit and Lamar has almost 200 more carries than him in 3 less games and he's 25 pounds lighter. Add to that Lamar's passing skills are no where near Josh's, so once there's less fear of him running, IMO he & the team will be in trouble then.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
40 minutes ago, elijah said:

Well, wouldn’t this be advantage Lamar strictly in terms of durability and long-term health? 

 

I would be more worried about the quick twitch running style of Lamar.  Those ligaments can only take so much strain and once he loses his legs, he becomes a non-dimensional QB.  Allen is usually bigger than the guys that tackle him when he takes off running.  I think secondary defenders hate tackling Allen.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, elijah said:

Well, wouldn’t this be advantage Lamar strictly in terms of durability and long-term health? 

Did you see the stat in this thread that Lamar has ran nearly 200 more times than Josh?
 

Additionally, being the person making the hits generally means less likely to be injured. Josh is bigger, and delivers blows (to be fair, he takes his shots too), Lamar not so much. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/16/2022 at 2:33 PM, Jay_Fixit said:

Mock drafts.

 

lol.

You mock mock drafts?! 🤔

😁

1 hour ago, BuffaloBillyG said:

The latest from the Murray camp. I am a fan of players getting their pay. I'm not a fan of moves like this and negotiating in the press. Comes across to me as pretty classless.  Murray and his agent care more about the "power move". Josh Allen cares more about winning Super Bowls. 

 

 

Aw geez, now every NFL player of note will be needing a graphic designer to create a Transformer like avatar logo.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BuffaloBillyG said:

The latest from the Murray camp. I am a fan of players getting their pay. I'm not a fan of moves like this and negotiating in the press. Comes across to me as pretty classless.  Murray and his agent care more about the "power move". Josh Allen cares more about winning Super Bowls. 

 

 

Tell Murray to Make the playoffs before he tries to be a little diva. I hate players like him

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/16/2022 at 2:27 PM, Inigo Montoya said:

There is no way in hell that I would trade Baker AND a #1 for a midget QB.

 

The best I can do is give the Cardinals props for thinking outside the box a few years ago, since Murray would’ve been off my board.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, elijah said:

Well, wouldn’t this be advantage Lamar strictly in terms of durability and long-term health? 

It is more of comparing a body at 211 lbs taking a hit vs a body at 240 lbs beating up Linebackers and DEs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

https://www.nbcsportsedge.com/football/nfl/teams/cle/cleveland-browns

 

ESPN's Dan Graziano reports that the Browns are "doing due diligence" on potentially available veteran quarterbacks.

 

"I heard lots of rumblings in the latter part of this week about Cleveland making a trade for a quarterback and possibly shipping out Mayfield," Graziano writes. The Browns have been regarded as a "wild card" entry to the Deshaun Watson sweepstakes, and while they have committed to Baker Mayfield publicly, a "big fish" could reportedly change that. This article cautions that Mayfield is still the favorite to start for the Browns in 2022, but his hold on the job appears to be tenuous. 

 

Apparently not set in stone that Baker returns as the starter.  This rumor will surely not sit well with Baker and I'm sure he'll be unable to resist responding to it.  Hopefully this will get interesting...

 

Edited by Inigo Montoya
  • Shocked 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Inigo Montoya changed the title to *[EDIT]* Browns doing "due diligence" looking at veteran FA QBs pg. 29 --- Ravens and Browns now in a QB contract pickle

Their problem isn't that they didn't a contract done, it's that there's significant reasons to not get one done.. 

 

No way I'd give Baker a new contract. I'd be (and it seems like the Browns are..) looking for his replacement. 

 

On 1/4/2022 at 6:31 AM, Greg S said:

Baker isn't getting that big payday. To think he was the #1 pick in 2018. He has been a disappointment. They made a point last night saying the Browns offense runs thru Chubb and Hunt. What does that tell you about Baker as a #1 pick?

 

Not only does their offense not count on throwing it.. when the game needs Baker to start throwing.. it doesn't end well. He can play well when the offense is moving through the running game. It's a lot easier to play QB when you're getting 5.0 ypc from your backs. 

 

I remain steadfast in my belief that having a middling QB is worse than a bad one because you can easily dump the bad one. 

Edited by Malazan
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Malazan said:

Their problem isn't that they didn't a contract done, it's that there's significant reasons to not get one done.. 

 

No way I'd give Baker a new contract. I'd be (and it seems like the Browns are..) looking for his replacement. 

 

 

Not only does their offense throw it.. when the game needs Baker to start throwing.. it doesn't end well. He can play well when the offense is moving through the running game. It's a lot easier to play QB when you're getting 5.0 ypc from your backs. 

 

I remain steadfast in my belief that having a middling QB is worse than a bad one because you can easily dump the bad one. 

To be more specific on your point, it is terrible to have the 10-16 best QB because to get a major improvement is next to impossible and you can easily end up with a much worse team. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

To be more specific on your point, it is terrible to have the 10-16 best QB because to get a major improvement is next to impossible and you can easily end up with a much worse team. 

 

It partially depends on is the issue entirely QB or is it the QB is in wrong scheme or with wrong OC?  Are the skill players the type who will work well with the QB?  Teams need to be adaptive or replacement will be in same situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Inigo Montoya changed the title to *[EDIT]* Browns looking at available FA QBs, Baker could be moved per ESPN's Graziano pg. 29 --- Ravens and Browns now in a QB contract pickle
16 hours ago, Limeaid said:

 

It partially depends on is the issue entirely QB or is it the QB is in wrong scheme or with wrong OC?  Are the skill players the type who will work well with the QB?  Teams need to be adaptive or replacement will be in same situation.

 

I disagree.  I can't think of a single QB in this century who went from decent to great because of a scheme or team change.  Matthew Stafford was great in Detroit but was dismissed by many because of the crappy franchise he played for but he was also great with the Rams, only with a good enough team around him to make him a winner.   Both Alex Smith and Kirk Cousins have been well above average QBs throughout their careers.  They were both better when they were on teams that suited them better scheme and talent wise, but they weren't trash even when they were on lesser teams.

 

In Mayfield's case, as the #1 pick in his draft class, if he's not an elite QB then he's going to be a disappointment.  I think that it's obvious that he isn't going to be elite, and maybe he's not ever going to be better than a Alex Smith or Kirk Cousins level QB, a very good starting NFL QB but not a true franchise QB even as good as Stafford or Ryan or Roethlisberger in their primes.  

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

They better move him now with all of this in the media.  I don't think Baker has the emotional maturity to deal with this kind of situation.  It's going to be a rough year for the Browns if he is still under center for them this season.

 

 

Edited by Inigo Montoya
  • Agree 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Inigo Montoya changed the title to *[EDIT]* Multiple reports Browns actively shopping Mayfield pg. 29/30 - Ravens / Browns in QB contract pickle
6 hours ago, SoTier said:

 

I disagree.  I can't think of a single QB in this century who went from decent to great because of a scheme or team change.  Matthew Stafford was great in Detroit but was dismissed by many because of the crappy franchise he played for but he was also great with the Rams, only with a good enough team around him to make him a winner.   Both Alex Smith and Kirk Cousins have been well above average QBs throughout their careers.  They were both better when they were on teams that suited them better scheme and talent wise, but they weren't trash even when they were on lesser teams.

 

In Mayfield's case, as the #1 pick in his draft class, if he's not an elite QB then he's going to be a disappointment.  I think that it's obvious that he isn't going to be elite, and maybe he's not ever going to be better than a Alex Smith or Kirk Cousins level QB, a very good starting NFL QB but not a true franchise QB even as good as Stafford or Ryan or Roethlisberger in their primes.  

Stafford wasn't great in Detroit, you could certainly argue he was good - to very good but great is a bit of hyperbole.  Brady was great on a pretty average Patriots team and I'd say Rodgers was great on a fair to midling Packers team.

3 hours ago, Inigo Montoya said:

 

They better move him now with all of this in the media.  I don't think Baker has the emotional maturity to deal with this kind of situation.  It's going to be a rough year for the Browns if he is still under center for them this season.

 

 

If you're a Browns fan you'd hope that his struggles have at least humbled him a little bit.   Hue Jackson has to smiling a little bit to himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not a fan of Baker,   wasnt interested even if we'd had the 1st overall pick.    that being said,   he's a good young QB,  who has played reasonably well until last season when OBJ got back on the field,  and Baker got banged up.    he had all sorts of injuries and tried to power through them last season.    if the Browns are looking to move on mbe theres more to it than what we as fans can see,   ill give Baker a pass for last season tho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, HT02 said:

Stafford wasn't great in Detroit, you could certainly argue he was good - to very good but great is a bit of hyperbole.  Brady was great on a pretty average Patriots team and I'd say Rodgers was great on a fair to midling Packers team.

 

 

My point is simply that there haven't been any QBs who improved significantly because they were put in a better scheme -- or even on a better team.  QBs show what they can do early on, and where they are 3 or 4 years into their starting careers is about where their ceiling is.   The best ones may get better because they get smarter with experience, but I don't buy the idea that 5 or 6 years into a career some QB who's been only decent is suddenly going to emerge as an elite talent as a signal caller.  

 

Mayfield hasn't shown a lot of growth as a quarterback or as a leader in his four seasons in Cleveland, especially compared to how much Allen and Jackson have improved since they were all drafted in 2018.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, BillsVet said:

Buffalo got the best QB in the 2018 draft.  Credit to Beane and McCoach.  

 

Now they just gotta start getting UFA right and not over-drafting players who fit McCoach's antiquated and inflexible scheme.  

 

I mean, I understand the desire for improvement but that “antiquated and inflexible scheme” resulted in the #1 scoring defense in the NFL.  I think we’re letting 13 seconds cloud reasonable analysis here.

 

  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, eball said:

 

I mean, I understand the desire for improvement but that “antiquated and inflexible scheme” resulted in the #1 scoring defense in the NFL.  I think we’re letting 13 seconds cloud reasonable analysis here.

 

 

Inflexible maybe. Antiquated, most certainly not. The NFL is now a big play league and the Bills give up the fewest big plays. Fans might not like it stylistically but defenses that are bend but not break and keep everything underneath are exactly where the league is going. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...