Jump to content

GB Packers hire Nate Hackett as OC


YoloinOhio

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Jauronimo said:

I think that whole offense just puked in their mouths after hearing this news.

 

I think all hires are going through Aaron Rodgers.

 

I'm happy for Nate Hackett and I hope he does well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Ice bowl 67 said:

You guys think this was a bad move?

 

Hard to say.  Not sure who he is away from Doug Marrone.  Marrone's offenses were never impressive, with Hackett as OC.  Don't know if that is on Hackett or Marrone.

We'll see how he works with LaFleur.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Happy Gilmore said:

 

Hard to say.  Not sure who he is away from Doug Marrone.  Marrone's offenses were never impressive, with Hackett as OC.  Don't know if that is on Hackett or Marrone.

We'll see how he works with LaFleur.

 

Not to mention, we'll see how it works with a QB who actually belongs in the league as a starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched the press conference where they introduced lafleur. 23 of the 27 minutes were from the CEO, mark murphy. looked as if he wanted to maintain as much power as possible. hiring someone who feels in over there head and will not demand any control of the 53 man roster.

 

That said I'm interested in seeing what hacket can do with a elite QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Logic said:

It is just INSANE to me that the Packers' number 1 objective was "challenge Aaron Rodgers" and "Get him in a modern, innovative offense"....

AND THEY CHOSE NATE HACKETT!!!

The aren't even really words for this type of insanity.

I am without speech.

It really is mind boggling. 

His offenses have been brutal , I guess he had moderate success with Orton , but had Watkins/Woods/Goodwin too.   it's really hard to justify this , downright strange to me they'd link him with an aging Aaron Rodgers. 

Packers fans cannot be happy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Logic said:

Luckily for Pack fans, Matt LeFleur is apparently going to be doing the playcalling. Still, I wouldn't want Hackett's fingerprints anywhere near my offense.

Would love if Hackett was calling plays just to see the look on Rodger's face when the call for the third consecutive dive play comes in from the sidelines.  Forget "pulling a Davis" and retiring at halftime, he'd create a new term and "pull a Rodgers" and retire mid-drive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MJS said:

Surprising for sure, but I never felt like Hackett was the issue here.

 

I used to argue it was Hackett and not EJ - a lot.

 

Took the shock of hearing from some Bills players that EJ could not learn the playbook and that the coaches had to keep dumbing everything down to reading half the field for me to leap off the bandwagon. 

 

We will see what he can do sans Marrone and shoddy QB's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Logic said:

It is just INSANE to me that the Packers' number 1 objective was "challenge Aaron Rodgers" and "Get him in a modern, innovative offense"....

AND THEY CHOSE NATE HACKETT!!!

The aren't even really words for this type of insanity.

I am without speech.

 

They tried that here ,unfortunately ej was terrible.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hackett rehabilitated himself last year when he did a really nice job in Jax. This year while the offense regressed it got obviously a lot worse after Hackett was fired. I am not sure he is necessarily the creative offensive mind Green Bay talked about.... but I think he has improved on the guy he was here in Buffalo. You have to remember that before Marrone hired him to OC here his only NFL coaching experience was as a Quality Control and Assistant QB Coach. And we hired him as QB/OC. He was thrown in totally at the deep end and while he sunk rather than swimming I think he has learnt from the experience.

 

Is Pettine still there? Re-creating the 2013 Bills staff?!

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Nikademus said:

I think Marrone held Hackett back alot. Always wondered to what degree, but my assumption was it was a high one. I'm very curious to see how this goes. Either way we'll have an answer in the near future

That is kind of my opinion.  Hackett is West Coast, so the Packers offense won't be stuck with having to learn a lot of new terminology.  In general, I think Marrone was a lot more conservative than Hackett.  Also, Buffalo was Hackett's first pro gig, while in Jacksonvill, he was saddled with Blake Bortles as his QB.  At the same time he had highly regarded running backs.  It was a no brainer that the Jaguars were going to try and run the ball a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

I gotta say, my first reaction to this news was "so this is how we waste the rest of Aaron Rodgers career"

 

In defense of the move, I seem to recall that after Marrone left, some players claimed Hackett would draw up creative plays every week and put them in the game plan, and Marrone would never use them.

But overall, my reaction was (to Green Bay): "Good Luck, Cupcake!"

 

This was my thought as well.  I remember Hackett brought some creative ideas to the Offensive game plan, and wanted to do some of that super hurry up no huddle offense that was all the rage.  That didn't work because we didn't have the talent (mainly QB) to handle it and Marrone suggest to run run run.

 

I kind of think if you separate the Hackett from the Moron, I mean Marrone, and he might have a better game plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The buddy system in the nfl is awful.  Hackett, who only had a job because his dad, should be coaching in college at best.  He is terrible.  There are probably hundreds of innovative coaches who will never get their shot because they don’t know the right people or daddy couldn’t help them.

 

the worst part is he will do nothing but if Rodgers is Rodgers, he will get talked up. So dumb.

6 hours ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:

 

They tried that here ,unfortunately ej was terrible.

 

 

 

They screwed up any chance EJ had by giving him Nate Hackett as his OC and QB coach.  I love this team but they are so dumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Ice bowl 67 said:

You guys think this was a bad move?

 

who cares what people think on the hiring, I'll let you know if it was a good move in 3 or so years

 

it probably won't lead to 3 Super Bowls by then

 

as if fans of this team can command Ex Cathedra on good hirings...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, buffaloboyinATL said:

There will come a time soon where Hackett will be discussed as one of the up and coming offensive minds in the game and he will be considered for Head Coaching vacancies.  Time will tell if it is merited or not but the Sean McVay effect will get him an opportunity.  

 

"Hi Aaron, I'm the new OC, here's the deal, you run the show 100%"

 

"i will sit there at the 50 reading a paper and drinking coffee."

 

 

He will be a genius

Edited by row_33
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, buffaloboyinATL said:

There will come a time soon where Hackett will be discussed as one of the up and coming offensive minds in the game and he will be considered for Head Coaching vacancies.  Time will tell if it is merited or not but the Sean McVay effect will get him an opportunity.  

Only if he stood in line behind McVay at Starbucks once 

 

seriously though - will there be any more coveted job than that of Zac Taylor’s once he goes to Cincy? It’s like they will wrap the contract around a silver spoon when presenting it. 

Edited by YoloinOhio
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Chuck Wagon said:

You can make a lot of money in the coaching racket just by knowing the right guys at the right time.  I firmly believe there are better OCs miring away at the FCS level than Hackett.  It's more who you know than what you know.

Yup, it’s sad.  Hell, UB’s coach has a better resume than him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...