boyst Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 Would you be tempted? Could you? I won't go into a million hypotheticals but the draft is deep in WR. There are only so many first round grades on WR. This is the top TE in the draft. Now that Knox has restructured maybe he could be traded. 1 1 1 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warriorspikes51 Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 No thanks 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aussie Joe Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 No need to trade Knox … play Bowers TE3 … release Morris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beast Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 What if Caleb Williams is there? About the same chance. 1 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 No. I'd let someone trade up and take him. 5 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweats Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 Are we going back to the old throwback grind it out league where RB's and TE's ruled the field? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMM Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 Moot. Never going to happen. If he starts to drop a team will trade up for him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Tim Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 If he is still available when we can trade up for him I would be very happy with that pick. Josh has shown he can work well with tight ends and he would give us a ton of flexibility on formations. No reason we can't use all three TE at once and use Kincaid and Bower as split out receivers. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJS Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 No. That would be ridiculous. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan2313 Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 no 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptnCoke11 Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 Silly to even think about. He’ll be long gone Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 Would never happen, but if it does, then you trade out of that pick. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 Not interested. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingBoots8 Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 If he’s at 28 you trade back a few spots and go from there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 35 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: No. I'd let someone trade up and take him. Which is why he won’t be there cuz if he starts to slide someone else well before us will trade down with someone going up to get him. He’s a top 10 player in this draft. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 32 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said: If he is still available when we can trade up for him I would be very happy with that pick. Josh has shown he can work well with tight ends and he would give us a ton of flexibility on formations. No reason we can't use all three TE at once and use Kincaid and Bower as split out receivers. gonna really scare defenses with 3 TEs lined up as WRs. How will they cover them? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Utah John Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 First of all Bowers won't be available when we pick, so no. Second, there are too many other positions of need, so no. Third, it would not be fair to DK1 or DK2 to make either of them sit and watch a rookie playing their position. Both DKs are really good, DK2 having the edge over DK1. So no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBFL Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 If King Cade didn’t show what he did last season, sure. The kid looks to be a legit threat in the RZ and middle of the field. Need to get the prototypical X or Z. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papazoid Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 absolutely yes but he wont be there past #15 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GASabresIUFan Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 I love Bowers. As a UGA season ticket holder, I've seen him play many many times. However, we have Kincaid, who is a wonderful TE. No need to draft Bowers if you already have Kincaid. Now if we trade Kincaid, then.......... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 Maybe we call Dallas say sorry about last year but what would you give us to help make it up to you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NORWOODS FOOT Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 He won’t be there. But, yes, due to his special skill set, I would take him. Too good of a player to pass up. Let Joe Brady figure it out. With that much talent it really wouldn’t be that hard. Find the favorable matchup and bleed it till they stop it. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 1 hour ago, GunnerBill said: No. I'd let someone trade up and take him. We did that with Mahomes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papazoid Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 him or kincaid can play wr2....lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoonerBillsFan Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 1 hour ago, boyst said: Would you be tempted? Could you? I won't go into a million hypotheticals but the draft is deep in WR. There are only so many first round grades on WR. This is the top TE in the draft. Now that Knox has restructured maybe he could be traded. Hell no. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KOKBILLS Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 39 minutes ago, boyst said: Would you be tempted? Could you? No and no... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde Smith Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 Nay! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfan89 Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 Unless they feel that Bowers has the ability to play as an outside WR consistently then I would strongly have to think they would pass and more likely trade down to a team looking to snag him. I love the idea of adding an elite talent but you also have to have it make sense for your roster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Your Brown Eye Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 Yes. BPA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanC883 Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 2 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said: Which is why he won’t be there cuz if he starts to slide someone else well before us will trade down with someone going up to get him. He’s a top 10 player in this draft. I agree with this, but the thought exercise I guess is if he is there at 28, what do you do? I'd take him, then grab a WR by trading up in Rd. 2. You'd have a dynamic TE set for the next 4 years, a top WR in Diggs, and another WR in the rookie. Really opens up the offense, IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 2 hours ago, nucci said: gonna really scare defenses with 3 TEs lined up as WRs. How will they cover them? Dont have to cover Knox…. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 3 minutes ago, RyanC883 said: I agree with this, but the thought exercise I guess is if he is there at 28, what do you do? I'd take him, then grab a WR by trading up in Rd. 2. You'd have a dynamic TE set for the next 4 years, a top WR in Diggs, and another WR in the rookie. Really opens up the offense, IMO. I love Bowers as a prospect, sure top 10 guy in this draft, I just think there is no realistic way he ever falls to us, but you never know. So to play your game on the what if he surprises and does, I still say we trade back because I think Beane could get back a premium on someone wanting to move up and get him at that point. Now as far as what I think will happen...I cant see anyway he would get past Cincy at 18 and if he somehow did, then several of the teams between Bengals and us would also have a high chance to grab him or someone will trade up like say a KC to grab him as an heir apparent to Kelce who is a key position in their offense and probably in the last year there. He is without a doubt a top 10 prospect overall, just depends on how a team values the TE position. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rigotz Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 So ... We just agreed to a re-worked deal for Knox so he's here long term ... And we just drafted another Tight End with our 1st rounder ... And Brock Bowers has zero chance of going outside the top 20 ... YES, PERFECT FIT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinky finger Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 1 hour ago, Your Brown Eye said: Yes. BPA. Uncanny discipline on your part Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsbackto81 Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 GET OUT!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frostbitmic Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 Brady will just have to design a 3TE Offense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donuts and Doritos Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 (edited) Sure, does he play WR-2 or DT for us? Edited March 11 by Donuts and Doritos Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted March 11 Author Share Posted March 11 3 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said: I love Bowers as a prospect, sure top 10 guy in this draft, I just think there is no realistic way he ever falls to us, but you never know. So to play your game on the what if he surprises and does, I still say we trade back because I think Beane could get back a premium on someone wanting to move up and get him at that point. Now as far as what I think will happen...I cant see anyway he would get past Cincy at 18 and if he somehow did, then several of the teams between Bengals and us would also have a high chance to grab him or someone will trade up like say a KC to grab him as an heir apparent to Kelce who is a key position in their offense and probably in the last year there. He is without a doubt a top 10 prospect overall, just depends on how a team values the TE position. I keep playing mock drafts against real people or just the computer. Every once in a while he's there. And sometimes just before us and Cinci passes. it won't be real but it's a good thought exercise. Id be very curious to see what we would do and if we got him what move is next. Knox plus pick to move up in 2 for a WR? Thought exercises and experiments are provocative. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 11 minutes ago, boyst said: I keep playing mock drafts against real people or just the computer. Every once in a while he's there. And sometimes just before us and Cinci passes. it won't be real but it's a good thought exercise. Id be very curious to see what we would do and if we got him what move is next. Knox plus pick to move up in 2 for a WR? Thought exercises and experiments are provocative. If we took Bowers then traded Knox to move back up in the 2nd and get someone like McConkey, Coleman, Pearsall, Polk, Franklin, etc...then I would lose my sh*t in excitement. First of all, if we miss out on either Thomas or Mitchell in the first, I would rather trade back and pick up an extra 3rd or something instead of reaching at 28, and grab one of those other WR's with the pick we traded back to. But if we could get Bowers and move Knox and still get one of those WR's then Beane is a god. Again, I think there is 0% of any of that happening...but lets say we did take Bowers, would you trade Kincaid who would fetch far better trade value than Knox? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from NYC Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 6 hours ago, boyst said: Would you be tempted? Could you? I won't go into a million hypotheticals but the draft is deep in WR. There are only so many first round grades on WR. This is the top TE in the draft. Now that Knox has restructured maybe he could be traded. There is a greater possibility of me getting a date with Margot Robbie than Bowers being there when we pick. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.