boyst

It's a weird position people back then into but everyone doubles down. Both Douglas and Hamlin had problems last year. They're mutually exclusice.

1) Andy Reid son has been sober and homicide free for over a year 2) none of their fans have got high and froze to death that we know about 3) they have acceptance toward those who commit crimes

And Douglas as a big dime is a-ok with me.

there is a great documentary on him to watch if anyone wants to learn baout how fascinating he is

so how do we fix judge shopping? what is the correct answer for the guy deported?

So the first judges ruling was ignored and a second judge came in and deemed it that he may stay. So, judge shopping and getting the favorable rule is acceptable? The guy committed a crime and was allowed to continue living in the US based on an individuals interpretation. The judge concluded he alone may decide this fate despite. The legistative branch, in your opinion, did not get the law right to the tinyith t being crossed therefore all else is moot. That the system was not allowed to carry out its fully due process through trial, review, and appeal. Does this belief carry through in all cases involving politics? To say that OJ is innocent, Trump did not commit any crimes related to January 6th, Clinton didn't committ crimes, and Nixon was innocent of all activities?

The original interpretation deemed him to be in violation of the law of immigration thus he was subject to removal by the law. The judge later determined that his interpretation of the law let him decide to circumvent the written law. If you believe this is permissible than you are deciding that any judge is capable of overriding both the executive and legislative branch, correct?

There isn't a narrative and it's not about insults. It's about taking the time to get to your discussion when I'm done with round. And for the record, it will confuse roundy but I am not in favor of all of the ways the immigration law is used. Who's to say that my great great grandpa didn't illegally enter the country in 1806 and thus i am illegal and should be deported to Hungary? Or that my grandma may have been in the Crypts so I am of criminal origin and can be deported? So the interpretation of the law set him to be incarcerated for a crime for being here illegally to which the punishment or justice is to be removed from the territorial property of the US?

Rip Iceman you were a real genius.

I asked a question. Does a judge have the ability to change the laws of the United States?

I am not going walk into two arguments making the same point to two individuals both interested in different topics. Round is about as intelligent as a 9 yr old with a pocket knife high on soda pop. However, he's not very honest so I have to handle him with special care. An argument on multiple fronts is difficult to defend a position when a special needs student is hurling spitballs at the chalkboard and someone else tries to discuss this on a more rational level Regardless, the guy has shown to be a judicial risk, a flight risk, evidence shows he is a gang member as well. Since 2012 he's been in the system. He should have long been removed. There is no reason to wait any longer. The bells and whistles about who he may be or what affiliations he has aren't that important. He may have knocked up some dumb broad and may have a poor child in this world who will never know their father. That's not anyone else's fault but his father's and mother's. The world ain't nice, it sucks, but this dude should have been thrown out in 2012 when it was found he broke the law.

Does a judge have the ability to change the laws of the United States? Hold on, sweetie. I'm dealing with one simpleton at a time.

Which laws are not being bound to with respect to deporting an illegal immigrant?

I, like you read headlines, when I saw it was you typing I stopped reading and pretend the rest of what you said fits my narrative like the supposed innocent man taken to el Salvador who was here totally legally and by pprt of entry..

No I don't. I want the states to have ultimate power and the feds to be an arbitrary factor to settle a few things. The fed handles foreign trade, interstate commerce, and national defense. But this is not what I want. You want a court order to mandate the guy is legally in this country, yes? That decision by the court to veto any executive action?