boyst

I don't need a *~~😇😇Feel♥️Good♥️Story😇😇~~*. I need a hard nosed football player. Good for this dude but play ball.

He's talented as a backup QB. The next Tyrod.

Patty loveless - 455 rocket. Helluva car

Mercury Blues - Alan Jackson - Mercury Run - George Strait - Chevy The One I Love - George Jones - Corvette The Car - Jeff Carson - Mustang Pickup Man - Joe Diffie - Coup DeVille (coincidentally doesn't mention a truck brand or type at all) That Ain't My Truck - Rhett Atkins - Chevy Those are just off the top of my head. Want more?

Got 3 more 1) the fans of the Chiefs have come into the sport faster and with more victories than any other team since the Patriots, as they discovered football 5 years ago 2) Travis Kelce-Swift fans have single handedly boosted pharmacy stock 50% 3) thanks to the chiefs most of us realize that Kansas City is in Kansas... Or Missouri. We aren't really sure but we don't care, actually.

Douglas is 6'2, 210. If we can get him the IV we have Poyer to get that dawg blood in him than it could be amazing. With his size he can still offer something in the big dime corner for certain downs in specific schemes. At 30 it'd be hard pressed to talk him into that or get him willing to sacrifice his body. But, if he could, he could surely play the small field in the middle to cover the 2TE or others.

It's a weird position people back then into but everyone doubles down. Both Douglas and Hamlin had problems last year. They're mutually exclusice.

1) Andy Reid son has been sober and homicide free for over a year 2) none of their fans have got high and froze to death that we know about 3) they have acceptance toward those who commit crimes

And Douglas as a big dime is a-ok with me.

there is a great documentary on him to watch if anyone wants to learn baout how fascinating he is

so how do we fix judge shopping? what is the correct answer for the guy deported?

So the first judges ruling was ignored and a second judge came in and deemed it that he may stay. So, judge shopping and getting the favorable rule is acceptable? The guy committed a crime and was allowed to continue living in the US based on an individuals interpretation. The judge concluded he alone may decide this fate despite. The legistative branch, in your opinion, did not get the law right to the tinyith t being crossed therefore all else is moot. That the system was not allowed to carry out its fully due process through trial, review, and appeal. Does this belief carry through in all cases involving politics? To say that OJ is innocent, Trump did not commit any crimes related to January 6th, Clinton didn't committ crimes, and Nixon was innocent of all activities?

The original interpretation deemed him to be in violation of the law of immigration thus he was subject to removal by the law. The judge later determined that his interpretation of the law let him decide to circumvent the written law. If you believe this is permissible than you are deciding that any judge is capable of overriding both the executive and legislative branch, correct?

There isn't a narrative and it's not about insults. It's about taking the time to get to your discussion when I'm done with round. And for the record, it will confuse roundy but I am not in favor of all of the ways the immigration law is used. Who's to say that my great great grandpa didn't illegally enter the country in 1806 and thus i am illegal and should be deported to Hungary? Or that my grandma may have been in the Crypts so I am of criminal origin and can be deported? So the interpretation of the law set him to be incarcerated for a crime for being here illegally to which the punishment or justice is to be removed from the territorial property of the US?

Rip Iceman you were a real genius.