Jump to content

TheWei44

Community Member
  • Posts

    358
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Fields

  • Location
    Cincinnati and DC

Recent Profile Visitors

814 profile views

TheWei44's Achievements

Rookie

Rookie (4/8)

298

Reputation

  1. As much as I liked how Brady did, those bubble screens to Diggs behind the LOS made no sense to me. Diggs has never been a "yards after catch" guy for the most part, and he's not built nor is he comfortable being essentially a running back in my view. He is not always averse to contact but there are plenty of plays where he avoids it. I'm guessing one or more drops on those screens was hearing the footsteps of the defenders. I am all for trying new things, but I was never a fan of those bubble screens to Diggs.
  2. The more interesting question, perhaps, is what did Tampa/Brady/defense do to beat the Chiefs with Mahomes in the Super Bowl?! Maybe a blueprint for us? I'm mostly kidding, but it's one stark example of Chiefs with Mahomes failing/having a bad game in the playoffs!
  3. Completely agree! But that's also besides the point. There's a tendency to focus on one or two plays and say if such and such had happened or didn't happen, then the outcome of the game would have been different. Except for the literal last play of the game, when the result may determine the game, all other individual plays are just part of the mosaic of the game, if you will. It's a little pet peeve of mine when someone says (not you specifically) essentially that if the 21nd play of the game had turned out differently, then we would have won (where that play might have been a pick six or just a pick or a missed FG). But the rest of the game from that point forward would have been different too so you can't assume everything else would have stayed the same . . .
  4. All the plays in a game by both teams determines the winner. Sure, some plays matter more than others, but wins and losses generally cannot be distilled to the result of one or two plays. For example, when Mahomes threw a TD pass to a wide-open Kelsey in the endzone, was that the reason we lost? Of course not. But it didn't help either and the ease with which the Chiefs moved the ball was a big reason we lost the game. We lost because the sum of their plays was a little bit better than the sum of our plays.
  5. Realize this is probably not a serious idea, but it'd be like asking the former CEO of Coca Cola (who was in charge when the stock went up 100X) if he'd be interested in being the CFO or COO of Pepsico. Why would anyone ever make a move like that? Or asking a former US president to be a VP. Has never happened and would basically never happen.
  6. Very sorry to hear the news, Scott. You and your family will continue to be in our thoughts and prayers and appreciate your thoughtful words as the top of this thread.
  7. We'll include you and your family in our nightly prayers. So sorry that you're having to go through this.
  8. Having an odd number of regular season games (17) and an odd number of playoff teams per conference is just strange (even putting aside all the other good reasons to have e.g. 16 games per season and 6 playoff teams with 2 getting byes). What other major sports league plays an odd number of games?! I guess the other three main leagues play so many more games, and so it's much easier to have an even number. But still, I find 17 games per season just really strange. It had always been an even number!
  9. I have a 13 yr old son too, and we live in Cincinnati but he's a Bills "superfan" - Wears a Bills sweatshirt to school every day in the winter. I have a signed OJ + others football (long story!), a local friend here who went to St Joes and then played hockey at Miami (OH!) generously pulled some strings to get my son a signed Damar jersey - Great stuff! But I can relate to what you're describing above with your son and family. I have felt guilty myself for my role in passing down the Bills tradition! My son was very, very upset last night, and it was hard to witness as a dad. But some of the bonding moments we've shared have been great too. My son hasn't wanted to change his fanhood, but if he did, I'd be 100% accepting of it. It's a personal choice and not a life or death choice or one that needs parental involvement. So I'd like to think I'd let him part ways with the Bills and let him root for whichever team he wants to root for (kids don't have a lot of opportunities to make their own choices, so this might be a good opportunity to do so). Just my 2 cents. Good luck and Go Bills!
  10. Totally agree with all of this. I'd add bad special teams play as another reason we lost but that was less of a factor than the injuries on D. I expected a close game and was bracing myself for this sort of outcome. Very bummed but I guess it's true that only one team and its fans will be happy in the end. Go Bills and there's always next year!
  11. The one thing I'll say re your 1) above is that we were in "playoff mode" with our backs against the wall. That's when we generally loosen the reins on Josh and let him run. So not sure we can credit that change to the coaching change per se. Even if Dorsey stayed on, my guess is that we'd need to allow Josh to run more since we were in survival mode.
  12. A Bills blowout would be nice, but I'm expecting a tight game played by teams that are practically divisional rivals these days. The crowd will make a big difference, and I like how Josh has been handling cover zero, etc. type situations lately. Both Josh and Patty are masters at improvisation but with different styles (Josh will run through people and has a size advantage and Patty is maybe a tad more elusive but he can't break through tackles like Josh can). I expect a slugfest. Probably the wrong game to give up quaaludes!
  13. I had the same thought but probably just coincidental (given our need to make roster moves)
×
×
  • Create New...