Jump to content

Shaq over Murphy, Right?


Dkollidas

Recommended Posts

Especially after this season, the way both have played, I assume they’ll try to re-sign Shaq, as long as he wants to be here, and cut ties with Murphy.

 

Shaq will basically take Murphy’s salary position on the team. 

 

Draft a DE in the 1st or 2nd round, and sign a lower priced UFA (Vic Beasley?).

 

Hughes/Draft-Pick

Lawson/UFA

 

seems like a much better way to have the defensive ends going forward. 

  • Like (+1) 14
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Dkollidas said:

Especially after this season, the way both have played, I assume they’ll try to re-sign Shaq, as long as he wants to be here, and cut ties with Murphy.

 

Shaq will basically take Murphy’s salary position on the team. 

 

Draft a DE in the 1st or 2nd round, and sign a lower priced UFA (Vic Beasley?).

 

Hughes/Draft-Pick

Lawson/UFA

 

seems like a much better way to have the defensive ends going forward. 

Murphy is one of worst signing in Beane era next to Star who combined rake in about 20million,  gas them both and use money on Shaq and another free agent.  Those two get destroyed on running plays

Edited by Niagara Dude
  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How much do they save cutting Murphy?

Lawson is having a good year. Is this good year due to steady progression or is it motivated by a contract? Either way I think Lawson is a very good rotational player. What’s that cost? $7m or $12m? 
I do like drafting a DE early. I think DE/CB will be the Bills first two picks depending on value. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Dkollidas said:

Especially after this season, the way both have played, I assume they’ll try to re-sign Shaq, as long as he wants to be here, and cut ties with Murphy.

 

Shaq will basically take Murphy’s salary position on the team. 

 

Draft a DE in the 1st or 2nd round, and sign a lower priced UFA (Vic Beasley?).

 

Hughes/Draft-Pick

Lawson/UFA

 

seems like a much better way to have the defensive ends going forward. 

 

 Shaq has been playing like a man with a contract negotiation coming 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Shaq is a RDE.  I’ve only seen him make 1 play on the left side this season.  Everything else comes from the right or DT. I like him, but I don’t think he’s a fit for us unless we plan on keeping him as a RDE.  

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, twist_to_open said:

Anybody know Murphy's contact without me having to look it up? Does it go past this year?

Over the cap has the savings at 7.2  million with 1.75 mill in dead money if we cut him in 2020, not sure about the post June 1st cut that option never seems to work on that site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it’s one or the other, Shaq all day long. He actually makes plays. I hope his progress continues and he's not just a contract year one-year-wonder. This is where you have to know the man, not just the player.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Niagara Dude said:

Murphy is one of worst signing in Beane era next to Star who combined rake in about 20million,  gas them both and use money on Shaq and another free agent.  Those two get destroyed on running plays

 

2 minutes ago, suorangefan4 said:

Neither are that good.

 

People seriously are going overboard after Shaq got 2 sacks on Sunday. 2 sacks where the offensive line didn't even put a single blocker on him and let him come in untouched. Murphy or anyone else would've gotten those sacks too.

 

You know I probably should just let them slide but are we really complaining about the 3rd ranked defense?  3rd in ppg, 3rd in ypg, 3rd in passing yards per game, and gasp 14th in rushing yards per game.  They are top 5 in 3 categories and top half of the league in the other category.

 

With 90 million in cap space there is no need to move on from Star or Trent.  There is money to spend on Shaq and Jordan Phillips and others who need to be re-signed.  There is still money to add players as well.  No reason to cut players and create holes in a very good defense.

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any DE will be upgrade over Murphy. No sacks, abosulutely invisible all season. 

If Beane finds in free agency and draft a dominatnt DE , upgrades for Star and Levi , 3rd LB on level with Edmunds and Milano = this defence will destroy every opponent next year.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, suorangefan4 said:

Neither are that good.

 

People seriously are going overboard after Shaq got 2 sacks on Sunday. 2 sacks where the offensive line didn't even put a single blocker on him and let him come in untouched. Murphy or anyone else would've gotten those sacks too.

 

Murphy is useless. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In still think we can upgrade Shaq..he has done well lately but not convinced to throw lot of money at him. It looked twice Broncos forgot to block him. He hasn't really stood out for me and considering this is his contract year you expect a player to do well. I have to look at his overall play last couple years included. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, billsfan714 said:

Over the cap has the savings at 7.2  million with 1.75 mill in dead money if we cut him in 2020, not sure about the post June 1st cut that option never seems to work on that site.

 

Use Spotrac.  I believe it's a much better site.

Click the Red X on the right of the year to see details.

No change if Murphy is cut after June 1st.

 

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/buffalo-bills/trent-murphy-14456/

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, suorangefan4 said:

Neither are that good.

 

People seriously are going overboard after Shaq got 2 sacks on Sunday. 2 sacks where the offensive line didn't even put a single blocker on him and let him come in untouched. Murphy or anyone else would've gotten those sacks too.

 

Shaq's been solid, if unspectacular, all season.  He's reminding me of Phil Hansen - the sort of player that'll never be an All-Pro, but that you can rely on to consistently do the job.  A good team needs a lot of players like that. 

 

Murphy...the only time I've noticed him the past few weeks was in blown coverage that had me saying "Oh yeah, I forgot about him...why is he dropped back in to coverage?"

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, billsfan714 said:

Over the cap has the savings at 7.2  million with 1.75 mill in dead money if we cut him in 2020, not sure about the post June 1st cut that option never seems to work on that site.

Not quite sure about Shaq yet, but saving 7.2M....we need to show Murphy the door.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, section122 said:

With 90 million in cap space there is no need to move on from Star or Trent.

 

Without getting into the merits of Murphy or Star, players need to contribute to the level of whatever remains on their contracts.  This should be true regardless of how much cap space the Bills are saving for White, Allen, Murphy, Phillips, and a Superbowl run.  Better to carry dead cap then dead weight.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NewEra said:

I think Shaq is a RDE.  I’ve only seen him make 1 play on the left side this season.  Everything else comes from the right or DT. I like him, but I don’t think he’s a fit for us unless we plan on keeping him as a RDE.  

This is correct, but I wouldn't be shocked if Hughes was cut (if no paycut)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, suorangefan4 said:

Neither are that good.

 

People seriously are going overboard after Shaq got 2 sacks on Sunday. 2 sacks where the offensive line didn't even put a single blocker on him and let him come in untouched. Murphy or anyone else would've gotten those sacks too.

True but at this point Shaq is the better player. But keep in mind Murphy already got paid and Shaq is trying to. Who knows what his motivation will be like once he cashes in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Mike in Horseheads said:

Shaq was a bust to many b4 the season including management since they didn't pick up the option. I doubt he will give the home town discount now

"Murphy" was a full episode of Seinfeld.  .... or sorry I don't know the other guy your talking about

It doesn't make you a bust if your option isn't picked up. You just failed to meet expectations. Like Shaq, you can still be a serviceable player. Not his fault he was over drafted.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, section122 said:

 

 

You know I probably should just let them slide but are we really complaining about the 3rd ranked defense?  3rd in ppg, 3rd in ypg, 3rd in passing yards per game, and gasp 14th in rushing yards per game.  They are top 5 in 3 categories and top half of the league in the other category.

 

With 90 million in cap space there is no need to move on from Star or Trent.  There is money to spend on Shaq and Jordan Phillips and others who need to be re-signed.  There is still money to add players as well.  No reason to cut players and create holes in a very good defense.

I don’t see any reason to keep Trent. You can save $7.2M by releasing him. That feels like a no-brainer. He’s a bad player. You can get equal or better production for half the price. Regardless of the cap space they already have there is zero reason for Trent Murphy to be on this team in 2020. The same goes for Kroft and Spencer Long imo (there is another $9Mish in those 2).

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

 

That implies he was dogging it previously and likely will do so after new con tract, no?

Not necessarily. Young players do get better with more experience. And players in general get better with good coaching and being placed in a better position to succeed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JohnC said:

Not necessarily. Young players do get better with more experience. And players in general get better with good coaching and being placed in a better position to succeed. 

 

 

All true...but not what I was responding to.

 

Poster implied player was turning up this game because of an upcoming potential contract negotiation, not for the reasons you listed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

 

All true...but not what I was responding to.

 

Poster implied player was turning up this game because of an upcoming potential contract negotiation, not for the reasons you listed.

Without question players do turn up their game when a contract is coming up. That happens in all sports. Getting better with experience and having a financial incentive to get better for the next contract are not mutually exclusive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JohnC said:

Without question players do turn up their game when a contract is coming up. That happens in all sports. Getting better with experience and having a financial incentive to get better for the next contract are not mutually exclusive. 

 

 

I disagree.  Allowing for improvement over years (Lawson has been around for 4 years now, underperforming), if I'm a GM and I think a player is turning it on to cash in, then I would be right to suspect he will turn it down after cashing in. 

 

In fact, by saying that they turn up their game explicitly says they made a decision to play harder than if it was not a contract year.  Don't want that guy.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...