Jump to content

chiefs Kelce will be 34 yrs old. How much longer can he turn in over 1000 yrd. does Kincaid=Kelce?


Coldfronts

Recommended Posts

  • Coldfronts changed the title to chiefs Kelce will be 34 yrs old. How much longer can he turn in over 1000 yrd. does Kincaid=Kelce?

Seems like we were saying the same thing about Brady when he turned 30. And he continued to burn us for a decade plus longer. 
 

obviously TE is a different position. But Kelce plays it at such a high level still thinks he has 4 years at least as long as the chiefs are willing to pay him

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He creates the same kind of match-up problems for defenses as Kelce.  Kelce is such a generational talent that it's way too early for an apples-to-apples comparison - but Kincaid has very a very similar skillset and could be the same kind of asset for Allen.

 

Kelce is still playing at a high level.  We'll have to deal w/ him for at least another 2-3 years, imo.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Coldfronts said:

https://www.si.com/nfl/chiefs/gm-report/kc-chiefs-te-travis-kelce-shares-thoughts-on-retirement-in-recent-interview

He is a large part of thier offense. If he retires or production drops so goes the chiefs offense.  

 

True the Chiefs could never win a SB after they lost a guy who had 24% of their targets....

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate making comparisons of a draft pick to a great well established player in the NFL.  Remember when a lot of people compared Oliver to the next Donald.

 

How’d that go?  He was doomed from the jump.  So this why I’m not dooming Kincaid saying he’s the next Kelce.  Just like a garbage truck beeping, slow the roll.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably another 2-3 years at least. Has shown no sign of slowing down...

 

Think we are going to continue to see athletes extending their prime years later and later into their careers as they continue to focus on taking care of their bodies through proper nutrition, proper rest and recovery, new sports science that helps them and teams prevent overtraining and injuries, proper workouts and medical advances that repair their bodies better and better.

 

More athletes than ever before hire personal chefs for their nutrition, have pods for their recovery, ice baths, etc etc down the long list of things they do to keep themselves in peak condition as long as possible. They have begun treating their off field regimen with as much importance as their on field regimen and that has not always been the case.

 

Athletes near their peak into their mid 30s or possibly even late 30s in rare cases will start to become the norm rather than the exception, IMO.

Edited by Big Turk
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 947 said:

Well Kelce didn't even have a target his rookie year, he played only 1 game on special teams. So here's hoping Kincaid can have a much better start to his career.

 

 

What's remarkable is that the reason he only played 1 game is that he had a season ending injury immediately in year 1.   Now he's Mr. Durable at one of the toughest positions to stay healthy at in football.   Those guys take a beating.   He's cracked the code in this regard.   TE's entering the league should be looking as much at how he stays healthy as any aspect.   Some of it is probably genetics........his brother is durable too.........but there is more to it than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kelce can definitely go another 2-3 years I think. It’s also silly to compare Kincaid to Kelce. Didn’t y’all learn to stop these years ago, most recently Ed Oliver being comped with Aaron Donald. Talk about setting yourself up for disappointment. Just let these kids play and make their own names instead of putting hall of fame standards on them. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BillsSbSoon said:

He turned 24 during his rookie year as will Kincaid. Same month too. So both were older rookies. Pretty interesting that that’s the case


That is very interesting. Only real difference is Kincaid has an established QB and Kelce had a young QB in Mahomes. Let’s hope Kincaid starts off with a bang with Josh. 

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kelce is a first ballot HOFer and maybe a top 3 TE of all time. Those are huge shoes to fill. If Kincaid can develop into a Greg Olsen type guy then I’ll be plenty happy. 

37 minutes ago, Rc2catch said:

Kelce can definitely go another 2-3 years I think. It’s also silly to compare Kincaid to Kelce. Didn’t y’all learn to stop these years ago, most recently Ed Oliver being comped with Aaron Donald. Talk about setting yourself up for disappointment. Just let these kids play and make their own names instead of putting hall of fame standards on them. 

Easily. Tight Ends have a shelf life compared to QBs. Guys like Witten, Tony G, Gates all played well into their late 30s. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys are too much. "Whoever the Bills pick is the best player at that position in NFL history." If things work out well he's probably the next TJ Hockenson. Nobody is Kelce and absolutely not Gronk. He's the size of Gronk's right butt cheek

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, NewEra said:

I’d say he has 2-3 more years of elite play as long as Reid is there.  I see him playing til 38ish. 
 

He’s such a stud. I have nothing but respect for that guy. 

And he's managed to stay pretty healthy especially for a big guy that takes on a lot of contact.  Think of other top TEs. Waller and Kittle miss a bit of time. Gronk was routinely a walking MASH unit. 

 

As much as I think they guy comes off like a complete tool as a person (though I have heard he's actually very likeable when not on camera) I have to respect his durability and toughness.

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At 6'5"  and 250 lbs, Kelce is bigger than Kincaid.  While Kincaid is said to be a physical guy who excels in running after the catch, Kelce is still going to have more power given the size difference.  That does not mean that he can't be an explosive receiving tight end and have s similar role to Kelce.  No guarantee he will be either.  We can hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, wppete said:

Still blown away KC didn’t trade up and go after Kincaid. If he ended up there it would’ve been scary.

No surprise at all. Not a position of need for KC. Kelce has a few years to go and there’s a couple of promising guys in the stable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will Kincaid be probably the best TE in NFL history like Kelce?

 

Probably not. Let's just start with him becoming a regular contributor on offense before we start making Kelce comparisons.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...