Jump to content

Man just about every single person on ESPN picking the Bengals


78thealltimegreat

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

 

This is exactly why shows and sports media outlets have their talent and writers make picks on every game every weekend.  Who is going to post things about a show where no one makes a pick every week?

 

It's pretty standard stuff.  It's obviously entertainment.

 

Of course it is.  There is so many sports shows that the material is so diluted they have to do things to "keep peoples attention".

It's why we have "clickbait".

Having everyone "pick" the winner helps with the gambling too.  Everyone's an expert.

I can care less about this stuff and probably shouldn't have even posted, but it's so unimportant.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, nucci said:

as were we

Not really.  The Dolphins were very fortunate to be in the game at all.  We dominated them to the tune of a +200 yardage advantage.

 

The Bengals, on the other hand, were actually dominated by the Ravens who outgained them by 130 yards (second straight week that the Bengals failed to clear the 300 total yard mark).  

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheBrownBear said:

Not really.  The Dolphins were very fortunate to be in the game at all.  We dominated them to the tune of a +200 yardage advantage.

 

The Bengals, on the other hand, were actually dominated by the Ravens who outgained them by 130 yards (second straight week that the Bengals failed to clear the 300 total yard mark).  

we were still fortunate to win against an inferior opponent regardless of the stats. Dolphins had ball at midfield down by 3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, nucci said:

we were still fortunate to win against an inferior opponent regardless of the stats. Dolphins had ball at midfield down by 3

My point is that it took a fluke-like performance (multiple turnovers, drops and special teams gaffes) to keep Miami in that game.  The Bills dominated the line of scrimmage and were clearly the superior team.  The Bengals game was essentially the opposite, with Cincy in the Miami role and just having enough juice to take advantage of the Ravens' errors.  Cincy was fortunate that the Ravens handed them the game in the 4th quarter.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, ColoradoBills said:

 

Of course it is.  There is so many sports shows that the material is so diluted they have to do things to "keep peoples attention".

It's why we have "clickbait".

Having everyone "pick" the winner helps with the gambling too.  Everyone's an expert.

I can care less about this stuff and probably shouldn't have even posted, but it's so unimportant.

 

Neither is CBS's entire non-football lineup (for example).   You see those commercials for their shows during the games and wonder: who is watching this stuff??

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Yobogoya! said:

The Bengals have played more mistake-free football than the Bills by a wide margin, and if the game becomes a shootout the Bengals have two elite weapons (Chase, Boyd) compared to our one (Diggs).

 

Can’t hate on anyone on the outside who picks them in this game, there’s enough objective reasons to justify it. 🤷‍♂️

 

Sure, you can make a case for them to win but that is the prevailing thought.  The Bills are clearly the better team, almost all advanced stats, the record and the fact that we have Josh Allen and they don't dictate that we should win, hence the oddsmakers making this a 5.5 spread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Yobogoya! said:

The Bengals have played more mistake-free football than the Bills by a wide margin, and if the game becomes a shootout the Bengals have two elite weapons (Chase, Boyd) compared to our one (Diggs).

 

Can’t hate on anyone on the outside who picks them in this game, there’s enough objective reasons to justify it. 🤷‍♂️

 

Tell me more about this "wide margin"

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Media may seem that they are favoring Cincinnati Bengals because the ones choosing Bengals are the most vocal. They make the most noise. Also, they're trying to garner clicks and ratings for their show; whatever they're on.

 

The more noise they make, the more likely all that noise for Bengals gonna back fire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Captain_Quint said:

I would rather be the underdog in the media, it seems to help Josh get over the pressure a little bit. 

 

 

Josh doesn't have any problem with pressure...he was slinging it all over the place on Sunday.  The turnovers were bad but none were "awful" mistakes by Josh.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Success said:

Every narrative I read now is "bumbling Allen."   The Bills COULD win, but our many turnovers will result in a loss.

 

Give me a break.  He was perfect in the postseason last year.  The team got all of their mistakes out of the way against Miami.

 

I'm not usually one to be over-confident, but I don't think this one is particularly close, especially w/ Cincy's O-line situation.  We're going to look like we did for some of those games in September & October.

 

The narrative about a bumbling Allen is correct, sorry, I know it is a bummer but it is real.  

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. WEO said:

there's absolutely massive pressure on the Bills to at least get to the AFCC game.  

As there should be....McDermott has to get over the hump or risk wasting peak josh allen 🤔..Daboll goes to Giants,turns Danny Dimes into a josh allen clone and is front runner for coach of the year after going into Minnesota and knocking vikes out with a receiver McDermott didn't even think was good enough to be on our roster 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RoyBatty is alive said:

The narrative about a bumbling Allen is correct, sorry, I know it is a bummer but it is real.  

 

Balderdash.  "Bumbling" Allen made about five or six throws in that game no other NFL QB even attempts.  Brown cut off his route on the first INT, Beasley had the ball bounce off his chest on the 2nd, and Josh was blindsided to lose the fumble for the third TO.  In exactly what way is Josh "bumbling."  These are clownish takes.

 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

SHOCKER 

 

😲

8 minutes ago, RoyBatty is alive said:

The narrative about a bumbling Allen is correct, sorry, I know it is a bummer but it is real.  

So is it the case that every time he throws an interception, we're right back to he's regressing and playing like his rookie year again (when he had absolutely nothing on offense) ?

 

Or is this really based on the Miami game, because the week before against the Patriots nobody seemed to have a problem with the deep balls? 

 

So really, what we have is, he better play perfect. 

 

Checkdowns, mixed with deep shots, need him to run, but also slide, need him to not get conservative, but we need to score 30+ as well to make ourselves feel good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, eball said:

 

Balderdash.  "Bumbling" Allen made about five or six throws in that game no other NFL QB even attempts.  Brown cut off his route on the first INT, Beasley had the ball bounce off his chest on the 2nd, and Josh was blindsided to lose the fumble for the third TO.  In exactly what way is Josh "bumbling."  These are clownish takes.

 

Correct imo

 

Bills had two TEs lined up over that blitz and Allen's progression started to the other side of the field

 

Have to think one of them missed their assignment to stay in and block

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, eball said:

 

Balderdash.  "Bumbling" Allen made about five or six throws in that game no other NFL QB even attempts.  Brown cut off his route on the first INT, Beasley had the ball bounce off his chest on the 2nd, and Josh was blindsided to lose the fumble for the third TO.  In exactly what way is Josh "bumbling."  These are clownish takes.

 

2 ints and three fumbles, be in denial all you want to.  Yes int one was off Beasley, and one fumble he wasnt even touched and lost the bal...it is football. How about the Minnesota game, was that not bumbling?    Not clownish takes at all, factual realistic takes.

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Yobogoya! said:

The Bengals have played more mistake-free football than the Bills by a wide margin, and if the game becomes a shootout the Bengals have two elite weapons (Chase, Boyd) compared to our one (Diggs).

 

Can’t hate on anyone on the outside who picks them in this game, there’s enough objective reasons to justify it. 🤷‍♂️

Is Boyd elite?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Straight Hucklebuck said:

SHOCKER 

 

😲

So is it the case that every time he throws an interception, we're right back to he's regressing and playing like his rookie year again (when he had absolutely nothing on offense) ?

 

Or is this really based on the Miami game, because the week before against the Patriots nobody seemed to have a problem with the deep balls? 

 

So really, what we have is, he better play perfect. 

 

Checkdowns, mixed with deep shots, need him to run, but also slide, need him to not get conservative, but we need to score 30+ as well to make ourselves feel good. 

 Did I write he was regressing; did I say he had to be perfect, no so don't put words.

 

The narrative of "bumbling" exists because it is real.  If you can't be intellectually honest about it just put me on ignore.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...