Jump to content

Haack restructures contract


YoloinOhio

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, MrEpsYtown said:

I think they want to draft a punter. You can’t go into the draft with with nobody on the roster and people knowing you need a guy, so keeping Haack on the roster feels like a safety net and a bit of a smokescreen. Its a pay cut, essentially. 

Plus, injuries do happen in camp or the regular season. He might not be a bad add midseason….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, IronMaidenBills said:


People on here tell me we have a top 5 NFL roster, how can that be true if we have a punter that’s ranking last in some punting metrics? 

It’s true. A bad punter who can be replaced ruins the whole roster, and makes Josh Allen and diggs useless. It is actually grounds for firing McDermott, Beane, Frazier, and the Pegulas should sell the team because of it.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Big Turk said:

 

Typically with other players when they did this last year they also guaranteed the contract in exchange for him accepting less money. 

 

If this is the case, there is no way he is getting cut.

 

I don't think this is relevant. It is such a small guarantee, they will cut him eventually imo. He is the fall back plan in case they can't get their guy imo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MWK said:

He is the worst punter in the league. Why would we ever keep him? I hope we bring in some legit competition so we don’t have to deal with this idiot for another year.

After the crying in the Kumerow thread, I am reaching the conclusion that's an acronym for

More Whiny Kvetching.

  • Haha (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MrEpsYtown said:

I think they want to draft a punter. You can’t go into the draft with with nobody on the roster and people knowing you need a guy, so keeping Haack on the roster feels like a safety net and a bit of a smokescreen. Its a pay cut, essentially. 

 

 

OK, I'm going to pretend that I didn't read this so that I can scream and howl and be angry some more.

 

 

6 minutes ago, Donuts and Doritos said:

Whhyyy??? Why are we banging our head against the wall continuously & expecting different results. 

 

 

 

Because we are doing many many things differently than we did last year?

 

Oh, wait, I forgot I was going to pretend!!!

 

YEAH!!! SCREAM!!! YELL!!! HOWL!!!!

 

 

From what I understand, now none of his money is guaranteed. Oh, wait, I did it again!!!

 

HOWL!!! BLAME!!!! MOAN!!!!

Edited by Thurman#1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said:

 

I don't think this is relevant. It is such a small guarantee, they will cut him eventually imo. He is the fall back plan in case they can't get their guy imo. 

 

The update is the guarantee in the contract was eliminated. Also $1 million when the team is currently over the cap and need every dollar they can save is NOT a small guarantee.

Edited by Big Turk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Ridgewaycynic2013 said:

After the crying in the Kumerow thread, I am reaching the conclusion that's an acronym for

More Whiny Kvetching.

sorry that I question our almighty front office. I didn’t know criticism was banned here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MrEpsYtown said:

I think they want to draft a punter. You can’t go into the draft with with nobody on the roster and people knowing you need a guy, so keeping Haack on the roster feels like a safety net and a bit of a smokescreen. Its a pay cut, essentially. 

 

We hope!

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BillsFan4 said:

This tells me that they are most likely drafting a punter, or signing one as an UDFA.

I expect there to be a camp battle for the job.

Beane essentially told us that too.

15 minutes ago, vincec said:

I like how people are saying that this is a good move because the team can cut him this fall, lol. If that's the best you can say about him...

Personally I won’t be happy unless he pays back his salary from last season 

Edited by YoloinOhio
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, IronMaidenBills said:

Lol good luck with your stance. It’s so prudent to sign players middle of the road salaries for bottom tier production. Is it any wonder why we don’t win Lombardis lol. 

 

 

And more dumbage from you.

 

Consistency is a virtue, sometimes. Not so much when it's consistency in not getting it.

 

What happened here is that we renegotiated his deal so that he has nothing guaranteed, actually $75K. He's essentially a camp body.

 

He actually saved a bit of money this year on the cap by re-signing as they also put a void year on the end and moved $350K to that void year, according to overthecap.

 

And you use that to figure that now you know why we don't win Lombardis!! How old are you? Seriously. Are you 12 or below? If you are, I'll definitely treat your brilliant conclusions with much less disdain.

Edited by Thurman#1
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Giuseppe Tognarelli said:

Why would the worst punter in the league be your fallback plan? Bring in someone else.

 

 

Because they save $350K this year on the cap, getting him to sign this and adding a void year?

 

Because he's not the worst punter around, he was just - by that particular measure - the worst starter, and bringing in a guy who couldn't even start would be even worse?

 

Because bringing in someone better would likely mean giving some guaranteed money for a team that may well draft a guy and get someone cheap in that way, requiring paying a guarantee to a guy you think you'll probably cut in camp?

 

Nah, couldn't be any of those. Because ... stuff

 

This is a remarkably tiny little issue. People getting upset about it says far more about them than it does about Beane.

 

 

Edited by Thurman#1
  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...