Jump to content

What exactly was that 4th down play supposed to be?


LabattBlue

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, LeGOATski said:

An option. 

 

I think they just should've straight up sneaked it, or tried to draw Offside, or punted it. Hindsight 20/20.

I think the Steelers showed enough to stop the QB sneak.  They had to do something different. It failed.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LeGOATski said:

An option. 

 

I think they just should've straight up sneaked it, or tried to draw Offside, or punted it. Hindsight 20/20.

 

Utter BS. You don't try that kind of crap in the 1st game of the season against a very good defense who is well coached especially when your offense is not in sync. 

 

A complete idiot should have known it would go like that. You QB sneak it with a QB who has an amazing track record of getting it. You let the QB throw a short pass with a stable of what is supposed to be the best receiving core in the league. You put in a full heavy set and ram it up there. 

Edited by jeremy2020
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Sad 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ya Digg? said:

I remember they pulled that play YEARS ago with Bledsoe and McGahee and it worked for a huge gain and a touchdown….I’ve seen it tried a couple times since then and it has always gone terribly 


Yes, that Seattle game, but IIRC it was a much tighter formation there.  This looked to me like an option pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:

I think it was a halfback pass.  Seriously.  Running back was going to catch the ball seven yards behind the LOS and then throw it downfield.  Incredible.


Thought so too but after seeing the replay there was not a receiver on that half of the field. It was a “run.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:

I think it was a halfback pass.  Seriously.  Running back was going to catch the ball seven yards behind the LOS and then throw it downfield.  Incredible.

Yeah I think so too. My guess is it was a tackle eligible. His blocker was setting up to pass block not block downfield.

Just now, 716er said:


Thought so too but after seeing the replay there was not a receiver on that half of the field. It was a “run.”

The tackle Brown who lined up eligible fell down.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, No_Matter_What said:

The other one was much worse. This looked like bad playcall in hindsight, but McD's decision to play 4&8 with no offensive rhythm instead of trying 53y FG after he didn't go for two shorter ones was extremely bad decision. I don't remember him making worse in game decision.

100% agree!!!

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hated the design of that play the moment it started.

 

Not the right call for that scenario.  Too many moving parts, too reliant on luck and things working as planned.

 

On a big 4th and 1, Josh should line up under center, and do a QB sneak right over the center.

 

You know, the play Tom Brady has pulled off 1,000 times in his career.

 

It's boring, but it works.  And Josh is a huge, strong, tall guy with long arms.

 

That would be a much smarter play over a large sample of snaps than the crap we saw today.

 

 

Edited by Nextmanup
  • Agree 4
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Nextmanup said:

I hated the design of that play the moment it started.

 

Not the right call for that scenario.  Too many moving parts, too reliant on luck and things working as planned.

 

On a big 4th and 1, Josh should line up under center, and do a QB sneak right over the center.

 

You know, the play Tom Brady has pulled off 1,000 times in his career.

 

It's boring, but it works.  And Josh is a huge, strong, tall guy with long arms.

 

That would be a much smarter play over a large sample of snaps than the crap we saw today.

 

 

 

There were about 4 plays called on offense that I thought were far too cute

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 4
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Man with No Name said:

Daboll is great in games where we completely overmatch the competition. everything seems so smart and fun. but when other teams have our number, there are never adjustments. After our last two games (KC and today) I am afraid we have been figured out and won't be able to adjust enough to be what we were. 

 

We'll beat up on teams with lesser defenses. Pittsburgh is one of 3-4 teams in the league can generate that level of pass rush with only 4 guys and Daboll will go right back to believing in his own Genius then when he faces a real defense, it will all crumble again. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a stupid call - plain and simple.  They probably should’ve just tried to sneak it with Allen but if they didn’t have confidence based on the way the OL was playing I would understand.  

20 minutes ago, ColoradoBills said:

 

Watch the play again and you will see that the play design had Gilliam there to make the block.

He didn't and the play got blown up.

It didn’t look like he had much of a much of a chance.  DB made a good play.  It was a bad play call

  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JohnNord said:

It was a stupid call - plain and simple.  They probably should’ve just tried to sneak it with Allen but if they didn’t have confidence based on the way the OL was playing I would understand.  

It didn’t look like he had much of a much of a chance.  DB made a good play.  It was a bad play call

 

Well the fact is it was a horrible result.  That doesn't negate Gilliam's part in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...