Jump to content

Michael Irvin Removed from NFL Network Superbowl LVll Coverage


T&C

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, babulator said:

I may be the only one, but I don't mind Irvin. I don't love everything he says obviously, but I like him and Mooch, their enthusiasm is infectious.

 

Kurt, Marshall and Sapp are/were all awful. With Kurt, if you don't QB exactly like him, he finds flaws, and Faulk is such a blind homer it's hard to listen to anything he says. Sapp.... well... his awfulness simply knows no bounds. Loved him as a player, but man, that guy is just out of his mind, he's not even of this planet anymore.

I would bet you are a lot younger than I am.   their target market demographic is probably 18-30 male.  Their "enthusiasm" to me is contrived and  nauseating.  And the other crew is equally obnoxious, Terry Bradshaw and cohorts, they laugh excessively for even the lamest of jokes.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

who cares?  I never understood how this mush-mouthed dope ever got or retained his broadcasting career.  He adds nothing (intelligible) to any broadcast.  If he's hitting on coworkers, he's gonna hear about it from the company.

 He said he didn’t know her

 

15 minutes ago, BUFFALOBART said:

Every time that I hear that voice, I turn the channel.

The NFL Network, was probably looking for any 'For Cause' excuse..


I agree. They’re not suspending their top guys for something so petty.

 

 

Edited by StHustle
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, GolfandBills said:

He’s guilty right?  That’s what we do now right?

Should be an easy one to figure out. Stuff Im reading says that it was recorded on security cam video. So if it shows what Irvin said...that they just had a short  conversation, and there was no unwanted/egregious contact, AND there were no eyewitnesses who heard the conversation (Im assuming that hotel lobby cams do not record audio), its a purely "he said, she said" situation, and Irvin is getting shafted.

 

Btw, I don't watch or listen to any pregame, post game, or radio/tv sports talks shows, so I have no opinion on how good or bad Irvin is in that capacity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, StHustle said:

 He said he didn’t know her

 


I agree. They’re not suspending their top guys for something so petty.

 

 

 

He also said he didn't talk to anybody in the lobby--went right to his room.

 

“They said, ‘Well, last night you walked in, you talked to somebody.’ I said, ‘I didn’t talk to anybody. I went straight to the room.’ And then they showed it on camera that I did talk to somebody. I talked to this girl for about a minute.

 

He's lying 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

He also said he didn't talk to anybody in the lobby--went right to his room.

 

“They said, ‘Well, last night you walked in, you talked to somebody.’ I said, ‘I didn’t talk to anybody. I went straight to the room.’ And then they showed it on camera that I did talk to somebody. I talked to this girl for about a minute.

 

He's lying 

Or maybe he was so impaired that he was hitting on many women that night, and just forgot when & where the encounters took place? But like I said above, if no one was close enough to hear their conversation, it's a "he said, she said" situation.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Bob Jones said:

Should be an easy one to figure out. Stuff Im reading says that it was recorded on security cam video. So if it shows what Irvin said...that they just had a short  conversation, and there was no unwanted/egregious contact, AND there were no eyewitnesses who heard the conversation (Im assuming that hotel lobby cams do not record audio), its a purely "he said, she said" situation, and Irvin is getting shafted.

 

Btw, I don't watch or listen to any pregame, post game, or radio/tv sports talks shows, so I have no opinion on how good or bad Irvin is in that capacity.

Lol its on recording and dudes admitting to being blacked out. Yet saying he didnt do anything, makes totaaaaal sense.

 

Lets not forget that the SB also draws the largest sex trafficking event worldwide every year. Could be related, might not, but NFLN had Sapp's story with that hooker he refused to pay, not that long ago.

 

Add in sex trafficking back drop story, and NFLN has the right to say we pay you a lot, please keep your eggplant in your pants this one, single,problematic weekend.

 

How hard is, "dont get involved in any kind of sex scandal for one weekend". Deeerrrrrppppppppp

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BillsShredder83 said:

Lol its on recording and dudes admitting to being blacked out. Yet saying he didnt do anything, makes totaaaaal sense. <Snipped for brevity>

I mean it's ALL just wild speculation by us and everyone else as to what really happened there, so my take is a valid as yours, I guess. Btw, you can't be "blacked out" and have a conversation, and then proceed to go up to your room. But like I said, if he was heavily inebriated, he may not be able to remember what he said, or even what he did that night. The encounter in question though was video recorded, so any "unwanted touching" should be easily discerned by watching the video.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bob Jones said:

I mean it's ALL just wild speculation by us and everyone else as to what really happened there, so my take is a valid as yours, I guess. Btw, you can't be "blacked out" and have a conversation, and then proceed to go up to your room. But like I said, if he was heavily inebriated, he may not be able to remember what he said, or even what he did that night. The encounter in question though was video recorded, so any "unwanted touching" should be easily discerned by watching the video.

 

 

he knows what he said...

 

He was initially lying to his network boss.  simple as that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Augie said:

I obviously have no idea what happened at the hotel, but any outcome that results in less Michael Irvin is not ALL bad! 

The guy literally shouts out little sound bytes of info; he might be the worst verbal communicator I've ever seen.

 

So of course he makes millions mostly saying nothing on TV for years.

 

This is reason 847 of 5,000 why I watch ZERO pre-game, half-time, or post-game talking head garbage, or any related "shows" that might be out there.

 

ALL OF IT is basically designed to be a carrier for tv ad revenue, nothing more.

 

We'll see more of this on Sunday when the "Super Bowl coverage" starts at 11am or something obscene! 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

I had a relative who worked at DFW doing a lot of “special concierge” type projects for wealthy and high profile people. She said that all those 1990s Cowboys stars were great guys: Aikman, Emmitt, even Jimmy Johnson. Except for one entitled obnoxious doosh. Michael Irvin. 

 

I believe that. Emmitt was/is a total pro, as is Aikman. 

 

Growing up and watching those Dallas/Bills Super Bowls I hated Aikman and the Cowboys, but I have to give Troy his props in that he puts a lot of work into being as good as he can at broadcasting and has gotten a lot better over the years. 

 

I find that he brings up a lot of great points that other broadcasters seem to either miss or gloss over. 

 

Jimmy Johnson is also seemingly a pretty good guy. He's what he seems to be: the ole ball coach. People forget that Ralph made a real push to hire him here years after JJ retired. 

Edited by TheFunPolice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RoyBatty is alive said:

I would bet you are a lot younger than I am.   their target market demographic is probably 18-30 male.  Their "enthusiasm" to me is contrived and  nauseating.

50, but still young at heart. Mike can be a little over the top @ times, but I like him. Admittedly, I don't watch as much of this stuff as most people on here do though. My bandwidth for sports has definitely waned over the years.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's very handsy with the women.........there was a segment earlier this season with that goofy Browns fan woman that works for NFLN and after the segment he puts his arm around her and leans into her and gives her a big squeeze and you can see on her face the distress about it.    I think he's losing his mind.  

 

 

Edited by BADOLBILZ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BillsShredder83 said:

They just shamelessly pander to the biggest fan bases. Where are all the ex players from?

 

NE. DAL. PIT. whether we like it or not, including bandwagon fans and "fans" that barely watch their own team, those 3 probably produce almost half the market as all other teams combined. Barffffffff

 

It's hard to believe that there are not any former Dallas Cowboy players from that era who could replace and improve upon Michael Irvin.

 

1 hour ago, BillsShredder83 said:

Add in sex trafficking back drop story, and NFLN has the right to say we pay you a lot, please keep your eggplant in your pants this one, single,problematic weekend.

 

How hard is, "dont get involved in any kind of sex scandal for one weekend". Deeerrrrrppppppppp

 

So... we've moved on from "driftwood?"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if it was in the hotel lobby, there should be security footage.  Where is TMZ on this?  And the women complained only to the NFL.  I mean, Irving has a reputation from the 90s for cocaine and partying, but if he simply said something grotesque to her, I don't know if that warrants taking him off the shows.  

 

Also, is he fired, or just off the shows?  If just off the shows, he is still getting paid, and likely that is some proof that this wasn't a big enough deal to violate a "morals" clause in his contract.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said:

I had a relative who worked at DFW doing a lot of “special concierge” type projects for wealthy and high profile people. She said that all those 1990s Cowboys stars were great guys: Aikman, Emmitt, even Jimmy Johnson. Except for one entitled obnoxious doosh. Michael Irvin. 

My friend was a good friend of Troy Aikman. Troy never mentioned Irvin, but in his first few years in Dallas, he was embarrassed to be around Jimmy Johnson & Jerry Jones at parties. Both of these married guys (in their 40s) would have a few drinks and hit on girls Troy’s age (early 20s).  Johnson was also notorious at Oklahoma State for chasing coeds. If Irvin is guilty, he may have learned from his former coach and owner. 
 

BTW,  Troy is a good guy, who donates to sports at his old high school without having his name attached. 

Edited by Tulsabillsfanz
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/8/2023 at 8:59 PM, Buffalo03 said:

These women at NFL network seem like women you wouldn't want to even start a conversation with. I wonder if it's the same woman that reported Warren Sapp, Ike Taylor and Heath Evans.  Marshall Faulk and Michael Irvin have also both had "claims" against them also. You never hear about any of this at ESPN. Do they just have better men working there? Or just less uptight women?

 

     The article doesn't give any information on whether the woman was another employee.  Since Sharpe claims he didn't know the woman it could have been an employee of the hotel itself.  There's no info on what was alleged to have occurred just the woman made a complaint.  No info on what that complaint was about to know whether it's justified or not.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

 

he knows what he said...

 

He was initially lying to his network boss.  simple as that.

 

 

    My you gleaned this as some fact how exactly?  Even with Irvins less than stellar reputation, he could very well have been so intoxicated drugs or alcohol or both that he does not remember anything.  Having video that a conversation took place he may truthfully say he doesn't remember.  

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, BarleyNY said:

If that’s the whole story, then, yes. I can see the network taking this action if she works there, if this had happened before with him and her and/or if it had happened before with him and other women (especially if they were employees or employees of affiliates). That is just speculation, but since she was staying in the same hotel and hotels around there are filled  primarily with people working the game it is a decent bet she is working it too. 

Ya I didn’t see her working with the network before the post but maybe there is more to the story and he is hiding behind this lobby interaction. 
 

if it was a random person that’s different but seeing them weekly adds a lot more 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, AuntieEm said:

 

 

    My you gleaned this as some fact how exactly?  Even with Irvins less than stellar reputation, he could very well have been so intoxicated drugs or alcohol or both that he does not remember anything.  Having video that a conversation took place he may truthfully say he doesn't remember.  

 

 

 

 

Yes, it's far more likely that he was falling down drunk in that video he was shown and therefore he could not remember this conversation.

 

 

That's an excellent point---did he happen to mention that in his defense?  It would make sense for him to, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Nextmanup said:

The guy literally shouts out little sound bytes of info; he might be the worst verbal communicator I've ever seen.

 

So of course he makes millions mostly saying nothing on TV for years.

 

This is reason 847 of 5,000 why I watch ZERO pre-game, half-time, or post-game talking head garbage, or any related "shows" that might be out there.

 

ALL OF IT is basically designed to be a carrier for tv ad revenue, nothing more.

 

We'll see more of this on Sunday when the "Super Bowl coverage" starts at 11am or something obscene! 

 

 

 

same here.

 

i like to read good analysis, especially from a gambling perspective, but i find it hard to separate the wheat from the chaff.  the sort of regular way ex players who get treated like Gauss (like Sherman the CB) if they managed to crack 4 digits on the SAT is just awful.  there are the occasional player or coach type person who gives something useful, but it's just drowned out by brain dead criminal blow hards carrying on.

 

frankly, this is why i subscribed to The Athletic, but honestly that's turned into the same sort of main stream coverage i got away from.  the only exception is that it's middlebrow midwit self congratulatory tripe instead of screaming and gossip.  still better i suppose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, that was FAST!

 

HEADLINE: Michael Irvin sues accuser, Marriott for $100 million over allegedly false accusation of misconduct

 

Story can be found on Yahoo Sports page....had trouble linking it.

 

From the story: "Rash and thoughtless actions can have severe consequences,” the lawsuit contends. “Marriott [parent company of Renaissance Hotels] apparently did not appreciate these simple truths when, in a rush to judgment, its employees and management inaccurately and inflammatorily accused Mr. Irvin of misconduct to the National Football League.”

 

Per the lawsuits, eyewitnesses support Irvin’s contention that he “casually exchanged pleasantries” with the accuser — a hotel employee — “shook her hand, and went to his room alone.”

Edited by Bob Jones
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/9/2023 at 10:48 AM, BillsShredder83 said:

Lets not forget that the SB also draws the largest sex trafficking event worldwide every year.

 

That's a myth.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/super-bowl-prostitution-increase/

 

And while we're at it...

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/domestic-violence-super-bowl-sunday/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...