The Frankish Reich

Will it include naked pelvic thrusting? Will the thrustee be his (male) cousin? Now I’m really intrigued.

But isn't this time different?

Thank you. I agree.

Well, according to PFF Lewan has been a pretty solid starter (roughly Dion Dawkins quality) most of his career, with at least one elite season in 2016, which is kind of a long time ago. I can’t say I spend my weekends isolating Lewan on the All 22 feed, but it seems that PFF has pretty well captured how most of the smart NFL people (GMs included) view his career performance? Or maybe his own contribution$ need to keep pace with inflation…

In other words: it’s perfectly fine that he treated national security information so cavalierly, because … Hillary.

What “impeachment based on her lies?” Trump wasn’t impeached over anything about 2016. He was impeached over withholding aid to Ukraine in exchange for dirt on the Biden’s, and then for trying to overthrow the results of the 2020 election.

https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/investigation-trump-s-handling-classified-documents-huge-n1295419 The under-the-radar scandal that is about to get a lot more over the radar. Why on earth was Trump spiriting away classified docs? There is just no way this happens by accident. Anyone who has the clearance to handle classified information knows the drill. Taking classified out of the White House is just ridiculous.

I don’t think the word “ignore” means what you think it means. 😛 I can’t wait for you to “ignore” me, then summarize what you think my “ignored” comment said, then go back and un-ignore my “ignored” comment so you can gloat about how perceptive you are.

Congratulations! You are now responding directly to comments you ostensibly “ignore.” In other words, quite literally carrying on your own internal dialogue here on an open forum. There are FDA approved treatments for this.

I will grant you that.

It is with no joy that I have to say that after years of arguing the opposite point, I now have to agree with you. The internet in general? A net positive. Social media? A net negative.

Are you suggesting that he had personal reasons for his political views? https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/video/trump-in-1999-i-am-very-pro-choice-480297539914

Enough! No dripping videos. I draw the line at Congressman Dry Hump. Seriously ... dude willingly participated in all the videos and probably trusted some people not to out him. It happens. He was a nothing a couple years ago and will be a nothing again after the election. There's no "kompromat campaign." He's not important enough to warrant that. You might as well say your old fave Hunter Biden is the victim of a kompromat campaign ... they're both morons who both willingly recorded their sorry and corrupt lives.

In the category of "even a blind squirrel finds a nut every once in a while," I can't disagree with my old friend BigBlitz on this one. Neither party has a monopoly on wackos. But right now, anyone has to admit it's this Cawthorn creep. Law School Exam Question of the Week: if I'm a Florida teacher discussing Madison Cawthorn, can I say gay? He's living the old punchline: the only way a Republican won't get reelected in his district is if he's caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy. EDIT: you gotta see the video. The headline says it all: "Naked Thrusting Cawthorn ..." OP - could you please change the title to "Naked Thrusting Cawthorn?"

I have no interest in rioting. But I gotta admit it: I'm curious as hell about how and where these Supreme Court Justices live.