The End of the Lamar Jackson Era

[KD in CA]

23 minutes ago, RalphWilson'sNewWar said:

Bills Fans seem unusually threatened by the success/hype of Jackson.

 

probably wouldn’t be as intense Had he been drafted in a “different” draft class and not in the one with Josh.

 

that in itself I see is producing a certain response from the fans.

 

I think Bills fans have an aversion in general to over hyped players, not just this one in particular.

 

Jackson has done much better than I expected overall, but I would agree with those that say the jury is still out.  Yes, he's going to be very effective against the teams that can't contain his running. Yes, he's playing for a very well run organization so will win a lot of games and be a fixture in the playoffs.  But to me he's still in the Vick/V Young/Tyrod category (clearly w/ Vick at the high end of that list);  he has not yet proven he belongs in the category of guys that can take you down the field with their arm when necessary.

 

To me, the real question people should ask themselves is where they would pick him in a QB redraft of the entire league?  Obviously not ahead of Mahomes or Wilson.  But even if we ignore the old guys, ahead of Allen?  Watson? Prescott?  Murray?  Burrow?   

[TheElectricCompany]

9 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

My point was, you stated "There's no precedent for elite MVP QBs regressing to average, especially 22 year olds. "  My point is, there is plenty of precedent for MVP QB regressing to the NFL average the year following their award.  Example: Cam Newton, who passed for 35 TD and had 10 INTs his 2015 MVP season and 19 TD with 14 INTs in 2016.

 

I'm not going to argue whether Cam or someone else is the "best dual threat QB in the history of the league".  What shouldn't be argued is that Cam Newton is a talented QB and now that he seems to have recovered from his injuries, he's once again playing at a high level.  If he weren't playing for the Pats, I'd happily root for him to pull a Kurt Warner.

 

I love seeing Cam making plays again, even if it's for the Pats. He's an exciting player.

Lamar's 2019 season is as memorable as they come. I like to think more are on deck.

[TheFunPolice]

Jackson is an exciting player who will continue to lead his team to a lot of wins. 

 

But against the best teams in the biggest spots (playoffs especially) he is going to need to come through to silence the doubters.

 

[Chuck Wagon]

No one is designing NFL plays for QBs to stand tall in the pocket, scan the entire field and find the open WR.  You've got guys like Aaron Donald and Khalil Mack wrecking shop.  Your entire thesis is utter trash.

Edited September 29, 2020 by Chuck Wagon

[Fan in Chicago]

Just now, TheElectricCompany said:

 

I love seeing Cam making plays again, even if it's for the Pats. He's an exciting player.

Lamar's 2019 season is as memorable as they come. I like to think more are on deck.

The league is definitely more fun when there are several good QBs so there is reason to hope for Jackson to pull it all together and prove that yesterday (or any of his other games against the Chiefs) are an anomaly. I like seeing dual threat QBs if only as a variation to the pure pocket passers. I wish these QBs (not named Cam-who=plays-for-the-Pats***) good success except against the Bills

[wjag]

The thing I worry about for Lamar is they are eventually going to get him hurt running that much.  Everyone knows it’s coming.  Just not when.  They’re exposing him to too many hits by running it.  

Edited September 29, 2020 by wjag

[LabattBlue]

3 hours ago, TheElectricCompany said:

Say it with me..."We don't have to tear down Lamar, to prop Josh up".

 

Lamar is a phenomenal player and deserves his place at the "elite of the elite" table. Josh is well on his way to earning a seat. Both of these things can exist simultaneously.

 

Frankly, I find this take to be garbage. "The end of an era" because the MVP had one bad game?  Get outta here...

 

Shaw - you come for the king, you better not miss.

100% agree!   Just a bad take by the OP. 

[colin]

so reading this thread, you'd think they don't pay coaches or other players besides qbs in the nfl.

 

its pretty obvious jackson has limitations as a passer, but the ravens also don't have the outside weapons they'd need for him to be passing the ball all over the place.  one point that was made before is what will the ravens look like if lemar is eating 40mm of cap.  i think that's a big one, because right now they have just nasty nasty talent up and down the d, and their OL and TE corps is silly good.  i think the nfl just can't play good D at the moment because of a lack of 

 

beyond the above, gregg roman kinda reminds me of kevin gilbride.  sick results every team he coached on, but then got chased out of town when it fell apart.  gilbride righted the ship w the NYG and won two chips.  it remains to be seen if roman/harby can fix this the way coughlin and gillbride did, but both OCs run a very unorthodox all in kind of O (but very different from each other) neither of which has much flexibility in it if things don't line up.  

 

one thing i don't think roman has ever had is a real game breaking WR to open up the field, i think the antonio brown speculation in this thread was pretty right on, adding a talent like that might be enough for the ravens to keep the d honest and just play advantage all the time.

 

eitherway, i hope the bills right the ship on D and smoke both these teams.

[Hapless Bills Fan]

Just now, TheElectricCompany said:

I love seeing Cam making plays again, even if it's for the Pats. He's an exciting player.

Lamar's 2019 season is as memorable as they come. I like to think more are on deck.

 

I think that the Ravens may have made a mistake trading Hurst, but I understand they felt long term they can't invest in Andrews, Hurst AND Boyle.  I did not realize they had done that, actually, and when I clued I thought maybe it was a mistake.

 

I see Lamar as being a bit in the spot where Josh Allen was last season. 

 

Josh had some big gaps in his game - the deep ball, the ability to throw with anticipation.  The better defenses "solved" that and smothered us.

 

IMO people don't give Lamar sufficient credit - he can in fact stand in the pocket and make reads, and the throws he makes, he makes very well.   But he does have gaps in his game, and if a defense is good enough to play sound gap control and take away the intermediate stuff (which last year, was not something most Ds could do), they could slow or stifle the Ravens.  We laid the foundation, the Titans built it up, now the Chiefs hammered in the sill.  So now it's on Lamar to "level up" again and start making some of those throws.  He did suffer some bad drops, and as above, I do wonder how losing his #2 TE is going to affect the game.  So far Boyle isn't filling those shoes.

Anyway, it puzzles me why some here believe Josh Allen can level up has game and improve, but a talented and uber-competitive QB like Lamar Jackson somehow can't.  He made a big jump in college, he made another huge jump last year, I don't see evidence to believe he's reached his ceiling yet.

[JohnNord]

3 hours ago, Shaw66 said:

I've said since the beginning of the year that I'm not buying the Lamar Jackson hype, and I'm not buying the Kyler Murray hype, either.   I know they are really special athletes, and they're a couple of the best running backs in the league, but they limit their offenses.  

 

The problem with Jackson is related to something McDermott (and plenty of other coaches) say all the time:  You have to force the opponent to defend the entire field - sideline to sideline and line of scrimmage to the goal line.  The reason is simple:  If you can threaten to strike anyplace on the field, the defense has to spread out to defend all those places.  When the defense spreads out, they create holes for the offense to attack. 

 

You could see the problem almost immediately last night.  One on side of the ball was a team, the Chiefs, that is perhaps the best in the league at attacking the whole field.  They will hurt you anyplace you leave unprotected.  The Ravens started out playing the game no more than 30 yards downfield, and as the game progress, they didn't even threaten that deep.  The defense tightened and tightened.  Sure, Jackson kept getting himself some nice runs here and there, but they essentially give up the ability to get 100-200 passing downfield to get an extra 50 or 100 out of Jackson.  That's a bad trade.  

 

The other thing that was apparent is that to be a premier QB, you MUST be able to stand in the pocket and direct the attack.  You can't run an effective, all-over-the-field passing attack from outside the hash marks.  Why?  Because you can't threaten deep passes down the right side if your QB is standing outside the left hashmark.  (Well, you can if your QB is Josh Allen, but that's something else.)   Your QB has to be able to stand in, see the entire field, make decisions, and then make throws.   Jackson couldn't do that last night.  If he's going to make it, he has a lot of work to do as a pocket passer.   But even that may not be enough, because if you're going to feature your QB running the ball, you need your receiver to stay shallow to block for him.  So in your regular offense, your receivers aren't running deep routes, so the deep threat isn't there.  

 

It was all pretty obvious watching last night.   Mahomes stands in the pocket, makes decisions and makes throws.   Jackson doesn't.  Jackson will not be a premier QB if he doesn't learn to play that traditional QB game.  He's way, way behind Josh Allen in developing those skills.  Allen plays much more like Mahomes than like Jackson.  McBeane have always said he was going to be a pocket passer.  They've been working on making him one since he arrived in Buffalo.  Baltimore went down the other road, building an offense that plays to Jackson's strengths, but that is an offense that by definition is limited.  I think they're wasting their time.   Jackson will hurt some teams sometimes, he'll force your defense to play a different style than their used to, but at the end of the season, Baltimore's offense will limit their ability to win big games.  

 

Finally, to bring it back to Allen and the Bills, Mahomes wasn't doing anything last night that Allen doesn't do.  Allen has the better arm, clearly, Mahomes is more poised and more able to attack weaknesses consistently - that's clear too.  What's so encouraging is that Allen can learn to be a great field general, but good as Mahomes arm is, he can't learn to throw like Josh.  

 

Bills are heading down the right road. 

 

 

 

 

I see what you are saying and it makes sense but I’m not writing off LJ anytime yet only because the Baltimore offense is built around what he does well and because their defense (at least this year) is one of the best in the NFL.

Roman is trying to run the same ball control, big play offense that he installed in San Francisco and Buffalo.   The only difference is that Jackson is a significantly better runner than Kaep or Tyrod.  
 

Whoever said that Baltimore is not built to play from behind is exactly correct.  When Lamar is down the entire offense seems to press really hard and ends up making some mistakes.  It happened against Tennessee in the playoffs and it happened last night

 

But given what LJ and the Ravens can do on the ground and given their defense, I think Baltimore will always be a tough out

[jethro_tull]

Well said and completely agreed- Michael Vick was in the same boat.    

When a QB has to improvise out of the pocket after the initial play call goes south you are in very rocky, inconsistent territory.  When you RELY on that type of improvisation to make plays you are doomed.  

[Bleeding Bills Blue]

37 minutes ago, RoyBatty is alive said:

 

Guess who else is guilty of that big time this season..Deshaun Watson.

 

Yep.  Allen got 2 15 yard penalties... took a terrible sack.  Hell the team gave up 29 unanswered points.  But the guy didn't waver or let the team around him know.  

[WEATHER DOT COM]

If Jackson's receivers could catch the ball last night, it's a close game.

[Sharky7337]

It may prove to be true but so far he has shown outside of this game to be a good passer.

[Bleeding Bills Blue]

Just now, wAcKy ZeBrA said:

If Jackson's receivers could catch the ball last night, it's a close game.

 

Yeah - if the chiefs defenders could catch he may have a couple picks too.

 

I also think the chiefs not passing on 3rd or 4th and 1 was a big miss.  The ravens cannot stop your pass game, get the first. 

[H2o]

1 minute ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said:

If Jackson's receivers could catch the ball last night, it's a close game.

Yeah, his guys didn't do him any favors for sure. Andrews dropped a sure TD as well as a couple other passes. Boyle had a bad drop. Snead had a bad drop. The game as a whole though still is in line with the blueprint to beat a Jackson led team right now. Until he shows he can beat people from the pocket when they keep him contained, this will be the gameplan of those who have a good enough defense to execute it. I suspect they will have some real trouble on their hands this year just winning the division alone now that Pittsburgh has Ben Ro back. 

[Bleeding Bills Blue]

5 minutes ago, jethro_tull said:

Well said and completely agreed- Michael Vick was in the same boat.    

When a QB has to improvise out of the pocket after the initial play call goes south you are in very rocky, inconsistent territory.  When you RELY on that type of improvisation to make plays you are doomed.  

 

Vicks best year was with Reid oddly enough.  Built a structure around him - improv will happen, but scheme to the players strengths. 

 

Note - buffalo brought in dennison to run a west coast zone rushing offense... with a QB who holds the ball and a power offensive line.  

Just now, H2o said:

Yeah, his guys didn't do him any favors for sure. Andrews dropped a sure TD as well as a couple other passes. Boyle had a bad drop. Snead had a bad drop. The game as a whole though still is in line with the blueprint to beat a Jackson led team right now. Until he shows he can beat people from the pocket when they keep him contained, this will be the gameplan of those who have a good enough defense to execute it. I suspect they will have some real trouble on their hands this year just winning the division alone now that Pittsburgh has Ben Ro back. 

 

People were like andrews dropped that 2nd TD and all i was thinknig was... thats a TOUGH catch.  

[TheElectricCompany]

22 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

I see Lamar as being a bit in the spot where Josh Allen was last season. 

 

Josh had some big gaps in his game - the deep ball, the ability to throw with anticipation.  The better defenses "solved" that and smothered us.

 

IMO people don't give Lamar sufficient credit - he can in fact stand in the pocket and make reads, and the throws he makes, he makes very well.   But he does have gaps in his game, and if a defense is good enough to play sound gap control and take away the intermediate stuff (which last year, was not something most Ds could do), they could slow or stifle the Ravens.  We laid the foundation, the Titans built it up, now the Chiefs hammered in the sill.  So now it's on Lamar to "level up" again and start making some of those throws.  He did suffer some bad drops, and as above, I do wonder how losing his #2 TE is going to affect the game.  So far Boyle isn't filling those shoes.

Anyway, it puzzles me why some here believe Josh Allen can level up has game and improve, but a talented and uber-competitive QB like Lamar Jackson somehow can't.  He made a big jump in college, he made another huge jump last year, I don't see evidence to believe he's reached his ceiling yet.

 

I never got the sense that LJ threw a poor deep ball, but  I know that was a popular offseason take. He throws some beautiful passes.

 

It's not often that we see a NFL player who can get over limitations with athleticism, but he's able to do so when he runs. The "play sound gap control" strategy is simple in concept, but extremely difficult to do in practice. He can run past or elude the vast majority of defenders he faces. The play against Milano last year, or the spin against the Bengals, simply isn't something you can gameplan around.

 

We're seeing what Josh's ceiling looks like, as well as Lamar's. The future is bright for both clubs, and both QBs will improve!

 

Edited September 29, 2020 by TheElectricCompany

[H2o]

2 minutes ago, dneveu said:

People were like andrews dropped that 2nd TD and all i was thinknig was... thats a TOUGH catch.  

Yeah it wasn't routine or anything, but it's a catch he usually would make. He is one of the better receiving TE's in the NFL right now. 

[QCity]

Running QBs don't last.

[Rico]

One thing Lamar and Josh have in common is an intense desire to be great and win. That can’t be taught. Disagree with the OP,  this was just one game.

[Bleeding Bills Blue]

Just now, H2o said:

Yeah it wasn't routine or anything, but it's a catch he usually would make. He is one of the better receiving TE's in the NFL right now. 

 

For sure - but the twitter trolls who constantly criticize allen for ball placement didn't have anything to say there.  The blame went to andrews only.

[WEATHER DOT COM]

2 minutes ago, dneveu said:

 

For sure - but the twitter trolls who constantly criticize allen for ball placement didn't have anything to say there.  The blame went to andrews only.

 

I guess I'd have to see it again but I'd expect my TE to make that catch every time.

 

The one over the middle Andrews dropped was a tough catch.

[Figster]

While I agree with OP to a certain extent I think its very possible Greg Romans O lacks enough emphasis in the passing game. Something I think the Bills experienced with Romans tenure here in Buffalo IMO.

 

Beating KC requires TD's on almost every posession.  One slip up and its playing catch up against a team practically impossible to stop. 

 

Josh Allen and the Buffalo Bills are on a collison course with KC.

 

Prepare for fireworks, explosions. McD's got a plan. Its all part of the process.

 

When the smoke has cleared there will be one team standing.

 

One Buffalo strong...

 

Do you Billieve!!! 

 

 

 

 

Edited September 29, 2020 by Figster

[Kwai San]

3 hours ago, Golden Goat said:

How good did it feel to type that? Was it weird? 

 

Felt weird to read it thats for sure.  But a good kinda weird...a warm fuzzy weird.  Ima gonna cuddle with this weird for awhile!!!!

[ColoradoBills]

1 hour ago, Nihilarian said:

Oh, because one team has another teams number... then everything unravels...no!

 

Ravens schedule, Washington, Cincy, Philly, Pittsburgh x2, Indy, NE, Tenn, Pitt, Dallas, Cleveland, Jacksonville, NY Giants, Cincy. This is a playoff team that will be there at the end of the season. 

 

 

I was scrolling thru the thread seeing if anyone cited the Ravens schedule.  It is so easy.

They got 4 games left against decent teams.  Let's say they split with PIT and split with NE*/TEN.

 

Not matter what Lamar Jackson eventually becomes the Titans are probably looking at a 12 win season and maybe more.

If PIT beats them twice then PIT will more than likely have a 12 or better win record.

It will be tough for the Bills with their tough schedule to get the bye.

 

[NewEra]

12 minutes ago, Figster said:

While I agree with OP to a certain extent I think its very possible Greg Romans O lacks enough emphasis in the passing game. Something I think the Bills experienced with Romans tenure here in Buffalo IMO.

 

 

 

 

I agree that it lacks enough emphasis on the passing game.  Some of that is on Roman.  Some of that is on Decosta.  He’s a great Gm, but their WR unit is among the worst in football.

Edited September 29, 2020 by NewEra

[GunnerBill]

1 hour ago, blacklabel said:

I'll give Lamar a mulligan on this one. If they do falter this season, I'll put it on Greg Roman. It's happened everywhere he's gone, he designs an offense that can lead the league in rushing year after year but his passing concepts have always been pretty elementary from what I've read. Once you stop his run game, he struggles to attack you through the air. It caught up to him in both San Francisco and Buffalo. Both teams could run the ball all day and do well with a lead. If they fell behind and had to throw it a bunch, forget it. If he can't adjust to help Lamar then they could have some trouble. 

 

It caught up to him in San Fran, sure. As did working for a borderline psychopath as his Head Coach. Whether it did for him in Buffalo is a matter of opinion. Mine is that being fired 2 games into your second season after leading the league in rushing to save the lardy ass of the useless Head Coach and his equally useless brother who had just been shredded by Ryan Fitzpatrick is not evidence of your offense failing. 

 

Roman is one of the best and most innovative OCs in the NFL. But people don't want to hear about creativity when it is run game creativity. Is his passing game a bit "vanilla"? Sure. But then equally all three stops he has had QBs who are better runners than passers. He was the OC that saved Alex Smith's career before that. 

1 minute ago, ColoradoBills said:

 

I was scrolling thru the thread seeing if anyone cited the Ravens schedule.  It is so easy.

They got 4 games left against decent teams.  Let's say they split with PIT and split with NE*/TEN.

 

Not matter what Lamar Jackson eventually becomes the Titans are probably looking at a 12 win season and maybe more.

If PIT beats them twice then PIT will more than likely have a 12 or better win record.

It will be tough for the Bills with their tough schedule to get the bye.

 

 

Only one bye now and the Bills have no shot at it. Baltimore will win 12 games minimum. They played the hard schedule last year and now get the easy one. They are the Bills in reverse. The Ravens are still a potential Superbowl Champion. They have to play better than last night but even aside from Lamar that was not the Ravens at their best. 

[Watkins90]

Mahomes and Allen both have the same arm strength. Yeah, maybe one can out throw the other by a couple yards, but at the end of the day they can both sling it far enough. That's all that matters. 

[BUFFALOTONE]

1 hour ago, TheElectricCompany said:

 

We're forever spoiled by Manning winning 5 MVPs.

Cam is arguably the best dual threat QB in the history of the league. Ryan won it in Year 9 and has always been good to great.

"Regress to the mean" will happen, but what's Lamar's mean? Time will tell.

42 total TDs was a great preview of what's to come.

 

I’d put Warren Moon, Randall Cunningham and maybe even Mike Vick ahead of Cam. 

[Thurman#1]

4 hours ago, JoshAllenHasBigHands said:

 

Its not a thing because the data shows that a QB is more likely to get hurt in the pocked than on the run. This includes in JA's case where the QB takes hits. Especially since the only times JA has ever been injured, he has been in the pocket.  

 

 

Two problems with this post. 

 

First, Allen was knocked out of the first Pats game in 2019 for the concussion protocol, and it was when he was running for the sticks.

 

Second, the data doesn't show what you're saying it does.

 

About what it says is that with the way they can massage the data and be sure of these things, they can't prove that running QBs get injured more than pocket QBs. Not that it doesn't happen, but that they can't prove it.

 

And I haven't yet found that any of them have found a way to look at the data to show whether running QB careers are shorter. Which they may be. When pocket passers lose a gear or two as they get older, they can still play the way they had. Not so with the running QBs, who have to try to re-learn to play the game with one of their biggest weapons missing. A few running QBs have lasted, especially guys who didn't have a lot of designed runs, and who slid a lot. Steve Young played till he was old, but he had a lot less wear on his tires through his first seven years than most. Randall Cunningham too.  But look at Vick, a spot player by 32. 

 

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/extra-points/2019/injury-proneness-running-qbs-overstated

Edited September 29, 2020 by Thurman#1

[BuffaLoko]

4 hours ago, Da webster guy said:

35 yards passing at the end of the 1st half.  Yikes.

In fairness to Lamar, he doesn't have the kind of weapons we have or KC has.  

Josh TD to Diggs Sunday was a Lamar type throw with that wrist flick. He didnt have time or the space to wind up so he just whipped that forearm.  Awesome.

 

 

.

I just can´t believe my own eyes, that we would be reading a statement like the one you made in your second line, as soon as week 3, but its true now we have weapons all over the pace! and the growth starts with adding SD, but goes on to the TEs, we have 1 great veteran in Kroft, 1 serviceable veteran in Smith and one 2 year TE with potential to be great! 

Edited September 29, 2020 by BuffaLoko

[TheCockSportif]

I'm not sure that Jackson is done, and I would opine that he is not... by a long shot.

 

Having written that, I'd rather have Allen than Jackson.  While I don't agree with your premise of the end of the Jackson era, your analysis of why Mahomes and Allen work -- where Jackson struggles -- is solid.

[WideNine]

I appreciate the opinions and recognize that I could easily be wrong, but one bad game does not wipe out the progress and accomplishments Jackson has made in this league.

 

Is he ready to go toe-to-toe with Mahomes? No he is not, but the kid works hard and is willing to adapt so I think folks should tap the breaks.

 

Don't want us to be guilty of the same bias folks have with Allen where they are waiting for one bad game to pile on.

 

I do think Allen is ahead of Lamar just in regards to reading defenses and being able to spread the ball around and push it downfield from the pocket.

 

I don't fault Roman for emphasizing Lamar's running ability while working to improve the areas where his game is weaker. It is the smart win-now approach.

 

I don't think we have seen Lamar's ceiling.

 

 

 

 

[Rock-A-Bye Beasley]

1 hour ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

Borderline racist? Really? Let's give that a rest, okay? Actual racism would appreciate it.

 

The truth is that the Bills base has more than its fair share of fans who insist the Bills forever screwed up by not grabbing Mahomes or Jackson, and taking the project cantaloupe farmer.  You couldn't be in a GDT or Shoutbox or even Twitter without Bills fans crying in their bowl of Flutie Flakes EVERY SINGLE TIME Josh overthrew a ball the past two years. By the time Mahomes was hoisting the Lombardi, the noise was embarrassingly ridiculous because while many of us would never confuse Allen for Mahomes, we could absolutely see Allen getting better.

 

So try and understand why some fans are happy to see their faith rewarded with the progress Josh has made. Yes, some overdo it a bit. Listen to talk sports radio and you know that's not something exclusive to Bills fans.

 

A Running Back?! Really? Let’s give THAT a rest. It’s insulting and yes it does involve race because For years athletic black QBs were told to switch positions. it’s fine to criticize Jackson, but when someone calls him a running back they are invoking race because of the history of the position and the fact that Jackson has already proven he can play QB at a high level. 
 

Edit: and 99% of running backs are black

Edited September 29, 2020 by Chemical

[machine gun kelly]

Shaw, I’ll give it to you he’s not the hype that has been stated about him, but that’s not his fault.  It’s the media fawning over him, just like Allen is not the trash that has been said about him in the past.  I’d rather have Allen, not because of these three weeks, but he has progressively improved over three years.  You kind of know what you have in Jackson, and the GM and coach have built a team around him.  This is not unlike McBeane have built a formidable team around Allen.

[Hapless Bills Fan]

1 hour ago, TheElectricCompany said:

 

I love seeing Cam making plays again, even if it's for the Pats. He's an exciting player.

Lamar's 2019 season is as memorable as they come. I like to think more are on deck.

 

"Your Kink is O.K." 

LOL

Kidding.Notkidding

 

Agree on Lamar 2019.

 

5 minutes ago, machine gun kelly said:

Shaw, I’ll give it to you he’s not the hype that has been stated about him, but that’s not his fault.  It’s the media fawning over him, just like Allen is not the trash that has been said about him in the past.  I’d rather have Allen, not because of these three weeks, but he has progressively improved over three years.  You kind of know what you have in Jackson, and the GM and coach have built a team around him.  This is not unlike McBeane have built a formidable team around Allen.

 

See, here is where I disagree. 

 

The dude is only 23 yrs old. 

 

We have endless discussion here that at 23 years old in his 3rd season, Allen is improving and may continue to improve, despite all the naysayers who say inaccurate QB in college do not improve in the NFL.

 

Why do we think one 23 yr old highly competitive intelligent athletic QB can improve, but another "is what he is" and can not?

 

It has puzzled me from Day 1.

[Sammy Watkins' Rib]

49 minutes ago, Rico said:

One thing Lamar and Josh have in common is an intense desire to be great and win. That can’t be taught. Disagree with the OP,  this was just one game.

 

Maybe. I thought Jackson's body language and demeanor was pretty poor last night in the second half. I don't think I've seen similar from Josh Allen.

[H2o]

50 minutes ago, dneveu said:

 

For sure - but the twitter trolls who constantly criticize allen for ball placement didn't have anything to say there.  The blame went to andrews only.

Not only that throw, but there were multiple throws to the intermediate and deeper parts of the field Jackson just outright missed. Brown could have had at least two, if not three, TD's last night if Jackson could have hit his man running wide open down the sidelines. Even Riddick called him out on it every time it happened. 

[GunnerBill]

31 minutes ago, BUFFALOTONE said:

I’d put Warren Moon, Randall Cunningham and maybe even Mike Vick ahead of Cam. 

 

Was Warren Moon really duel threat? I'm not sure he belongs in that company. Before my time but based on what I have seen and read Steve Young was more duel threat than Warren Moon. Moon could scramble a bit but he was a thrower from the pocket.