Jump to content

Rock-A-Bye Beasley

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,094
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Rock-A-Bye Beasley

  1. Absolute disaster unless we trade for one of the established WRs. Even then, why trade with KC? to only move up from the 4th to 3rd?! You just take a WR and hope it’s the one KC wanted. Not guarantee they get the guy they want. Insane. clearly KC thought their guy could be gone by 32
  2. Does it matter? Texans have our WR 1, Chiefs have the fastest one of all time. But we traded up in the 4th!!!
  3. Delusion causes you to remain stagnant. You’ll settle for less in every aspect in life if you’re not honest with yourself
  4. sorry let me rephrase that and get ready to post later: “[guy Bills pick] is clearly an upgrade over Diggs and instantly top 10 in league, while Reid and Mahomes will be clueless how to use [guy KC picks] and he will probably bust”
  5. Those of you not upset we didn’t trade up or trade for a #1 yet. Chiefs are going to also get a WR tonight. We aren’t gonna pass them
  6. Need to trade for a #1WR. depending on a rookie past those top 3 in a Super Bowl window is malpractice
  7. I'm falling into a deep depression with the realizations that (a)No matter how many times we trade down, my thirst for picks will not be quenched, and (b) by the end of the draft we will have ZERO picks. They'll all be transformed into players taking up precious cap space which I have a growing hunger for.
  8. Yep, but not as big of a gamble as you'd think. MHJ, Nabers, or Odunze each would be the top of their WR class in most years so the only reason we have a shot at a #1 is because of the depth. Joe Marino was asked where they'd rank over all WR prospects from the past three years and he said they're the top three. Of course he still doesn't want to trade up because he has the same unquenchable thirst for picks as the rest of you.
  9. Are you implying that the earlier picks are more likely to be good players? Like, just for example, the 28th picks versus the 9th pick?
  10. and the one at 9, that still counts as a pick right? Or is it a player as soon as it's used. Oh man we're gonna have no picks soon
  11. The whole draft? Am I missing something? We end up with 7 picks this year in that scenario.
  12. Like who? What other needs do we have that can't be filled with the other 6 picks we'd still have this year, free agency, and next year's picks?
  13. 2 2nds, this years and next, probably gets it done. Obviously for the right player. I was speaking relative to those discussing getting up in the top ten. Actually, looking at this chart I just googled, one 2nd would be enough to get to 20. https://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp
  14. JSN fell to 20 last year. Wouldn't cost too much to get to that range if someone falls.
  15. Ignored my point about day 3 guys being unproven. They're unlikely to even make the roster.
  16. Everyone saying we need the picks to fill out the roster. How many players did we sign last offseason for 1.7 mil? They were proven NFL players too, not unknown rookies. Buffalo fans' obsession with draft picks and cap space is annoying and clearly residual mental damage from the drought.
  17. first of all, I thought this is a WR thread. second, there are always veteran DTs sitting around even after FA and into the season every single year.
  18. Not sure but the Bengals were missing most of their o line the year prior and still couldn’t get any pressure
  19. how many years they lose in divisional in a row?
  20. Alright I’ll just say it. I could do a better job than him but I will bring up 9/11 a lot more
×
×
  • Create New...