Jump to content

2019 NFL Combine updates


YoloinOhio

Recommended Posts

I'm more concerned about Metcalf's medical history than his college production. An athlete like that will produce in an NFL offense but if he can't stay on the field that's a big risk in the top 10.

 

This draft will be crazy. Last year I had at least some idea of what the Bills and other teams would do, this year feels like a total wildcard at every pick.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Metcalf is a physically gifted freak. That alone doesn't put him in the Bills' plans at #9. A trade down, maybe. Based on Beane's comments, he doesn't believe in the protypical "#1" receiver in today's NFL. Its all about scheme and matchups. Although he *may be worthy at #9, I'm not sold on his game to translate into that high of a pick for the Bills and the team they are trying to build. I also don't believe we will be going o-line at #9 either, as Beane has stated he does not think there is one he believes to be elite. Top ten pick has to be elite, or potentially elite for him to make that selection. Folks, face it....its gonna be one of Oliver, Josh Allen, Quinnen Williams, Christian Wilkens, or a Montez Sweat. It could very well be Byron Murphey or Greedy Williams as well. And lets not forget Devin White.Its the only value( possibly elite talent) worthy of #9 in the eyes of McBeane. Now, a trade down, and everything opens up for skill players/ O-line in the 1st round

Edited by BuffAlone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

I'm more concerned about Metcalf's medical history than his college production. An athlete like that will produce in an NFL offense but if he can't stay on the field that's a big risk in the top 10.

 

This draft will be crazy. Last year I had at least some idea of what the Bills and other teams would do, this year feels like a total wildcard at every pick.

I don't know about the neck injury.  That could just be a freak injury, and not indicative of a tendency.  However, I have heard some comments  about him being so tight as an athlete, he might be prone to muscle strains and pulls and the like.  His 1.6 % body fat index might not actually be healthy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TigerJ said:

I don't know about the neck injury.  That could just be a freak injury, and not indicative of a tendency.  However, I have heard some comments  about him being so tight as an athlete, he might be prone to muscle strains and pulls and the like.  His 1.6 % body fat index might not actually be healthy. 

Yup. Prone to Hamstring strains and cramps, especially in a cold weather town

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, BuffAlone said:

Metcalf is a physically gifted freak. That alone doesn't put him in the Bills' plans at #9. A trade down, maybe. Based on Beane's comments, he doesn't believe in the protypical "#1" receiver in today's NFL. Its all about scheme and matchups. Although he *may be worthy at #9, I'm not sold on his game to translate into that high of a pick for the Bills and the team they are trying to build. I also don't believe we will be going o-line at #9 either, as Beane has stated he does not think there is one he believes to be elite. Top ten pick has to be elite, or potentially elite for him to make that selection. Folks, face it....its gonna be one of Oliver, Josh Allen, Quinnen Williams, Christian Wilkens, or a Montez Sweat. Its the only value( possibly elite talent) worthy of #9 in the eyes of McBeane. Now, a trade down, and everything opens up for skill players/ O-line in the 1st round

 

Its all hypothetical at this point, but I’m not sure that we should be treating every word Beane says at the combine as gospel.

 

The only draft that we have seen from him so far Beane has traded UP... Allen is understandable  of course, but I find it interesting that with a lot of holes and few resources to fill them, he spent a first  and top of the third last year on a very young, physical freak with plenty of upside..

 

I personally don’t care if they pick  Metcalf at 9 or not but it’s not going to surprise me if he is picked there..

Edited by Aussie Joe
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, thebandit27 said:

 

Not really.

 

I would need to convince myself that he's able to refine his route running and up his catch percentage if I'm talking him in the top 10.

 

I think he's an incredible athlete, and certainly has the potential to be a WR1, but I have serious reservations regarding why he didn't produce at Ole Miss.

 

Thanks for getting political!

 

A smart poster might've noticed that I referenced his receptions PER GAME, which takes availability into account.

 

Seriously shocked at people getting upset about his lack of production being questioned.

You make a very good point about Metcalf.  Production matters, and it is also something the Bills value highly per many interviews with McBean.  He might be great, but maybe not.  Personally, I prefer a focus on the lines at 9, although I suspect Metcalf now goes before then anyway.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Aussie Joe said:

 

Its all hypothetical at this point, but I’m not sure that we should be treating every word Beane says at the combine as gospel.

 

The only draft that we have seen from him so far Beane has traded UP... Allen is undersyamdqble of course, but I find it interesting that with a lot of holes and few resources to fill them, he spent a first  and top of the third last year on a very young, physical freak with plenty of upside..

 

I personally don’t care if they pick  Metcalf at 9 or not but it’s not going to surprise me if he is picked there..

I agree. I just think we should get used to Beane being steadfast in his approach. He's stayed true to his word and philosophy thus far, no reason to doubt him now. That said, it IS poker playing time of year

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Aussie Joe said:

 

Its all hypothetical at this point, but I’m not sure that we should be treating every word Beane says at the combine as gospel.

 

The only draft that we have seen from him so far Beane has traded UP... Allen is understandable  of course, but I find it interesting that with a lot of holes and few resources to fill them, he spent a first  and top of the third last year on a very young, physical freak with plenty of upside..

 

I personally don’t care if they pick  Metcalf at 9 or not but it’s not going to surprise me if he is picked there..

It certainly seems as though Beane will gamble on physical freaks if he deems them to be “coachable”. We’ll see with Metcalf. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said:

D.K. is going to the Bills at #9.  You all are going to have to deal with that.

 

This time last year 70%, or more, of this board wanted nothing to do with Josh Allen and were calling him a "day 2" guy.

 

Not saying the Bills will not pull the trigger, but I think the NE model of role players on offense has kind of hurt the super star #1 WR model. Belichick tells players "this game you are a decoy", this game you we will throw to you only after they show this defense, etc... Multiple players coming out of the org parrot the same thing so there must be some truth to it.

 

It sounds like McDermott when describing his ideal WRs was buying into that concept, and it is hard to argue with the success of teams that can spread the ball around to players who are willing to just do their part - personal accolades and numbers aside.

 

Does not mean they will not take an outstanding offensive skill player, but certainly any players who have a prima donna "me-first" reputation are very unlikely to end up as FA or draft prospects while Beane and McDermott are around.

 

....and yet again there was the Kelvin Benjamin thing - perhaps that was the butterfly that kicked them in the head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, K-9 said:

We need to tap the breaks on Metcalf and the other athletic freaks on display a little bit.

 

It’s a great first step in the process for him, but what he’s put on tape and how he does in his interviews is every bit as important. Especially when it comes to breaking it down on the whiteboard and showing how much he understands route concepts and understanding why defenses do certain things in certain situations, etc. 

 

No doubt his athleticism will be hard to ignore for some teams, but the league has gotten smarter over time, too. If he doesn’t understand the concepts involved, it won’t matter how fast he is or how high he can jump. 

 

Love his physical ability, but I’ll be convinced after seeing a season or two first.

 

Unfortunately you draft now, not a season or two later.  He will be in the top 10

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, thebandit27 said:

 

I think he's an incredible athlete, and certainly has the potential to be a WR1, but I have serious reservations regarding why he didn't produce at Ole Miss.

 

 

Looks to me like it was more a lack of targets than lack of skill.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Alphadawg7 said:

 

Unfortunately you draft now, not a season or two later.  He will be in the top 10

My comments have nothing to do with where I think he’ll be drafted and everythIng to do with knowing there’s a lot more to the process  left to go through. 

 

All these prospects are just checking boxes, nothing more at this point. 

 

As for wanting to wait a season or two, it’s because I have absolutely no clue to how well he plays the game of football. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, K-9 said:

My comments have nothing to do with where I think he’ll be drafted and everythIng to do with knowing there’s a lot more to the process  left to go through. 

 

All these prospects are just checking boxes, nothing more at this point. 

 

As for wanting to wait a season or two, it’s because I have absolutely no clue to how well he plays the game of football. 

 

No need to sweat it K9...the ONLY certain thing is that we all will certainly be wrong on more than a few prospects we were high on.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, NewEra said:

Metcalf is too 6 now?  Lol.  This is crazy.  Dude isn’t that good.  I’d still consider it a reach at 9 as he won’t be top 9 on my BPA list

Teams fall in love with elite measureables. Its all potential at this point. Theres a decent amount of people that think he can become a better route runner. If so the sky is the limit for him. The injury put a damper on things.

 

Nobody knows what he will turn into. Look at Foster he eclipsed his college totals in his first year on one of the worst offenses in the league. Production in college isnt the be all and end all. 

 

Could definetly see him being high on beanes board. He seems to like high ceiling elite athleticism players. Look at Allen and Edmunds.

Edited by Not at the table Karlos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said:

D.K. is going to the Bills at #9.  You all are going to have to deal with that.

 

This time last year 70%, or more, of this board wanted nothing to do with Josh Allen and were calling him a "day 2" guy.

He will be gone before are pick! 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said:

 

I got a feeling he goes Top 10..

 

Someone will roll the dice..might be Beane... he loves him some high ceiling..

 

He does, but I think drafting a QB is different than any other position.  Taking a chance on Josh Allen in the top 10 is one thing.

At WR it's a totally different thing.  Beane just this past week he doesn't believe in a prototypical number one WR.  I wouldn't

be mad if he grabbed Metcalfe though.

 

Look for guys at whatever position (but this year specifically OL, DL and TE) that has the following:

 

* A history of production over time

* High end athletic traits/size for their position

* A leader on their college team

* Position versatility

* A known, good work ethic

* A player who stacked games together over time (healthy or available)

* Film that consistently shows a player who plays with a passion/motor

* Clean off the field (As much as anyone can know the type of person one is)

 

This seems to be Beane and McD's M.O. in the first three rounds of draft.

 

Metcalfe would fit some of that.  The healthy/available thing is big with this Bills regime, in general though.

It all depends on Free Agency.  Do they get a WR in FA or trade?  Or do they focus on OL?  Interesting few

weeks coming up.

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HappyDays said:

 

I don't think he'll even be available at 9. That was my fear going into the combine.

I’m fine with Butler at 9 if he isn’t. I said a month or so ago that the WR Class was much better than was being talked about. IIRC I said two guys will go in the top 15. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dopey said:

If NE doesn't take him  at the end of rd 1 and he's there when we pick in rd 2, do you grab him?

I would not take him early in round 2.  I’d rather see them get an OL or WR, especially if they take a DL in 1st, but even if they take a OL in first, I would not be against taking another in 2nd.

 

I do expect the Bills to pursue OL in FA, but I’m not expecting a huge haul at that position that will address all of the OL needs.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Not at the table Karlos said:

Teams fall in love with elite measureables. Its all potential at this point. Theres a decent amount of people that think he can become a better route runner. If so the sky is the limit for him. The injury put a damper on things.

 

Nobody knows what he will turn into. Look at Foster he eclipsed his college totals in his first year on one of the worst offenses in the league. Production in college isnt the be all and end all. 

 

Could definetly see him being high on beanes board. He seems to like high ceiling elite athleticism players. Look at Allen and Edmunds.

I realize that.  Just don’t agree that he’ll be a top 6 pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thebandit27 said:

And yet Metcalf had 30 catches last year and averaged 3 receptions per game in the SEC...

 

To me, he's an athlete trying to play football right now 

 

You may choose to add Christian Wilkins to that list 

Agreed - Wilkins has dominated at a high level of competition and has the character traits that the Bills are after.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For all those saying Metcalf at 9 is a no-brainer: With the 40 time he just put up, there's a chance he's not even THERE at 9. 

If he is, I think the Bills have already shown that they like supreme athletic specimens by drafting Edmunds and Allen. The question is how they feel about his health and his college production.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, bills6969 said:

Normally I’m against picking WRs in first round but I’d definitely go with Metclaf if he’s there at 10.  Dude is Calvin Johnson.2.0

Johnson was 2inches taller and 6-8lb heavier. I dunno if we’ll ever see a 2.0. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...