Jump to content

Mat68

Community Member
  • Posts

    4,826
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

2,851 profile views

Mat68's Achievements

Veteran

Veteran (6/8)

2k

Reputation

  1. Its never that simple. Last time Buffalo traded up for a Wr it was a bad decision. Class is too deep imo.
  2. Still can by staying at 28, 60 next year 1st or 3rd. They very well could draft a wr at any of those top picks that takes over for Diggs. That wr plus 2 or 3 other starters is more important than 1 player slightly better in college.
  3. Draft 2 between 148 and 204 on day 3. Rapp and Blackmon get the first shot. Could be a solid duo.
  4. Guy coaches in the Rocky mountains 😂😂. That will help recruiting.
  5. I think that is too much for a wr. Too little depth to mortgage that much. That should be 3 starters or future starters for a wr.
  6. Only position without a possible/probable starter too. No one would be comfortable with Hamlin or Lewis starting week 1.
  7. I appreciate his own takes and avoidance of group think. I find it funny he posts this and multiple “Gurus” tweet people in the NFL have Nabers over Harrison. Enough questions to remove him from first rd imo. 60 for sure. There will be a very good wr at 60.
  8. Why move an All pro you paid as top of his position? Sign a guy and draft 1 or 2 on day 3 and safety is set.
  9. Young guy coming off career year. Like it. Make it happen Beane.
  10. Sure done in a way that adds cap space. Best player on the defense as it sits.
  11. Last 3 years averaged under 4 per carry. Hard pass. Give me a guy similar to Johnson. Part of committee productive but did not get many touches. I think you can find better athletes for the same money or investments.
  12. Yuck. Very underwhelming. Poor efficiency. Rather draft a guy late vs Mattison.
  13. After letting Po and Hyde walk I would be surprised if they went with another 30 year old vet for good money.
  14. The argument is by hitting on later round guys their cap number is less then the vet minimum and controlled for a few years. Yes you can fill holes with vet minimum FA but they are 1 year deals. They contribute or over perform they either walk in FA or get a significant bump in pay. Limiting the veteran presence on the bottom of the roster will make it more enticing for priority UDFAs. They can choose where to sign. Buffalo for the last few years has not seen much action in this category because the path to the roster was crowded by veterans.
×
×
  • Create New...