Jump to content

What is the Bills record without Shady?


What is the Bills record without Shady?  

99 members have voted

  1. 1. What is the Bills record without Shady?

    • 5 wins or less
      66
    • 6 wins
      12
    • 7 wins
      9
    • 8 wins
      2
    • 9 wins
      3
    • I'm irrationally exuberant. GO BILLS!!!
      7


Recommended Posts

He's the best player on the offense and usually  the best player out of all 22 on the field.. We're doomed without him, but I still feel he'll be there from week 1 on , barring injury of course. It's all heresay at this point. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know in another thread I mentioned that I kind of viewed this season as a throw away year anyways, with the qb situation and wr depth chart.  Making the playoffs last year helps me to not even be upset about that.  So I pretty much felt that 8 wins was the max, and 4 was the floor.

 

So if Shady is gone, suspended, or healthy all 16 games, I don’t think it matters from a playoffs or no playoffs perspective.  Will it effect the number of wins?  Probably.  But to me, if it decreases the win total by 2, that’s going from 7 to 5 wins, or 8 to 6 wins.  So it does not impact a playoff push at all in my mind, regardless of the outcome.  

 

Ending the drought, to me, makes this all a little easier to handle from a Bills perspective.  If there was a year that we have to move on from our best player, this would be it.  We probably wouldn’t be a playoff team anyways.  This would have been more devastating last year, when we all (at this time in the off-season prior to Watkins and Darby trades) at least thought there was a chance of playoffs.  This year, I’m not even stressing the thought of losing Shady for the year, or for good.  

 

PS:  Everything I just wrote is from a purely football perspective focused on wins and losses.  In no way am I suggesting that wins and losses are more important than domestic violence.  Just simply making the point that from a Bills fan perspective, losing your best player would make the upcoming season much more difficult to accept if the drought still existed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, billsfan5121 said:

I know in another thread I mentioned that I kind of viewed this season as a throw away year anyways, with the qb situation and wr depth chart... BLAH BLAH BLAH..

No one knows about our wr depth. We haven’t had a qb capable of determining who’s good/who’s not.

 

Anyway, minus Shady, 0-2 wins unless Allen starts games.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Chandler#81 said:

No one knows about our wr depth. We haven’t had a qb capable of determining who’s good/who’s not.

 

Anyway, minus Shady, 0-2 wins unless Allen starts games.

Let’s be real for a moment.  Our WR depth chart does not look good.  You know that as much as I do.  Does that mean they can’t be good, or won’t be good?  Of course not.  I never said they can’t be good.  Of course they can.  There was a point Stevie Johnson was a 7th round pick and had 2 career TDs.  Then, in 2010, he gets 10 TDS and 1000 yards.  I assume prior to the 2010, people were concerned with the WR depth chart, and rightfully so.  That’s where I’m at this year.  It doesn’t “look” good.  But it’s the NFL, games need to get played, and we could all be in for a big surprise.  But don’t criticize people for thinking it “looks” like a position of need.  Every football “expert” feels the exact same way, so it’s not like I’m making wild assumptions.  But I admit it’s simply an assumption that the WR depth chart does not look threatening at this time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, billsfan5121 said:

Let’s be real for a moment.  Our WR depth chart does not look good.  You know that as much as I do.  Does that mean they can’t be good, or won’t be good?  Of course not.  I never said they can’t be good.  Of course they can.  There was a point Stevie Johnson was a 7th round pick and had 2 career TDs.  Then, in 2010, he gets 10 TDS and 1000 yards.  I assume prior to the 2010, people were concerned with the WR depth chart, and rightfully so.  That’s where I’m at this year.  It doesn’t “look” good.  But it’s the NFL, games need to get played, and we could all be in for a big surprise.  But don’t criticize people for thinking it “looks” like a position of need.  Every football “expert” feels the exact same way, so it’s not like I’m making wild assumptions.  But I admit it’s simply an assumption that the WR depth chart does not look threatening at this time.

 

great points.  The WR chart looks bleak.  But, I have a feeling we have a lot of high-upside guys and 1-3 of them have a great year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, RyanC883 said:

 

great points.  The WR chart looks bleak.  But, I have a feeling we have a lot of high-upside guys and 1-3 of them have a great year.  

That’s exactly how I feel.  Nobody can tell me it doesn’t at least look bad.  But looking bad and turning out to be bad are two different things.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hot take: our record would have been exactly the same the past 2 years without Shady. Our other running backs usually had about the same YPA as he did and statistics show rushing efficiency has practically no effect on winning a game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McCoy on this team or not on this team has little impact on the bottom line.

 

He's a great talent and good for your fantasy team, but he is utterly replaceable, and his presence on the field doesn't translate to wins or losses.

 

When he is gone, he will be replaced with another RB and the show will continue down the road.

 

Not sure why people don't get this.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

McCoy was going to have a down year anyways.  If today’s nfl, if you are that depended on a rb, your team isn’t that good.

 

but we’ll end up with 7-9 wins like we always do.

 

If shady is out, who is our weapon to stretch the defense? Who changes the equation and takes up an extra defender? We don’t even have 1 yet alone the 2-3 needed to succeed offensively. If (big if) shady doesn’t play a snap, it could get very ugly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t expect this team to have a great record with or without Shady. I think that I had them at about 6-10 so if you subtract him it probably amounts to 5 or less imo. 

 

With that hat being said the focus isn’t really on this year. All that matters this year is that Allen looks the part. Shady wasn’t going to be a key figure on this team by the time they are ready to compete anyways. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Kirby Jackson said:

I don’t expect this team to have a great record with or without Shady. I think that I had them at about 6-10 so if you subtract him it probably amounts to 5 or less imo. 

 

With that hat being said the focus isn’t really on this year. All that matters this year is that Allen looks the part. Shady wasn’t going to be a key figure on this team by the time they are ready to compete anyways. 

 

 

i will try to accept that the focus isn't really on this year

 

but last year wasn't enough to erase the jadedness and indescribableness since 1999

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎7‎/‎11‎/‎2018 at 12:27 PM, Dopey said:

If he's a gone, is he the last of Rex's guys?

I was thinking the same exact thing.  Incognito and Tyrod now possibly Shady.  From a football standpoint I suppose it won't hurt team with everyone being engrained in the process so to speak

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...