Jump to content

Bills FA rumors thread


YoloinOhio

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, NewEra said:

At least 5 elite or close to elite DEs available??  Really?  Name 5

 

here’s  a list

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/defensive-end/

Why the angst? I’d be thrilled with any of these: the aforementioned Chandler J, Justin Houston, Calais Campbell (though I know he’s more a DT), Melvin Ingram, Gregory, Hicks, Ogbah, Reddick, clowney, von miller

 

That’s 10, some a lot better than others but all better than what we have

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said:


2 days ago the Saints were 35 million over the cap and now they are 5. And they didn’t cut anybody and re-sign Carl Granderson. I’m not saying Beane will go crazy with restructures etc, but they can do anything if they want. 

 

It's Saturday. Free Agency opens on Monday. Beane's gonna do some stuff between now and then to get some wiggle room to make moves. But THAT much? No way. "They can do anything they want" is such a minimizing thing to say. It's not that simple. You need to have the contracts to make it work for both parties and you need them to agree to it. If it were as simple as that, we'd have the space right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

 

 

If the folks breaking down our cap space are correct that we could free up 30 plus million this year before an Edmonds trade then that can all be done.  

 

 

Here is the question we're going to very soon have to come to grips with.  

 

Do we play for '23 and beyond or do some serious splash moves to go all in now.  Maybe both can still be true but I don't know.  

 

We will still be a SB contender this year but our offseason will look like last years.  

 

And if we draft Williams at 25 I'd consider it a sign we're doing just that.  Looking long term.  

 

Even if we were able to land ALL those people (unrealistic), even if Beane was on the same page with you and traded Edmunds (unrealistic), even if every possible way to free up every penny was able to be done and agreed upon by those players (unrealistic) - we still wouldn't have enough cash to make all of that happen.

 

Saquon Barkley, Chandler Jones, Rob Gronkowski, Bobby Chandler, and re-signing Harrison Phillips is insanely unrealistic.

Edited by BillsFanForever19
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

It's Saturday. Free Agency opens on Monday. Beane's gonna do some stuff between now and then to get some wiggle room to make moves. But THAT much? No way. "They can do anything they want" is such a minimizing thing to say. It's not that simple. You need to have the contracts to make it work for both parties and you need them to agree to it. If it were as simple as that, we'd have the space right now.


Right. I agree. I really don’t think he will kick the can much, I am just saying he can if he wants to to.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Turbo44 said:

Why the angst? I’d be thrilled with any of these: the aforementioned Chandler J, Justin Houston, Calais Campbell (though I know he’s more a DT), Melvin Ingram, Gregory, Hicks, Ogbah, Reddick, clowney, von miller

 

That’s 10, some a lot better than others but all better than what we have


Gotcha.  Not angst, sorry.  I just think people throw the word “elite” around there way too often.  
 

I’d really like Jones or Miller. Both worthy of elite imo.  Ogbah next I suppose

 

clowney, sure.  The only rumors I’ve heard about him leaving cleveland is he wants to get paid and they aren’t willing to pay him what he’s looking for. Which is probably too rich for us.  
 

Reddick-  not sure how he fits on this team.  Maybe that of Lorenzo’s old role? He and

ed next to eachother sounds fierce vs the pass but 😳 vs the run.  
 

Gregory is good, but I want no part of paying Gregory any kind of guaranteed money.  I don’t see him as a guy McB would go after.  
 

houston, Campbell, and Ingram = I’d rather have Jerry Hughes back and he’ll be cheaper.  He deserves to win the SB this year. 
 

hicks is a beast but more of a 3T for our scheme?  Is he capable of playing the 1?  He’s def not a DE on this team imo.  
 

 

31 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said:

He’s a DT no? 

Would replace harrison imo.  1T with some pass rush ability 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ndirish1978 said:

Hearing Chandler Jones unlikely to sign here per Albright. In that case I have no idea what Beane was thinking not making a move for Mack. We are desperate for a legit pass rush. 

Just for context, we were first or second in pressure rate and top 10 in sacks. We can use a stud but we are absolutely not desperate. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said:

Again, the Bills could not absorb Mack’s contract. He has a 30 mill cap hit this year. He already restructured it last year and wasn’t going to again. That is part of the deal. 

 

The Chargers are only responsible for $17.75 million of that cap hit in 2022.

 

 

Joe Marino easily created $38.5 million in cap space by extending a few core players and restructuring their cap hits in 2022 in his mock offseason. So yes we absolutely could have afforded Mack and still had plenty of room left to spare.

 

I'm hoping that Beane has another move ready to pull the trigger on, something like signing Chandler Jones or trading for Danielle Hunter. If an impact edge rusher isn't added given the choices that were available I will likely consider this offseason a failure.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Big Blitz said:

Here is the question we're going to very soon have to come to grips with.  

 

Do we play for '23 and beyond or do some serious splash moves to go all in now.  Maybe both can still be true but I don't know.  

 

Trading for Mack would not have been an "all in" move. "All in" is what the Rams did when they gave a 1st round pick for a one year rental of Brandin Cooks, a 2nd for a one year rental of Sammy Watkins, and a 2nd and 3rd for a half a year rental of Von Miller. Restructuring a few contracts and giving up a 2nd for three years of an impact pass rusher is not the same thing. Trading a 1st for Diggs didn't mortgage our future. Neither would the Mack trade if we had pulled it off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beast.  Substantial return + his salary is scary.  Maybe we could address the edge pass rush by moving Ed out to DE on early downs.  And have ed and Fletcher inside on passing downs.  If we’re going to pay Ed big bucks after this season, we might want to experiment some. He was a game wrecker the last 1/3 of the season. 

3 minutes ago, njbuff said:

Would you rather have Cox or Chandler Jones?

 

Jones would only cost money and who knows what the price for Cox would be.

 

Interesting.

Jones by a wide margin imo.

 

jones + the draft pick we didn’t have to trade >>> cox minus the draft pick 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, TheyCallMeAndy said:

His contract is a monster, I don’t think he’s an option without reworking his deal.

If we traded for him I think his cap hit would be 8.6m - 8.4 salary and 200k workout bonus. So….if they have any interest in picks and Cole in the trade he’d only be 2m add’l to cap. I’m torn though because (a) Singletary was great at the end of last what and (b) CMC running would mean less josh throwing. Though cmc catching out of the backfield for us would be unbelievable. CMC, diggs, Gabriel, knox, Gronk (if we sign him) and a wr at 25 or 57; how does a team cover all these guys?

5 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

Trading for Mack would not have been an "all in" move. "All in" is what the Rams did when they gave a 1st round pick for a one year rental of Brandin Cooks, a 2nd for a one year rental of Sammy Watkins, and a 2nd and 3rd for a half a year rental of Von Miller. Restructuring a few contracts and giving up a 2nd for three years of an impact pass rusher is not the same thing. Trading a 1st for Diggs didn't mortgage our future. Neither would the Mack trade if we had pulled it off.

Mack was great until the last 2 years. That would have been a lot of risk for a guy who couldn’t stay on the field the last 2 years. That’s why the draft picks traded were underwelming 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BuffBillsForLife said:

A $40 million cap hit for a DT!?  I would rather have them sign Jones as a FA than trade a bunch for Cox, personally.

He wouldn’t be a 40M cap hit for us.

1 minute ago, SCBills said:

Philly could certainly use a young linebacker….

 

Sorry, had to… 

 

(half joking)

 

You ain’t lying

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, TheyCallMeAndy said:

His contract is a monster, I don’t think he’s an option without reworking his deal.

 

Actually a team that trades for McCaffrey would only have an $8.6 million cap hit in 2022, and would have zero guaranteed money due after that season. Carolina would take the brunt of the cap hit. That's why they're reportedly seeking a 1st, it actually costs them more cap space in 2022 to trade him and the trading team would carry no real risk.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cox would pricey as his salary AP hit to the acquiring team is low from what I can tell. 2022 salary of 1.12m, roster bonus of $1m and an option of $2.9m whatever that means. I don’t think the acquiring team would be responsible for restructured done in the past the contract. So $5m for 2022 and even less in 2024 is dirt cheap snd is going to be costly. Thinking pick 25 plus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, njbuff said:

Would you rather have Cox or Chandler Jones?

 

Jones would only cost money and who knows what the price for Cox would be.

 

Interesting.

 

Speaking just about the players, not salary or compensation...

 

Cox did have a down year last year statistically, so the Bills would have to determine if they think he is on the decline, or if it was instead due to him being unhappy with the Eagles, trade rumors, contract, defensive system (as has all been rumored). [He's 10 months younger than Jones---so it's really a question for both players, are they on the decline?]

 

But, I think Cox would be a much bigger impact player for the Bills (than Jones). QBs try to get the ball out quickly against the Bills defense, so it is hard for outside pass rushers to get home. But Cox would shore us up against the run and still gets interior pressure on the QB. The man has been a beast and can disrupt a game.

 

I would love the Bills to get Cox (if determined that his play still matches the cost).

Edited by folz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No guarantees you’ll land one of the top edge rushers so I like the idea of Fletcher Cox as a backup plan. I’d even support Akiem Hicks from Chicago if he had a favorable contract here, guy single handedly shuts down run games when healthy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Turbo44 said:

Cox would pricey as his salary AP hit to the acquiring team is low from what I can tell. 2022 salary of 1.12m, roster bonus of $1m and an option of $2.9m whatever that means. I don’t think the acquiring team would be responsible for restructured done in the past the contract. So $5m for 2022 and even less in 2024 is dirt cheap snd is going to be costly. Thinking pick 25 plus

 

It's a good question, but I think the trade partner would take on the restructure bonus just as the trade partner takes on a roster bonus if the trade is finalized before it comes due.

 

It's only amortized signing bonuses (already paid out money) that stay with the trading team

 

I think

 

Since posting wrong gouge on the internet is well known as the best way to get correct information, I feel certain we'll be set straight soonest

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BuffBillsForLife said:

A $40 million cap hit for a DT!?  I would rather have them sign Jones as a FA than trade a bunch for Cox, personally.

$40m dead cap for eagles if they move him.  His cap hit is just about $15m

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/philadelphia-eagles/fletcher-cox-9822/

 

 

 

How many players have we signed that we were rumored to be in on before hand under Beane? IIRC we just get news of a signing with nothing before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

Even if we were able to land ALL those people (unrealistic), even if Beane was on the same page with you and traded Edmunds (unrealistic), even if every possible way to free up every penny was able to be done and agreed upon by those players (unrealistic) - we still wouldn't have enough cash to make all of that happen.

 

Saquon Barkley, Chandler Jones, Rob Gronkowski, Bobby Chandler, and re-signing Harrison Phillips is insanely unrealistic.

I’m not here to disagree with you but last year we also thought that no way will be able to keep Milano and Williams , just saying that if Bean wants to get something done he’ll figure out a way 

12 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

He’s going to play out this year and go from there. Beane isn’t changing out the captain of the D, they are all in this year.  

I agree with you but if we are moving on from him next year ,  wouldn’t it be better to get something for him instead of letting walk ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...