Jump to content

Bills sign TE Jacob Hollister


Recommended Posts

Just now, krf139 said:

Everyone claimed Josh had no talent around him at Wyoming to justify his meh college stats, so nobody should be happy to bring in anyone he played with.  

That was Allen's junior year that he had nothing around him, and that's being nice to the definition of nothing. It looked like a peewee football team against college athletes.

 

They actually had quite a bit of talent his sophomore year when he had Gentry, Hollister, Hill, and 1 or 2 NFL linemen around him.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BuffaloBills1998 said:

So I’m sure this means no more Ertz to Buffalo. Philly was probably asking to high of a draft pick and they weren’t budging off what they wanted

Not exactly. Hollister is more of a attached TE and will be more a Lee Smith replacement. Bills still need a receiving TE to push Knox

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Rico said:

Looks like a high-motor lunch-pailer with a mean streak. 

usa_today_11291544.0.jpg

He looks like every 80's teen "bad guy" like he is going to challenge someone to a race down Devils Canyon for the rights to the ski resort.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BuffaloBills1998 said:

So I’m sure this means no more Ertz to Buffalo. Philly was probably asking to high of a draft pick and they weren’t budging off what they wanted


Third round apparently... I’m glad they didn’t give that up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, FluffHead said:


 

he has made some plays but not exactly the upgrade most were hoping for

Nothing more then a Lee Smith replacement (  IMO ) I don’t think this means that Ertz is out of the picture 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hollister looks like a depth signing who will help in the run blocking.  He likely was not brought in to stretch the field or be an athletic receiving option.   I haven't watched him play enough to know if he's a good run blocker, but it was noted up above in this thread.  I have seen him make a few catches, but those make the highlight package.  I have no issue with this signing in and of itself, but if they were planning on adding a receiving threat at TE and this was the best they could do, I would be disappointed.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said:

 

Welcome to Bills free agency 2021

 

- Punter

- WR4

- Back up QB

- Blocking TE

 

Well jeez, when you put it that way... 🙂 

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, msw2112 said:

Hollister looks like a depth signing who will help in the run blocking.  He likely was not brought in to stretch the field or be an athletic receiving option.   I haven't watched him play enough to know if he's a good run blocker, but it was noted up above in this thread.  I have seen him make a few catches, but those make the highlight package.  I have no issue with this signing in and of itself, but if they were planning on adding a receiving threat at TE and this was the best they could do, I would be disappointed.

 

While Knox hasn't had the production many of us have hoped for, but I do think he does a really good job taking the top off of defenses in order to open up the passing game for our wr's. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ngbills said:

This is Lee Smith or Reggie Gilliam replacement not Knox. At least I hope. Played in TE friendly systems and not produced as a receiving threat. I almost see him more as a Patrick Dimarco or how they used Gilliam this year. 

 

Still need to get Ertz...

 

Hollister does not deserve to be put in the Lee Smith category as a TE receiving threat.  He was the #3 WR on Seattle's 4000+ yd passing offense in 2019, 3.7 receptions/game, 31.7 ypg.  He ain't Kittle, Waller, Hunter, or Kelce but when did Pat DiMarco, Reggie Gilliam, or (fergoshsakes) Lee Smith do that in the NFL?

 

Hollister's snaps fell off the first part of 2020 after Seattle signed Greg Olsen, but he still made some catches when his snap count increased at the end of the season.

 

Decent depth signing and really not a Lee Smith replacement I think - I don't think he can block anything near Lee Smith's abilities

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Ethan in Portland said:

Puke. At best he looks like a guy that would replace Gilliam. I watched him play. He is not even as good as Kroft. 

 

Is this team any better than last year at this point in free agency? No pass rusher.  Older but less injury risk at WR. Otherwise the same team plus Star that made a deep playoff run. Kudos to Beane for keeping the Oline intact. Now he just needs to find a couple front 7 edge defenders that will contribute right away and a long term replacement for Star at NT.

 

forgot about Gilliam.  I like that guy.  He flashed a few times this season. 

 

The edge defender that can contribute right away is the big ?? for me.  I don't think you get a day 1 contributor through the draft at 30, so we have to get one in FA or hope AJ improves.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, krf139 said:

Everyone claimed Josh had no talent around him at Wyoming to justify his meh college stats, so nobody should be happy to bring in anyone he played with.  

Exactly what I was thinking. Not thrilled with the signing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, dbfla10 said:

Not exactly. Hollister is more of a attached TE and will be more a Lee Smith replacement. Bills still need a receiving TE to push Knox

Ertz coming here is a long shot anyways. Philly wants too high of a pick and Buffalo won’t give it up for a TE that’s in decline. Unless he gets released and signs with us immediately for the vet minimum, we’re most likely drafting one and developing him

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Hollister does not deserve to be put in the Lee Smith category as a TE receiving threat.  He was the #3 WR on Seattle's 4000+ yd passing offense in 2019, 3.7 receptions/game, 31.7 ypg.  He ain't Kittle, Waller, Hunter, or Kelce but when did Pat DiMarco, Reggie Gilliam, or (fergoshsakes) Lee Smith do that in the NFL?

 

Hollister's snaps fell off the first part of 2020 after Seattle signed Greg Olsen, but he still made some catches when his snap count increased at the end of the season.

 

Decent depth signing and really not a Lee Smith replacement I think - I don't think he can block anything near Lee Smith's abilities

Lee Smith was a TE ?? I thought he was 
OL-man 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BuffaloBills1998 said:

Ertz coming here is a long shot anyways. Philly wants too high of a pick and Buffalo won’t give it up for a TE that’s in decline. Unless he gets released and signs with us immediately for the vet minimum, we’re most likely drafting one and developing him


I suspect they are fine going into this season with Knox, Sweeney, and Hollister.  If they can add someone in the draft, that is gravy. 
 

i don’t get the Ertz love anyway. The guy seems pretty broken down. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Miyagi-Do Karate said:


I suspect they are fine going into this season with Knox, Sweeney, and Hollister.  If they can add someone in the draft, that is gravy. 
 

i don’t get the Ertz love anyway. The guy seems pretty broken down. 

 

Other than Pitts, which we are not getting, the draft is really bad for TE

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RyanC883 said:

 

forgot about Gilliam.  I like that guy.  He flashed a few times this season. 

 

The edge defender that can contribute right away is the big ?? for me.  I don't think you get a day 1 contributor through the draft at 30, so we have to get one in FA or hope AJ improves.   

 

I think Hollister may have a career year in TD receptions. He's way better that Lee Smith in Red Zone situations. I'll put the under / over at 6. He may also improve the run game with his blocking in 11 or 12.  
 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, krf139 said:

Everyone claimed Josh had no talent around him at Wyoming to justify his meh college stats, so nobody should be happy to bring in anyone he played with.  

 

The reason Allen had no talent around him his Jr year in Wyo is because Gentry, Hollister, center Chase Roullier (starting for WFT) and I think 2-3 other guys for the NFL after his Sophomore year.

 

Gentry was on the Bears PS for 2 seasons, waived at the start of camp, then injured after the XFL picked him up.  Hollister was signed by NE for 2 years then the Seahawks traded for him. 

 

It's not like these guys are game-changers (if they were, they wouldn't be signing on cheap deals) but it's not like they're trash no one else in the NFL has rostered, either.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, ngbills said:

This is Lee Smith or Reggie Gilliam replacement not Knox. At least I hope. Played in TE friendly systems and not produced as a receiving threat. I almost see him more as a Patrick Dimarco or how they used Gilliam this year. 

 

Still need to get Ertz...

At 245 lbs, he is no Lee Smith replacement, unless you are talking about occupying a roster spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, krf139 said:

Everyone claimed Josh had no talent around him at Wyoming to justify his meh college stats, so nobody should be happy to bring in anyone he played with.  

No talent his senior season most agreed he had NFL caliber talent in his junior season when Gentry, Hill and Hollister played with him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Miyagi-Do Karate said:


I suspect they are fine going into this season with Knox, Sweeney, and Hollister.  If they can add someone in the draft, that is gravy. 
 

i don’t get the Ertz love anyway. The guy seems pretty broken down. 

It’s because people are making excuses for him because he played with a bad QB on a bad team. Some guys want to give him the benefit of a doubt for some reason. Just like you idk why

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like this signing.  If we can't get Ertz, Hollister is better than any guy we would draft, and would be our TE2 out of the gate.  I'd say he's an above-average TE, not bad for TE2.  Also consider we have WR's that can do TE type work in Beasly and Sanders in terms of red zone opportunities.  Then you add Knox and Hollister.  It's not bad.  Not thrilling in the sense of adding an all-around weapon, but in short yardage adding him is a plus.  Also plus run blocker.  

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BuffaloBills1998 said:

It’s because people are making excuses for him because he played with a bad QB on a bad team. Some guys want to give him the benefit of a doubt for some reason. Just like you idk why

And some people just like to pretend that they know it all by looking at stats.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...