Jump to content

Bills sign Josh Norman


Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, JMF2006 said:

He will be CB2 here not CB1 like Washington tried to make him.


 

He will have to compete to be CB2.  He very will could be behind Levi Wallace and who knows who else we sign and draft.

 

I have no issues with the signing as it is really just a depth signing.  The money is totally irrelevant as it is a one year deal and begins to provide depth before FA begins.

  • Like (+1) 7
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mattynh said:

This regime loves one year deals.   Which Seems like a good strategy 

 

I agree that it is smart strategy.

 

You cannot fill all your holes in one offseason via the draft. Filling in with cheap-ish vets allows them to focus elsewhere for another year until the value matches up. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Low risk.  High reward.

 

There was a time not very long ago that Josh Norman was among the league's best cornerbacks.  But when he moved to Washington, it became clear that he was a scheme-dependent player.  The guy was fantastic in zone.  He was terrible in man.  The good news is, we play mostly zone coverage and Sean McDermott was the defensive coordinator that got the most out of Norman. 

 

Hopefully this doesn't stop us from bringing back Kevin Johnson, because we could really use depth at the position.  With Tre White, Levi Wallace, Norman and K.Johnson on the outside, then Taron Johnson at the nickel spot, we could completely wipe Cornerback off our needs list.

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He’s familiar with the system

 

has played at a high level under this system

 

He played poorly the past two years playing more man-to-man which is not his forte

 

More often than not McD brings out the best in DB’s

 

He is only 32 years old, not injury prone (fingers crossed) so he should still be able to play a physically high level on this 1 year deal.

 

The Bills were not going to spend cash to cap, they have the money and it won’t alter their FA strategy

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a fantastic pick up.  Yes, he was awful with the Redskins.  But come on, it was the Redskins.  I don't think anyone really wanted to play there.  Horrible coach, horrible organization.  McD said it himself.  "Here in Buffalo, you will be the best version of yourself."  I firmly believe that and he'll get the most out of Norman.  I think Norman will be excited to play again and we will get the most out of him.  If not, he'll enjoy the bench.  McD has shown that he's smart enough to pull players or rotate them when they're not performing as expected.  For the doubters out there, be patient and be optimistic.  Our FO knows what they're doing.

  • Like (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m a little amazed how negative some of these comments are. This hurts NOTHING. 
It’s only a year, he was a very effective zone corner, Levi and Taron are still here, and it’s not like they won’t add more guys to the competition. Norman has never been overly athletic but the dude has instincts. What is the worst case scenario? He backs up Levi? 
Or he’s depth if they sign someone who can steal Levi’s job? Beane covers all angles, low risk signing just in case he can’t get what he really wants later. Kinda like Kroft last year. 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Thank you (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Rc2catch said:

I’m a little amazed how negative some of these comments are. This hurts NOTHING. 
It’s only a year, he was a very effective zone corner, Levi and Taron are still here, and it’s not like they won’t add more guys to the competition. Norman has never been overly athletic but the dude has instincts. What is the worst case scenario? He backs up Levi? 
Or he’s depth if they sign someone who can steal Levi’s job? Beane covers all angles, low risk signing just in case he can’t get what he really wants later. Kinda like Kroft last year. 

It’s ok to not like a signing of a aging veteran without being labeled negative. Fan debate is part of the sport landscape. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

Anyone know how this signing affects comp picks? 

 I don't think it counts in the formula.  However, with as much money and holes as the Bills have, I dont expect to get comp picks from this offseason.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

Anyone know how this signing affects comp picks? 


Haha...I almost brought it up!

 

He’s not a CFA, so he doesn’t count toward the formula for Buffalo.

 

Neither do RFAs FWIW, so let’s get those offer sheets for Feiler and Breida ready!!!

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

Anyone know how this signing affects comp picks? 

 

Comp pick formula only factors in players who play out their deals.

 

Norman was cut and thus does not count in the formula. We could also sign any number of guys who were cut and it doesn't factor in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, JMF2006 said:

 

Considering that top guys get 15m an established vet getting 6m with bonuses is good value.

 

 

Or....as the great Pat Summerall would say......"that's True...................................................................................................................................................value".

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, AlCowlingsTaxiService said:

Kinda like they knew Benjamin?

Remember when they cut him midseason because he was slacking? The organization is no BS

17 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

Anyone know how this signing affects comp picks? 

He was cut, so it has no affect. The comp picks only matter for players with expiring contracts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Either Beane & McDermott:

 

1) Watched film of last year and decided he could still perform well in our system

 

or

 

2) Read about his availability (probably here), pressed Caps Lock and said, "I'VE HEARD OF HIM!  LET'S GET THIS GUY!  SUPERBOWL!"

 

I may be wrong, but I'm inclined to believe they watched film.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 7
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most likely not much risk associated with this and probably not much guaranteed either...which is why there are incentives built in.  If he doesn't do well, Bills can cut him out of training camp with no real risk involved.  If he does do well, Bills will have a good player.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a prove it deal and if he isn't looking good - I think the Bills will leave him on the bench or have him come in on certain situations.  The Bills have a lot of options on how to use him - and Washington is a clown show franchise right now - many guys on that team are preserving themselves for their next contract opportunity elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m not as completely satisfied with Kevin Johnson as most Bills are.  I thought he did ok in stretches but like Levi Wallace, struggled a bit at times.  He also didn’t have a great game in the playoffs.   So anyone lamenting at a possible Johnson loss is a bit overblown  IMO. 
 

As far as Norman - there’s no doubt he has been bad the last few years.  But you have to think that the the Bills scouting department and McDermott know know what they are doing.  Also you have to take into account that he’ll be joining a veteran secondary and playing in scheme he knows well and has excelled in.

 

Worst case scenario - he gets outplayed by Wallace and another CB and doesn’t make it through training camp.  The Bills lose a few million that won’t come close to making or breaking their cap situation.  
 

Let’s see how this plays out

  • Like (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Rochesterfan said:


 

He will have to compete to be CB2.  He very will could be behind Levi Wallace and who knows who else we sign and draft.

 

I have no issues with the signing as it is really just a depth signing.  The money is totally irrelevant as it is a one year deal and begins to provide depth before FA begins.

 

 

They didn't just give him 6 million to be behind Wallace.  They signed him because of Wallace...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, thebandit27 said:


A lot less than what? “Up to $6M in incentives” doesn’t tell you much 

Would think there is a decent amount of money tied to active roster bonuses per game.  Nice low risk signing for a guy who will finally return to the scheme he was elite in.  Even though he is older now, he should be able to fill in as needed on the outside.  I am a fan of this one.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...