Jump to content

OK - why the h#ll do we not have a new punter?!?


Bockeye

Recommended Posts

Seems like they explored a couple of options and it didn't work out so they're gonna roll with the guy they already know as opposed to swapping him out right before the season for a guy they don't know/trust. I think they had hoped one of the punter's would have performed better and got caught off guard a bit. A little late on this one.

Edited by LSHMEAB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very simple answer: They are waiting a week so if they bring in a veteran they don't have to guarantee his salary.  In the meantime, Bojorquez has one week to change their minds.  I hope he never has to punt this week and no wisecracks that it will be because of turnovers.  

  • Like (+1) 11
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Bockeye said:

Seriously.  I’m asking the veterans and experts on here. Is there some conspiracy theories out there or what?

 

Does not make sense. 

 

Who’s out there? Really, I don’t keep track of FA punters so if there is a viable option on the wire I am curious to know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think with this upcoming season as we advance ahead on 6 wins, it's likely there will be alot of very close games. Field position will be critical.  He struggled last year and this preseason.  Guys like Colquitt, Miller, Anger and Allen were available and substantial upgrades. I think Sunday will be Bojos last stand. If he continues his 35 yard shankers with little hang time there's no doubt Sean will release him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BuffaloBillies said:

What are we talking about... 3-4 yards here and there MAYBE? He has had some good ones and has been part of the team. Maybe the coaching staff has decided it's not worth the hassle. We'll either be good enough to win with an OK punter or we're not. 

Being pinned at the 5 vs a touchback is a much bigger difference than 3-4 yards

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BuffaloBillies said:

What are we talking about... 3-4 yards here and there MAYBE? He has had some good ones and has been part of the team. Maybe the coaching staff has decided it's not worth the hassle. We'll either be good enough to win with an OK punter or we're not. 

Maybe you better sit this round out.  Hang time prevents returns which can lead to TD's.  A shank can cost a team 40 yards.  Being able to pin them inside the 10 is crucial in terms of field position.  Having a good punter is a huge advantage.

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

Maybe you better sit this round out.  Hang time prevents returns which can lead to TD's.  A shank can cost a team 40 yards.  Being able to pin them inside the 10 is crucial in terms of field position.  Having a good punter is a huge advantage.

 

Someone tell Beane  and McDermott this. They had all the off season to find a good one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Albany, NY is right and this is where the NFLPA rule hurts veteran players.  A less experience player could sign on roster and bet on himself but a veteran cannot.

 

I hope between week 1 and week 2 some veteran punters are brought in, and try both punting and holding kicks.  I personally prefer athletic punters like Moorman was who can make plays other than by kicking whether it means the player is a good tackler, can throw the ball or can run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

Maybe you better sit this round out.  Hang time prevents returns which can lead to TD's.  A shank can cost a team 40 yards.  Being able to pin them inside the 10 is crucial in terms of field position.  Having a good punter is a huge advantage.

 

Ok. Fair enough. I'm in the minority. Just never really valued punters. Maybe it's a personal thing. Kick it and move on...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Warcodered said:

I mean if you look at a bunch of guys and none of them are a clear cut better option than what you have then you'd probably not risk cutting who you've got.

I feel differently. Bojo has been so bad and inconsistent while wearing the uniform that giving another player a chance was the only move.

 

If by rare chance the new guy ended up being worse, at least you tried. Now, when the inevitable shank costs the Bills, fans are going to as why didn’t they see this coming and try something else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Albany,n.y. said:

Very simple answer: They are waiting a week so if they bring in a veteran they don't have to guarantee his salary.  In the meantime, Bojorquez has one week to change their minds.  I hope he never has to punt this week and no wisecracks that it will be because of turnovers.  

 

This right heah!!  ^^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The main issue of course has been his inconsistency.  You just hope he doesn’t shank one when we’re deep in our own territory in the 4th Qtr.

 

Looking at the stats for last season, Bojo was tied for 16th in the NFL with a 45.1 yard average.  He was tied for 21st in Net Average at 39.4 yards.  This is a stat with many factors.  For punts that are returned, a lot is on the coverage team.  If one guy is caught out of his lane, it could result in a long return which messes up this average.  Of course, punts with a good hang time may not be returned. 

Bojo had 22 of 45 punts returned, which isn’t very good.  For comparison, the leaders in Net Avg were Morstead of the Saints and Hekker of the Rams and each had 43 punts, with only 12 each returned.

 

in summary, Bojo is definitely not one of the better punters in the NFL, but he’s also not the worst.

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Bockeye said:

Seriously.  I’m asking the veterans and experts on here. Is there some conspiracy theories out there or what?

 

Does not make sense. 

 

Just couldn't get one. If BOJO  (bang one, jerk one) cant get it together this year then getting a top punter needs to be a priority. We have 90 mil cap space maybe we have to buy one.

 

 

Edited by Buffalo Barbarian
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ColeB said:

The main issue of course has been his inconsistency.  You just hope he doesn’t shank one when we’re deep in our own territory in the 4th Qtr.

 

Looking at the stats for last season, Bojo was tied for 16th in the NFL with a 45.1 yard average.  He was tied for 21st in Net Average at 39.4 yards.  This is a stat with many factors.  For punts that are returned, a lot is on the coverage team.  If one guy is caught out of his lane, it could result in a long return which messes up this average.  Of course, punts with a good hang time may not be returned. 

Bojo had 22 of 45 punts returned, which isn’t very good.  For comparison, the leaders in Net Avg were Morstead of the Saints and Hekker of the Rams and each had 43 punts, with only 12 each returned.

 

in summary, Bojo is definitely not one of the better punters in the NFL, but he’s also not the worst.

 

He was a below average punter last year prone to absolute howlers (dropping the ball before getting a chance to punt and botching a snap / fake - whatever it was supposed to be). This offseason his basic punting has been a lot worse too. 

 

The Bills tried to get Colquitt and he ended up going elsewhere. They have obviously looked at the rest of the market and not been convinced by the options. Bojo is going to hurt them in my view. He has a huge leg but no technique whatsoever. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Bockeye said:

Seriously.  I’m asking the veterans and experts on here. Is there some conspiracy theories out there or what?

 

Does not make sense. 

Hey Cockeye, stay with your thread.?

 

lest a newspaper wrapped gift from the fish market appear at your door. (Thanks Jimmy Spags!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Albany,n.y. said:

Very simple answer: They are waiting a week so if they bring in a veteran they don't have to guarantee his salary.  In the meantime, Bojorquez has one week to change their minds.  I hope he never has to punt this week and no wisecracks that it will be because of turnovers.  

 

I don't get the obsession GMs seem to have with avoiding guaranteed salary.  Say you avoid having to pay a punter $2M by doing this (a very high estimate).  Even if you lose just one game due to your crappy punter, was the cost avoidance worth it?

5 hours ago, BuffaloBillies said:

What are we talking about... 3-4 yards here and there MAYBE? He has had some good ones and has been part of the team. Maybe the coaching staff has decided it's not worth the hassle. We'll either be good enough to win with an OK punter or we're not. 

 

His shanks have been 25 yard punts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, 4_kidd_4 said:

As the resident punting expert, I can neither confirm nor deny the

existence of a vast league-wide punter conspiracy against the Buffalo Bills.

There’s a career in politics waiting for you, kid.  (No, I didn’t misspell that.)

14 minutes ago, Captain Caveman said:

Look on the bright side, maybe we'll finally be the team that just goes for it on fourth down all the time and revolutionizes the game!

Making amends for previous ‘cowardly’ decisions from previous coaching regimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Albany,n.y. said:

Very simple answer: They are waiting a week so if they bring in a veteran they don't have to guarantee his salary.  In the meantime, Bojorquez has one week to change their minds.  I hope he never has to punt this week and no wisecracks that it will be because of turnovers.  

^^^This. Sometimes the simplest answer is the best one :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...