Jump to content

TE Lee Smith visiting Bills


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

Someone please explain to me the advantage of playing a “blocking TE” that absolutely is no threat in the passing game as opposed to an extra OL? 

 

And a penalty machine if I recall correctly.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

Someone please explain to me the advantage of playing a “blocking TE” that absolutely is no threat in the passing game as opposed to an extra OL? 

 

If it's purely for competition and he's not being offered much (more than Fisher), I'd have no problem with it. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

If it's purely for competition and he's not being offered much (more than Fisher), I'd have no problem with it. 

I get it but that still doesn’t answer my question. Neither of them needs to make it IMO. If we are worried about short yardage or whatever I’d rather have Waddle in there or Teller or whomever. An OL is certainly a better blocking option. If the guy doesn’t provide anything in the passing game you should just run a 6th OL our there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good.  I like all the current Bills and I always like to have one that I can hate on.  Why not bring back an old favorite Mr. Smith to be that guy once again.  Hughes just isn't getting enough dumb penalties lately to justify it anymore and Mills is gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Gray Beard said:

He was good for one drive killing penalty per game. I forget, was it holding or false starts?

 

 

You are selling him WAY short.

 

He is a big play penalty guy..........mostly 10 and 15 yarders.

 

I have a feeling he will continue to work on his long snapping and hang around the NFL for another decade after teams finally have had enough of his exploits at TE.

  • Haha (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Locomark said:

Well this goes with the theory that we are just loading guys into camp because we have the money to do it if they sign him. We all know he is just a big man package guy. 

You said big man package 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Doc said:

...why?  They signed Kroft and Fisher, drafted Knox and Sweeney, and already have Croom.  And he's just a blocker, which is something Fisher can do.  I don't get it.

They hope he can. For the same price Smith has actually shown he CAN

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's an excellent blocker or at least he was. I heard somewhere that Sweeney had great hands, so I'm guessing he goes to the PS. We know Kroft and Knox are almost certain to make the roster and Croom is decent depth. Fischer is strictly a blocker. If Smith signs, those TE positions will be hotly contested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont recall him being that bad or epically bad. He certainly was not a star, but whatever. Most of you are way overreacting and being drama queens. Just a mediocre blocking TE that will fill out some depth and push teach some of the young guys. No issues with a modest deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lee Smith is a lot more mobile than most guards/tackles and will be blocking down the field for WRs/RBs when most guards/tackles would be left behind.  That is why you sign a TE like him rather than use an extra OL on play.  The question is just like with FBs will he be on enough plays to warrent a roster slot?

 

When he is targeted he usually catches the ball (56/66) with 7 TDs - not many guards/tackles can do that.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...