Dr. Who

But why not? You're missing out on an opportunity.

I just don't think Beane has used enough day 1 and day 2 capital over the course of his tenure on WR. He may have lucked into a productive player in Bell. My understanding based on what @gonzo1105 and @GunnerBill have written, 2027 is both stacked at WR and a draft that is likely to have a lot of QBs chosen early, so there is a good chance that a very good WR will either fall to the late first or be within striking distance for a trade up.

@NewEra and I were strong advocates for Kincaid prior to that draft. When healthy, he is a genuine weapon. I still do not think that exculpates Beane for what I view as lack of sufficient attention to WR. I agree with those who believe he carries over prejudices from his time at Carolina that account for his roster building proclivities. I don't believe it was simply evaluation misses, though his evaluation at WR is also somewhat suspect. Still, he ought to have devoted more early picks, imo. We have good talent at TE and one can plausibly expect Cook to be more of a receiving threat with Carmichael crafting game plans. All that is good, but I don't personally count that as somehow adding to the quality of the WR room. Many will think that is a mere matter of semantics. Practically speaking, if we stay healthy, there is enough to compete for a Super Bowl.

I don't think it is a good room now. You asserted that it is. We differ in our judgment. As I wrote earlier, I think it is adequate. If Coleman, Palmer, or Bell can significantly contribute, it could be good. All that is projection at this point. I mentioned the 2027 draft because it is supposed to be a strong draft for WR and also because I believe the WR room will be the focus for additional early talent next year. It's not as solid as it could or should be. I did not say or imply that somehow Beane should have added an expensive FA at the position this year. You mentioned it, so I presume you infer that is something I am implicitly asserting when I claim the WR room is not "good." There wasn't really anyone available worthy of that investment, nor do we have the cap space for it. However, Beane is responsible for how he has addressed the position over the years and I don't think he has properly valued the position. It's one place in his criteria for roster building where I fault him. I am not in the least interested in arguing the point. Folks who believe otherwise are welcome to their opinion.

I hope this is true. I find it a more plausible argument when it comes to the defense. I buy that McDermott was hyper-detailed about his system. That kind of focus is not conducive to natural talent responding instinctively and getting into a "flow state." So, you can argue that McDermott benefitted lesser talented players who were analytical and unlikely to go off-script. There might be an inherent cap on the ceiling for that kind of defense. It certainly seemed to be a recurring issue in the post-season. But then, to be honest, I recall some folks on this board with coaching experience who seemed to dismiss those kinds of stark contrasts. Maybe so, but I'm happy to see if Leonhard suddenly unlocks some talent that might have been stifled by system or coaching attitudes. A lot of folks surmise that the playcalling on offense was dictated to some degree by the need to protect the defense. Surely it is a good thing to have a strong run game, but it is even better if you have a potent passing game. Again, some folks believe Allen is a much more efficient qb when he is no longer a gunslinger. I think we over-corrected, but part of that is due to WRs that can't separate. Regardless, it will be an intriguing year. I do think an aggressive mindset is preferable. Be bold, and force the other team to react.

Think what you like. My guess is they will draft a WR in round one or two in 2027.

I don't have a strong sense of how the roster on the defensive side will match up with the new scheme. I am hopeful, because I think we badly needed a change of approach there. Staying healthy is always a wild card. I think last year was one of those seasons that are generally a slog. The Seahawks were playing well in the post-season. They are not a memorable team. You can win that way. I'd like to aspire to more than that, though I agree that we probably meet the threshold for a team that can legitimately contemplate a championship.

You are exaggerating. Of course, this is an absurd and impossible expectation. What we have been lacking are a sufficient number of difference makers on both sides of the ball. It doesn't require HOF caliber in every case. Beane has consistenly preferred a course that prioritizes depth. Ironically, injuries have depleted that depth, often in bunches at the same position group, which played a significant role in recent playoff losses. In any event, Beane has not done well with the WR room. It is still not a good WR room. It went from bottom five to adequate. It may develop into better than that, but it's not what we currently have. If Coleman and Palmer have solid seasons, you can then assert good without simply projecting best case scenarios.

And yet you were avid for trading all sorts of 2027 capital to pick up mulitple nose tackles in the 2026 draft. But yes, if you have the magical capacity to draft JJ or Crosby, that is cost effective and preferable. Next year is an excellent year for WR in the first round. We also need to think about OT. I'll be interested to see how many folks who routinely prioritize defensive needs are on board with a focus on WR that doesn't rely on hoping the likes of Palmer or Coleman turn into reliable weapons.

Still too long. Sentence length is pretty good here, but three or four words is optimum. Way too many bullet points. I once knew a girl who didn't like watching black-and-white movies because they were too hard to understand. Over half the population won't read a single book in a year. Something more like haiku is recommended. Fella runs fast. A lot like Hairston. Strange he lasted until the seventh round.

I guess that's why they call it lonesome hill.

They have an elevated opinion of both Coleman and Palmer. I don't really know why.

Finally, someone focused on the important things.

You trying to lose us some third round picks?

I am rooting for Burton, as well, because he could be a legitimate WR2 based on talent. I am skeptical based on character that he even makes training camp. Bell will need to develop to possibly become WR2 over time. He won't be that from the jump, obviously. As for those who keep maintaining that Coleman and Palmer are the plan to fill that role, that is frankly more of the Beane hope and a prayer mentality that has cost him third round picks at the trade deadline.