Jump to content

EJ Gaines Signs with the Browns for 1 Year at $4M


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

I know we signed Davis....and I expect him to be good

 

But come on....4 million for EJ Gaines?   You gotta make that happen Beane

It takes both sides. He’s smart to sign a 1 year deal where he will start. His market was beyond dead. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Adam727 said:

I was expecting we wouldn't be able to afford Gaines and he'd be playing somewhere else this year.  But I'm pretty disappointed the Bills weren't able to beat a 1 yr $4mil contract offer...  

 

Seriously.

1 year $4 mil?

That's pathetic we didn't beat that.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Adam727 said:

I was expecting we wouldn't be able to afford Gaines and he'd be playing somewhere else this year.  But I'm pretty disappointed the Bills weren't able to beat a 1 yr $4mil contract offer...  

 

Yeah, at that price I would have though the Bills could have resigned him as the Nickel back and CB depth.  Hell, 2 year $8M deal would have been good, especially with Vontae here on only a 1 year deal.  

 

But with his injury issues, I am not gonna fret this by any means.  Just feels like a pretty good deal to get him on a 1 year $4M deal.  But we still have a strong secondary (assuming no one gets hurt though).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bills may well have offered something very similar prior to going out and getting Davis.  Perhaps not though.  He was out of the lineup quite a bit, hence the $4m plus incentives contract.  The BIlls have their starting corners.  Looking for nickel and depth at this point, and they are not going to pay $4m + for that, in a cap strapped year.  Too many other holes. They can probably do better than Johnson, but it would not surprise me if he was back.  The will draft one in the first three rounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

Looks like we'll be drafting a CB at 12

 

DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMED

:lol: That would be awesome.

 

Dick Jauron approved.

55 minutes ago, formerlyofCtown said:

Reality is if we signed him he would have got hurt.  Now he will make the Pro Bowl.

This has been closer to the truth, for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He probably priced himself out. That is why Beane made the move for Davis. We probably moved on at that point. 

 

The fact that his price was so low says nothing about Beane missing out. We probably gave him an offer he thought was low and he likely got less on the market. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't just assume we could not afford it. It might just be that the GM disagrees with you and went in a different direction. I like EJ Gaines but I also trust that if the team moved on then there were reasons beyond just money.

 

They moved on from a lot of guys that the fans didn't want to see gone. It didn't hurt the team. I'm not worried.

Edited by Lfod
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, YoloinOhio said:

It takes both sides. He’s smart to sign a 1 year deal where he will start. His market was beyond dead. 

It's surprising to me. By the end of the season I honestly felt he was the key player on the team. If he played, we'd win, if he didn't I thought we'd lose. Hopefully, we won't miss him too much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They seem to be hoping injured players like Davis and Murphy will be good again and players like Lotu , Ivory, Bodine, etc will improve their poor play of the last few seasons. Hope it works out.

  Cockrell just signed today for 2yr at 3.4 per., he has been playing well and can cover slot or outside. Was hoping they were giving him a look.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get these reactions. I'm sure Beane most definitely offered him a contract with playing time incentives that could have exceeded 4 million at the very least.

 

What probably happened was we signed Davis because Gaines over--valued himself; once we got Vontae, that shut the door on him returning, even if we did offer a contract with at least 4 million. EJ's market was dead silent, so he got a lot less than he wanted, especially likely from what he and his agent were asking from the Bills before negotiations with other teams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, billsfan11 said:

So the Bills sign a older vontae Davis for 10 mil but can’t give Gaines 5 or 6?

 

I like Beane but I’m not sure I understand this indirect trade off

Spotrac says $5 mil for Davis.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just seeing the pay this morning is brutal news considering my post yesterday.  Woods' release later this summer would have covered 3/4th of it.

 

damn shame...damn shame, because it would have been a boon to our D and insulated us if any of the three CB went down.

 

Can you imagine having Gaines, White and Davis for less than what New England pays Gilmore.

 

@TPS

Edited by dollars 2 donuts
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, JimKellyTryouts said:

I don't get these reactions. I'm sure Beane most definitely offered him a contract with playing time incentives that could have exceeded 4 million at the very least.

 

What probably happened was we signed Davis because Gaines over--valued himself; once we got Vontae, that shut the door on him returning, even if we did offer a contract with at least 4 million. EJ's market was dead silent, so he got a lot less than he wanted, especially likely from what he and his agent were asking from the Bills before negotiations with other teams. 

 

Considering it seemed like the Bills moved-on from Gaines even before the FA period opened (by signing Davis), they probably offered Gaines a deal that he and his agent thought was insulting and they told the Bills to F themselves, either directly or indirectly.  Then when he hit the market and found offers that were substantially worse, he took the best one he could get, and that was the Browns. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Chuck Wagon said:

 

 

The guys running the team have never valued the RB position like that.  Barkley's pass catching ability increases his value, but it's also likely they are fine with Hyde / Duke Johnson at RB.  Guard is likely the strongest position on their team with Zeitler / Bitonio, so that rules out Nelson.  They could be in play for Chubb but might never see him.  I think they are a real candidate to trade down.

I think they stay at #4 and get either Chubb or Barkely. One of the two is guaranteed to be there. Browns had a lot of draft selections last year and again have a lot this year. I don't see the value in them gaining more picks. They need quality over quantity in this draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sammy Watkins' Rib said:

I think they stay at #4 and get either Chubb or Barkely. One of the two is guaranteed to be there. Browns had a lot of draft selections last year and again have a lot this year. I don't see the value in them gaining more picks. They need quality over quantity in this draft.

 

One thing I was thinking is that if they draft a QB (Darnold), they would be wise to use a 1st rounder on a LT.  Fourth overall is too high for McGlinchey so they may be willing to move back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Doc said:

 

Considering it seemed like the Bills moved-on from Gaines even before the FA period opened (by signing Davis), they probably offered Gaines a deal that he and his agent thought was insulting and they told the Bills to F themselves, either directly or indirectly.  Then when he hit the market and found offers that were substantially worse, he took the best one he could get, and that was the Browns. 

I think he just wants to play and the Bills were offering him the slot role. He’s the #1 corner in Cleveland. 

8 hours ago, billsfan11 said:

So the Bills sign a older vontae Davis for 10 mil but can’t give Gaines 5 or 6?

 

I like Beane but I’m not sure I understand this indirect trade off

They signed Vontae Davis for 5 mill

2 hours ago, wppete said:

The browns are stacked. They are going to very good next year. 

They still have one of the worst secondaries in the league. It might be even worse this year than last year unless they get a starting CB in the draft. Should have kept McCourty. 

Edited by YoloinOhio
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

I think he just wants to play and the Bills were offering him the slot role. He’s the #1 corner in Cleveland. 

They signed Vontae Davis for 5 mill

They still have one of the worst secondaries in the league. It might be even worse this year than last year unless they get a starting CB in the draft. Should have kept McCourty. 

It was 5 mil? Oh I could have sworn I thought it was 10 for some reason 

3 hours ago, TPS said:

Spotrac says $5 mil for Davis.

My bad I thought I read ten. Thanks for clarifying 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, billsfan11 said:

It was 5 mil? Oh I could have sworn I thought it was 10 for some reason 

My bad I thought I read ten. Thanks for clarifying 

I think he can make up  to 8 with incentives but it’s 5 mill base, 3.5 gtd

 

edit: looked it up and it’s lower 

 

 

Edited by YoloinOhio
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

I think he just wants to play and the Bills were offering him the slot role. He’s the #1 corner in Cleveland.

 

Slot CB is pretty much a starting position these days. Maybe less chance of getting injured as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Doc said:

 

Slot CB is pretty much a starting position these days. Maybe less chance of getting injured as well.

That’s true, but outside corners make more money. It’s about the next contract. He’s a young guy on a 1 year deal. If he plays well on the outside he will make a lot more on the market next year than if he was the #3 corner in Buffalo 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BillsFan2313 said:

Gaines has played good for like 8 games in his career, thus the reason for a 1 year 4 million contract. Some of you are really really over valuing EJ Gaines. 

 

The reason for the 1 year prove it deal is his inability to stay in the lineup due to injurty.  He's a good player. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Doc said:

 

One thing I was thinking is that if they draft a QB (Darnold), they would be wise to use a 1st rounder on a LT.  Fourth overall is too high for McGlinchey so they may be willing to move back.

 

If I were the Browns I wouldn't bother trading down at all. They have plenty of draft picks already and will have a ton of cap space for the next couple years. They don't need picks anymore, they need blue-chip players. Fitzpatrick or Chubb would be the smart move for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Steve Billieve said:

dead money is still dead money.  there's a reason most people didn't think we would be able to trade Darius last year.

 

100M is still 100M even with your imagination of alot of dead money next year too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, JimKellyTryouts said:

I don't get these reactions. I'm sure Beane most definitely offered him a contract with playing time incentives that could have exceeded 4 million at the very least.

 

What probably happened was we signed Davis because Gaines over--valued himself; once we got Vontae, that shut the door on him returning, even if we did offer a contract with at least 4 million. EJ's market was dead silent, so he got a lot less than he wanted, especially likely from what he and his agent were asking from the Bills before negotiations with other teams. 

 

He like a lot of posters here probably read the predictions he'd get a $8 Million + contract and the window for the Bills closed.

 

He is taking a chance here that he can stay healthy for 1 year and then hope to hit it big in free agency but if you cannot hit it big with the Brown$ I doubt it is possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

The reason for the 1 year prove it deal is his inability to stay in the lineup due to injurty.  He's a good player. 

 

1 good year, actually half a year. I believe he was rated one of the worst cbs in the NFL while with the Rams. 15,11 and 11 games of "good player" play would have equaled a more lucrative contract. Injuries might have played a little factor, but only playing good in a handful games did more so IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...