Jump to content

BillsFan130

Community Member
  • Posts

    6,130
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Recent Profile Visitors

4,128 profile views

BillsFan130's Achievements

Veteran

Veteran (6/8)

2.1k

Reputation

  1. You're entitled to your opinion. We'll have to agree to disagree.
  2. I think I've beaten this long enough so while I appreciate your response, I'm kind of worn out talking about the pass rush lol. As no one will convince me that it was good on Sunday
  3. Edmunds is definitely a polarizing player to say the least lol, 23 pages and counting. For me, I can't say I'm a big fan of him. Thought he was really good in 2019. Thought he struggled pretty badly last year. (although injuries played a role) And this year I think he played well week 1, and didn't play very well the past 2 games. In saying all of this, I can't blame Beane picking up his 5th year option. He has shown he can be the guy, I just don't think he's done it consistently enough.
  4. I think Tua can be judged a bit. He doesn't really have any good traits which would really concern me if I'm a dolphins fan. Mac definitely can't be judged yet as he's only played 3 games. And actually looked good in 2 of those
  5. Sure, I think they can get to 10 wins. I just meant I don't think they are going to make much noise in the playoffs, yet. Next year very possible
  6. I will still say the chiefs until the bills beat them. If the bills do, then it's arguable IMO Good post. I can't say I'm sold on the chargers yet myself. Like they beat KC yesterday, but I think chiefs turned it over 4 times? That never happens . Chargers are still good, just don't think they are ready to compete with the big boys when it's all said and done.
  7. Fair enough man. I guess what I was just trying to prove was that it's not as black and white as you said. You may very well be right about the pass rush was sufficient enough. I Just thought it was at least up for discussion. I appreciate the apology. You have a good night as well sir
  8. Ok so some stats for the pass rush for you: 0 sacks. 2 Qb hits. 9 Pressures (compared to 44 last week to put it in perspective) Sure there are other factors, but seriously what metrics for pass rush are more valuable than sacks, qb hits and pressures?
  9. The lack of sacks to me is not the only factor, but it's for sure a factor. Especially when they only got 2 Qb hits on top of it. I will for sure acknowledge there are factors besides sacks. But I would actually like to know the "pressure " percentage of the pass rush yesterday because to me, it didn't really feel like there was much with the exception of a few plays . I think 0 Sacks and 2 QB hits reflect that^ In the big picture with everything factored in.
  10. I really don't care if you get swayed or not lol. My point is it's not as black and white as you say and you're the one who's "clueless" by making that statement. If you want to disagree that's fine. Just don't be obnoxious about it and call people "clueless " when it's a legit debate
  11. Here you go bud. Since I'm "clueless " and there is no room for debate because the pass rush was "very good", you may want to tune into this podcast. About 20 minutes in.
  12. Hmmm I would mostly agree with you. I thought Payne was beating Ford pretty easily though. At least early in the game. Seemed like Ford played better as the game went on though and the interior pass rush was definitely missing for Washington later on to your point.
  13. He was very underwhelming yesterday. The guy on the locked on Washington podcast was right about him when he said he's not really a difference maker
  14. Ya I'm agreeing with you haha. I'm saying it's hard to say he can't play in crowds when he hasn't had much of a chance. And ya he played unreal that game in front of a crowd
×
×
  • Create New...