Jump to content

UPDATE: NBC Rejects trade offer. : Per Report: ESPN Trying to "Trade" For Al Michael's to pair with Peyton for MNF broadcast.


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Bronxbomber21 said:

Why would NBC ever do that ? What's are they getting back?

 

Hard to say what ESPN/Disney could offer..?

 

Just now, Buffalo03 said:

They do already have Mike Tirico. He was good when he was on ESPN doing the games

 

This is a good point... If Al wants to leave, NBC might be happy moving to Tirico full time instead of this slow succession thing they're doing now, but even if that was a positive, I can't imagine they want to help the competition become a power house.

 

If Manning is half as good as people expect, he and Michaels would instantly challenge Romo and Nantz for top broadcast duo with Tirico and Collinsworth and Buck and Aikman playing for 3rd and 4th, respectfully. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

Talk football 1 night a week for 4 months and make nearly 20 million a year for the next 20+ years if he wants.

 

How does Manning turn it down?

 

Didn't ESPN balk at paying Tony Romo $17M a year to commentate on games?  Now they're going to pay Peyton > $20M?  Not sure I believe it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, whatdrought said:

 

Hard to say what ESPN/Disney could offer..?

 

 

This is a good point... If Al wants to leave, NBC might be happy moving to Tirico full time instead of this slow succession thing they're doing now, but even if that was a positive, I can't imagine they want to help the competition become a power house.

 

If Manning is half as good as people expect, he and Michaels would instantly challenge Romo and Nantz for top broadcast duo with Tirico and Collinsworth and Buck and Aikman playing for 3rd and 4th, respectfully. 

I would rank the four pairs differently.    I've been waiting and hoping for MIihaels to retire for years.   Nantz, Tirico and Buck are seriously good play by play men.   All four commentators are good.   

 

Tirico left ESPN because he understood Michaels was going to retire and he'd get the Sunday night gig.  Somehow Michaels didn't retire. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Shaw66 said:

I would rank the four pairs differently.    I've been waiting and hoping for MIihaels to retire for years.   Nantz, Tirico and Buck are seriously good play by play men.   All four commentators are good.   

 

Tirico left ESPN because he understood Michaels was going to retire and he'd get the Sunday night gig.  Somehow Michaels didn't retire. 

 

Suppose it shakes out that way, how would you rate them? 

 

I guess Manning is a wildcard, but I also think that the current iteration of Michaels is held back by Collinsworth which could lead to Peyton rejuvenating his career like Romo did for Nantz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just want an “in stadium only” sound option.

 

Come on now, w streaming thru PC and smart TV you mean to tell me we can’t have custom in-game camera and audio options? That’s how any of these services/sports packages might get my dollar.

 

But then again, how would I have any idea what a laugh-riot the all new Bob ❤️ Abishola is gonna be? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ESPN should not be focusing on one big splash given how desperately under staffed they are.  They need to bring in experts and lots of them.  The average ESPN panel is 4.25 former players and journalists as it is!!!!  These guys are spread too thin!!! I need 15 guys MINIMUM shouting over each other to get their hot takes and superficial analyses heard.  I should NOT have to hear opinions from the same guy twice!!

 

One man, no matter how tough to listen to, is not going to swing the needle.  ESPN's only hope to right this ship is to bring in 35-40 Booger McFarlands and a handful of Dennis Millers.

Edited by Jauronimo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

they've gotta figure out how to flex games or at least be smarter about how they pick the teams.  even adjusting the schedule as late as pre season. monday night used to mean something. now it's kind of lost the luster. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, whatdrought said:

 

Hard to say what ESPN/Disney could offer..?

 

 

This is a good point... If Al wants to leave, NBC might be happy moving to Tirico full time instead of this slow succession thing they're doing now, but even if that was a positive, I can't imagine they want to help the competition become a power house.

 

If Manning is half as good as people expect, he and Michaels would instantly challenge Romo and Nantz for top broadcast duo with Tirico and Collinsworth and Buck and Aikman playing for 3rd and 4th, respectfully. 

 

Buck and Aikman are no where near the top 4.... theyre horrendous. And same with Tirico and Collinsworth... Tirico is good but Collinsworth drags them down

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gugny said:

I just want Booger gone.

 

I don’t pay as much attention to announcers as others, in general.  I do enjoy Romo because he’s outside the box and tells you what’s coming with eerie accuracy, but he’s not the reason I tune in. Booger is a reason to tune OUT or hit MUTE. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Kmart128 said:

 

Buck and Aikman are no where near the top 4.... theyre horrendous. And same with Tirico and Collinsworth... Tirico is good but Collinsworth drags them down

Buck is OK. Aikman is terrible.  All Aikman does is recite bland clichés.  Romo is light years better, discussing in depth what's going on, and why.  

 

Romo:Aikman as graduate school:middle school

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Buffalo_Stampede said:

If Romo is getting 17 you're not getting Peyton Manning for less.

 

I agree.  My point was that ESPN passed on giving Romo $17M, so I'm surprised that they would even consider going after Peyton who will want more...if they can even lure him to the booth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LabattBlue said:

Peyton doing scripted commercials...very enjoyable.

 

Peyton doing unscripted game analysis...I have a feeling he would be a dud.

 

Not sure if ESPN views him as the next Romo?  

 

Really untrue.  Go watch his ESPN series Peyton's Places.  He's very quit witted and has a good time.  I think he would be a solid guy int the booth.  Other than Romo, the field is uniformly horrible, without exception.

 

He could walk right in and be a star.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Im not sure Manning has the voice or dialect that’s gonna work well for this.... 

He’d be commenting on a football game, not running for President. Did Madden have great dialect ? Regardless of one’s personal take on Madden, he was very popular. Manning gets a very high “ Q score” or whatever , so he has the broad appeal that networks covet. It doesn’t matter if he’s as analytical as Romo, it’s simply that people like him. That’s gold for TV. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Incredibly, Michaels has been traded by ESPN once before as the network traded the legendary broadcaster to NBC for a cartoon called Oswald the Lucky Rabbit. No, we aren’t making that up."

40 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

If Romo is getting 17 you're not getting Peyton Manning for less.

 

i missed it, but has Peyton shown he has what it takes to call games?

 

Joe Montana bombed horribly.

 

and many others.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...