Jump to content

Which One - Fitz, Tyrod, or Barkley as Your Your Backup?


Irv

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, MacGyver said:

Barkley

 

Fans around here would be calling for Fitz way too soon, and Tyrod is not really backup material IMO.

Why do you think he's not backup material? I put him in the same category at Fitz: Not quite good enough to be a starter, but one of the best backups in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MJS said:

Why do you think he's not backup material? I put him in the same category at Fitz: Not quite good enough to be a starter, but one of the best backups in the league.

 

He doesn't have the right attitude to be a backup IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I liked some of the things that Tyrod can do, I have no longing to have him as my backup QB.  I think if you have to resort to using Tyrod for any length of time, you have to change your offense, because he has something of a specialized skill set.  Fitz can also do some good things.  I wouldn't mind having him as my backup, but I'd just as soon keep Barkley.  I'm sure Barkley has some negatives.  I haven't followed his career beyond hearing he didn't have a great arm coming out of USC.  His sample size with the Bills is too small to make any definitive assessment, but he hasn't given me any reason not to like him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot more input is needed for me I love Fitz because of the kind of team mate he is & i really like that gun slinger mentality but his INT's kill you eventually, Tyrod is also great guy super team mate & leader very safe player & as a back up probably couldn't do much better but he does need to score more, just take some chances !

 

Then there is Barkley, if his one & only game for the Bills could be any kind of pre curser of how he would be on the field all the time hands down my pick but we haven't seen enough of him in Dabols scheme to know but i trust McBeane & he is there for now so he is my pick !! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming none of them is asked to play:

 

Fitz the mentor...... the wise voice in the ear of the starter.  A wise counsel to the young QB trying to learn the ropes of being a team leader under a media microscope.

 

Barkley is the sidekick.  Like Tonto or Robin, he is in the fight but knows his place, burries his ego and is loyal to the cause.  That was Frank Reich.

 

Tyrod seems so understated and his personality is veiled.  His effect in the room would be more subtle.  I doubt he need do much for Rivers and what good he did for Mayfield is not obvious to me.

 

Now, when you need them to start a game or, to the extreme, finish a season and take it to the post season ala Foles, I have no idea but I think your team is screwed with any of them as the starter.

 

Edited by JESSEFEFFER
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, MacGyver said:

Barkley

 

Fans around here would be calling for Fitz way too soon, and Tyrod is not really backup material IMO.

 

Having seen Josh's performance last season, why would anyone be quick to call for Fitz this year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, WhoTom said:

 

Having seen Josh's performance last season, why would anyone be quick to call for Fitz this year?

 

It would only take a few poor performances by Allen to have many Bills fans clamoring for Fitz.

Edited by MacGyver
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, MacGyver said:

iirc he brought up the QB race card and had a bit of a victim mentality to him.

He was asked about those issues directly and answered honestly. I don't have an issue with that. His opinion is that race plays a factor, and other people have the opinion that it doesn't. Two halves of the same coin.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, MJS said:

He was asked about those issues directly and answered honestly. I don't have an issue with that. His opinion is that race plays a factor, and other people have the opinion that it doesn't. Two halves of the same coin.

 

Fair enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Rc2catch said:

I’m taking Fitz 100%

You know where he went to school? That man is smart. 

 

In all seriousness I would take Fitz over the others as backup, as he’s the most capable to come out of the pen and get you some wins in an injury situation. Not to mention the guy has played for 1000 coaches and teams now he knows how to work a playbook and offense and apparently is quite good in the locker room 

Yes.  You don't know what you are going to get with any of those 3 guys, but I think you have more of a chance at catching Fitz on a day good than with the others, and if you do, he can do the most for you when he's on.

 

Of course, he also might throw 4 INTs.

 

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

Go back two years and there were actually posters on this forum arguing that Tyrod Taylor was a Franchise Quarterback. Yes folks, our expectations had been lowered to such an extent that it became a thing. 

 

"Hey this guys doesn't completely screw up every time he hits the field, damn that must be what a Franchise Quarterback looks like." 

Tyrod is basically still a rookie.  Give him time.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

During the bills/Steelers game(Johnson’s drop) years ago there was a dude that sat behind us the whole game and just kept yelling “come on FRITZY! get mad, FRITZY!” I’ll never forget it. Good ole “FRITZY”... My buddy that was there with me(Stiller fan) and I have called him by the name “FRITZY” to this day. 

 

funny thing is ole fritz did seem to look pretty pissed off when he had to zing one. 

 

....And I’m not answering the question. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tyrod is the man who broke the curse. I would take him all day. I wish he was still a Bill.

38 minutes ago, Teddy KGB said:

Tyfraud or Pickspatrick for more than league minimum is a hard pass.  

You mean Fitz-putrid, Fitz-tragic, or Fitz-pick-6?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With our defense and lack of elite offensive personnel, I'm taking Tyrod every day of the week. 

 

Heck, he lead them to 9 wins with that gutted 2017 roster. 

 

Both Fitz and Barkley would put up better numbers(with a lot more turnovers), but Tyrod would lead them to the most wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fitz x1000 Harder questions please, like can underthrowing be fixed:)

1 hour ago, SloanBillsFan said:

Kinda torn because I am a TT fan and I liked Fitz right up to the point where he got a huge paycheck and his hands turned into every opponent's best friends. 

 

I think I'd have to go:

  • Barclay 
  • Taylor 
  • Fitz

I hope your 1st choice was autocorrected.

If not im worried about how you came to your conclusion 

Edited by gobills1212
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Mr. WEO said:

Wow, really?

 

Fitz and it isn't even close.

 

Barkley is a nonentity.

 

Not everybody agrees.  I did not anticipate the split opinions on this.  I'm leaning towards the guy that would make the least mistakes - TT. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Irv said:

 

Not everybody agrees.  I did not anticipate the split opinions on this.  I'm leaning towards the guy that would make the least mistakes - TT. 

 

You have to score points to win.  

 

Tyrod is worthless in todays nfl.  

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Irv said:

 

Not everybody agrees.  I did not anticipate the split opinions on this.  I'm leaning towards the guy that would make the least mistakes - TT. 

 

I'd rather have the guy who has seen it all, will walk into the locker room and the huddle and immediately command the respect of his teammates and if they lose, go down swinging.

 

TT could achieve none of that.  Neither could Barkley.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Limeaid said:

Depends on scheme and how backup would be used.

Fitz - if you needed someone to take chances since you were not going to win otherwise

Tyrod - Someone to make something happen when RBs/line were not getting it done. Good as 2nd QB as slash QB/RB.

Barkley - when you are winning the game and QB needs to come out for injury.  Don't take chances, don't mess up.

 

Pretty good assessment.

 

Barkley played a very good game against the Jets for us last year.  He did everything you want your QB to do if you're playing with a good D and just want him to score enough points - threw for enough yards, completed 60% of his passes, 9 YPA, no mistakes.  His performance in 2016 to finish the season with Chicago suggests that he might not be able to sustain that, unless it represents a true uptick in QB IQ or a better-match of a system.

 

Good Fitz can light your hair on fire, and has been able to since his very first game as a pro, but all fans in Buffalo painfully know he will eventually turn into Bad Fitz and crush your hopes and dreams while grinding your bones to make his bread.  OK, not that last, but the rest of it.

 

1 hour ago, Irv said:

 

Not everybody agrees.  I did not anticipate the split opinions on this.  I'm leaning towards the guy that would make the least mistakes - TT. 

 

Making the least mistakes as a QB doesn't count when you won't pull the trigger and try an adequate number of times. 
It's like a student submitting a blank sheet of test paper - they didn't make mistakes, but they didn't take a shot either.

 

TT can play decently in a specific system.  If he were backing up LJax in a system designed by Roman and designed around a strong run game, I'd pick him.  No where else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tough call. I'd pick Fitz since I've seen a larger body of work. Based on the Jets game, it would be Barkley all the way, but that was just one game. I'd be cool with Tyrod except the NFL knows his shtick now. (Like latter day Flutie.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...