Jump to content

Update TE Parham back to SD


Reed83HOF

Recommended Posts

Also have to got with the thought on 12 personnel above, from even a roster building standpoint, it's cheaper for 2 topish TEs than 2 topish WRs. This along with mismatches and I know Kelce is his own thing, but he'll the KC offense revolves around stopping him and teams can't. Within our own division (where we look first) the 12 personnel does give us an edge. Even against KC and Cin to a degree....

 

Right?

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

6’8 obviously could be used as a major redzone threat. Mismatch lined up in slot too

 

With him and Spencer Brown, the rest of the league could not compete with us…….in rebounding. 

2 minutes ago, TOboy said:

Not sure we’ll see lots of 12 personnel, we just signed a 5’6 receiver today who will likely have a much bigger role than our backup TE. 
 

That said, I can see Parham being a nice red zone target. 

 

Maybe it averages out?  🤷‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TOboy said:

Not sure we’ll see lots of 12 personnel, we just signed a 5’6 receiver today who will likely have a much bigger role than our backup TE. 
 

That said, I can see Parham being a nice red zone target. 

 

I saw Harty lined up in the backfield on some plays...Davis, two of: (Hines, Cook, Shakir & Harty depending on the game situation), Knox and tight end 2... go no huddle out of that every fourth drive.

 

Not to make this a Harty post, but Diggs, Harty, Shakir in stacked trips reading coverage on who goes deep middle short with two of Cook, Hines and Knox staying in to block, with the other being the immediate hot route depending on where the pressure is coming from...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 78thealltimegreat said:

Very deep TE class I’d rather take one in the draft and develop him in TE2 sets behind Dawson but his size does give the Bills something they don’t currently have a player who can make a contested catch 

There is a 6'8" TE in the draft that I'd like better. There are at least two other TEs (consensus #s 1 and 2) who would do a lot more in developing plays for two TE sets. 
I hope we are not being set up for an all-D draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, RichRiderBills said:

Meh....

 

3 minutes ago, wppete said:

Hopefully this happens. Parham has untapped talent. 

 

Be poster 2, not poster 1.

 

Everyone got unreal expectations when they saw us come up with 45.3 in cap.

 

But they neglected to factor in we were 18.7 over the cap to begin with and more importantly - we had *24* Free Agents. Even if we let most of them walk, we'd still need to replace those bodies.

 

This always meant that by and large, we'd have to look for diamonds in the rough. Players that the scouting department identified as having untapped potential and room for growth.

 

With McGovern, Harty, and possibly Parham - you can see the potential. And if they're able to reach that potential, the "overpays" will become "bargains".

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...