Jump to content

Cowboys and Dak reach deal


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Boxcar said:

I really wish the NFL would get rid of the salary cap

 

Remember why the cap was created in the first place.  Parity.

 

Rich teams like Dallas would throw the most money at the top FA's.  Doesn't mean championships, look at Washington over the years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CaptnCoke11 said:

Yay

 

Yes, if they will give us all a break and stop talking about it constantly it will be a treat for Everybody!  I’m SICK of all the Dak/Cowboys talk, and while we’re at it when the subject turns to LeBron I’m likely to change the channel.  

 

Then there is Brady........

 

 

 

 

.

Edited by Augie
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Limeaid said:

 

So does Jerry Jones, Kraft, etc.   

 

Watch Football become like baseball where some teams are effectively farm teams.

If you want an argument that the salary cap helps create parity, baseball isn't a good place to look. Different teams are winning every year. The difference is that teams can actually pay their players to stay rather than have constant turnover due to cap restraints. It's a good thing that the Padres locked up FTJ without having to worry about it. The cap also didn't seem to stop the Patriots from making every other Superbowl for like 10 years either.

 

Does anyone enjoy fussing over numbers so that we can fit in the contract for a linebacker?

Edited by Boxcar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Boxcar said:

If you want an argument that the salary cap helps create parity, baseball isn't a good place to look. Different teams are winning every year. The difference is that now teams can actually pay their players to stay. The cap also didn't seem to stop the Patriots from making every other Superbowl for like 10 years either.

 

Does anyone enjoy fussing over numbers so that we can fit in the contract for a linebacker?

 

No my argument is that baseball was ruined due to some teams being able to spend a lot more which is what eliminating salary cap does.

 

And New England winning had nothing to do with cap.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Limeaid said:

 

No my argument is that baseball was ruined due to some teams being able to spend a lot more which is what eliminating salary cap does.

 

And New England winning had nothing to do with cap.

Yeah but the highest spending teams aside from the Dodgers aren't really winning much. Red Sox, Angels, Cubs, Phillies, etc. The Rays are competitive every year, as are the Athletics. What happens is that these high spenders eventually get bogged down by the end years of huge contracts. The Angels have made the playoffs one time, for example, while Mike Trout was part of the team, arguably the best player of all time. The Angels consistently have a top 5, usually top 3 payroll. Lots of smaller teams are competing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NFL and players just need to learn to distribute the cap space a little better, that way teams are built more evenly/fairly. Like positional salary minimum/maximum. This IS a team sport the last time I checked. Why should 1 player get 15% or more of the salary cap? Honestly.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, inaugural balls said:

 

Hear hear!

 

I long for the days of ineptitude at the QB position.

 

Geez, people......really?

You have no issue with an inferior QB getting a record breaking contract, necessarily bumping up the cost for our own QB?

1 minute ago, costrovs said:

The NFL and players just need to learn to distribute the cap space a little better, that way teams are built more evenly/fairly. Like positional salary minimum/maximum. This IS a team sport the last time I checked. Why should 1 player get 15% or more of the salary cap? Honestly.

Because the market dictates that he's worth it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, FFadpecr said:

Josh Allen and his agent are celebrating right now as we speak.

 

Dak getting $40 mil per means that Josh Allen's floor in contract negotiations starts at $45 mil per.

 

Josh Allen just made more money from this contract.

And this is exactly why the players want other players to get as much as they can. Josh won and didn't even have to get off the couch.

Edited by 716
Typos
  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Boxcar said:

Because the market dictates that he's worth it?

The players agents dictate the market then.

What if the NFL steps in and says they're gonna limit the salary based on the players position?

QB's - no more than 10%

WR - no more than 5%

.............. and so on,

It'll make it easier for teams to sign there own players. It'll put more emphasis on drafting good players and keeping them.

Teams will be built from the draft, the way it should be.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, costrovs said:

The players agents dictate the market then.

What if the NFL steps in and says they're gonna limit the salary based on the players position?

QB's - no more than 10%

WR - no more than 5%

.............. and so on,

It'll make it easier for teams to sign there own players. It'll put more emphasis on drafting good players and keeping them.

Teams will be built from the draft, the way it should be.

 

 

 

The NFL does not have that power. It would have to be collectively bargained in a new CBA. QB pay is getting out of control, but I’m not sure what the best solution is. 

 

A wise man I knew once said the answer to high prices is...........high prices. Those rookie deals look more inviting every year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CNYfan said:

Maybe Josh is between Prescott and Mahomes?

I’m not saying this because I’m a bills fan but Allen is way better then dak. Allen had 0 run game and everyone know what was coming and Allen still carried this team to the AFCC just think if we had Zeke. So I think he will get more then dak especially if he plays the same this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Augie said:

 

The NFL does not have that power. It would have to be collectively bargained in a new CBA. QB pay is getting out of control, but I’m not sure what the best solution is. 

 

A wise man I knew once said the answer to high prices is...........high prices. Those rookie deals look more inviting every year. 

I don't see why ANY team would be opposed to it. I'm sure some players wont like it.  Tough sh*t, if you got a problem with it, go get a normal job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, costrovs said:

I don't see why ANY team would be opposed to it. I'm sure some players wont like it.  Tough sh*t, if you got a problem with it, go get a normal job.

 

You do understand collective bargaining and the CBA, right???  You know, contracts and “stuff”.  What all the lawyers do? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So let's do a little  accounting

 

Est cap 170mill

 

Dak 40 mill

Zek 15 mill

 

So 55 mill for 2 players 

170 -55

 

115 mill for 49 players 

 

So basically  2mill per player 

And just think Oliver gets 4mill per year on a first round pick

 

Not many clams to go around for the rest of the team

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Augie said:

 

You do understand collective bargaining and the CBA, right???  You know, contracts and “stuff”.  What all the lawyers do? 

 

To a certain extent yes. And again, why should 1 player get upwards of 12% or more of the teams salary cap? Is there a rule saying the QB should get that much? Or a star WR should get around 10%? or why 3/4 players should consist of 25% of the teams salary cap? I don't think so....

Mind you, I didn't look at the CBA, but I believe that as long as the team is under the cap before the season starts(or whatever the rule specifically states) then that's all that matters.

If the cap is 170M, The top QB's (Mahomes) should get 10%, so at most 17M. Dak's would probably be like 12M in this scenario.

Just limit the positional spending(all positions, not just QB). It'll give teams a lot more money to put towards other positions of need. Some players would get mad because they wont get as much, but others would end up getting more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, BillsRdue said:

This sucks, it is going to drive Allen's price way, way up and limit us building depth around him long term. 

I don’t think this deal will impact Josh’s deal at all. He was always going to get 40+ million on his deal. The cap will start going back up, the Bills will be able to build a team around him.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guess Allen just made a killing without doing a thing...

1 hour ago, BillsRdue said:

This sucks, it is going to drive Allen's price way, way up and limit us building depth around him long term. 

 

Not really...the cap is about to skyrocket especially after the new TV contracts kick in after 2022...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, billsfan89 said:

 

If the aav is 40 million then what the hell was Dak asking for? These QB deals are absurd. I think this sets the market for Josh as he isn't taking a penny less.

I think Josh is focused on winning a championship and like Brady will do right by the team to ensure that they can put a competitive team around him.  

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, FFadpecr said:

 

 

Watson 39 last year

Dak 40 this year

Mahomes 45 last year

 

 

Factoring in QB Inflation, Josh should get 47-48 

I don’t think he will get more than Mahomes. Mahomes was a MVP and Super Bowl winner. 
I can see 10 years at 430 million with half guaranteed. I think that’s a fair contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...