Jump to content

The Real Reason Why the Colts' Fans were Booing Andrew Luck


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, JoPar_v2 said:

 

If memory serves, there was talk of them tanking that year when Manning was hurt and Luck was looming in the draft, for the simple reason that they stuck with Curtis Painter (remember him!) instead of trying to find and sign a better option, because Painter was god awful. Like, Peterman-level awful. That’s where the narrative comes from.

That's how i remember it.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, BringBackFergy said:

That gut punch will turn into a haymaker when the Fans find out Luck was asked to delay his announcement. 

 

As @klos63 said above...sometimes enough is enough. Luck had every opportunity to announce this “change of heart” in April or May. Nooooo, in exchange for $21 million, he decided to “think about it” for three months. Ka-Ching  $$

 

I think this is completely plausible.  The question I had is, why is he there with the team if he already told the FO he's quitting?  They got busted trying to withhold it from the fans.  

 

No head coach would let a player who just quit be mingling with ex teammates during a game without a reason.  

 

Obviously not similar in terms of what the player did for the organization but if Vontae Davis came back out in Bills attire and it broke he quit ......

 

They weren't booing because they don't appreciate what Luck meant - they boo'd because he shouldn't be out there.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BringBackFergy said:

I'm a little sick of all the talking heads and current / ex-football players saying the Colts' fans were wrong to "Boo" Andrew Luck.

 

Sure the guy has been thrown around like a rag doll for the last 6 years, but you have to dig deeper into one issue that has been talked about very little: MONEY

 

First, we can all agree that Jim Irsay is of questionable integrity. Had a few run-ins with the law, TANKED the year to get Luck, and is overall somewhat slimy.

 

If Luck was having this pain for the last few years and recently had problems with his calf muscle and ankle, why did it become a "career ending" problem just two weeks before the start of the season. MONEY

 

Second, take a look at what Luck said on his interview. Paraphrasing here but he said he's had discussions with Chris Ballard over the summer about his pain, physical condition, etc.  Why do you think he held off on making this announcement until two weeks before the season? MONEY

 

Third, when Irsay found out about Luck's condition and discussions with Ballard, I'll bet Irsay brought Luck into his office and said "Can you hold off for another month or two? Let's wait and see? I'll make it worth your while."  Meanwhile, the Colts were able to renew season tickets and generate revenue based on the assumption (by those same Booing fans) that Luck was all set to play this year.

 

Fourth, fast forward to the day after his retirement when we hear in passing that Irsay will not seek repayment of the $21 million bonus!!! What??

 

Something stinks in this whole thing.  Irsay, the delays in announcing retirement, and the "Go ahead and keep $21 million". I don't feel bad for Luck at all. Ironworkers, roofers, police officers, etc. all suffer through pain and discomfort and very rarely get a $21 million dollar golden parachute on retirement.  The dirt will come out soon enough...and the Fans will really start to Boo.

 

 

The indisputable fact is that Luck retired.  Almost everything else in BBF's post is opinion.  

 

We don't know the "real" reason Luck retired.  I do know that every player retires at some point.  Only they can decide when it's right for them and their families.  Luck reevaluated his situation and decided it was best for him to retire now.  That's his right.  He's not required to play football.  

 

Who among us knows what Luck's family has been advising him or what the doctors have been telling him?   Or how those things may have changed over the course of the year?

 

I don't feel sorry for Luck.  He had a bad day when folks booed but a bad day doesn't make a bad life.  I do think it's classless for fans to boo him over something like this.  Let's boo Al Qaeda.  Let's boo Neo Nazis.  Let's not boo an athlete because he's doing something as sinister as retiring.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nextmanup said:

Did you read his post?  He just told you.

 

Luck was asked to hold off making the announcement  as long as possible so that the organization had time to secure maximum ticket sales for the upcoming season.   The fans realized this, paid money to see Luck but aren't going to see him, and were pissed, so they booed.  

 

As compensation for playing along, Luck gets to keep all that money the organization legally could have taken back from him.

 

Sure this is somewhat of a "conspiracy theory" but it very well could have played out this way.

 

It may also have been much more innocent than this too, with Luck finally being pressed to make the decision only when he had to, on the eve of the regular season.  

 

And in exchange for services performed, being a good guy, and probably in hopes of him changing his mind and wanting him to come back to the team, he was allowed to keep all that bonus cash.

 

I'd say what really happened is one of these 2 things.

I heard a lot of nonsense, but he didn't state why the fans booed.

 

It's pretty simple. The fans booed because they were pissed Luck was retiring 2 weeks before the season, because their chances of winning just went way down. That's all. Simple. It wasn't because they all collectively thought of, at the same time, of some weird conspiracy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MJS said:

I heard a lot of nonsense, but he didn't state why the fans booed.

 

It's pretty simple. The fans booed because they were pissed Luck was retiring 2 weeks before the season, because their chances of winning just went way down. That's all. Simple. It wasn't because they all collectively thought of, at the same time, of some weird conspiracy.

You are re-stating what I wrote and what BBF wrote, just in using different words.

 

And actually BBF did explain why they were booing.  Maybe not as directly as you would have preferred.

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

The fans booed him because they were drunk at a preseason game. Honestly this whole story got out of hand. It might have been a few loud fans. Yeah there are a few a-holes in a large crowd of drunk people. Who really cares 

Right, and the talking heads/some players seem to act like it’s a pressing world issue. Getting booed as a millionaire is not one of the more cruel things that happen on this earth. Yet the pundits are using this is an example for the decline of western civilization. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BringBackFergy said:

 

 

Something stinks in this whole thing.  Irsay, the delays in announcing retirement, and the "Go ahead and keep $21 million". I don't feel bad for Luck at all. Ironworkers, roofers, police officers, etc. all suffer through pain and discomfort and very rarely get a $21 million dollar golden parachute on retirement.  The dirt will come out soon enough...and the Fans will really start to Boo.

 

yes, of course.  and then there is the traditional gathering of the townsfolk to boo the retirement  announcements of the ironworkers, roofers and police officers.  It's a celebrated tradition to boo a person who gave you his all and then decides it's time to retire.

 

Excellent point.

 

In your super clever conspiracy run through, you strangely didn't mention that the Colts were still selling tons of season tickets despite 8-8 seasons (more recently WITH Luck) and the continued employment of football mental midget Chuck Pagano....

 

But keep us posted as to when "the dirt comes out"!

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Nextmanup said:

You are re-stating what I wrote and what BBF wrote, just in using different words.

 

And actually BBF did explain why they were booing.  Maybe not as directly as you would have preferred.

No. BBF said:

 

"Why is everyone mad at fans for booing? They were warranted to boo because of x, y, z."

 

The title of the thread indicates that there is a different reason the fans were booing besides what was originally thought, and that the reason would be given. That reason was never given. Thus my original post (which was just a joke).

 

Instead, the topic was about conspiracies why the OP feels that Colts fans are justified in their booing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BringBackFergy said:

I'm a little sick of all the talking heads and current / ex-football players saying the Colts' fans were wrong to "Boo" Andrew Luck.

 

Sure the guy has been thrown around like a rag doll for the last 6 years, but you have to dig deeper into one issue that has been talked about very little: MONEY

 

First, we can all agree that Jim Irsay is of questionable integrity. Had a few run-ins with the law, TANKED the year to get Luck, and is overall somewhat slimy.

 

If Luck was having this pain for the last few years and recently had problems with his calf muscle and ankle, why did it become a "career ending" problem just two weeks before the start of the season. MONEY

 

Second, take a look at what Luck said on his interview. Paraphrasing here but he said he's had discussions with Chris Ballard over the summer about his pain, physical condition, etc.  Why do you think he held off on making this announcement until two weeks before the season? MONEY

 

Third, when Irsay found out about Luck's condition and discussions with Ballard, I'll bet Irsay brought Luck into his office and said "Can you hold off for another month or two? Let's wait and see? I'll make it worth your while."  Meanwhile, the Colts were able to renew season tickets and generate revenue based on the assumption (by those same Booing fans) that Luck was all set to play this year.

 

Fourth, fast forward to the day after his retirement when we hear in passing that Irsay will not seek repayment of the $21 million bonus!!! What??

 

Something stinks in this whole thing.  Irsay, the delays in announcing retirement, and the "Go ahead and keep $21 million". I don't feel bad for Luck at all. Ironworkers, roofers, police officers, etc. all suffer through pain and discomfort and very rarely get a $21 million dollar golden parachute on retirement.  The dirt will come out soon enough...and the Fans will really start to Boo.

To the bolded, there's several articles of Jim Irsay saying he told Luck that he should hold off as long as you can on making big decisions.

 

 

“I again tried to be the best sounding board I could for him,” Irsay told reporters. “As a father of children that are older than him, you know, life has its spiritual journey, people. I mean this is, you know, this stuff is kind of a ‘bigger than all of us’ sort of issue. And I would never try to talk someone out of something that their heart truly wasn’t into. And so I was there to aboslutely support him and counsel him. Big decisions, you hold off on it. As long as you can, hold off on them. And then when you have to make them, then you make them.” (Emphasis added.)

 

 

https://sports.yahoo.com/more-clues-emerge-regarding-colts-023706618.html

Edited by LOVEMESOMEBILLS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Pegulas hired Rex Ryan as their first move as owners.

 

Everyone on earth knew that Rex Ryan's defensive philosophy wouldn't work with the Top 3 defense created/coached by the prior regime.

 

But Rex was popular.  He got attention.  He said the "right" things.  Result: record-setting season ticket sales.  Other result: the defense and the team were ruined.

 

Money rules the day.

 

The timing of Luck's retirement announcement is suspect, to say the least.  Indy was a sexy pick to make the Super Bowl.  I'm sure their season ticket sales were just lovely.

 

Something is certainly rotten in Denmark.  And Andrew Luck has $21 million reasons to not give one half of a ***** about those boos.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, LOVEMESOMEBILLS said:

To the bolded, there's several articles of Jim Irsay saying he told Luck that he should hold off as long as you can on making big decisions.

 

 

“I again tried to be the best sounding board I could for him,” Irsay told reporters. “As a father of children that are older than him, you know, life has its spiritual journey, people. I mean this is, you know, this stuff is kind of a ‘bigger than all of us’ sort of issue. And I would never try to talk someone out of something that their heart truly wasn’t into. And so I was there to aboslutely support him and counsel him. Big decisions, you hold off on it. As long as you can, hold off on them. And then when you have to make them, then you make them.” (Emphasis added.)

 

 

https://sports.yahoo.com/more-clues-emerge-regarding-colts-023706618.html

Wow!! Thanks for posting this. Daddy Irsay was such a caring soul that he wanted Little Andrew to delay his announcement. What a great guy. And Andy decided to placate Daddy Warbucks by delaying the announcement for weeks/months?? Oh that’s right...21 million reasons to wait until the season is around the corner. 

 

@Mr. WEO will have to conduct further investigations. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, BringBackFergy said:

Wow!! Thanks for posting this. Daddy Irsay was such a caring soul that he wanted Little Andrew to delay his announcement. What a great guy. And Andy decided to placate Daddy Warbucks by delaying the announcement for weeks/months?? Oh that’s right...21 million reasons to wait until the season is around the corner. 

 

@Mr. WEO will have to conduct further investigations. 

 

Wow the owner told his QB not to quit but to wait a little longer before he made such a decision?  That's...wild!

 

How many season tickets do you think this "sexy SB pick" (really, who truly thought this team would beat out NE and KC?  LOL) sold since, say July?  He hasn't practiced all summer--everyone knew something was up.  He was at 3 practices all summer!  Given his injury history and the fact that the team could not give any info on his return, you would have to be a complete moron to be jumping into the Colts season ticket market----in August.  A TOTAL idiot.

 

So this "Conspiracy" of paying Luck--the man who was already falling apart--to keep his retirement a "secret" for another month or so for very late season ticket sales.....is just kind of dumb.

Edited by Mr. WEO
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Lurker said:

 

I'd say it's your opinion, but you're certainly entitled to it...

 

Yours definitely does if you disagree... jilting the bride a week before the wedding isn't acceptable, so why should it be  in this case? Please.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

Wow the owner told his QB not to quit but to wait a little longer before he made such a decision?  That's...wild!

 

How many season tickets do you think this "sexy SB pick" (really, who truly thought this team would beat out NE and KC?  LOL) sold since, say July?  He hasn't practiced all summer--everyone knew something was up.  He was at 3 practices all summer!  Given his injury history and the fact that the team could not give any info on his return, you would have to be a complete moron to be jumping into the Colts season ticket market----in August.  A TOTAL idiot.

 

So this "Conspiracy" of paying Luck--the man who was already falling apart--to keep his retirement a "secret" for another month or so for very late season ticket sales.....is just kind of dumb.

There's some saying that Luck may have let the team know as early as March that he was going to retire, but there were people inside the organization asking him to give it one more season before he decided to retire or not. This may or may not be true, but I've heard it multiple times, PFT was one of them.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Ethan in Portland said:

Let him keep the money. It is a sunk cost in economic terms.  

It keeps good will with the player in the hope he changes his mind in 8 weeks or next off-season.

It is not a sunk cost. 

 

Teams get credit back to their salary cap when any player has to pay back a sign bonus or loses salary due to suspension.

Edited by cba fan
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Ethan in Portland said:

Let him keep the money. It is a sunk cost in economic terms.  

It keeps good will with the player in the hope he changes his mind in 8 weeks or next off-season.

This isn’t buying Luck’s jersey for $90, giving him $100 and saying “keep the change”. It’s $21 million freaking dollars. A/k/a Hush Money. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BringBackFergy said:

I'm a little sick of all the talking heads and current / ex-football players saying the Colts' fans were wrong to "Boo" Andrew Luck.

 

Sure the guy has been thrown around like a rag doll for the last 6 years, but you have to dig deeper into one issue that has been talked about very little: MONEY

 

First, we can all agree that Jim Irsay is of questionable integrity. Had a few run-ins with the law, TANKED the year to get Luck, and is overall somewhat slimy.

 

If Luck was having this pain for the last few years and recently had problems with his calf muscle and ankle, why did it become a "career ending" problem just two weeks before the start of the season. MONEY

 

Second, take a look at what Luck said on his interview. Paraphrasing here but he said he's had discussions with Chris Ballard over the summer about his pain, physical condition, etc.  Why do you think he held off on making this announcement until two weeks before the season? MONEY

 

Third, when Irsay found out about Luck's condition and discussions with Ballard, I'll bet Irsay brought Luck into his office and said "Can you hold off for another month or two? Let's wait and see? I'll make it worth your while."  Meanwhile, the Colts were able to renew season tickets and generate revenue based on the assumption (by those same Booing fans) that Luck was all set to play this year.

 

Fourth, fast forward to the day after his retirement when we hear in passing that Irsay will not seek repayment of the $21 million bonus!!! What??

 

Something stinks in this whole thing.  Irsay, the delays in announcing retirement, and the "Go ahead and keep $21 million". I don't feel bad for Luck at all. Ironworkers, roofers, police officers, etc. all suffer through pain and discomfort and very rarely get a $21 million dollar golden parachute on retirement.  The dirt will come out soon enough...and the Fans will really start to Boo.

 

 

Nah.

 

Fans were jerks, he was injured. It ain't rocket science, or even single digit addition.

 

And it's very rare to seek the money back. The Bills didn't seek repayment from freaking Vontae Davis.

Edited by Thurman#1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, LOVEMESOMEBILLS said:

There's some saying that Luck may have let the team know as early as March that he was going to retire, but there were people inside the organization asking him to give it one more season before he decided to retire or not. This may or may not be true, but I've heard it multiple times, PFT was one of them.

 

If true, well....of course they were!  Why wouldn't they??  What FO would NOT try to talk him out of it, even for another season?  

 

So what?

 

What the theorists are saying is that he was paid off to delay the announcement for a month or two, as though, after going 10-6 and Luck having a great season, some potential season ticket buyers would......wait until training camp to pull the trigger on those tickets.  And don't they have a waiting list?

 

That's as silly as it sounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BringBackFergy said:

I'm a little sick of all the talking heads and current / ex-football players saying the Colts' fans were wrong to "Boo" Andrew Luck.

 

Sure the guy has been thrown around like a rag doll for the last 6 years, but you have to dig deeper into one issue that has been talked about very little: MONEY

 

First, we can all agree that Jim Irsay is of questionable integrity. Had a few run-ins with the law, TANKED the year to get Luck, and is overall somewhat slimy.

 

If Luck was having this pain for the last few years and recently had problems with his calf muscle and ankle, why did it become a "career ending" problem just two weeks before the start of the season. MONEY

 

Second, take a look at what Luck said on his interview. Paraphrasing here but he said he's had discussions with Chris Ballard over the summer about his pain, physical condition, etc.  Why do you think he held off on making this announcement until two weeks before the season? MONEY

 

Third, when Irsay found out about Luck's condition and discussions with Ballard, I'll bet Irsay brought Luck into his office and said "Can you hold off for another month or two? Let's wait and see? I'll make it worth your while."  Meanwhile, the Colts were able to renew season tickets and generate revenue based on the assumption (by those same Booing fans) that Luck was all set to play this year.

 

Fourth, fast forward to the day after his retirement when we hear in passing that Irsay will not seek repayment of the $21 million bonus!!! What??

 

Something stinks in this whole thing.  Irsay, the delays in announcing retirement, and the "Go ahead and keep $21 million". I don't feel bad for Luck at all. Ironworkers, roofers, police officers, etc. all suffer through pain and discomfort and very rarely get a $21 million dollar golden parachute on retirement.  The dirt will come out soon enough...and the Fans will really start to Boo.

 

Colts season ticket holders really have had a roller coaster of emotions (and value) the last 10 years.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but this conspiracy theory makes no sense given the numbers. 

 

While I don't have the specifics of the Colts ticket revenue values for season tickets they sold in 2019, their total gross receipts in 2017 were $59 million (the year he missed the entire season), and the average total gate receipts for the 2010 - 2017 seasons was about $57.3 million.  https://www.statista.com/statistics/320644/nfl-indianapolis-colts-revenue-from-ticket-sales/  

 

So ticket revenues have been virtually flat for the past 8 seasons.  So first off, there is no indication that somehow those gross receipts would have drastically fallen had Luck retired in the Spring vs when he did.  If Josh had blown out a knee late in training camp (now frantically knocking on wood for even typing that!), I would not have wanted my money back for my seasons.  And in those 8 years, one was before Luck was drafted, in one he played only 7 games, and in one he did not play at all. There was virtually no difference in revenue for those years versus the other 5.

 

Second, they are required to contibute one third of those revenues to the revenue shared pool (Roughly $20 Million).  Any loss in revenue that might have occurred would have been greatly mitigated by the fact that the reduced receipts for that 1/3 would have been averaged in with the other 32 teams.  In fact, some of the lost revenue may have been offset depending upon the value of the pool.

 

The Colts were entitled to recover nearly $25 million from Luck.  So even if they had lost 1/2 of their revenue or $30 million (which I highly doubt!), worst case it would have been close to a wash had they just recovered the bonus from Luck.

 

So I guess this theory requires us to believe that essentially, the Colts owner decided to take in the money from the supposed 50% of season ticket holders that would never have purchased had they known Luck was retiring, and then give it to Luck?  What sense does that make?  Or how about that Luck and Irsay worked out a deal where they postponed his retirement announcement to take in an extra $30 million in season ticket revenue, and then he would let Luck keep the bonues money of $25 million so that Luck could kick back half to Irsay so they both ended up with $15 million each of the defrauded season ticket holders money???

 

Sorry.  Not buying it. While there may have been a dip in season ticket sales, it is highly doubtful that it would have execeeded what they could have recovered from Luck.  It would have made far more sense to announce it right away (assuming they had known of it since the spring), and just recovered from Luck what was necessary to offset the loss.  They could always give it back to him next year, if he decided to come back.

 

Occam's Razor says that the simplest explanation is the most probable one.  Given the numbers, I'll go with that.  Luck tried to come back and once again, the cycle of pain and injury was extended far longer than anyone expected, and he'd just had enough.  So he decided to do it now, so that the team at least had a few weeks to get used to the idea that he wouldn't be back.  No reason to defraud unsuspecting Colts fans of their hard earned money. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

Nah.

 

Fans were jerks, he was injured. It ain't rocket science, or even single digit addition.

 

And it's very rare to seek the money back. The Bills didn't seek repayment from freaking Vontae Davis.

 

That could be why Vontae handled it in such a bizarre way. By quitting at halftime, they’d have had to do fractions. If you hate math, you avoid fractions, as I do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luck in his first 6 years ranks up there with Marino and other greats in their first years starting as a QB.  There is nothing felonious about this decision.  The man was hurt so much, he said enough is enough, and yes the fans, not all, but those who booed should be ashamed.

 

They didn’t tank all year fir Luck.  Maybe the last game or two when all hope was gone.  In addition, he may have been able to keep part of his bonus, but would have made significantly more $, if he just went on IR, and the team would have put him there with the hope he would come back.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, JoPar_v2 said:

 

If memory serves, there was talk of them tanking that year when Manning was hurt and Luck was looming in the draft, for the simple reason that they stuck with Curtis Painter (remember him!) instead of trying to find and sign a better option, because Painter was god awful. Like, Peterman-level awful. That’s where the narrative comes from.

They signed Kerry Collins in TC. Also brought in Dan Orvlosky towards the end of the year. 

 

Painter was bad, but he averaged 191 yards a game and had only 9ints in 8 starts. Peterman would get comeback player of the year with those numbers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, BringBackFergy said:

I'm a little sick of all the talking heads and current / ex-football players saying the Colts' fans were wrong to "Boo" Andrew Luck.

 

Sure the guy has been thrown around like a rag doll for the last 6 years, but you have to dig deeper into one issue that has been talked about very little: MONEY

 

First, we can all agree that Jim Irsay is of questionable integrity. Had a few run-ins with the law, TANKED the year to get Luck, and is overall somewhat slimy.

 

If Luck was having this pain for the last few years and recently had problems with his calf muscle and ankle, why did it become a "career ending" problem just two weeks before the start of the season. MONEY

 

Second, take a look at what Luck said on his interview. Paraphrasing here but he said he's had discussions with Chris Ballard over the summer about his pain, physical condition, etc.  Why do you think he held off on making this announcement until two weeks before the season? MONEY

 

Third, when Irsay found out about Luck's condition and discussions with Ballard, I'll bet Irsay brought Luck into his office and said "Can you hold off for another month or two? Let's wait and see? I'll make it worth your while."  Meanwhile, the Colts were able to renew season tickets and generate revenue based on the assumption (by those same Booing fans) that Luck was all set to play this year.

 

Fourth, fast forward to the day after his retirement when we hear in passing that Irsay will not seek repayment of the $21 million bonus!!! What??

 

Something stinks in this whole thing.  Irsay, the delays in announcing retirement, and the "Go ahead and keep $21 million". I don't feel bad for Luck at all. Ironworkers, roofers, police officers, etc. all suffer through pain and discomfort and very rarely get a $21 million dollar golden parachute on retirement.  The dirt will come out soon enough...and the Fans will really start to Boo.

Actually, it does make sense. Good take!?

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Patrick_Duffy said:

 

 

I have to agree if I was a season ticket holder I would definitely be upset also. Just the timing of this does kinda seem like a slap in the face of the ticket holders. A lot of money is spend on those tics and to have this happen now right before the season, I can certainly understand their frustration.

But how is it any different than Teddy Bridgewater blowing out his knee in TC? Or Brady getting hurt week one? Players get hurt, they dont meet expectations, but that doesnt mean your tickets are now null and void. You paid for the realty TV show that is 100% realty. Things will not always go to the FANs expectation and and thats just too damn bad for the fan.

 

Bills started 5-2, finished 7-9. Never once did i consider calling my ticket rep to demand a refund. I pad for reality and I got it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Captain Hindsight said:

But how is it any different than Teddy Bridgewater blowing out his knee in TC? Or Brady getting hurt week one? Players get hurt, they dont meet expectations, but that doesnt mean your tickets are now null and void. You paid for the realty TV show that is 100% realty. Things will not always go to the FANs expectation and and thats just too damn bad for the fan.

 

Bills started 5-2, finished 7-9. Never once did i consider calling my ticket rep to demand a refund. I pad for reality and I got it

 

I guess it's maybe the fans had high hopes with Luck (assuming the colts fans thought he was starting) playing this season and he decides to wait til 2 weeks before the season started. I mean Bridgewater got hurt practicing if I remember right and you could kind of expect him to miss out after that maybe.

 

The fans were under the assumption that Luck was playing the season and they finally thought they could possibly go deep into the playoffs, then the rug was pulled from underneath so suddenly with the timing of it.

 

I think maybe it's the timing more than anything else. In any event they will get over it eventually.

Edited by Patrick_Duffy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've heard too many people suggest Fantasy Football had something to do with it. I love fantasy football, I'm in 3 leagues, but I would never boo a player for anything to do with that. Also, Luck is easily replaceable in most leagues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, BuffaloBob said:

I'm sorry but this conspiracy theory makes no sense given the numbers. 

 

While I don't have the specifics of the Colts ticket revenue values for season tickets they sold in 2019, their total gross receipts in 2017 were $59 million (the year he missed the entire season), and the average total gate receipts for the 2010 - 2017 seasons was about $57.3 million.  https://www.statista.com/statistics/320644/nfl-indianapolis-colts-revenue-from-ticket-sales/  

 

So ticket revenues have been virtually flat for the past 8 seasons.  So first off, there is no indication that somehow those gross receipts would have drastically fallen had Luck retired in the Spring vs when he did.  If Josh had blown out a knee late in training camp (now frantically knocking on wood for even typing that!), I would not have wanted my money back for my seasons.  And in those 8 years, one was before Luck was drafted, in one he played only 7 games, and in one he did not play at all. There was virtually no difference in revenue for those years versus the other 5.

 

Second, they are required to contibute one third of those revenues to the revenue shared pool (Roughly $20 Million).  Any loss in revenue that might have occurred would have been greatly mitigated by the fact that the reduced receipts for that 1/3 would have been averaged in with the other 32 teams.  In fact, some of the lost revenue may have been offset depending upon the value of the pool.

 

The Colts were entitled to recover nearly $25 million from Luck.  So even if they had lost 1/2 of their revenue or $30 million (which I highly doubt!), worst case it would have been close to a wash had they just recovered the bonus from Luck.

 

So I guess this theory requires us to believe that essentially, the Colts owner decided to take in the money from the supposed 50% of season ticket holders that would never have purchased had they known Luck was retiring, and then give it to Luck?  What sense does that make?  Or how about that Luck and Irsay worked out a deal where they postponed his retirement announcement to take in an extra $30 million in season ticket revenue, and then he would let Luck keep the bonues money of $25 million so that Luck could kick back half to Irsay so they both ended up with $15 million each of the defrauded season ticket holders money???

 

Sorry.  Not buying it. While there may have been a dip in season ticket sales, it is highly doubtful that it would have execeeded what they could have recovered from Luck.  It would have made far more sense to announce it right away (assuming they had known of it since the spring), and just recovered from Luck what was necessary to offset the loss.  They could always give it back to him next year, if he decided to come back.

 

Occam's Razor says that the simplest explanation is the most probable one.  Given the numbers, I'll go with that.  Luck tried to come back and once again, the cycle of pain and injury was extended far longer than anyone expected, and he'd just had enough.  So he decided to do it now, so that the team at least had a few weeks to get used to the idea that he wouldn't be back.  No reason to defraud unsuspecting Colts fans of their hard earned money. ?

 

Good points.

 

But this conspiracy theory is even dumber than what you describe in the bolded sentence:  they are saying that there is a group of season ticket buyers who decided NOT to jump in after Luck's great 2018 season and Colts immediate resurgence--but instead decided to wait until summer to buy......and then, despite Luck being essentially absent from camp and the Colts FO giving bizarre and uninformed descriptions of what was wrong with Luck.....these people THEN DECIDED TO BUY SEASON TICKETS!!   They were tricked!!

 

LOL.

 

Let's assume there are say, 1000 such morons in Indy (silly high number, but this is Indy):  Even at the high tier of $4000 a season, that's $4 million(before, as you point out, revenue sharing) extra in Irsay's pocket---for which he paid $21 million to Luck for.

 

It is to laugh....

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a raw, gut reaction in the heat of the moment to the worst possible way to "announce" (read:leak) the retirement.

 

I don't excuse the fans for their behavior, but I understand it.

 

It was still a ***** move on the fans part, and one I'm sure they'll regret and want to forget in the long run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...