Jump to content

Capaccio's top ten FA WRs


buffaloaggie

Recommended Posts

I want two of John Brown, Donte Moncrief, Golden Tate, or Adam Humphries.

 

I think we have to remember, though, that Buffalo has been one of the worst destinations for WR's for many years. It's going to take a couple seasons of Josh Allen slinging it before that changes. These guys might not want to come here unless we overpay a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, 947 said:

OL is much easier to find in free agency. If we sign 2 guys, that frees us up to wait until the 3rd round for OL & take WR or TE early. I'd much prefer that route.

 

I don't necessarily agree with that. There will be a ton of competition for the quality Olinemen available, of those that don't resign with their respective teams. Oline is a problem all around the league. The decent ones that do hit free agency will get paid a lot.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Moncrief's age, price and upside. I like TW next because he did produce when he wasn't buried in the depth chart but his price might be through the roof as the market is thin. I'd prefer to develop Zay in the slot, but Beasly would be cheaper than Humphries if you want to throw in the towel on Zay. John Brown seems to play a similar spot as Foster and Foster is much cheaper and looks to have more upside.. 

Edited by qwksilver
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

WGR doesn't let us Europeans in any more because of our little data protection regulation.... who was in Sal's top 10? In my mind it is a very, very thin group. 

 

 

Didn't realize you were in Europe. I have some of the same issues with various sites because I live in Japan.

 

1) Tyrell Williams

2) John Brown

3) Adam Humphries

4) Devin Funchess

5) Golden Tate

6) Cole Beasley

7) Randall Cobb

8 ) Donte Moncrief

9) Tavon Austin

10) Cordarrelle Patterson

 

 

 

Capaccio does have notes in here that some of these guys might cost too much, some are mostly slot guys and some are less receivers than "give him the ball in space" guys. I thought it was an interesting article.

Edited by Thurman#1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CaptnCoke11 said:

I’m going draft for WR.. None of those free agent WRs will be worth the contracts they will get.  

 

Well, as buddy nix used to say, everybody overpays in free agency.  Hard to believe we couldnt retain Woods for $8m and now guys with less talent are getting $12m

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Da webster guy said:

 

Well, as buddy nix used to say, everybody overpays in free agency.  Hard to believe we couldnt retain Woods for $8m and now guys with less talent are getting $12m

 

I am not sure we could have retained Woods for that to be honest. He wanted to go back to Southern Cal. The Buffalo price would have been higher I suspect. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Logic said:

I'm actually fine with them signing Funchess AS LONG AS they don't count on him to be the #1 or #2 receiver. Funchess is an 800-yards-per-year guy. That's a guy that can help your team.

If they were to sign Funchess to a reasonable contract but then also spend a 1st or 2nd round pick on WR, would it bother you?

Rookie
Foster
Jones
Funchess
Duke Williams
McKenzie

That's a pretty promising WR depth chart

The problem is they would sell him to the fans as a #1. I could just see Beane now making the comparisons to Anquan Bolden. Lol. I still can't believe he tried to sell Bolden like he was 26yrs old and in his prime when we signed him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only two I’d pursue are 1. Humphries 2. Williams - in that order. 

 

The others I don’t want or know they won’t come here. I believe Tate already stated he wants a chance at a ring. Even me being the optimist I am at times, knows we are a few years away from competing for a playoff spot regularly(I hope). 

 

Funchess, is KB Lite without the production. John Brown, bleh, I think Foster is going to be better than him. Cobb has issues staying healthy. I’m not a fan of Moncrief at all. Patterson I wouldn’t mind because he can be used in multiple ways, also, he’d have to be an additional signing if we land one of the two mentioned above. I wouldn’t mind Beasley, just prefer Humphries over him due to age and the constant increase in production every year. 

 

 

Edited by Captain Murica
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, FeelingOnYouboty said:

I'd take Adam Humphries. Dependable and a safety valve for our young QB. 

 

Foster, Jones, Humphries, Williams, McKenzie and one of Metcalf/Butler/Harmon/Samuel/Ridley and our WR corps is really, really good in one off-season.

I think “really really good” is a really really big exaggeration.  ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

I guess this could be a desperation move in September or October if all else fails.

 

If he had not torn his Achilles he was absolutely 100% my first choice to bring in. I'd have traded for him in season too. He is the perfect placeholder vet to lead and teach habits and take pressure off the young guys. With the injury I am sceptical. He wouldn't be 100% at all during camp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

I really think Tavon Austin is a guy that can be used in a lot of ways and can really help us out. That’s a guy I would be very interested in and he should be overly expensive.

Austin has not been productive his entire career...the reason he can be used in a lot of ways is because he is not good enough to play one position.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, nucci said:

Austin has not been productive his entire career...the reason he can be used in a lot of ways is because he is not good enough to play one position.

Tavon Austin is the Sam Bradford is receivers. Funny that the St Louis Rams basically sealed their fate with those guys.

Edited by C.Biscuit97
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

If he had not torn his Achilles he was absolutely 100% my first choice to bring in. I'd have traded for him in season too. He is the perfect placeholder vet to lead and teach habits and take pressure off the young guys. With the injury I am sceptical. He wouldn't be 100% at all during camp.

The fact that it's his 2nd achilles injury pretty much should kill any interest in the Bills signing him. At least I would hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My pick is Tyrell Williams sounds like a really good pick up given every thing about him & he is young enough to give him a decent contract so he can grow with Allen & become a corp piece to the offense !!

 

I also hear that Demarius Thomas could be let go he tore his Achilles near the end of last yr i wonder if released would he be a good pick up for a prove it contract seeing as he will be 31 & considering the injury ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Demaryius Thomas had already lost a step before tearing his achilles. Recovering from that injury at age 31 is extremely difficult, even most young guys never regain the same explosion. I'd stay far away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Jay_Fixit said:

Tavon Austin played with Sean McVay and McVay had no use for him.

 

Austin sucks. It’s time for people to understand this.

 

He ran the ball 59 times that year. He was used exactly how I described. He would be a great WR5/RB4/PR/KR.

15 hours ago, Stank_Nasty said:

Brown was on pace for well over 1000 yds on the season and was making big plays for Flacco before Jackson took over and rendered the wr’s obsolete in Balt. I’d welcome him with open arms. 

 

Also beasley would be a welcome addition. Surprised these 2 havnt been mentioned by others more in this thread. 

 

I think Brown would be a solid addition too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, nucci said:

Austin has not been productive his entire career...the reason he can be used in a lot of ways is because he is not good enough to play one position.

Don't you think his stock in the draft went up because of his numbers and not his speed? That West Virginia team he was apart of loved to throw the ball and throw the ball some more...not to mention flanker sweeps.

Edited by Misterbluesky
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, FeelingOnYouboty said:

ESPN running an interactive story and predict the Bills sign Tyrell Williams to a 4 year/56M dollar deal in Free Agency

 

http://www.espn.com/espn/feature/story/_/id/25901330/predicting-2019-nfl-offseason-dominoes-free-agents-trades-cause-ripples

Free Agency definitely inflates salaries. Landry and Watkins were the big beneficiaries last year, so I guess an average of $14 mil/year is not unreasonable for Williams? KC and Cleveland did not get the bang for the bucks.  

 

NFL WR Salary List

Link to comment
Share on other sites

T Williams and C Patterson are pretty good receivers and elite return men. To me, that's killing 2 birds with 1 stone even if they aren't #1's. They'd still be valuable additions. Brown would be a nica addition too. If we could sign Brown, G McCoy and Williams, we could really focus on the OL in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Humphries is intriguing.  With the wrs they brought in via late in the draft Proehl and Mccloud, and the utilization of McKenzie down the stretch slot is definitely a position of importance in the teams passing attack.  Having a legit sure handed slot reciever would be a need Imo.  I think Humpries, Beasley and Tate would be worth bringing vs any of the top available outside wrs.  You could potentially get one of the aforementioned and a TE for the money Williams may cover.  Where Buffalo is sitting I would go slot and TE in FA and draft a few outside guys and a rb come April.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, FeelingOnYouboty said:

ESPN running an interactive story and predict the Bills sign Tyrell Williams to a 4 year/56M dollar deal in Free Agency

 

http://www.espn.com/espn/feature/story/_/id/25901330/predicting-2019-nfl-offseason-dominoes-free-agents-trades-cause-ripples

Good, they should and this would be a fair contract. 

Rookie- DK Metcalf @ 15

Tyrell Williams 

Robert Foster

Zay Jones

Duke Williams 

Maybe cut McKenzie?

That would be 5 solid wrs

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, GreggTX said:

T Williams and C Patterson are pretty good receivers and elite return men. To me, that's killing 2 birds with 1 stone even if they aren't #1's. They'd still be valuable additions. Brown would be a nica addition too. If we could sign Brown, G McCoy and Williams, we could really focus on the OL in the draft.

Williams has never returned an nfl kick or punt and Patterson has never been pretty good at wr…. soooo i think you'd still need both stones to kill 2 birds.

 

i'd really like brown and McCoy on board though!

Edited by Stank_Nasty
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Daboll seems pretty comfortable substituting WRs like the rams do. I’m not sure if that stemmed from trying to find a reliable group, or if that’s going to be his MO moving forward. If it’s what he wants to do then some of these slot guys are in play, and I’d expect Beane to go for pure value and “process”. My money would be on guys who’ve proven to be reliable outlets for scrambling QBs and are under 30... Cobb (Rodgers), Humphries (Fitzmagic), etc. Along with guys that have all the physical tools to be a #1, stretch the field vertically, or play teams. 

 

I’d assume Humphries, Cobb, Brown, Williams, and Patterson are in play. I’m tempted to throw Jared Cook into the equation as a TE option as well, though I think he stays in Oakland/LV or goes back to GB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/11/2019 at 8:21 PM, Stank_Nasty said:

Brown was on pace for well over 1000 yds on the season and was making big plays for Flacco before Jackson took over and rendered the wr’s obsolete in Balt. I’d welcome him with open arms. 

 

Also beasley would be a welcome addition. Surprised these 2 havnt been mentioned by others more in this thread. 

 

I think he'd be a fine pickup (though there may be diminishing returns with stocking up on basically all guys that are purely deep threats like him and Foster), but Brown was trending down before Baltimore ever made a switch. Over the last 4 starts with Flacco, Brown had less than 30 yards in 3 of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...