Jump to content

Dion Dawkins


Rigotz

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

Back to LG NOW?  

 

Two seasons in that genie is out of the bottle........he and his agent will not go for that.

 

You'd better be sure you aren't going to want to upgrade if you move a young player to a high dollar $ position.

 

If they play well and you move them you are messing with their money.

 

Simple

 

he plays well at lg you pay him like a elite lg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

Back to LG NOW?  

 

Two seasons in that genie is out of the bottle........he and his agent will not go for that.

 

You'd better be sure you aren't going to want to upgrade if you move a young player to a high dollar $ position.

 

If they play well and you move them you are messing with their money.

 

IDK man some elite guards have cleared 10 Mil a year lately. He actually could make a little more if turns out to be a elite LG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Peter said:

Dawkins would be better with Richie next to him and even better if he were on the right side and Cordy were playing left tackle. 

 

P.S. I never saw Cordy beaten the way I have seen Dion beaten sometimes.  He seems like a great kid but it is clear that he misses Richie next to him.

 

P.P.S. This is another example of the process guys mismanaging a position group.

 

Yes because they planned to have 2 pro bowl caliber players off the team from the previous year inside...SMFH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, matter2003 said:

 

Yes because they planned to have 2 pro bowl caliber players off the team from the previous year inside...SMFH

 

There was no reason to initiate a pay cut with one of our few pro bowl players.  That was stupid and unnecessary.

 

The Bills found out that Eric Wood's career was over during literally the first week of the off season.  It is not like they did not have time to engage the "process" to replace him adequately.

 

In the end, McBeane outsmarted themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Tenhigh said:

A good guard could have the same effect (boosting LG and LT play) and it won't completely ruin any chance we have or resigning DD. 

While it might give him a boost, I doubt the cumulative impact would be greater than having a better LT than him and DD playing G.  I believe he will be better at G than anyone you draft next season.  You can also afford to pay him like a LT for a few year while you have a rookie playing LT under a better contract. It gets us through the window while having Allen on his rookie contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Lurker said:

 

That was a big miss on Beane's part, IMO.    The better alternative would have been to include a 2019 draft pick in the package needed to move up for the QB.   He would then have the franchise QB and his LT position locked down, allowing Dawkins to fill another spot on the O-line.

 

Instead, he went the high wire route and fell off.     He's still falling and we haven't heard the splash yet, either...

Why do you assume that in a deal to move up that we would have come away with a LT if we gave up a first round pick this year? As it turned out he got (hopefully) his franchise qb and also a talented MLB who will be the center piece to our defense. This year we will have all our picks and will be drafting from a high position. I'm more than satisfied with how last year's draft transpired and the position he placed this franchise for next year's draft 

Edited by JohnC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DasNootz said:

While it might give him a boost, I doubt the cumulative impact would be greater than having a better LT than him and DD playing G.  I believe he will be better at G than anyone you draft next season.  You can also afford to pay him like a LT for a few year while you have a rookie playing LT under a better contract. It gets us through the window while having Allen on his rookie contract.

Interesting hypothesis, but I don't really agree.  By kicking him inside you have a potential to have 2 subpar starters if you draft a LT vs an LG, because none of us know how he'd perform at guard, and you never know if the rook is going to pan out.  Plus, you can draft a good LG in a lower round than you can a good LT. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't mess with a good thing.  Dawkins is doing well and is only growing.  

 

Moving him to guard or right tackle is not a great idea.  He is good enough to play left tackle, and so he will want to play left tackle.  He will not want the demotion of being moved to guard or right tackle.  That'll be a big issue come time to resign him, and I assume no one wants this to end with him walking away or him getting overpaid as a guard or right tackle.  

 

Besides, moving guys around the line is not as easy as everyone thinks.  For example, Henderson was a terrible right tackle, but a mucccch better left tackle.  That was where he spent his whole life, that is where he was comfortable, and he could never get used to switching sides.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He’s an ok LT.  If he can be an all pro guard, draft a tackle and move him. Problem being, he’s probably going to be pissed.  If we don’t move him to guard, moving him to RT and getting a stud LT would be a nice alternative.  We need 3-4 new starters on the OL next season.  Dawkins being the only one I want to keep as a starter.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NewEra said:

He’s an ok LT.  If he can be an all pro guard, draft a tackle and move him. Problem being, he’s probably going to be pissed.  If we don’t move him to guard, moving him to RT and getting a stud LT would be a nice alternative.  We need 3-4 new starters on the OL next season.  Dawkins being the only one I want to keep as a starter.  

 

What makes you think he would be able to make that switch? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really like Dion Dawkins, one of my favourite players on this team. Athletic, aggressive and nasty. But he hasn’t looked great this year. Maybe the poor OL coaching and constant change at QB and bad QBs at that. I believe he will be a pro bowler eventually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Peter said:

Dawkins would be better with Richie next to him and even better if he were on the right side and Cordy were playing left tackle. 

 

P.S. I never saw Cordy beaten the way I have seen Dion beaten sometimes.  He seems like a great kid but it is clear that he misses Richie next to him.

 

P.P.S. This is another example of the process guys mismanaging a position group.

How was McBeane supposed to know that Woods would be forced to retire and Richie would go off the deep end?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

Because Cordy Glenn was a better LT  then Dion Dawkins is.......

 

You just didnt see Cordy get beat.....Dawkins does at times.   This does not mean that Deon cannot play LT...he can....but if we can find a guy who can play LT for us Dion probably has all pro potential as a LG (which is woeful for us right now)

 

 

...STILL don't understand the rush for McBeaned to dump him......sure he was coming off an injury, but it didn't stop him from signing Murphy and Halftime Vontae, right?.....he has started all seven for the Bengals and Dalton has only been sacked 14 times......didn't realize our rock solid line made him expendable.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

 

...STILL don't understand the rush for McBeaned to dump him......sure he was coming off an injury, but it didn't stop him from signing Murphy and Halftime Vontae, right?.....he has started all seven for the Bengals and Dalton has only been sacked 14 times......didn't realize our rock solid line made him expendable.......

I think it was like 2 years of injury wasnt it?

 

I still didnt want to see him go

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

 

...STILL don't understand the rush for McBeaned to dump him......sure he was coming off an injury, but it didn't stop him from signing Murphy and Halftime Vontae, right?.....he has started all seven for the Bengals and Dalton has only been sacked 14 times......didn't realize our rock solid line made him expendable.......

 

He didn’t dump him. We had a replacement LT and needed capital to fill a more important position - qb. He made a business decision. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

I think it was like 2 years of injury wasnt it?

 

I still didnt want to see him go

 

...yup, but he finally opted for foot surgery in January 2018 that was deemed successful.....

5 minutes ago, JoshAllenHasBigHands said:

 

He didn’t dump him. We had a replacement LT and needed capital to fill a more important position - qb. He made a business decision. 

 

...Dawkins will be fine......but his source of draft capital was misguided IMO......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

...yup, but he finally opted for foot surgery in January 2018 that was deemed successful.....

 

...Dawkins will be fine......but his source of draft capital was misguided IMO......

Where else would you have gotten it? 

12 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

Just imagine what this OL could have looked like with Glenn at LT and Dawkins at LG......

What makes you say Dawkins can play LG? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, JoshAllenHasBigHands said:

Where else would you have gotten it? 

What makes you say Dawkins can play LG? 

He played it at a high level in college......he has all the attributes of a very good offensive guard......

 

Not just powerful....but he is a mover (but so is Teller and he hasnt even gotten a chance to play yet)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jpsredemption said:

They wanted to get out of Glenns contract...you know the left tackle we had that was really good.

and the injury may have been nagging. But yes . the contract was likely heavily weighting the decision to move him

one of my fantasies was Cordy Richie Groy miller Dawkins.

I think Dawkins and Miler would have a healthy run block game and developed well together as mate. would have had them room together on campus.
The left side would have held up for the pocket passer and allow rookie development having  a " safe space "

it was just a fantasy after all

1 hour ago, JoshAllenHasBigHands said:

 

What makes you think he would be able to make that switch? 

natural RT. and the payday would still be decent

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Rigotz said:

I've seen this in a number of threads now:

"We need to draft a Left Tackle #1 and move Dawkins inside because ______"

Why? Everyone said the same thing about Cordy Glenn and I didn't understand that either.

 

1. He's the only player on our Offensive Line that has an above average PFF grade:

https://www.profootballfocus.com/nfl/players/dion-dawkins/11818

 

2. "He's not long enough to play tackle" ... what? He has 35'' arm length, which is above average for any tackle.

http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/dion-dawkins?id=2557875

 

3. He has ZERO help inside ... which is important, because bad guard play is making him do more iso with worse communication.

https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/pro-2018-nfl-offensive-line-rankings-all-32-teams-units-after-week-6

 

Most importantly he's 24 years old.  ... he can run block and pass block ... and he plays with a mean streak.

Please stop this stupid narrative that we desperately need a Left Tackle.

We need Wide Receivers and basically every other O-Line position first.

 

 

 

 according to PFF Miller (63.2) is higher than Dawkins 61.5 soooo

 

 and Chris Ivory is the highest on Offense at 79.8...

 

 

 Matt Milano (80.6) and Jerry Hughes (84.0) are the only two guys on the bills rated above avg. Tre is 65.9 Rated 48th CB....

Edited by gordong
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JohnC said:

Why do you assume that in a deal to move up that we would have come away with a LT

 

I'm saying we could have kept Glenn and used a 2019 draft pick in the package used to snag Allen.   They created a self-inflicted wound by tossing Glenn away when there were other, less radical alternatives...

 

 

2 hours ago, JoshAllenHasBigHands said:

 

What makes you think he would be able to make that switch? 

 

What makes you think he couldn't?   It's a lot easier to play OG than LOT...

Edited by Lurker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Watkins90 said:

How was McBeane supposed to know that Woods would be forced to retire and Richie would go off the deep end?

 

They couldn't have predicted Richie. I don't blame them for that. I don't even think the pay cut sent him over the edge I just think he is a troubled individual. Wood they knew about waaaaaay before they traded Glenn. 

20 minutes ago, Lurker said:

What makes you think he couldn't?   It's a lot easier to play OG than LOT...

 

I think he was talking about the difference between left tackle and right tackle. He can play Left tackle and I am convinced he would be an excellent LG. I don't think he can play on the right side - his movements just look horribly unnatural that side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

They couldn't have predicted Richie. I don't blame them for that. I don't even think the pay cut sent him over the edge I just think he is a troubled individual. Wood they knew about waaaaaay before they traded Glenn. 

 

I think he was talking about the difference between left tackle and right tackle. He can play Left tackle and I am convinced he would be an excellent LG. I don't think he can play on the right side - his movements just look horribly unnatural that side.

 

...wish I could remember who said it.....but someone said asking an OL to switch sides is analagous to asking a right handed QB to throw left handed......too bad an OL guru poster like Shaunta 53 disappeared to comment.........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Jpsredemption said:

They wanted to get out of Glenns contract...you know the left tackle we had that was really good.

They wanted to get out from under his injuries-- which made paying the money an issue to them.  It also allowed them a chip to use to get a QB.  Time will tell if that was a smart strategy.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

He WAS good till he started taking on injuries.

 

I would not have moved him because when he is healthy he is was one of the under rated LT's of the league......but I understand why he was moved.   You dont just replace those guys though that is why conflicted when we moved him.

Well we finally agree on something. Hell has frozen over lol.

43 minutes ago, purple haze said:

They wanted to get out from under his injuries-- which made paying the money an issue to them.  It also allowed them a chip to use to get a QB.  Time will tell if that was a smart strategy.

Jason Peters has been injured a lot. Have the Eagles tried to ship him out of town? .. that example has nothing to do with the Bills btw...bc they also botched his situation...they could've had him for over a decade!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, purple haze said:

They wanted to get out from under his injuries-- which made paying the money an issue to them.  It also allowed them a chip to use to get a QB.  Time will tell if that was a smart strategy.

It would have been fine if they got Darnold or Mayfield

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...