Jump to content

Mayock on WGR


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, nucci said:

Why do you say that? There are so many ways to structure a contract to make them fit....plus cap is expected to increase again for next season

 

I thought maybe we invest in a few monsters for our front 7 in FA and some OL and WR help.

 

Use picks 21 22 and cordy glenn to move up and grab one of the top 3.

 

I dont wanna get handicapped to that contact and then we cant sign and resign players we need.

 

Im  also sick of us taking the 4th best prospect like Losman or continually bringing in other teams throwaway QBs like Fitz (Fitz Rules tho) Bledsoe Rob Johnson etc.

 

12 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

 

oh i'd love to trade up and get baker or one of those guys i just don't think it's happening and plenty of other teams need qbs so they will be willing to trade as well. i'd love to be able to use that cap space to sign other free agents to fill holes. problem is the draft is after free agency. 

 

he lost to green bay in the wild card round when his defense couldn't stop the packers. you underestimate the impact a great defense has on the team. give him a defense and look out. he played really well in that playoff game.

 

You could be right, its been said Beane likes to build through the draft,  so well see.

 

I could see him staying pat and taking Rudolph at 21.

 

I could see him trying to get Cousins and stocking our roster with our draft.

 

Bean scouted a lot of QBs this year.  I really think if they find a trade partner they will trade up for Rosen, Darnold, and maybe Mayfield.

 

Even tho I think Mayfield might be the best of the 3 rite now, i think McBean wants a QB more in the mold of a Rosen or Rudolph, strait pocket passers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, FearLess Price said:

 

I thought maybe we invest in a few monsters for our front 7 in FA and some OL and WR help.

 

Use picks 21 22 and cordy glenn to move up and grab one of the top 3.

 

I dont wanna get handicapped to that contact and then we cant sign and resign players we need.

 

Im  also sick of us taking the 4th best prospect like Losman or continually bringing in other teams throwaway QBs like Fitz (Fitz Rules tho) Bledsoe Rob Johnson etc.

 

 

 

Your idea works as well. Just saying they can sign Cousins and draft well and still be ok. Not saying that's what i want but it can be done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don't get people who continue to view qb as the cheap option if there is ever a position you spend big money on it's the QB position without your team is just mucking thru the seasons.  I hear the biggest argument is they would rather spend the money on other positions, well sorry but without a QB your chances of playoffs go down hrmmm maybe there is a team who missed the playoffs for 17yrs because they brought in big FA other than a QB that was worth something.

 

Cousins would be a welcome addition to this team and they can fill other positions with the draft.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Dr. Fong said:

That's the same kind of thinking that got people in trouble in the real estate market.

 

How did we go from the NFL salary cap to real estate?

13 minutes ago, Sammy Watkins' Rib said:

 

Cousins has been doing as much winning as Taylor over the last three years. The guy may be able to throw the ball a lot but success has been limited. 

 

Tyrod has a better career record than Drew Brees had from 2014 to 2016.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, nucci said:

Your idea works as well. Just saying they can sign Cousins and draft well and still be ok. Not saying that's what i want but it can be done.

 

 

If it can be done without handicapping other positions we need, ER, DT, LBs, CB2, OG,OT, we would instantly become contenders again. 

 

I hope the big money doesnt make him flop, or lose his motivation kinda like what happened with Dareus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, FearLess Price said:

 

 

If it can be done without handicapping other positions we need, ER, DT, LBs, CB2, OG,OT, we would instantly become contenders again. 

 

I hope the big money doesnt make him flop, or lose his motivation kinda like what happened with Dareus.

unfortunately, that is a risk with the kind of money available

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Chuck Wagon said:

 

 

Cutting / trading Tyrod and the hit from Wood leave us at about $41 mil in cap space.  A base salary restructure on Cordy Glenn gets us to $48 mil in cap space.

 

Our rookies require about $ 8 mil in cap space.

 

I would be surprised if we were major FA players, Beane has said he values comp picks.  Outside of EJ Gaines, most all our FAs are guys from the previous regime who aren't great system fits.  

 

And that's just simple salary cap math, there are several other options available.

 

So yeah, I think we can sign Cousins, with our draft picks, keep Gaines or other FAs of ours we want to or sign a few mid level, cheap FAs, the type of guys McBeane would be looking at anyways.

Rookies don't really require 8 million because you only count the top 51 contracts on the roster in the offseason..as these rookies will be pushing other players our of the top 51, its actually 8 million minus the value of the contracts of the players pushed out of the top 51. Usually this ewuates to about 2 million which means in reality we need about 6 million or a little less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever they think is the solution to their QB problem, I'll support it. If that means backing up the Brinks truck for Cousins, fine. If it means trading a bunch of picks to get inside the top five of the first round, that's fine too. If they stay put and wait to see which QBs are on the board at 21 and 22 and go that route, so be it. It's a "wait and see" approach I have with this regime but so far I'm encouraged by what I hear and seeing how well the trades they made last year worked out is also a positive sign.

 

The one thing I will say that I don't think is very likely is the trading of Cordy Glenn. Not in the way that some people think. He's damaged goods at the moment so his value probably isn't very high. Foot injuries on any player are bad news but they're especially rough on a 6'6" 340 lb. left tackle. I do think they'll end up moving on from him due to Beane wanting to open up as much cap space as possible but I don't think they'll score anything more than a 4th or 5th round pick at best just because whichever team is interested is gonna have to make sure their doctors clear him.

 

They also value their draft picks. I think something pretty special is gonna have to come across their table in order for them to give up a number of picks to move up. 

 

Could go a lot of different ways, it'll be interesting (and hopefully exciting) to see how it all shakes out.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, bdutton said:

If Cousins is so good, why did Washington spend a fortune to bring in FA Alex Smith?????

 

 

Part of me wonders if they don't like his personality or if there's something behind the scenes we don't know about. They could have had him for basically the same amount they're paying Smith (had they signed him 2 years ago). I asked some friends for their thoughts (since I live in the DC area) and they are all pissed at the FO and think they blew it. They want Cousins to win a SB against Washington (I'm sure that would actually change) because they hate the way he was treated here. I don't know, interesting situation. 

 

Edited by elroy16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, bdutton said:

If Cousins is so good, why did Washington spend a fortune to bring in FA Alex Smith?????

 

Not only did they overpay Alex Smith, they traded a starting cb and a draft pick.  Why? Because Washington screwed the pooch on their Cousins gamble. They couldnt let Cousins walk and not have anyone in place.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, matter2003 said:

Rookies don't really require 8 million because you only count the top 51 contracts on the roster in the offseason..as these rookies will be pushing other players our of the top 51, its actually 8 million minus the value of the contracts of the players pushed out of the top 51. Usually this ewuates to about 2 million which means in reality we need about 6 million or a little less.

 

 

You are exactly right. 

 

I was just using EXTREMELY rough math to illustrate that yes, we could sign Kirk Cousins and still field a whole entire NFL team this year.  There is a ton of minutia and little moves that can be done to save money.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FearLess Price said:

Thanks for posting this. The audio is up.

 

It was just a speculative comment IMO.

 

We dont have the $ to pay out 30 mill a year for QB

 

I like what he said about Baker. I hppe that doesnt stop McBeane from drafting him tho.

The Bills absolutely have the money. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, bdutton said:

If Cousins is so good, why did Washington spend a fortune to bring in FA Alex Smith?????

 

If you're waiting for Washington to do something logical, you'll probably be waiting awhile. They're just a dumb organization.

 

Not saying Cousins is the savior, but Washington constantly makes absurd decisions with their money and trading what they did for Alex Smith and then locking him in long-term is just another example IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, bdutton said:

If Cousins is so good, why did Washington spend a fortune to bring in FA Alex Smith?????

 

Because their owner had a serious case of man-love for RG3.  Shanahan preferred Cousins.  Shanahan got canned, Front Office reluctantly let go of RG3 after 3 years of showing he couldn't play, then low-balled Cousins after 4 years of openly rooting for RG3 to win the job.   Not many QB's would've performed as well as Cousins under those circumstances.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FearLess Price said:

Thanks for posting this. The audio is up.

 

It was just a speculative comment IMO.

 

We dont have the $ to pay out 30 mill a year for QB

 

I like what he said about Baker. I hppe that doesnt stop McBeane from drafting him tho.

Yes it was a speculative comment, but it was informed speculation.  He knows Cousins understands how important the coach os, and he followed the Cousins comment immediately with his comment about how much he likes McBeane.  I think he thinks Buffalo is a more likely landing spot than many people do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, elroy16 said:

Part of me wonders if they don't like his personality or if there's something behind the scenes we don't know about. They could have had him for basically the same amount they're paying Smith (had they signed him 2 years ago). I asked some friends for their thoughts (since I live in the DC area) and they are all pissed at the FO and think they blew it. They want Cousins to win a SB against Washington (I'm sure that would actually change) because they hate the way he was treated here. I don't know, interesting situation.

 

You outlined the key point right there.  Had they signed him 2 years ago.  But they didn't.

 

There is bound to be all sorts of unfortunate speculation about what Washington knows that the rest of the league doesn't, but even drunk former GM Scot McCloughan says nothing but good things about Cousins: " he’s competitive. He works his tail off. He’s so methodical. Every day he has planned out. He’s always in the building, he’s always watching tape, he’s always talking to coaches, he was talking to me. From the standpoint of the tangibles, they’re excellent. ..... He’s respected in the building, he’s a really good football player, he’s a leader, he’s a smart guy, he does everything right "

I think what's behind the scenes is that McCloughan mis-evaluated Cousins.  They took a chance on franchising him that he'd regress to what they saw as "his mean" and they could sign him after a year, but he didn't and they couldn't.

 

3 minutes ago, Shaw66 said:

Yes it was a speculative comment, but it was informed speculation.  He knows Cousins understands how important the coach os, and he followed the Cousins comment immediately with his comment about how much he likes McBeane.  I think he thinks Buffalo is a more likely landing spot than many people do. 


McCloughan also says this:
“I can promise you this,” McCloughan said. “He has done his homework, probably too much, about each roster, who his receivers are, who his backs are, who his O-linemen are, who the coach is. Not just the head coach, but the coordinator, position coach, the system they run. I promise you he has notebook after notebook for each team. He is very, very intellectual about knowing what’s best for him. He understands he’s getting older, he’s been in the league a little bit. He wants to win. I know that. Personally, knowing him, it’s not about the money. It’s about the right fit, where he knows he has stability, he has good coaches, he has good players and he has a chance to be successful. I don’t blame him. He’s put himself in that situation with what he’s done the last three years.”

3 minutes ago, yungmack said:

I'd love to land the best QB available. However that's not Cousins.

 

Oh, do tell, Guru, who is it?

Edited by Hapless Bills Fan
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chuck Wagon said:

 

 

And I can't speak for everyone either, but I would really like to know from those who are against spending the money on Cousins, what opportunities they think signing Cousins would cause us to lose out on.

 

First and foremost it's how I feel about the Quarterback, how I feel about Kirk Cousins.  Some will argue he's a top 10 quarterback.  I can't say that they're wrong.  But I believe them to be wrong.  I personally would rather roll the dice on a rookie.  I understand the odds and the crapshoot nature of that strategy.  I understand there's no guarantee there's a rookie we love enough to move up and draft.  I just know how I feel about the Kirk Cousins the QB and I do not want to go that route.

 

With that being said, if they do sign Cousins, I'll quickly be on board and can appreciate the value of being able to fill holes with the draft picks.  It's just not my preference or first choice of how things could shake out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My $0.02 worth of nothing....Ok, Bills spend a fortune on Cousins, possibly have their QB for the next 5 years and use their draft picks to fill the roster for cheap (and hopefully get 4 starters w/ those top four picks). Or they give up their bushel of draft picks and move up to get the QB they want, thus possibly spending a fortune on FA to get the players they couldn't get in the draft. Or wait it out, hope the QB that falls to them at #21 / #22 pans out and still use the remaining draft picks to fill out the roster. This way saves money, but leaves future at QB still in limbo. 

 

Three scenarios, the first two they're spending the money, just in different ways. One may solve our QB problem for the next few years w/ a proven QB (although some don't see him as successful or worth the money), the second may get us a starting QB but he may be a year away from playing and nothing else via the draft. Third is a crap shoot, as we wait and see what falls to us, but we do get to keep our picks and still fill out our roster w relatively cheap talent. 

 

I don't think we have the $$ for Cousins, but I'd like to see them make a move for him. He said he's made his money and that won't be a determining factor on where he goes (sure, we can believe that :rolleyes:...but he may want to win and maybe he views us as a winner and breaking the bank won't be necessary for him). That way we'll still have our picks to get the team good talent w/o having to rely on high prices FA's to fill out the roster. We can hit the clearance bin for roster filler and maybe find another gem or two. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Nineforty said:

 

First and foremost it's how I feel about the Quarterback, how I feel about Kirk Cousins.  Some will argue he's a top 10 quarterback.  I can't say that they're wrong.  But I believe them to be wrong.  I personally would rather roll the dice on a rookie.  I understand the odds and the crapshoot nature of that strategy.  I understand there's no guarantee there's a rookie we love enough to move up and draft.  I just know how I feel about the Kirk Cousins the QB and I do not want to go that route.

 

With that being said, if they do sign Cousins, I'll quickly be on board and can appreciate the value of being able to fill holes with the draft picks.  It's just not my preference or first choice of how things could shake out. 

JK, good post

4 minutes ago, 707BillsFan said:

My $0.02 worth of nothing....Ok, Bills spend a fortune on Cousins, possibly have their QB for the next 5 years and use their draft picks to fill the roster for cheap (and hopefully get 4 starters w/ those top four picks). Or they give up their bushel of draft picks and move up to get the QB they want, thus possibly spending a fortune on FA to get the players they couldn't get in the draft. Or wait it out, hope the QB that falls to them at #21 / #22 pans out and still use the remaining draft picks to fill out the roster. This way saves money, but leaves future at QB still in limbo. 

 

Three scenarios, the first two they're spending the money, just in different ways. One may solve our QB problem for the next few years w/ a proven QB (although some don't see him as successful or worth the money), the second may get us a starting QB but he may be a year away from playing and nothing else via the draft. Third is a crap shoot, as we wait and see what falls to us, but we do get to keep our picks and still fill out our roster w relatively cheap talent. 

 

I don't think we have the $$ for Cousins, but I'd like to see them make a move for him. He said he's made his money and that won't be a determining factor on where he goes (sure, we can believe that :rolleyes:...but he may want to win and maybe he views us as a winner and breaking the bank won't be necessary for him). That way we'll still have our picks to get the team good talent w/o having to rely on high prices FA's to fill out the roster. We can hit the clearance bin for roster filler and maybe find another gem or two. 

You're not the first person to say this. Why do you think this? Contracts can be structured a number of ways. The Bills can sign Cousins if they choose to

Edited by nucci
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Why do you say that?

 

My comment outlines why i said it. I shouldve clarified that although we could  we might be handicapping cap we could spend on some help in other areas.

 

If we draft the right QB we get a franchise QB cheap for 5 years. And in those 5 years we can draft and sign a lot of talent to out around him

 

37 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

The Bills absolutely have the money. 

Look up. Then look down.

 

1 hour ago, FearLess Price said:

 

Cousins has never won a playoff game. Even when Cousins had an top shelf WR and TE rpster he didnt get passed the WC round.

 

I understand why Bills fans wana sign cousins. Its an easy fix to a position that we havent really filled since JKelly retired.

 

I disagree tho, id rather we trade up and take our shot at one of the top 3 QBs this draft.

 

New regime, new OC, draft capital to move up,  its the perfect time, and we can use the cap space that would've went to Cousins, to instead bring in good solid vets at positions on the OL and  front 7 where it takes rookies a while to get good at. LBs can play well right off the bus but it taes a while for OL and DT in most cases.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, aristocrat said:

 

you will see the skins lose more games than they did last year. the skins didn't have a very good team around cousins. their d was not good and like you have seen with brees the past few years and rivers...bad teams lose. even those two who are by all accounts franchise guys couldn't win by themselves. all of a sudden the saints get some great defensive players in the draft and same for the chargers and they win more than they did before.

 

Brees is a different level.  And the "bad defense" that stopped him winning was not just below average like Washington's (28th in ypg and 19th in ppy in 2016; 21st ypg and 27th ppg in 2017) it was all time historically bad. The 2015 and 2016 New Orleans Saints defense is the worst 2 year defensive run in NFL history.  It's a fact... give Brees a defense better than 27th in the league and he makes the playoffs 100% of the time.  

 

The Rivers comparison is a better one.  But Rivers, until this season, had no running game, no defense and no healthy weapons.  The one thing that Cousins had plenty of in 2015 and 2016 was weapons.  Admittedly that disappeared in 2017 too and I actually think made his 2017 season more impressive.  A poor man's Philip Rivers is pretty much what I think Cousins is.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, John from Hemet said:

Who exactly is the best QB available?

 

In the draft.  I really think its gonna be Mayfield and Rosen at 1st. Maybe Darnold will catch up after a year.

 

In FA Cousins by default because hes top 15 and doesnt get hurt as much as bradford and has a longer track record of being good than Keenum and Bridgewater is Tyrod status talent rite now.

 

Foles isnt a FA but hes up there with Cousins, even more so because he showed clutch trait. Cousins has never showed us that.

28 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:


I think what's behind the scenes is that McCloughan mis-evaluated Cousins.  They took a chance on franchising him that he'd regress to what they saw as "his mean" and they could sign him after a year, but he didn't and they couldn't.

 


McCloughan also says this:
“I can promise you this,” McCloughan said. “He has done his homework, probably too much, about each roster, who his receivers are, who his backs are, who his O-linemen are, who the coach is. Not just the head coach, but the coordinator, position coach, the system they run. I promise you he has notebook after notebook for each team. He is very, very intellectual about knowing what’s best for him. He understands he’s getting older, he’s been in the league a little bit. He wants to win. I know that. Personally, knowing him, it’s not about the money. It’s about the right fit, where he knows he has stability, he has good coaches, he has good players and he has a chance to be successful. I don’t blame him. He’s put himself in that situation with what he’s done the last three years.”

 

Good post. Reading this makes Denver seem like the best spot for him.

34 minutes ago, Shaw66 said:

Yes it was a speculative comment, but it was informed speculation.  He knows Cousins understands how important the coach os, and he followed the Cousins comment immediately with his comment about how much he likes McBeane.  I think he thinks Buffalo is a more likely landing spot than many people do. 

 

Most def breh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much I'd love to see Cousins here, there's NO chance in Hades that he will want to come to Buffalo.   The weather, a defensive minded coach, worst WR group in the league.   He'll be able to chose between Denver, Arizona, Jets, possibly Jacksonville....I'd bet he moves on to Arizona. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Brees is a different level.  And the "bad defense" that stopped him winning was not just below average like Washington's (28th in ypg and 19th in ppy in 2016; 21st ypg and 27th ppg in 2017) it was all time historically bad. The 2015 and 2016 New Orleans Saints defense is the worst 2 year defensive run in NFL history.  It's a fact... give Brees a defense better than 27th in the league and he makes the playoffs 100% of the time.  

 

Except for the years he had a #25, #26 D and didn't make the playoffs....I take your overall point though. 

 

Brees is one of a short handful of QB in the league who can lift and carry a team, even shorter after Peyton Manning's decline and fall.

 

13 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

The Rivers comparison is a better one.  But Rivers, until this season, had no running game, no defense and no healthy weapons.  The one thing that Cousins had plenty of in 2015 and 2016 was weapons.  Admittedly that disappeared in 2017 too and I actually think made his 2017 season more impressive.  A poor man's Philip Rivers is pretty much what I think Cousins is.  

 

I don't think the man is that poor with Cousins.  JMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Except for the years he had a #25, #26 D and didn't make the playoffs....I take your overall point though. 

 

Brees is one of a short handful of QB in the league who can lift and carry a team, even shorter after Peyton Manning's decline and fall.

 

 

I don't think the man is that poor with Cousins.  JMO.

 

You are right sorry it is better than 25th. Not sure why I had 27th in my head.  In his last 4 non playoff seasons the D ranks have been atrocious though, 31st, 28th, 32nd, 31st.  

 

I think Cousins has a lot to prove to be there with Rivers career wise.  Rivers has at times been a borderline top 5 QB.  He is now borderline top 10 which is exactly where Cousins is.... I suppose I meant poor man's compared to peak Rivers. And peak Cousins should be now and the next couple of years really. 

Edited by GunnerBill
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, FearLess Price said:

In the draft.  I really think its gonna be Mayfield and Rosen at 1st. Maybe Darnold will catch up after a year.

 

That's two QB.  We can only pick one.  Who is the best QB available?

 

If I were Cousins, I would have my agent trailing trial balloons to Minnesota.

 

Does Denver have an OL? CHFF says it's "meh" at best, although one can argue how much CHFF rating is skewed by the QB.  Who's their RT?

Does Denver have quality WR younger than 30?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...