Taro Nimbus Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Josh Jacobs to Green Bay. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Process Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Rats 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GETTOTHE50 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Falcons paying millions just to lose in the first round with Krusty Kirk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Stampede Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 WR2 money. Fans here had him as WR4. lol. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HappyDays Posted March 12 Author Share Posted March 12 Ugh I think we could have afforded that for sure, not a crazy overpay. Curtis Samuel and Josh Reynolds are still on the board. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LABILLBACKER Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Wow, that was pricier than I thought. Too bad, liked what he could've brought. Don't know if there would be enough money for Sutton on a 2 yr deal? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cray51 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Too expensive for him 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strive_for_five_guy Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Beane right now: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aussie Joe Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Overpay .. but the market is hot ,.. My prediction for the Bills Free Agency WR is Valdes - Scantling at about $5m … all they can afford .. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Process Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 I was interested in Mooney, but also wouldn't have wanted him to be higher than #4 on the WR depth chart. That doesn't even include Kincaid etc who should also be seeing more targets than him. Obviously at this price it makes zero sense. Just draft a guy in round 1 and find a cheapish vet to fill the #4/primary backup spot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Stampede Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Just now, Aussie Joe said: Overpay .. but the market is hot ,.. My prediction for the Bills Free Agency WR is Valdes - Scantling at about $5m … all they can afford .. All they can afford is incorrect. All they want to afford is correct. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aussie Joe Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Just now, Buffalo_Stampede said: All they can afford is incorrect. All they want to afford is correct. Same difference at the end of the day 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strive_for_five_guy Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 1 minute ago, Aussie Joe said: Overpay .. but the market is hot ,.. My prediction for the Bills Free Agency WR is Valdes - Scantling at about $5m … all they can afford .. I’m curious what Michael Thomas’ market is. Don’t think the Bills are going to find too impactful of a WR in FA, but I’d take a flier on him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCBills Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 If I’m Beane, I’m exploring the trade market for a WR1 type guy who’s younger. If that’s not available, sign a cheaper vet, draft a guy and hope for the best. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Think that was probably beyond us. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Jokeman Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Just now, strive_for_five_guy said: I’m curious what Michael Thomas’ market is. Don’t think the Bills are going to find too impactful of a WR in FA, but I’d take a flier on him. He's a low risk high reward guy if get him at a low cap figure (see less than $6 million). I'd welcome him since Brady and Curry have worked with him when they were with the Saints. He might never be a 1200 plus yard guy again but if he can stay healthy think he's a respectful #2 while we develop Shorter and a rookie WR behind him. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasterStrategist Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Not sure why ppl want to sign a WR2. Round 1 pick is likely pegged for that. We likely need a WR4, $5-6m type. Then draft a 2nd WR in middle rounds. With Diggs, Kincaid, Shakir, Knox, Cook. We need 1 very good option to add, and a couple supporting types. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Stampede Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 1 minute ago, Aussie Joe said: Same difference at the end of the day Somewhat, but to me it’s more of an excuse for the front office. If they want to sign a WR2 in UFA they can. The cap is not preventing it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 lol I told y’all he was gonna get $12-$14M per and never coming here. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dillenger4 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Matches the Gabe Davis contract. Interesting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheWeatherMan Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 3 minutes ago, MasterStrategist said: Not sure why ppl want to sign a WR2. Round 1 pick is likely pegged for that. We likely need a WR4, $5-6m type. Then draft a 2nd WR in middle rounds. With Diggs, Kincaid, Shakir, Knox, Cook. We need 1 very good option to add, and a couple supporting types. We need a WR 1, we all ready have a WR 2 and WR 3 3 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said: lol I told y’all he was gonna get $12-$14M per and never coming here. Cookie? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasterStrategist Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Just now, TheWeatherMan said: We need a WR 1, we all ready have a WR 2 and WR 3 Cookie? Diggs is WR1. Maybe not a top 5 WR anymore, but he's still a top 15-20 guy. By definition, that's WR1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mat68 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 This is why in the FA Wr thread I said avoid them all. Buffalo could easy roll with 12. Shakir, Diggs, Kincaid, and Knox. Give me Shakir over all the FA wrs. Draft one with 28 or 60 and another the top of day 3. If you go vet get a guy on a one year deal hoping Allen gets him paid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheWeatherMan Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Just now, MasterStrategist said: Diggs is WR1. Maybe not a top 5 WR anymore, but he's still a top 15-20 guy. By definition, that's WR1 Did you watch the last 8 games of the season? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCofNC Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 That’s going to look like a bargain I believe, he was a pretty legit #1 prior to Fields. With all the attention going to London, Pitts and that running game.. they could be realllllly good. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No_Matter_What Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Interesting. Does this mean that they are off WR market at pick 8? They already have London, Mooney, Pitts + Robinson. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasterStrategist Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 1 minute ago, TheWeatherMan said: Did you watch the last 8 games of the season? Yeah and he was fighting thru injury it looked like Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Jokeman Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 1 minute ago, No_Matter_What said: Interesting. Does this mean that they are off WR market at pick 8? They already have London, Mooney, Pitts + Robinson. I would think so. Yet they could trade down and still take a WR at #8 (but I hope not the Bills). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rigotz Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 42 minutes ago, strive_for_five_guy said: Beane right now: I hope he stays asleep with the ridiculous values these players are going for. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerseyBills Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 30 minutes ago, TheWeatherMan said: Did you watch the last 8 games of the season? Did you watch the first 8? He was killing it, top 3 WR numbers. You don't fall off mid season like that? I've always said he likely had a nagging injury 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChans Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 (edited) The king goes to the Ravens, unfortunately, Lamar is still gonna have to pass in the postseason, Edited March 12 by FireChans Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draconator Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 10 minutes ago, Draconator said: pet peeve. Baltimore is not THE queen city. It is a Queen city. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills6969 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleeding Bills Blue Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 50 minutes ago, No_Matter_What said: Interesting. Does this mean that they are off WR market at pick 8? They already have London, Mooney, Pitts + Robinson. I should hope so - you don't spend 3 firsts in 3 years on playmakers just to spend a 4th in a row. If anything they might be in a good spot for someone to trade up for a QB. Could always move London on draft day i suppose if you really like nabers or something. There's only one ball, and you got robinson wanting his 90-120 targets. Then you have pitts wanting probably 80-100. Then you have london wanting 100-140. Last year they had jonnu smith as the 4th option, but i would assume mooney slots in for a lot of those. There's probably snaps and targets available, but i'm not sure a first round pick there is wise, unless you are considering Pitts basically a bust. Considering their pass rush is absolute trash, and they had 8 total interceptions as a team - they probably need to add to that defense. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruffalo Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 17 minutes ago, Draconator said: Likely the best fit for him. I'm very glad Beane is staying away from this first wave of RBs. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleeding Bills Blue Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Just now, Bruffalo said: Likely the best fit for him. I'm very glad Beane is staying away from this first wave of RBs. Wouldn't be shocked if we stayed away from the 2nd wave tbh. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruffalo Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 3 minutes ago, Bleeding Bills Blue said: Wouldn't be shocked if we stayed away from the 2nd wave tbh. Considering how the market has been for RBs compared to last season, it wouldn't surprise me. RBs are getting paid this year. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleeding Bills Blue Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 1 minute ago, Bruffalo said: Considering how the market has been for RBs compared to last season, it wouldn't surprise me. RBs are getting paid this year. The top end was tagged a year ago with jacobs, barkley, and pollard all getting it. Factoring in what they all received last year - all are basically getting a similar number AAV. Swift, Henry, Jones, Ekeler all available this year too. It was a pretty loaded market. Looking at this list - i don't see anyone who i'd pay left. Let someone else overpay. Patterson - Old and a KR only guy Mattison - Bad Elliott - bursts of good, but he was always a big hitter and now he's hitting singles instead of homers CEH - still young, coming off a terrible season Akers - still young, coming off a terrible season Foreman - big fast dude in the murray mold Scott - Put him next to damien harris Harris - See scott, plus an injury Dobbins - Can't see much of a market with all the injuries Hunt - Didn't even lead his team in carries after chubb was hurt so... i'd assume hes trending down Dillon - Big.. fast... not sure he's very dynamic though. Mckinnon - pretty much 3rd down only, would take away some cook snaps in those situations. Not an upgrade over cook, but an upgrade over murray playing on third downs blocking. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruffalo Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 3 minutes ago, Bleeding Bills Blue said: The top end was tagged a year ago with jacobs, barkley, and pollard all getting it. Factoring in what they all received last year - all are basically getting a similar number AAV. Swift, Henry, Jones, Ekeler all available this year too. It was a pretty loaded market. Looking at this list - i don't see anyone who i'd pay left. Let someone else overpay. Patterson - Old and a KR only guy Mattison - Bad Elliott - bursts of good, but he was always a big hitter and now he's hitting singles instead of homers CEH - still young, coming off a terrible season Akers - still young, coming off a terrible season Foreman - big fast dude in the murray mold Scott - Put him next to damien harris Harris - See scott, plus an injury Dobbins - Can't see much of a market with all the injuries Hunt - Didn't even lead his team in carries after chubb was hurt so... i'd assume hes trending down Dillon - Big.. fast... not sure he's very dynamic though. Mckinnon - pretty much 3rd down only, would take away some cook snaps in those situations. Not an upgrade over cook, but an upgrade over murray playing on third downs blocking. Dobbins is kind of interesting if you can get him on the team for a cheap prove it type deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.