Jump to content

MasterStrategist

Community Member
  • Posts

    2,169
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Recent Profile Visitors

2,447 profile views

MasterStrategist's Achievements

Veteran

Veteran (6/8)

1.5k

Reputation

  1. Agree, I'm not advocating a "reach" at DE. I however think that the Robinsons, Chop and Darius will be excellent picks. Bring something different in skill sets, but both can "win" matchups and create havoc. Nobody knows which prospects will prosper, so I won't waste time arguing merits of one versus another. But I'll continue to say that we need DE/pass rush help badly. Just a bit more than WR, IMO, after the Samuel pickup. Player evaluation needs to meet the draft slot, but we're a better/more rounded team, if the scouting/evaluation has a DE=a WR at 28....you take the DE and come back with a WR in round 2 (potentially moving up, which I'm mentioned in numerous other posts)
  2. I'll play devils advocate. Disagree with your point about McDermott coaching tendencies/philosophy, and bad defense vs Chiefs in playoffs. We had WAY too many injuries to compete on defense, on every level-especially missing our top 2 LBs against a team with a dominant TE and Coach's use of LBs being paramount. Each postseason, except for 2020, we've entered with too many injuries to key players: 1. 2021: Tre 2. 2022: Von, Tre still hobbled, Micah, Daquan 3. 2023: Milano, Bernard, Daquan coming off a torn pec, Rasul playing at 75% Problem is injuries and not having a dominant player on defense. Easier to overcome injuries, if we have a dominant guy healthy. Instead, we have several very good guys and when 1-2 miss, then we're SOL. Our offense plays lights our because of Josh. Eventually we need to find an equivalent defensive output to rely on. And to me, that's what Beane has been chasing (Von signing, DL investments), and he should keep going that route until he hits. With such a deep WR class, there will be very good WRs sitting there in round 2. Usually is anyhow in each class, it's about proper scouting/etc but it's easier to hit when more talent is there. At DL, such a weak class overall, but there are 1-2 guys who could be there in Round 1 that could be a huge help. Diggs, Samuel, a 2nd round WR with deep ball skills, Shakir, Kincaid, Knox would already be an upgrade on LY and likely our best group since 2020. I just don't think we need a RD1 WR, not after investing in Kincaid LY and Samuel, to go with current group. Our DE room is going to look bare after 2024 season, with Von likely gone and AJE isn't any more than a DE3- need more juice up front.
  3. There will be "close to equal" talent in RD2 at WR, if we move up to 50. WR6-8 at 28, vs WR 10-14 in RD2 isn't much drop-off. At DE, both Robinsons are tier 2 talents to me (potential). Different skill sets, Chop brings the elite athleticism, while the other is more physical and can bounce inside too. Either is worthy of 28
  4. Miller is a wild card, he either gets close to prior form OR he is washed up. I think he'll rebound, but he's not going to be what he was in 2022 pre injury. He's a rotational piece to me. Von is also gone after this year, and AJE isn't a DE2 (he could be, but isn't yet). Groot isn't locked up longterm either. I say DE is something that could impact the team the most. DT, I'm fine with Jones and Ed. Find a viable backup in FA (either at 1 tech or 3 tech), draft the other later rounds.
  5. Agree with both sides of discussion, Samuel is versatile piece. But another reason we don't "need" a RD1 WR. With Diggs, Samuel, Shakir, Kincaid and Knox, that's already a solid group. A WR in RD2, of the deepest draft at WR in history, is all we need.
  6. Exactly. DE and WR are both equal needs but I think DE could have biggest impact on success of team. We don't have a top tier DL player. We have 1 tier two player (Ed), a tier 3 guy (Groot), tier 3-4 in AJE and Von. We need another DL player in the tier 2 category, or ideally potential to be an all-pro. We won't have success late in playoffs with what we have now, just not good enough. We arent in position to get an elite player at DL on draft, but both Robinsons have different skill sets, and bring potential to be tier 2 guys relatively quickly.
  7. Exactly baseline WR2/complimentary piece to the WR room. I mentioned earlier today in the Armstead thread, that Beane is likely targeting Samuel/MVS, then going DL in RD1. Wr in RD2 (trade up to high 40s/#50, to get ahead of Steelers). Will see if draft plays out like that. But hoping we can get our starting FS before draft, and a backup DT.
  8. Agreed. Those day 3 picks will be valuable for moving up in Rd 2 though. Say to jump ahead of Steelers, move from Pick 60 to Pick 50. Both Steelers and Bills have very similar positional needs: WR, Safety, Center
  9. Exactly. We get better value investing those FA $s/remaining cap on a WR (such as Samuel/MVS) and a starting caliber FS. Solid logic why a versatile DL would help. I mentioned a couple RD1 DL prospects above, who could help immediately. Team likes bumping Groot inside on passing downs as well, so that's an existing option. Just think a low-tier WR2 and starting FS are wiser investments, with remaining cap $s. Go get that DL prospect early, and WR in RD2 (in one of the deepest classes ever)
  10. Sorry, should have said I don't think Beane will get into a bidding war. I think he has a value on Erik and doesn't "go after him too aggressively", IMO/no source. Personally, I'd rather invest an early pick on DL...knowing Von is likely gone after this year, and AJE is only on a 2-yr deal/isn't a DE2. WR is so deep we can find a starter in RD2
  11. I'm not sure we go after Armstead, IMO Texans will land him. Because of $ and age/injury, I think Beane stays put. As a possibility, I'm wondering if Beane strategy is to go DL round 1 (which will initially trigger some anger by fans) and trade up in Round 2 for a WR. DL: Chop Robinson, Darius Robinson (who profiles similar to Armstead, inside/out versatilty) are two guys to watch WR: such a deep draft, Beane might not see much difference between WR5-6 (which is likely our Rd1 option, if we stay put) & WR8-12 (if we move up in Rd 2) I don't see us using all eleven picks, so Rd 2 is ripe for moving up. Or we stay put and see WR12ish at our pick. Sign a guy like Samuel or MVS, who could be a WR2b (complimentary weapon), add a Rd2 Wr. Diggs/Kincaid/FA/Rd 2 Wr/Shakir/Knox....would be a nice collective group. DL: Oliver, Jones, Groot, Von, AJE, 1 more FA DT, Rd1 DE, Late round DT
  12. The Rapp signing is my only issue thus far, as I was hoping for a legit starter via FA. Perhaps they still have a plan there. Lewis is super cheap, provides best ROI for his familiarity with system and position versatility/ST play. Re: Morrow, all I can think is there could be concern with: 1. Injuries occurring again AND/OR 2. Dorian might not pick things up yet in Year 2. It's a fact that the injury bug hit us hard LY, especially at LB. But after seeing what happened against KC, I don't think they wanted a rookie in the LB4 spot (especially a late pick) and Dorian hasn't proved anything, except his athleticism. McDs Def philosophy revolves around strong LB play. Having a dependable LB3 is a good investment, given recent injury luck and what we have on roster.
  13. Re: draft/round 1 and 2 If right guys are there, I think our most impactful strategy should be: RD1 WR and RD2 OC/OG. With Daquan back, I think we can find a 1 tech DT in Rd 4-6. Same for DE4 slot. I think Beane will grab 1 more DT and DE in FA, sets up depth-wise heading into draft.
  14. Yeah and he was fighting thru injury it looked like
  15. Diggs is WR1. Maybe not a top 5 WR anymore, but he's still a top 15-20 guy. By definition, that's WR1
×
×
  • Create New...