Jump to content

The Ringer ranking of Receiver Cores - Opinions???


Billsfan1972

Recommended Posts

While still not week one and really have little to say until the season starts, thought this may spur some discussion.

 

https://www.theringer.com/nfl/2023/8/17/23834765/rankings-the-nfl-best-past-catcher-receiving-group-2023

 

Interesting how low the Bills and Chiefs are on this list, which really then shows how highly they think of Mahomes & Allen.

 

Conversely Cincy, Dallas, SF, Chargers, Vikings, Eagles near the top. 

 

I have no comments outside I too give most of the credit to Allen for the Bills performance on offense, but let's hear the experts here debate it. 

Edited by Billsfan1972
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Billsfan1972 said:

While still not week one and really have little to say until the season starts, thought this may spur some discussion

 

https://www.theringer.com/nfl/2023/8/17/23834765/rankings-the-nfl-best-past-catcher-receiving-group-2023

 

Interesting how low the Bills and Chiefs are on this list, which really then shows how highly they think of Mahomes & Allen.

 

I have no comments outside I too give most of the credit to Allen for the Bills performance on offense, but let's hear the experts here debate it. 

Weird that they don't even list Knox as a pass catching option. As a matter of fact, they basically have Kincaid described as an inline TE. I'm going to say these rankings are inconclusive at best.

 

"18. Buffalo Bills

 

WR: Stefon Diggs
WR: Gabe Davis
WR: Trent Sherfield
WR: Khalil Shakir
RB: James Cook
TE: Dalton Kincaid

Buffalo didn’t have a reliable underneath option last year behind Diggs, leading them to rely on Cole Beasley in their embarrassing divisional-round loss to the Bengals. Enter first-round tight end Kincaid out of Utah. Long term, Kincaid is a potentially fantastic addition. But rookie tight ends must learn to block NFL defensive ends and get open against NFL defenders, so they rarely contribute early. If Josh Allen ever checked it down, we might be looking at Cook as one of the best receiving backs in the league."

Edited by BuffaloBillyG
  • Agree 4
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the Bills are ranked about right. Although Knox is a bigger weapon than Shakir as is Harty. So not sure totally on their method... but somewhere around halfway feels right. 

 

A top 5 #1 

A lower end #2

A borderline top 10 TE and a rookie Big Slot / TE

Sherfield who is a versatile, reliable backup. 

Cook who needs to show more as a pass catcher.

 

Not bad. But nowhere near elite.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, BillsDad51 said:

Their comment on Kincaid seems a little off. I don't think he'll be required to block defensive ends much. He'll be on the field as a receiver in 12 personnel groups.

 

 

 

That would be a hell of a block of Kincaid was blocking DEs while split out in the slot...except if he was in tight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

I think the Bills are ranked about right. Although Knox is a bigger weapon than Shakir as is Harty. So not sure totally on their method... but somewhere around halfway feels right. 

 

A top 5 #1 

A lower end #2

A borderline top 10 TE and a rookie Big Slot / TE

Sherfield who is a versatile, reliable backup. 

Cook who needs to show more as a pass catcher.

 

Not bad. But nowhere near elite.

I agree that on paper middle of the pack is right about where the Bills should be at the moment.

 

However, I think if utilized properly by the end of the year as a group they may be viewed much higher. The talents that each has is diversified enough to cause some true matchup nightmares. Hopefully the sum of the parts will result in something that is very hard to defend. 

11 minutes ago, HOUSE said:

I posted 26 times in the DeAndre Hopkins thread but did anyone listen......no

Only 26? You know we can't take anything under 35 seriously.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Billsfan1972 said:

While still not week one and really have little to say until the season starts, thought this may spur some discussion.

 

https://www.theringer.com/nfl/2023/8/17/23834765/rankings-the-nfl-best-past-catcher-receiving-group-2023

 

Interesting how low the Bills and Chiefs are on this list, which really then shows how highly they think of Mahomes & Allen.

 

Conversely Cincy, Dallas, SF, Chargers, Vikings, Eagles near the top. 

 

I have no comments outside I too give most of the credit to Allen for the Bills performance on offense, but let's hear the experts here debate it. 

Clearly a well researched article.  They’ve got Richie James and Rashee Rice listed as TEs.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, BuffaloBillyG said:

Weird that they don't even list Knox as a pass catching option. As a matter of fact, they basically have Kincaid described as an inline TE. I'm going to say these rankings are inconclusive at best.

 

"18. Buffalo Bills

 

WR: Stefon Diggs
WR: Gabe Davis
WR: Trent Sherfield
WR: Khalil Shakir
RB: James Cook
TE: Dalton Kincaid

Buffalo didn’t have a reliable underneath option last year behind Diggs, leading them to rely on Cole Beasley in their embarrassing divisional-round loss to the Bengals. Enter first-round tight end Kincaid out of Utah. Long term, Kincaid is a potentially fantastic addition. But rookie tight ends must learn to block NFL defensive ends and get open against NFL defenders, so they rarely contribute early. If Josh Allen ever checked it down, we might be looking at Cook as one of the best receiving backs in the league."

 


If Kincaid doesn't get the ball often because "he has learn to block defensive ends" then the Bills shouldn't have drafted him. 


They also didn't mention Harty. If he stays healthy, he's a dynamic player 

Edited by Warriorspikes51
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:

Explain to me why The Ringer should be considered a credible site for analysis, especially given the oversights and errors cited in the posts above.

 

because we're bored

 

i suggest watching one bite pizza reviews from the barstool guy until the season starts

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems the rest of the world is catching on to what I’ve been saying.  It’s Diggs and a bunch of JAGs.

23 minutes ago, BillsfaninChicago said:

I think they just plum forgot about Knox. Having said that until all the other receivers we have (including Davis) prove otherwise I think we are still only average to slightly above. 

Knox is not a great receiver and hasn’t been used as one much either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Billsfan1972 said:

While still not week one and really have little to say until the season starts, thought this may spur some discussion.

https://www.theringer.com/nfl/2023/8/17/23834765/rankings-the-nfl-best-past-catcher-receiving-group-2023

Interesting how low the Bills and Chiefs are on this list, which really then shows how highly they think of Mahomes & Allen.

Conversely Cincy, Dallas, SF, Chargers, Vikings, Eagles near the top. 

I have no comments outside I too give most of the credit to Allen for the Bills performance on offense, but let's hear the experts here debate it. 

 

Well, this amused me greatly

 

Quote

31. New England Patriots

WR: JuJu Smith-Schuster
WR: DeVante Parker
WR: Kendrick Bourne
WR: Mike Gesicki
WR: Tyquan Thornton
RB: Rhamondre Stevenson
TE: Hunter Henry

“Stink, stank, stunk” was how Boston Sports Journal reporter Mike Giardi described the Patriots pass catchers early in training camp. By all accounts, receiver remains a problem that Bill Belichick has been unable to solve. Smith-Schuster has had a few disappointing years. Gesicki is a tight end on paper but in reality a glorified (and ineffective) receiver. Thornton is a speed demon who has yet to contribute in meaningful ways. This group’s only hope is to be rescued by new coordinator Bill O’Brien—if he can remove the stench that Matt Patricia left on this offense.

 

Juju SS is fresh off a 977 yd, 77.2% catch% season with the Superbowl champions.  That's not a fluke, he has 3 similar seasons, though he's probably more a "good #2" than a #1.  Davante Parker was solid last year in NWE.  Gesicki was a solid >50 receptions, 700 yd guy for 3 years in Mia before McDaniel got there. 

 

Maybe if they all meet in NE and stink, stank, stunk *whispers* maybe the problem is not the receivers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As said until the season starts I really don't get too excited (thus my departure annually after the Bills are eliminated & I no longer posts and obsess on play calling).

 

The point is look at the top of the list and how they make qb's better and then there's Mahomes and Allen having to make due.....

 

Interesting MVP Candidates Burrow, Hurts & Herbert there along with the overpaid and disliked Cousins, of course the overhyped Cowboys and Dak and most protected qb (anyone playing for the 49'ers).

Edited by Billsfan1972
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DCofNC said:

Seems the rest of the world is catching on to what I’ve been saying.  It’s Diggs and a bunch of JAGs.

Knox is not a great receiver and hasn’t been used as one much either.

Over the past two seasons he has over 1100 yards receiving and 15 touchdowns. Not All Pro level numbers but pretty good considering the personal tragedy he was dealing with.
 

Not saying it would make a huge difference but he does factor into a receiver analysis especially with some potential coverage relief in Kincaid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny...that ranking seems to be of the opinion that the Bills have better passing game weaponry than the Chiefs.

All I've heard around here lately is how Patrick Mahomes' receiving corps is sooooo much better than Josh Allen's. Huh.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bills to me are probably somewhere between 10-15 at this point to me. Diggs is a top 5 WR. Gabe is a top 40ish guy. Knox and Kincaid are a top 7 or 8 TE room (and potentially better). Harty, Sherfield and Shakir are middle of the pack depth. Cook is a top 15 receiving back (and potentially even better). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

 


If Kincaid doesn't get the ball often because "he has learn to block defensive ends" then the Bills shouldn't have drafted him. 


They also didn't mention Harty. If he stays healthy, he's a dynamic player 

Apparently Knox is persona non grata as well 🙄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DCofNC said:

Knox is not a great receiver and hasn’t been used as one much either.

Come to think of it, I’ve never heard Josh talk about Knox in the way he describes Kincaid: “fun to throw to/good body language/etc,” but the addition of Kincaid does sound like Knox has upped his game (or maybe he’s the forgotten man?). This is the first camp I’ve heard Knox being mentioned almost daily in a positive write up.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Logic said:

Funny...that ranking seems to be of the opinion that the Bills have better passing game weaponry than the Chiefs.

All I've heard around here lately is how Patrick Mahomes' receiving corps is sooooo much better than Josh Allen's. Huh.


Nobody here really says that.  
 

What is said, quite frequently, is that KC has had a better offensive mind leading the team in Andy Reid, has put forth a much better Offensive Line around Mahomes and that those things, plus Kelce, allow them to perform at a high level even without Tyreek Hill. 
 

What is also said, is that they are not devoid of investment at WR.. 

 

They traded for a recent RD1 WR who wasn’t a fit on the team that drafted him after the coaching change.  They brought in a WR3 to give them a vet presence.  Then drafted, in consecutive years, RD2 WR’s.  
 

We have Diggs as our major investment at WR (money and/or draft capital).   Then a RD4 WR in Gabe Davis that has been a success, potentially a major success depending on his season this year.   Then after him, what we had last year was an embarrassment.   This year, we still have the RD5 WR, plus another RD5 WR and some veterans that, while nothing that really moves the needle, should be upgrades in WR depth. 
 

With the additions of McGovern, Torrence and Kincaid.. I have high hopes for this Offense.  The OL should be much better and the WR/TE’s as a group are much better than middle of the pack if factoring in Knox and the potential of Kincaid.  
 

But the criticisms up to this off-season of what Beane and staff has surrounded Josh Allen with, compared to Mahomes & Burrow, are very valid. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

That’s because your reading comprehension isn’t any good… 


You:

"What dime a dozen talent had Mahomes turned into contributors?

 

He has had a lot more to work with than Allen."



Also you:

"Hill and Kelce coupled with Mahomes was the best in the league… better than anything the Bills have ever given Allen and even with the Hill trade they still had JuJu and MVS with Kelce… not great receivers but not nobody’s/scrubs like the Bills trotted out last season behind Diggs and the inconsistent Davis. … the investment also isn’t nearly the same as the Bills lack there of."
 


Don't pretend like you haven't been beating the "KC consistently gives Mahomes better receivers" drum recently.

But let's suppose you were only talking about the past there, and not the present. Do you still feel like KC has a better receiving corps than Buffalo this season? 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BuffaninSarasota said:

CORPS:

a body of people engaged in a particular activity.

"the press corps"   ..... or WIDE RECEIVERS, IN THIS CASE

 

CORE:

"the central or most important part of something"


 

In the case of the BiIls, it’s wide receiver corpse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Logic said:


You:

"What dime a dozen talent had Mahomes turned into contributors?

 

He has had a lot more to work with than Allen."



Also you:

"Hill and Kelce coupled with Mahomes was the best in the league… better than anything the Bills have ever given Allen and even with the Hill trade they still had JuJu and MVS with Kelce… not great receivers but not nobody’s/scrubs like the Bills trotted out last season behind Diggs and the inconsistent Davis. … the investment also isn’t nearly the same as the Bills lack there of."
 


Don't pretend like you haven't been beating the "KC consistently gives Mahomes better receivers" drum recently.

But let's suppose you were only talking about the past there, and not the present. Do you still feel like KC has a better receiving corps than Buffalo this season? 
 

are you denying that KC has consistently done a better job surrounding Mahomes w offensive talent?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like others said, I don't have a problem with the ranking, but it should list Knox instead of Shakir.  I think we are somewhere in that 12-20 range.  This will obviously improve if Davis takes a step up and Kincaid turns out to be a real weapon.  Maybe just wishful thinking, but I feel like there is some real untapped potential with our group.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...