Jump to content

Texans sign Laremy Tunsil to huge extension


Recommended Posts

Ian Rapoport

@RapSheet

·

23s

More specifics on the #Texans extension with LT Laremy Tunsil, who blew up the tackle market: 3 years, $66M with $57.85M guaranteed (more than I initially said) with $40M over the first two years and a $13M signing bonus, per me and

@wyche89

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BillsMafi$ said:

Dawkins is smiling 

Wish I could say he wont get that much money, but he isn't far off from the player Tunsil is.   If Tunsil got 22 million a year, Dawkins could easily get 21.5

 

No clue why the Texans thought they needed to add 5.5 million to the biggest LT contract already in the NFL.   Really screwed a lot of other teams by setting the market that high.

Edited by thenorthremembers
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mike in Horseheads said:

Just crazy money, now Dawkins price tag just went up so is he worth that?

 

I don't think so.  It's hard to play hard ball with your players but its like - Dawkins... You are not top 5, or even top 10 really at your position.  Why should i make you the highest paid?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All but $8M guaranteed?  Good luck with that.

 

3 minutes ago, thenorthremembers said:

Wish I could say he wont get that much money, but he isn't far off from the player Tunsil is.   If Tunsil got 22 million a year, Dawkins could easily get 21.5

 

No clue why the Texans thought they needed to add 5.5 million to the biggest LT contract already in the NFL.   Really screwed a lot of other teams by setting the market that high.

 

I'll bet Tunsil threatened to hold out.  BOB is coaching for his job this year and that would have killed it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Doc said:

All but $8M guaranteed?  Good luck with that.

 

 

I'll bet Tunsil threatened to hold out.  BOB is coaching for his job this year and that would have killed it.

 

Tunsil definitely held all the cards.  On the flip side, if QBs are going to be getting $35-40 million, it's about right.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said:

 

Tunsil definitely held all the cards.  On the flip side, if QBs are going to be getting $35-40 million, it's about right.

Difference is Quarterbacks are already making that kind of money.    There was no reason to pay him 30% more than what Castonzo just got when he is a lesser player, and if you want to argue age, he is getting 2% more on the cap than Lewan got in 2018.  It was a stupid move by a stupid team.

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Call_Of_Ktulu said:

I would be pissed if we paid Dawkins a 15 mil a year average. Dawkins is NOT a top 15 LT and probably shouldn’t even be playing the position. 

Better get ready to be pissed.   He is 100% a top 15 player at his position. 

 

He is younger, and easily better than these top 15 paid Left Tackles below.

 

Reiff
Duane Brown
Okung
Donovan Smith
DJ Humphries
Solder

 

The guy is going to get paid 16 million a year or more easy, and the dumb Texans really just made a mess for the Bills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Doc said:

All but $8M guaranteed?  Good luck with that.

 

 

I'll bet Tunsil threatened to hold out.  BOB is coaching for his job this year and that would have killed it.

 

This is one reason being head coach AND being GM is a bad idea. They should have different roles and objectives to do this properly. 

 

 

.

Edited by Augie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Augie said:

 

This is one reason being head coach AND being GM is a bad idea. They should have different roles and objectives to do this properly. 

 

 

.

 

As a general rule, I couldn't argue, but Belichick seems to be good enough at it.

 

Mind you, he never would have dished out 2 1sts without having a deal in place first.

 

He might even have cut him rather than pay him that much, tbh.

 

On a side note, not only has Tunsil done remarkably well for himself without an agent, he also gets to keep all the money without paying a shark. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Buddo said:

 

As a general rule, I couldn't argue, but Belichick seems to be good enough at it.

 

Mind you, he never would have dished out 2 1sts without having a deal in place first.

 

He might even have cut him rather than pay him that much, tbh.

 

On a side note, not only has Tunsil done remarkably well for himself without an agent, he also gets to keep all the money without paying a shark. ;)

 

Belichick doesn’t ever have to worry about losing his job. Not the case in Houston, or almost anywhere else. Having said that, I can’t really say I love Belichick the GM. He doesn’t draft particularly well. You can’t argue with his success, but I think more of that comes from being a brilliant coach (and of course a cheater), than being a good GM. 

 

I think there can be an inherent conflict if you play both roles. The coach in you can reach for players trying to keep their job, while the GM should have longer term roster building and cap management as primary objectives. It’s hard to wear both hats, IMO.  

 

P.S. - I didn’t realize Tunsil didn’t have an agent. I guess he’s not too baked, or at least less baked than the Texans BOB. And you’re right, Belichick NEVER would have painted himself into that corner. This was just dumb all the way around, as I see it. 

Edited by Augie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...