Jump to content

Tyreek Hill Deal


aristocrat

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, mannc said:

Or maybe, like the NFL, they don’t think he did it.

I guess they would be experts on being able to determine if he did or not, they have plenty of experience in it.....

 

Or they figure if they keep cutting guys who do it they won't have anyone left?

Edited by apuszczalowski
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unreal.  How the hell are they paying 2 wrs, neither a true #1, 34M a year and still doling out monster deals to other guys too.. soon to be the same mess Reid left Philly in.  It will be Maholmes and the grocery baggers in 3 years.  The contract conveniently lines up with having to pay the QB

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, mannc said:

Or maybe, like the NFL, they don’t think he did it.

 

Well, they know he did at one point... and that audio clip is pretty damning. 

 

I mean, they’re gonna cut a guy for fighting back against a woman who started the fight, and yet a child beater gets money.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DCofNC said:

Unreal.  How the hell are they paying 2 wrs, neither a true #1, 34M a year and still doling out monster deals to other guys too.. soon to be the same mess Reid left Philly in.  It will be Maholmes and the grocery baggers in 3 years.  The contract conveniently lines up with having to pay the QB

 

Wait...are you saying Hill isn’t a #1 WR?

 

87 catches, 1479 yards and 12 TDS last year

 

What or who do you consider a true #1 WR?

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, whatdrought said:

 

Well, they know he did at one point... and that audio clip is pretty damning. 

 

I mean, they’re gonna cut a guy for fighting back against a woman who started the fight, and yet a child beater gets money.

The child beater is more important to Andy's offense apparently :thumbdown:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bangarang said:

 

Wait...are you saying Hill isn’t a #1 WR?

 

87 catches, 1479 yards and 12 TDS last year

 

What or who do you consider a true #1 WR?

Yeah, thats exactly what Im saying.  Hill is a helluva playmaker, but a conventional WR he is not.   A lot of yards came on gadget bull#### and crazy scrambles that broke defenses down by Maholmes.  I'd take a bet he wont break 1000 yards this year, teams can plan for him AND he's buily like a school girl, he wont last.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, whatdrought said:

 

Well, they know he did at one point... and that audio clip is pretty damning. 

 

I mean, they’re gonna cut a guy for fighting back against a woman who started the fight, and yet a child beater gets money.

 

They released the entire clip of that audio and it sounds like the girlfriend made it up to threaten him. Another case of editing to create FAKE NEWS.

He may have done it in the past (who knows) but in regards to the latest incident, he's innocent.

 

 

Edited by unbillievable
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DCofNC said:

Yeah, thats exactly what Im saying.  Hill is a helluva playmaker, but a conventional WR he is not.   A lot of yards came on gadget bull#### and crazy scrambles that broke defenses down by Maholmes.  I'd take a bet he wont break 1000 yards this year, teams can plan for him AND he's buily like a school girl, he wont last.

 

Yikes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, whatdrought said:

 

Well, they know he did at one point... and that audio clip is pretty damning. 

 

I mean, they’re gonna cut a guy for fighting back against a woman who started the fight, and yet a child beater gets money.


I'm not saying it's right -- but video is far more impactful than audio.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, DCofNC said:

Yeah, thats exactly what Im saying.  Hill is a helluva playmaker, but a conventional WR he is not.   A lot of yards came on gadget bull#### and crazy scrambles that broke defenses down by Maholmes.  I'd take a bet he wont break 1000 yards this year, teams can plan for him AND he's buily like a school girl, he wont last.

the nfl is putting an asterisk next to his stats, so everyone knows they are just gadget play stats. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, unbillievable said:

 

They released the entire clip of that audio and it sounds like the girlfriend made it up to threaten him. Another case of editing to create FAKE NEWS.

He may have done it in the past (who knows) but in regards to the latest incident, he's innocent.

 

 

 

I didn’t see that- the part where he said “you should be scared of me too, B word” was fake?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, DCofNC said:

Yeah, thats exactly what Im saying.  Hill is a helluva playmaker, but a conventional WR he is not.   A lot of yards came on gadget bull#### and crazy scrambles that broke defenses down by Maholmes.  I'd take a bet he wont break 1000 yards this year, teams can plan for him AND he's buily like a school girl, he wont last.

:lol: I'll take that bet as long as there are outs for injury. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, whatdrought said:

 

I didn’t see that- the part where he said “you should be scared of me too, B word” was fake?

 

It's called context.

 

She basically tells him that she can end his NFL career with false accusations, eventually the argument gets heated enough where he tells her what would happen if everything she's accusing him of were true.

 

Interesting that everyone here remembers the initial accusation, but almost no one knows about the follow-up investigations. Maybe the NFL should ban every player accused of a crime, because if it's about image, whatever happens after  the initial report is irrelevant.

 

Edited by unbillievable
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, DCofNC said:

Yeah, thats exactly what Im saying.  Hill is a helluva playmaker, but a conventional WR he is not.   A lot of yards came on gadget bull#### and crazy scrambles that broke defenses down by Maholmes.  I'd take a bet he wont break 1000 yards this year, teams can plan for him AND he's buily like a school girl, he wont last.

 

So there's like 2 #1 receivers in the league?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DCofNC said:

Yeah, thats exactly what Im saying.  Hill is a helluva playmaker, but a conventional WR he is not.   A lot of yards came on gadget bull#### and crazy scrambles that broke defenses down by Maholmes.  I'd take a bet he wont break 1000 yards this year, teams can plan for him AND he's buily like a school girl, he wont last.

what type of gadget plays? just because he runs circles around defenders doesn't mean it's a gadget play. This is really a ridiculous comment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, klos63 said:

what type of gadget plays? just because he runs circles around defenders doesn't mean it's a gadget play. This is really a ridiculous comment.


I agree with you... Sure he catches a lot of passes near the LOS... but he also is insanely fast and elusive.  He's executing the gadget play better than anyone else could - so that would lead me to believe that he's an amazing player. 

 

He has top level deep ball tracking.  This leads me to believe he'll have a long and successful career, because speed while important is nothing if you can't get under the pass and catch it in stride.  Look at Desean Jackson - not a particularly sharp route runner, and probably not as fast as he used to be, but the guy gets open and catches deep balls.

 

He's not particularly physical, but he is quick out of breaks.

 

Just because he's not huge or a high catch point guy doesn't mean he isn't a top 3 receiver in the league at the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, whatdrought said:

 

But the chiefs aren't responsible for that... That's CPS' job.They're responsible, as an organization, to not pay scub bags. 

I'm with you. I'm all about doing purely symbolic things that hurt the victims while doing nothing to improve the situation, as long as those things make self-righteous d-bags with no skin in the game feel good about themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, klos63 said:

what type of gadget plays? just because he runs circles around defenders doesn't mean it's a gadget play. This is really a ridiculous comment.

 

So Hill does catch bubble screens and a the little shovel passes (far from all he catches of course) but newsflash - that is modern NFL offense. The Bills just kept a guy for exactly that purpose over a big guy who high points the ball. So is Hill a bit "unconventional" as a #1 receiver? Yep. But calling it gadget bull**** completely misses the direction NFL offenses are going in. A guy who can do gadget stuff isnt a drawback.... it is an asset! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rob's House said:

I'm with you. I'm all about doing purely symbolic things that hurt the victims while doing nothing to improve the situation, as long as those things make self-righteous d-bags with no skin in the game feel good about themselves.

 

Oh look, you're cute. 

 

If that's what you understood from my post, i'm not gonna bother with you, but say hi to your colon when your head is up there....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys know the NFL is QUICK to suspend a player if they find a shred of credible evidence. Law enforcement and the league determined the allegations were false...what makes you think you know better than them? I'm sure you think Shady got his ex robbed as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, StHustle said:

You guys know the NFL is QUICK to suspend a player if they find a shred of credible evidence. Law enforcement and the league determined the allegations were false...what makes you think you know better than them? I'm sure you think Shady got his ex robbed as well.

That's not what they determined.  They determined they couldn't prove anything and they don't want to risk being sued.  None of this compels the Chiefs to extend this cretin but here we are.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, StHustle said:

You guys know the NFL is QUICK to suspend a player if they find a shred of credible evidence. Law enforcement and the league determined the allegations were false...what makes you think you know better than them? I'm sure you think Shady got his ex robbed as well.

 

So this is the hill you want to die on? That Tyreek Hill isn't a shitlord?
 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...